Challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of Environmental Product Declarations for construction products in the European context

Purpose In the last decade, efforts have multiplied to develop and refine a framework for converting human-readable to machine-readable Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs). Still, the fast growth of the topic created several issues. These are mostly due to changing policy landscape, numerous p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The international journal of life cycle assessment 2024-05, Vol.29 (5), p.759-788
Hauptverfasser: Cardoso, Vitor E. M., Sanhudo, Luís, Silvestre, José Dinis, Almeida, Manuela, Costa, António Aguiar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 788
container_issue 5
container_start_page 759
container_title The international journal of life cycle assessment
container_volume 29
creator Cardoso, Vitor E. M.
Sanhudo, Luís
Silvestre, José Dinis
Almeida, Manuela
Costa, António Aguiar
description Purpose In the last decade, efforts have multiplied to develop and refine a framework for converting human-readable to machine-readable Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs). Still, the fast growth of the topic created several issues. These are mostly due to changing policy landscape, numerous parallel initiatives, and the difficulty of providing a tamper- and mistake-proof schema due to the huge size of the challenge. Method This work objectively analyses and discusses challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of EPDs for construction products in the European context. By inspecting 3286 available datasets on the largest European aggregator of EPDs, the trends, issues, and opportunities are identified on a per data field basis. Results and discussion Preparation of the data for analysis disclosed several significant inconsistencies within the datasets. The study of data fields addressing contextualization of use exposed the heterogeneity in implementing guidelines by different Programme Operators (POs). Regarding the data fields addressing LCA impacts evaluation, the datasets compliant with EN 15804:A2-2019 seem to be short of expectations regarding their aims, particularly reporting end-of-life cycle stages impacts. The correlation analysis between environmental impact indicators points to strong and statistically significant coefficients and the existence of behavioural patterns for certain groups, which question the relevance of reporting such a wide range of impact indicators. The reduction of their number could lead to faster adoption by the industry and a higher proliferation of this LCA instrument by curtailing entry costs. Conclusions While the available volume of data portrays a seemingly homogeneous structure, reality does not follow. The sheer extent of the challenge, the multiple distinct initiatives, and the realized loosely enforced digital format schema seem to have contributed to a quite heterogeneous bundle of aggregated data. Future works should explore the application of data templates for the use of EPDs in digital processes.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11367-024-02279-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153600312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3043553596</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-ed40e78c621cb0a7ffa63bfa2b070f9260d3da24ceaefdea8d89c03915659fae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi1EJZaWF-BkiQuXwNhO4vURLcsfqRIc2rM164y7qbL2Yju0vAJPjbehIHHgYNka_75vRvMx9lLAGwGg32YhVK8bkG09Upvm7glbiV60je5APmUrMO26Uao1z9jznG8BpADTrdjPzR6nicINZT4GXvbE95gOMYwZyxgDxzDwYbwZC06Ppej5NnwfUwwHCrXOv6Y4zK7w9-QmTA9Q5j4m7uqjpPp1kh0X6k-f7ZzikTCcqEL35YKdeZwyvfh9n7PrD9urzafm8svHz5t3l41TWpeGhhZIr10vhdsBau-xVzuPcgcavJE9DGpA2TpC8gPhelgbB8qIru-MR1Ln7PXiWwf6NlMu9jBmR9OEgeKcrRKd6gGUkBV99Q96G-cU6nRWQau6TnWmr5RcKJdizom8PabxgOmHFWBP8dglHlvjsQ_x2LsqUosoV7iuP_21_o_qFxfml7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3043553596</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of Environmental Product Declarations for construction products in the European context</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Cardoso, Vitor E. M. ; Sanhudo, Luís ; Silvestre, José Dinis ; Almeida, Manuela ; Costa, António Aguiar</creator><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Vitor E. M. ; Sanhudo, Luís ; Silvestre, José Dinis ; Almeida, Manuela ; Costa, António Aguiar</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose In the last decade, efforts have multiplied to develop and refine a framework for converting human-readable to machine-readable Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs). Still, the fast growth of the topic created several issues. These are mostly due to changing policy landscape, numerous parallel initiatives, and the difficulty of providing a tamper- and mistake-proof schema due to the huge size of the challenge. Method This work objectively analyses and discusses challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of EPDs for construction products in the European context. By inspecting 3286 available datasets on the largest European aggregator of EPDs, the trends, issues, and opportunities are identified on a per data field basis. Results and discussion Preparation of the data for analysis disclosed several significant inconsistencies within the datasets. The study of data fields addressing contextualization of use exposed the heterogeneity in implementing guidelines by different Programme Operators (POs). Regarding the data fields addressing LCA impacts evaluation, the datasets compliant with EN 15804:A2-2019 seem to be short of expectations regarding their aims, particularly reporting end-of-life cycle stages impacts. The correlation analysis between environmental impact indicators points to strong and statistically significant coefficients and the