Characterization of the semen microbiota of healthy stud dogs using 16S RNA sequencing

The reproductive microbiota of male dogs has never been investigated using culture-independent sequencing techniques. The purpose of the present study was to get seminal knowledge on the microbiota of the ejaculate. Specifically, factors as the fraction of the ejaculate, the sperm quality (normosper...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Theriogenology 2024-03, Vol.216, p.1-7
Hauptverfasser: Banchi, P., Bertolotti, L., Spanoghe, L., Ali Hassan, H., Lannoo, J., Domain, G., Henzel, K.S., Gaillard, V., Rota, A., Van Soom, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Theriogenology
container_volume 216
creator Banchi, P.
Bertolotti, L.
Spanoghe, L.
Ali Hassan, H.
Lannoo, J.
Domain, G.
Henzel, K.S.
Gaillard, V.
Rota, A.
Van Soom, A.
description The reproductive microbiota of male dogs has never been investigated using culture-independent sequencing techniques. The purpose of the present study was to get seminal knowledge on the microbiota of the ejaculate. Specifically, factors as the fraction of the ejaculate, the sperm quality (normospermia, teratozoospermia), and the living environment were evaluated. The sperm-rich and the prostatic fractions of the ejaculate were collected from healthy stud dogs. Following the sperm analysis, samples from twenty animals (normospermic n = 10 and teratozoospermic n = 10) were stored at – 80 °C until further processing including DNA extraction and 16S rRNA sequencing. Alpha- (Shannon index) and beta- (Bray-Curtis, Unweighted UniFrac) diversities were assessed and compared (PERMANOVA) based on the group of samples (biological samples from the ejaculate and controls), the fraction of the ejaculate (sperm-rich and prostatic fractions), the animal group (normospermia and teratozoospermia), and the living environment of the animal (kennel or pet living in-house). The most abundant bacterial phyla in canine semen samples were Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria. Overall, the dominant bacterial family was that of Pasteurellaceae The genus Mycoplasma was never detected. No differences in terms of bacterial composition were found based on the fraction of the ejaculate and based on the animal group (P > 0.05). On the other hand, differences in alpha and beta diversities were highlighted based on the living environment (P = 0.001). Overall, the results of the present study provide preliminary insights on dog semen microbiota, opening a new chapter in the field of canine andrology. Our results suggest that the environment may play a role in influencing the reproductive microbiota of male dogs and that the prostatic fraction of the ejaculate can be used for further research as a representative of the semen microbiota. •The living environment shapes the semen microbiota of male dogs.•The sperm-rich and prostatic fraction of canine ejaculates share the microbiota.•The semen microbiota of healthy dogs has low bacterial abundance.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2023.12.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153596005</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0093691X23004958</els_id><sourcerecordid>3153596005</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b4cbe416093fbec348d44c0c669963d1694c3bfefecced73412eaea652b2763b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFr3DAQhUVJ6W7S_oWiQw-52NFYstaGXsKSTQIhhaQtvQlZHu9qsa2NJAe2vz5aNink1tPA8N68eR8h34DlwEBebPO4QW_dGkfXu_U-L1jBcyhyBtUHModqUWe84HBC5ozVPJM1_JmR0xC2jDEuJXwiM16BgFJUc_J7udFem5gu_tXRupG6jqYAGnDAkQ7WeNdYF_Vhv0Hdx82ehji1tHXrQKdgxzUF-Ugf7i-T52nC0aTVZ_Kx033AL6_zjPxaXf1c3mR3P65vl5d3mRGCxawRpkEBMv3ZNWi4qFohDDNS1rXkLchaGN502KEx2C64gAI1alkWTbGQvOFn5Px4d-ddyg5RDTYY7Hs9opuC4lDyspaMlUn6_ShNjULw2Kmdt4P2ewVMHciqrXpPVh3IKihUIpvsX1-TpmbA9p_5DWUSrI4CTH2fLXoVjE00sLUeTVSts_-X9ALoYZQF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3153596005</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization of the semen microbiota of healthy stud dogs using 16S RNA sequencing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Banchi, P. ; Bertolotti, L. ; Spanoghe, L. ; Ali Hassan, H. ; Lannoo, J. ; Domain, G. ; Henzel, K.S. ; Gaillard, V. ; Rota, A. ; Van Soom, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Banchi, P. ; Bertolotti, L. ; Spanoghe, L. ; Ali Hassan, H. ; Lannoo, J. ; Domain, G. ; Henzel, K.S. ; Gaillard, V. ; Rota, A. ; Van Soom, A.