Challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of Environmental Product Declarations for construction products in the European context
Purpose In the last decade, efforts have multiplied to develop and refine a framework for converting human-readable to machine-readable Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs). Still, the fast growth of the topic created several issues. These are mostly due to changing policy landscape, numerous p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The international journal of life cycle assessment 2024-05, Vol.29 (5), p.759-788 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 788 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 759 |
container_title | The international journal of life cycle assessment |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Cardoso, Vitor E. M. Sanhudo, Luís Silvestre, José Dinis Almeida, Manuela Costa, António Aguiar |
description | Purpose
In the last decade, efforts have multiplied to develop and refine a framework for converting human-readable to machine-readable Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs). Still, the fast growth of the topic created several issues. These are mostly due to changing policy landscape, numerous parallel initiatives, and the difficulty of providing a tamper- and mistake-proof schema due to the huge size of the challenge.
Method
This work objectively analyses and discusses challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of EPDs for construction products in the European context. By inspecting 3286 available datasets on the largest European aggregator of EPDs, the trends, issues, and opportunities are identified on a per data field basis.
Results and discussion
Preparation of the data for analysis disclosed several significant inconsistencies within the datasets. The study of data fields addressing contextualization of use exposed the heterogeneity in implementing guidelines by different Programme Operators (POs). Regarding the data fields addressing LCA impacts evaluation, the datasets compliant with EN 15804:A2-2019 seem to be short of expectations regarding their aims, particularly reporting end-of-life cycle stages impacts. The correlation analysis between environmental impact indicators points to strong and statistically significant coefficients and the existence of behavioural patterns for certain groups, which question the relevance of reporting such a wide range of impact indicators. The reduction of their number could lead to faster adoption by the industry and a higher proliferation of this LCA instrument by curtailing entry costs.
Conclusions
While the available volume of data portrays a seemingly homogeneous structure, reality does not follow. The sheer extent of the challenge, the multiple distinct initiatives, and the realized loosely enforced digital format schema seem to have contributed to a quite heterogeneous bundle of aggregated data. Future works should explore the application of data templates for the use of EPDs in digital processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11367-024-02279-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153600312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3043553596</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-ed40e78c621cb0a7ffa63bfa2b070f9260d3da24ceaefdea8d89c03915659fae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi1EJZaWF-BkiQuXwNhO4vURLcsfqRIc2rM164y7qbL2Yju0vAJPjbehIHHgYNka_75vRvMx9lLAGwGg32YhVK8bkG09Upvm7glbiV60je5APmUrMO26Uao1z9jznG8BpADTrdjPzR6nicINZT4GXvbE95gOMYwZyxgDxzDwYbwZC06Ppej5NnwfUwwHCrXOv6Y4zK7w9-QmTA9Q5j4m7uqjpPp1kh0X6k-f7ZzikTCcqEL35YKdeZwyvfh9n7PrD9urzafm8svHz5t3l41TWpeGhhZIr10vhdsBau-xVzuPcgcavJE9DGpA2TpC8gPhelgbB8qIru-MR1Ln7PXiWwf6NlMu9jBmR9OEgeKcrRKd6gGUkBV99Q96G-cU6nRWQau6TnWmr5RcKJdizom8PabxgOmHFWBP8dglHlvjsQ_x2LsqUosoV7iuP_21_o_qFxfml7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3043553596</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of Environmental Product Declarations for construction products in the European context</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Cardoso, Vitor E. M. ; Sanhudo, Luís ; Silvestre, José Dinis ; Almeida, Manuela ; Costa, António Aguiar</creator><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Vitor E. M. ; Sanhudo, Luís ; Silvestre, José Dinis ; Almeida, Manuela ; Costa, António Aguiar</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
In the last decade, efforts have multiplied to develop and refine a framework for converting human-readable to machine-readable Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs). Still, the fast growth of the topic created several issues. These are mostly due to changing policy landscape, numerous parallel initiatives, and the difficulty of providing a tamper- and mistake-proof schema due to the huge size of the challenge.
Method
This work objectively analyses and discusses challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of EPDs for construction products in the European context. By inspecting 3286 available datasets on the largest European aggregator of EPDs, the trends, issues, and opportunities are identified on a per data field basis.