existence of behavioural patterns for certain groups, which question the relevance of reporting such a wide range of impact indicators. The reduction of their number could lead to faster adoption by the industry and a higher proliferation of this LCA instrument by curtailing entry costs. Conclusions While the available volume of data portrays a seemingly homogeneous structure, reality does not follow. The sheer extent of the challenge, the multiple distinct initiatives, and the realized loosely enforced digital format schema seem to have contributed to a quite heterogeneous bundle of aggregated data. Future works should explore the application of data templates for the use of EPDs in digital processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0948-3349</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11367-024-02279-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Context ; Correlation analysis ; Data Availability ; data collection ; Data Quality ; Datasets ; Digitization ; Earth and Environmental Science ; End of life ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Environmental impact ; Environmental indicators ; Heterogeneity ; Homogeneous structure ; Impact analysis ; Indicators ; industry ; issues and policy ; landscapes ; Life cycles ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>The international journal of life cycle assessment, 2024-05, Vol.29 (5), p.759-788</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-ed40e78c621cb0a7ffa63bfa2b070f9260d3da24ceaefdea8d89c03915659fae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-ed40e78c621cb0a7ffa63bfa2b070f9260d3da24ceaefdea8d89c03915659fae3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4886-2406</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11367-024-02279-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11367-024-02279-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Vitor E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanhudo, Luís</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvestre, José Dinis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, António Aguiar</creatorcontrib><title>Challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of Environmental Product Declarations for construction products in the European context</title><title>The international journal of life cycle assessment</title><addtitle>Int J Life Cycle Assess</addtitle><description>Purpose In the last decade, efforts have multiplied to develop and refine a framework for converting human-readable to machine-readable Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs). Still, the fast growth of the topic created several issues. These are mostly due to changing policy landscape, numerous parallel initiatives, and the difficulty of providing a tamper- and mistake-proof schema due to the huge size of the challenge. Method This work objectively analyses and discusses challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of EPDs for construction products in the European context. By inspecting 3286 available datasets on the largest European aggregator of EPDs, the trends, issues, and opportunities are identified on a per data field basis. Results and discussion Preparation of the data for analysis disclosed several significant inconsistencies within the datasets. The study of data fields addressing contextualization of use exposed the heterogeneity in implementing guidelines by different Programme Operators (POs). Regarding the data fields addressing LCA impacts evaluation, the datasets compliant with EN 15804:A2-2019 seem to be short of expectations regarding their aims, particularly reporting end-of-life cycle stages impacts. The correlation analysis between environmental impact indicators points to strong and statistically significant coefficients and the existence of behavioural patterns for certain groups, which question the relevance of reporting such a wide range of impact indicators. The reduction of their number could lead to faster adoption by the industry and a higher proliferation of this LCA instrument by curtailing entry costs. Conclusions While the available volume of data portrays a seemingly homogeneous structure, reality does not follow. The sheer extent of the challenge, the multiple distinct initiatives, and the realized loosely enforced digital format schema seem to have contributed to a quite heterogeneous bundle of aggregated data. Future works should explore the application of data templates for the use of EPDs in digital processes.</description><subject>Context</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Data Availability</subject><subject>data collection</subject><subject>Data Quality</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Digitization</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>End of life</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental indicators</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Homogeneous structure</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>industry</subject><subject>issues and policy</subject><subject>landscapes</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>0948-3349</issn><issn>1614-7502</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi1EJZaWF-BkiQuXwNhO4vURLcsfqRIc2rM164y7qbL2Yju0vAJPjbehIHHgYNka_75vRvMx9lLAGwGg32YhVK8bkG09Upvm7glbiV60je5APmUrMO26Uao1z9jznG8BpADTrdjPzR6nicINZT4GXvbE95gOMYwZyxgDxzDwYbwZC06Ppej5NnwfUwwHCrXOv6Y4zK7w9-QmTA9Q5j4m7uqjpPp1kh0X6k-f7ZzikTCcqEL35YKdeZwyvfh9n7PrD9urzafm8svHz5t3l41TWpeGhhZIr10vhdsBau-xVzuPcgcavJE9DGpA2TpC8gPhelgbB8qIru-MR1Ln7PXiWwf6NlMu9jBmR9OEgeKcrRKd6gGUkBV99Q96G-cU6nRWQau6TnWmr5RcKJdizom8PabxgOmHFWBP8dglHlvjsQ_x2LsqUosoV7iuP_21_o_qFxfml7g</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Cardoso, Vitor E. M.