</creatorcontrib><description>The reproductive microbiota of male dogs has never been investigated using culture-independent sequencing techniques. The purpose of the present study was to get seminal knowledge on the microbiota of the ejaculate. Specifically, factors as the fraction of the ejaculate, the sperm quality (normospermia, teratozoospermia), and the living environment were evaluated. The sperm-rich and the prostatic fractions of the ejaculate were collected from healthy stud dogs. Following the sperm analysis, samples from twenty animals (normospermic n = 10 and teratozoospermic n = 10) were stored at – 80 °C until further processing including DNA extraction and 16S rRNA sequencing. Alpha- (Shannon index) and beta- (Bray-Curtis, Unweighted UniFrac) diversities were assessed and compared (PERMANOVA) based on the group of samples (biological samples from the ejaculate and controls), the fraction of the ejaculate (sperm-rich and prostatic fractions), the animal group (normospermia and teratozoospermia), and the living environment of the animal (kennel or pet living in-house). The most abundant bacterial phyla in canine semen samples were Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria. Overall, the dominant bacterial family was that of Pasteurellaceae The genus Mycoplasma was never detected. No differences in terms of bacterial composition were found based on the fraction of the ejaculate and based on the animal group (P &gt; 0.05). On the other hand, differences in alpha and beta diversities were highlighted based on the living environment (P = 0.001). Overall, the results of the present study provide preliminary insights on dog semen microbiota, opening a new chapter in the field of canine andrology. Our results suggest that the environment may play a role in influencing the reproductive microbiota of male dogs and that the prostatic fraction of the ejaculate can be used for further research as a representative of the semen microbiota. •The living environment shapes the semen microbiota of male dogs.•The sperm-rich and prostatic fraction of canine ejaculates share the microbiota.•The semen microbiota of healthy dogs has low bacterial abundance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-691X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2023.12.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38141548</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>16S rRNA sequencing ; Actinobacteria ; animal reproduction ; Animals ; Bacteria - genetics ; Canine ; DNA ; Dog Diseases ; Dogs ; family ; Firmicutes ; genus ; kennels ; Male ; males ; Microbiota ; microorganisms ; Mycoplasma ; Pasteurellaceae ; Reproductive microbiota ; RNA ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; Semen ; Sequence Analysis, RNA - veterinary ; Sperm ; sperm quality ; Teratozoospermia - veterinary</subject><ispartof>Theriogenology, 2024-03, Vol.216, p.1-7</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b4cbe416093fbec348d44c0c669963d1694c3bfefecced73412eaea652b2763b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b4cbe416093fbec348d44c0c669963d1694c3bfefecced73412eaea652b2763b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6061-4889</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093691X23004958$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38141548$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Banchi, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertolotti, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spanoghe, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali Hassan, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lannoo, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domain, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henzel, K.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaillard, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rota, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Soom, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization of the semen microbiota of healthy stud dogs using 16S RNA sequencing</title><title>Theriogenology</title><addtitle>Theriogenology</addtitle><description>The reproductive microbiota of male dogs has never been investigated using culture-independent sequencing techniques. The purpose of the present study was to get seminal knowledge on the microbiota of the ejaculate. Specifically, factors as the fraction of the ejaculate, the sperm quality (normospermia, teratozoospermia), and the living environment were evaluated. The sperm-rich and the prostatic fractions of the ejaculate were collected from healthy stud dogs. Following the sperm analysis, samples from twenty animals (normospermic n = 10 and teratozoospermic n = 10) were stored at – 80 °C until further processing including DNA extraction and 16S rRNA sequencing. Alpha- (Shannon index) and beta- (Bray-Curtis, Unweighted UniFrac) diversities were assessed and compared (PERMANOVA) based on the group of samples (biological