Results and discussion
Preparation of the data for analysis disclosed several significant inconsistencies within the datasets. The study of data fields addressing contextualization of use exposed the heterogeneity in implementing guidelines by different Programme Operators (POs). Regarding the data fields addressing LCA impacts evaluation, the datasets compliant with EN 15804:A2-2019 seem to be short of expectations regarding their aims, particularly reporting end-of-life cycle stages impacts. The correlation analysis between environmental impact indicators points to strong and statistically significant coefficients and the existence of behavioural patterns for certain groups, which question the relevance of reporting such a wide range of impact indicators. The reduction of their number could lead to faster adoption by the industry and a higher proliferation of this LCA instrument by curtailing entry costs.
Conclusions
While the available volume of data portrays a seemingly homogeneous structure, reality does not follow. The sheer extent of the challenge, the multiple distinct initiatives, and the realized loosely enforced digital format schema seem to have contributed to a quite heterogeneous bundle of aggregated data. Future works should explore the application of data templates for the use of EPDs in digital processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0948-3349</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11367-024-02279-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Context ; Correlation analysis ; Data Availability ; data collection ; Data Quality ; Datasets ; Digitization ; Earth and Environmental Science ; End of life ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Environmental impact ; Environmental indicators ; Heterogeneity ; Homogeneous structure ; Impact analysis ; Indicators ; industry ; issues and policy ; landscapes ; Life cycles ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>The international journal of life cycle assessment, 2024-05, Vol.29 (5), p.759-788</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-ed40e78c621cb0a7ffa63bfa2b070f9260d3da24ceaefdea8d89c03915659fae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-ed40e78c621cb0a7ffa63bfa2b070f9260d3da24ceaefdea8d89c03915659fae3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4886-2406</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11367-024-02279-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11367-024-02279-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Vitor E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanhudo, Luís</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvestre, José Dinis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, António Aguiar</creatorcontrib><title>Challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of Environmental Product Declarations for construction products in the European context</title><title>The international journal of life cycle assessment</title><addtitle>Int J Life Cycle Assess</addtitle><description>Purpose
In the last decade, efforts have multiplied to develop and refine a framework for converting human-readable to machine-readable Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs). Still, the fast growth of the topic created several issues. These are mostly due to changing policy landscape, numerous parallel initiatives, and the difficulty of providing a tamper- and mistake-proof schema due to the huge size of the challenge.
Method
This work objectively analyses and discusses challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of EPDs for construction products in the European context. By inspecting 3286 available datasets on the largest European aggregator of EPDs, the trends, issues, and opportunities are identified on a per data field basis.
Results and discussion
Preparation of the data for analysis disclosed several significant inconsistencies within the datasets. The study of data fields addressing contextualization of use exposed the heterogeneity in implementing guidelines by different Programme Operators (POs). Regarding the data fields addressing LCA impacts evaluation, the datasets compliant with EN 15804:A2-2019 seem to be short of expectations regarding their aims, particularly reporting end-of-life cycle stages impacts. The correlation analysis between environmental impact indicators points to strong and statistically significant coefficients and the existence of behavioural patterns for certain groups, which question the relevance of reporting such a wide range of impact indicators. The reduction of their number could lead to faster adoption by the industry and a higher proliferation of this LCA instrument by curtailing entry costs.
Conclusions
While the available volume of data portrays a seemingly homogeneous structure, reality does not follow. The sheer extent of the challenge, the multiple distinct initiatives, and the realized loosely enforced digital format schema seem to have contributed to a quite heterogeneous bundle of aggregated data. Future works should explore the application of data templates for the use of EPDs in digital processes.</description><subject>Context</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Data Availability</subject><subject>data collection</subject><subject>Data Quality</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Digitization</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>End of life</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental indicators</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Homogeneous structure</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>industry</subject><subject>issues and policy</subject><subject>landscapes</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>0948-3349</issn><issn>1614-7502</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi1EJZaWF-BkiQuXwNhO4vURLcsfqRIc2rM164y7qbL2Yju0vAJPjbehIHHgYNka_75vRvMx9lLAGwGg32YhVK8bkG09Upvm7glbiV60je5APmUrMO26Uao1z9jznG8BpADTrdjPzR6nicINZT4GXvbE95gOMYwZyxgDxzDwYbwZC06Ppej5NnwfUwwHCrXOv6Y4zK7w9-QmTA9Q5j4m7uqjpPp1kh0X6k-f7ZzikTCcqEL35YKdeZwyvfh9n7PrD9urzafm8svHz5t3l41TWpeGhhZIr10vhdsBau-xVzuPcgcavJE9DGpA2TpC8gPhelgbB8qIru-MR1Ln7PXiWwf6NlMu9jBmR9OEgeKcrRKd6gGUkBV99Q96G-cU6nRWQau6TnWmr5RcKJdizom8PabxgOmHFWBP8dglHlvjsQ_x2LsqUosoV7iuP_21_o_qFxfml7g</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Cardoso, Vitor E. M.