</creator><creator>Sanhudo, Luís</creator><creator>Silvestre, José Dinis</creator><creator>Almeida, Manuela</creator><creator>Costa, António Aguiar</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4886-2406</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of Environmental Product Declarations for construction products in the European context</title><author>Cardoso, Vitor E. M. ; Sanhudo, Luís ; Silvestre, José Dinis ; Almeida, Manuela ; Costa, António Aguiar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-ed40e78c621cb0a7ffa63bfa2b070f9260d3da24ceaefdea8d89c03915659fae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Context</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Data Availability</topic><topic>data collection</topic><topic>Data Quality</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Digitization</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>End of life</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental indicators</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Homogeneous structure</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>industry</topic><topic>issues and policy</topic><topic>landscapes</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Vitor E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanhudo, Luís</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvestre, José Dinis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, António Aguiar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>The international journal of life cycle assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cardoso, Vitor E. M.</au><au>Sanhudo, Luís</au><au>Silvestre, José Dinis</au><au>Almeida, Manuela</au><au>Costa, António Aguiar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of Environmental Product Declarations for construction products in the European context</atitle><jtitle>The international journal of life cycle assessment</jtitle><stitle>Int J Life Cycle Assess</stitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>759</spage><epage>788</epage><pages>759-788</pages><issn>0948-3349</issn><eissn>1614-7502</eissn><abstract>Purpose In the last decade, efforts have multiplied to develop and refine a framework for converting human-readable to machine-readable Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs). Still, the fast growth of the topic created several issues. These are mostly due to changing policy landscape, numerous parallel initiatives, and the difficulty of providing a tamper- and mistake-proof schema due to the huge size of the challenge. Method This work objectively analyses and discusses challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of EPDs for construction products in the European context. By inspecting 3286 available datasets on the largest European aggregator of EPDs, the trends, issues, and opportunities are identified on a per data field basis. Results and discussion Preparation of the data for analysis disclosed several significant inconsistencies within the datasets. The study of data fields addressing contextualization of use exposed the heterogeneity in implementing guidelines by different Programme Operators (POs). Regarding the data fields addressing LCA impacts evaluation, the datasets compliant with EN 15804:A2-2019 seem to be short of expectations regarding their aims, particularly reporting end-of-life cycle stages impacts. The correlation analysis between environmental impact indicators points to strong and statistically significant coefficients and the existence of behavioural patterns for certain groups, which question the relevance of reporting such a wide range of impact indicators. The reduction of their number could lead to faster adoption by the industry and a higher proliferation of this LCA instrument by curtailing entry costs. Conclusions While the available volume of data portrays a seemingly homogeneous structure, reality does not follow. The sheer extent of the challenge, the multiple distinct initiatives, and the realized loosely enforced digital format schema seem to have contributed to a quite heterogeneous bundle of aggregated data. Future works should explore the application of data templates for the use of EPDs in digital processes.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11367-024-02279-w</doi><tpages>30</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4886-2406</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0948-3349
ispartof The international journal of life cycle assessment, 2024-05, Vol.29 (5), p.759-788
issn 0948-3349
1614-7502
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153600312
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Context
Correlation analysis
Data Availability
data collection
Data Quality
Datasets
Digitization
Earth and Environmental Science
End of life
Environment
Environmental Chemistry
Environmental Economics
Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology
Environmental impact
Environmental indicators
Heterogeneity
Homogeneous structure
Impact analysis
Indicators
industry
issues and policy
landscapes
Life cycles
Statistical analysis
title Challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of Environmental Product Declarations for construction products in the European context
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T00%3A43%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Challenges%20in%20the%20harmonisation%20and%20digitalisation%20of%20Environmental%20Product%20Declarations%20for%20construction%20products%20in%20the%20European%20context&rft.jtitle=The%20international%20journal%20of%20life%20cycle%20assessment&rft.au=Cardoso,%20Vitor%20E.%20M.&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=759&rft.epage=788&rft.pages=759-788&rft.issn=0948-3349&rft.eissn=1614-7502&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11367-024-02279-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3043553596%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3043553596&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true