samples from the ejaculate and controls), the fraction of the ejaculate (sperm-rich and prostatic fractions), the animal group (normospermia and teratozoospermia), and the living environment of the animal (kennel or pet living in-house). The most abundant bacterial phyla in canine semen samples were Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria. Overall, the dominant bacterial family was that of Pasteurellaceae The genus Mycoplasma was never detected. No differences in terms of bacterial composition were found based on the fraction of the ejaculate and based on the animal group (P &gt; 0.05). On the other hand, differences in alpha and beta diversities were highlighted based on the living environment (P = 0.001). Overall, the results of the present study provide preliminary insights on dog semen microbiota, opening a new chapter in the field of canine andrology. Our results suggest that the environment may play a role in influencing the reproductive microbiota of male dogs and that the prostatic fraction of the ejaculate can be used for further research as a representative of the semen microbiota. •The living environment shapes the semen microbiota of male dogs.•The sperm-rich and prostatic fraction of canine ejaculates share the microbiota.•The semen microbiota of healthy dogs has low bacterial abundance.</description><subject>16S rRNA sequencing</subject><subject>Actinobacteria</subject><subject>animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria - genetics</subject><subject>Canine</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Dog Diseases</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>family</subject><subject>Firmicutes</subject><subject>genus</subject><subject>kennels</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>males</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>microorganisms</subject><subject>Mycoplasma</subject><subject>Pasteurellaceae</subject><subject>Reproductive microbiota</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>Semen</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, RNA - veterinary</subject><subject>Sperm</subject><subject>sperm quality</subject><subject>Teratozoospermia - veterinary</subject><issn>0093-691X</issn><issn>1879-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFr3DAQhUVJ6W7S_oWiQw-52NFYstaGXsKSTQIhhaQtvQlZHu9qsa2NJAe2vz5aNink1tPA8N68eR8h34DlwEBebPO4QW_dGkfXu_U-L1jBcyhyBtUHModqUWe84HBC5ozVPJM1_JmR0xC2jDEuJXwiM16BgFJUc_J7udFem5gu_tXRupG6jqYAGnDAkQ7WeNdYF_Vhv0Hdx82ehji1tHXrQKdgxzUF-Ugf7i-T52nC0aTVZ_Kx033AL6_zjPxaXf1c3mR3P65vl5d3mRGCxawRpkEBMv3ZNWi4qFohDDNS1rXkLchaGN502KEx2C64gAI1alkWTbGQvOFn5Px4d-ddyg5RDTYY7Hs9opuC4lDyspaMlUn6_ShNjULw2Kmdt4P2ewVMHciqrXpPVh3IKihUIpvsX1-TpmbA9p_5DWUSrI4CTH2fLXoVjE00sLUeTVSts_-X9ALoYZQF</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Banchi, P.</creator><creator>Bertolotti, L.</creator><creator>Spanoghe, L.</creator><creator>Ali Hassan, H.</creator><creator>Lannoo, J.</creator><creator>Domain, G.</creator><creator>Henzel, K.S.</creator><creator>Gaillard, V.</creator><creator>Rota, A.</creator><creator>Van Soom, A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6061-4889</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Characterization of the semen microbiota of healthy stud dogs using 16S RNA sequencing</title><author>Banchi, P. ; Bertolotti, L. ; Spanoghe, L. ; Ali Hassan, H. ; Lannoo, J. ; Domain, G. ; Henzel, K.S. ; Gaillard, V. ; Rota, A. ; Van Soom, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b4cbe416093fbec348d44c0c669963d1694c3bfefecced73412eaea652b2763b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>16S rRNA sequencing</topic><topic>Actinobacteria</topic><topic>animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria - genetics</topic><topic>Canine</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Dog Diseases</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>family</topic><topic>Firmicutes</topic><topic>genus</topic><topic>kennels</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>males</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>microorganisms</topic><topic>Mycoplasma</topic><topic>Pasteurellaceae</topic><topic>Reproductive microbiota</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>Semen</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, RNA - veterinary</topic><topic>Sperm</topic><topic>sperm quality</topic><topic>Teratozoospermia - veterinary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Banchi, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertolotti, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spanoghe, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali Hassan, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lannoo, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domain, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henzel, K.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaillard, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rota, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Soom, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Theriogenology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Banchi, P.</au><au>Bertolotti, L.</au><au>Spanoghe, L.</au><au>Ali Hassan, H.</au><au>Lannoo, J.</au><au>Domain, G.</au><au>Henzel, K.S.</au><au>Gaillard, V.</au><au>Rota, A.</au><au>Van Soom, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization of the semen microbiota of healthy stud dogs using 16S RNA sequencing</atitle><jtitle>Theriogenology</jtitle><addtitle>Theriogenology</addtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>216</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><issn>0093-691X</issn><eissn>1879-3231</eissn><abstract>The reproductive microbiota of male dogs has never been investigated using culture-independent sequencing techniques. The purpose of the present study was to get seminal knowledge on the microbiota of the ejaculate. Specifically, factors as the fraction of the ejaculate, the sperm quality (normospermia, teratozoospermia), and the living environment were evaluated. The sperm-rich and the prostatic fractions of the ejaculate were collected from healthy stud dogs. Following the sperm analysis, samples from twenty animals (normospermic n = 10 and teratozoospermic n = 10) were stored at – 80 °C until further processing including DNA extraction and 16S rRNA sequencing. Alpha- (Shannon index) and beta- (Bray-Curtis, Unweighted UniFrac) diversities were assessed and compared (PERMANOVA) based on the group of samples (biological samples from the ejaculate and controls), the fraction of the ejaculate (sperm-rich and prostatic fractions), the animal group (normospermia and teratozoospermia), and the living environment of the animal (kennel or pet living in-house). The most abundant bacterial phyla in canine semen samples were Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria. Overall, the dominant bacterial family was that of Pasteurellaceae The genus Mycoplasma was never detected. No differences in terms of bacterial composition were found based on the fraction of the ejaculate and based on the animal group (P &gt; 0.05). On the other hand, differences in alpha and beta diversities were highlighted based on the living environment (P = 0.001). Overall, the results of the present study provide preliminary insights on dog semen microbiota, opening a new chapter in the field of canine andrology. Our results suggest that the environment may play a role in influencing the reproductive microbiota of male dogs and that the prostatic fraction of the ejaculate can be used for further research as a representative of the semen microbiota. •The living environment shapes the semen microbiota of male dogs.•The sperm-rich and prostatic fraction of canine ejaculates share the microbiota.•The semen microbiota of healthy dogs has low bacterial abundance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38141548</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.theriogenology.2023.12.018</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6061-4889</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-691X
ispartof Theriogenology, 2024-03, Vol.216, p.1-7
issn 0093-691X
1879-3231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153596005
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects 16S rRNA sequencing
Actinobacteria
animal reproduction
Animals
Bacteria - genetics
Canine
DNA
Dog Diseases
Dogs
family
Firmicutes
genus
kennels
Male
males
Microbiota
microorganisms
Mycoplasma
Pasteurellaceae
Reproductive microbiota
RNA
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics
Semen
Sequence Analysis, RNA - veterinary
Sperm
sperm quality
Teratozoospermia - veterinary
title Characterization of the semen microbiota of healthy stud dogs using 16S RNA sequencing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A34%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20of%20the%20semen%20microbiota%20of%20healthy%20stud%20dogs%20using%2016S%20RNA%20sequencing&rft.jtitle=Theriogenology&rft.au=Banchi,%20P.&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=216&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.issn=0093-691X&rft.eissn=1879-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2023.12.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153596005%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3153596005&rft_id=info:pmid/38141548&rft_els_id=S0093691X23004958&rfr_iscdi=true