</creator><creator>Sanhudo, Luís</creator><creator>Silvestre, José Dinis</creator><creator>Almeida, Manuela</creator><creator>Costa, António Aguiar</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4886-2406</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of Environmental Product Declarations for construction products in the European context</title><author>Cardoso, Vitor E. M. ; Sanhudo, Luís ; Silvestre, José Dinis ; Almeida, Manuela ; Costa, António Aguiar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-ed40e78c621cb0a7ffa63bfa2b070f9260d3da24ceaefdea8d89c03915659fae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Context</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Data Availability</topic><topic>data collection</topic><topic>Data Quality</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Digitization</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>End of life</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental indicators</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Homogeneous structure</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>industry</topic><topic>issues and policy</topic><topic>landscapes</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Vitor E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanhudo, Luís</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvestre, José Dinis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, António Aguiar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>The international journal of life cycle assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cardoso, Vitor E. M.</au><au>Sanhudo, Luís</au><au>Silvestre, José Dinis</au><au>Almeida, Manuela</au><au>Costa, António Aguiar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of Environmental Product Declarations for construction products in the European context</atitle><jtitle>The international journal of life cycle assessment</jtitle><stitle>Int J Life Cycle Assess</stitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>759</spage><epage>788</epage><pages>759-788</pages><issn>0948-3349</issn><eissn>1614-7502</eissn><abstract>Purpose
In the last decade, efforts have multiplied to develop and refine a framework for converting human-readable to machine-readable Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs). Still, the fast growth of the topic created several issues. These are mostly due to changing policy landscape, numerous parallel initiatives, and the difficulty of providing a tamper- and mistake-proof schema due to the huge size of the challenge.
Method
This work objectively analyses and discusses challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of EPDs for construction products in the European context. By inspecting 3286 available datasets on the largest European aggregator of EPDs, the trends, issues, and opportunities are identified on a per data field basis.
Results and discussion
Preparation of the data for analysis disclosed several significant inconsistencies within the datasets. The study of data fields addressing contextualization of use exposed the heterogeneity in implementing guidelines by different Programme Operators (POs). Regarding the data fields addressing LCA impacts evaluation, the datasets compliant with EN 15804:A2-2019 seem to be short of expectations regarding their aims, particularly reporting end-of-life cycle stages impacts. The correlation analysis between environmental impact indicators points to strong and statistically significant coefficients and the existence of behavioural patterns for certain groups, which question the relevance of reporting such a wide range of impact indicators. The reduction of their number could lead to faster adoption by the industry and a higher proliferation of this LCA instrument by curtailing entry costs.
Conclusions
While the available volume of data portrays a seemingly homogeneous structure, reality does not follow. The sheer extent of the challenge, the multiple distinct initiatives, and the realized loosely enforced digital format schema seem to have contributed to a quite heterogeneous bundle of aggregated data. Future works should explore the application of data templates for the use of EPDs in digital processes.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11367-024-02279-w</doi><tpages>30</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4886-2406</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0948-3349 |
ispartof | The international journal of life cycle assessment, 2024-05, Vol.29 (5), p.759-788 |
issn | 0948-3349 1614-7502 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153600312 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Context Correlation analysis Data Availability data collection Data Quality Datasets Digitization Earth and Environmental Science End of life Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Economics Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Environmental impact Environmental indicators Heterogeneity Homogeneous structure Impact analysis Indicators industry issues and policy landscapes Life cycles Statistical analysis |
title | Challenges in the harmonisation and digitalisation of Environmental Product Declarations for construction products in the European context |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T00%3A43%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Challenges%20in%20the%20harmonisation%20and%20digitalisation%20of%20Environmental%20Product%20Declarations%20for%20construction%20products%20in%20the%20European%20context&rft.jtitle=The%20international%20journal%20of%20life%20cycle%20assessment&rft.au=Cardoso,%20Vitor%20E.%20M.&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=759&rft.epage=788&rft.pages=759-788&rft.issn=0948-3349&rft.eissn=1614-7502&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11367-024-02279-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3043553596%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3043553596&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |