Reducing weight bias and stigma in qualitative research interviews: Considerations for researchers

Summary Perceptions and biases influence how we interact with and experience the world, including in professional roles as researchers. Weight bias, defined as negative attitudes or perceptions towards people that have large bodies, can contribute to weight stigma and discrimination leading to negat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obesity reviews 2024-07, Vol.25 (7), p.e13750-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Hung, Pam, Miciak, Maxi, Godziuk, Kristine, Gross, Douglas P., Forhan, Mary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 7
container_start_page e13750
container_title Obesity reviews
container_volume 25
creator Hung, Pam
Miciak, Maxi
Godziuk, Kristine
Gross, Douglas P.
Forhan, Mary
description Summary Perceptions and biases influence how we interact with and experience the world, including in professional roles as researchers. Weight bias, defined as negative attitudes or perceptions towards people that have large bodies, can contribute to weight stigma and discrimination leading to negative health and social consequences. Weight bias is experienced by people living with obesity in media, health care, education, employment and social settings. In research settings, there is potential for weight bias to impact various aspects of qualitative research including the participant‐researcher dynamic in interviews. However, evidence‐based strategies to reduce weight bias in qualitative research interviews have yet to be identified. We discuss how weight bias may influence research interviews and identify several considerations and strategies for researchers to minimize the impact of weight bias. Strategies include practicing reflexivity, planning and conducting interviews in ways that support rapport building, using inclusive language, and considering participatory methods.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/obr.13750
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153588453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3065139882</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3810-a12cc61c06d5247b8fa470ebd6c299d15705bc47d0b1e5177e8bf3ad113869023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctKAzEUBuAgiveFLyABN7qozWkmk4w7Ld5AEETB3ZDLmRqZzmgy0-LbG23tQhCzySF8_OHwE3IA7BTSGbYmnAKXgq2RbchyOZCqeF5fzQq2yE6Mr4yBLDhski2uciVyxbaJeUDXW99M6Bz95KWjxutIdeNo7Pxkqqlv6Huva9_pzs-QBoyog31J7x2Gmcd5PKPjtoneYUgkTbRqw8phiHtko9J1xP3lvUueri4fxzeDu_vr2_H53cByBWygYWRtDpblTowyaVSlM8nQuNyOisKBkEwYm0nHDKAAKVGZimsHkLYp2IjvkuNF7lto33uMXTn10WJd6wbbPpYcBBdKZYL_T1lWSFBCQaJHv-hr24cmLZJULoAXSn39fbJQNrQxBqzKt-CnOnyUwMqvjsrUUfndUbKHy8TeTNGt5E8pCQwXYO5r_Pg7qby_eFhEfgKld5rq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3065139882</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reducing weight bias and stigma in qualitative research interviews: Considerations for researchers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hung, Pam ; Miciak, Maxi ; Godziuk, Kristine ; Gross, Douglas P. ; Forhan, Mary</creator><creatorcontrib>Hung, Pam ; Miciak, Maxi ; Godziuk, Kristine ; Gross, Douglas P. ; Forhan, Mary</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Perceptions and biases influence how we interact with and experience the world, including in professional roles as researchers. Weight bias, defined as negative attitudes or perceptions towards people that have large bodies, can contribute to weight stigma and discrimination leading to negative health and social consequences. Weight bias is experienced by people living with obesity in media, health care, education, employment and social settings. In research settings, there is potential for weight bias to impact various aspects of qualitative research including the participant‐researcher dynamic in interviews. However, evidence‐based strategies to reduce weight bias in qualitative research interviews have yet to be identified. We discuss how weight bias may influence research interviews and identify several considerations and strategies for researchers to minimize the impact of weight bias. Strategies include practicing reflexivity, planning and conducting interviews in ways that support rapport building, using inclusive language, and considering participatory methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-7881</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1467-789X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-789X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/obr.13750</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38685680</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Bias ; education ; employment ; health services ; Humans ; interview ; Interviews as Topic ; obesity ; Obesity - psychology ; people ; qualitative analysis ; Qualitative Research ; Research Design ; Research Personnel - psychology ; Social Stigma ; Stereotyping ; stigma ; Weight ; weight bias ; Weight Prejudice ; weight stigma</subject><ispartof>Obesity reviews, 2024-07, Vol.25 (7), p.e13750-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of World Obesity Federation.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. Obesity Reviews published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of World Obesity Federation.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3810-a12cc61c06d5247b8fa470ebd6c299d15705bc47d0b1e5177e8bf3ad113869023</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2087-0516 ; 0000-0001-9520-4302</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fobr.13750$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fobr.13750$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38685680$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hung, Pam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miciak, Maxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godziuk, Kristine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Douglas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forhan, Mary</creatorcontrib><title>Reducing weight bias and stigma in qualitative research interviews: Considerations for researchers</title><title>Obesity reviews</title><addtitle>Obes Rev</addtitle><description>Summary Perceptions and biases influence how we interact with and experience the world, including in professional roles as researchers. Weight bias, defined as negative attitudes or perceptions towards people that have large bodies, can contribute to weight stigma and discrimination leading to negative health and social consequences. Weight bias is experienced by people living with obesity in media, health care, education, employment and social settings. In research settings, there is potential for weight bias to impact various aspects of qualitative research including the participant‐researcher dynamic in interviews. However, evidence‐based strategies to reduce weight bias in qualitative research interviews have yet to be identified. We discuss how weight bias may influence research interviews and identify several considerations and strategies for researchers to minimize the impact of weight bias. Strategies include practicing reflexivity, planning and conducting interviews in ways that support rapport building, using inclusive language, and considering participatory methods.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>education</subject><subject>employment</subject><subject>health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>interview</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>obesity</subject><subject>Obesity - psychology</subject><subject>people</subject><subject>qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Research Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Social Stigma</subject><subject>Stereotyping</subject><subject>stigma</subject><subject>Weight</subject><subject>weight bias</subject><subject>Weight Prejudice</subject><subject>weight stigma</subject><issn>1467-7881</issn><issn>1467-789X</issn><issn>1467-789X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ctKAzEUBuAgiveFLyABN7qozWkmk4w7Ld5AEETB3ZDLmRqZzmgy0-LbG23tQhCzySF8_OHwE3IA7BTSGbYmnAKXgq2RbchyOZCqeF5fzQq2yE6Mr4yBLDhski2uciVyxbaJeUDXW99M6Bz95KWjxutIdeNo7Pxkqqlv6Huva9_pzs-QBoyog31J7x2Gmcd5PKPjtoneYUgkTbRqw8phiHtko9J1xP3lvUueri4fxzeDu_vr2_H53cByBWygYWRtDpblTowyaVSlM8nQuNyOisKBkEwYm0nHDKAAKVGZimsHkLYp2IjvkuNF7lto33uMXTn10WJd6wbbPpYcBBdKZYL_T1lWSFBCQaJHv-hr24cmLZJULoAXSn39fbJQNrQxBqzKt-CnOnyUwMqvjsrUUfndUbKHy8TeTNGt5E8pCQwXYO5r_Pg7qby_eFhEfgKld5rq</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Hung, Pam</creator><creator>Miciak, Maxi</creator><creator>Godziuk, Kristine</creator><creator>Gross, Douglas P.</creator><creator>Forhan, Mary</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2087-0516</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9520-4302</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Reducing weight bias and stigma in qualitative research interviews: Considerations for researchers</title><author>Hung, Pam ; Miciak, Maxi ; Godziuk, Kristine ; Gross, Douglas P. ; Forhan, Mary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3810-a12cc61c06d5247b8fa470ebd6c299d15705bc47d0b1e5177e8bf3ad113869023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>education</topic><topic>employment</topic><topic>health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>interview</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>obesity</topic><topic>Obesity - psychology</topic><topic>people</topic><topic>qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Research Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Social Stigma</topic><topic>Stereotyping</topic><topic>stigma</topic><topic>Weight</topic><topic>weight bias</topic><topic>Weight Prejudice</topic><topic>weight stigma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hung, Pam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miciak, Maxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godziuk, Kristine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Douglas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forhan, Mary</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obesity reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hung, Pam</au><au>Miciak, Maxi</au><au>Godziuk, Kristine</au><au>Gross, Douglas P.</au><au>Forhan, Mary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reducing weight bias and stigma in qualitative research interviews: Considerations for researchers</atitle><jtitle>Obesity reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Obes Rev</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e13750</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e13750-n/a</pages><issn>1467-7881</issn><issn>1467-789X</issn><eissn>1467-789X</eissn><abstract>Summary Perceptions and biases influence how we interact with and experience the world, including in professional roles as researchers. Weight bias, defined as negative attitudes or perceptions towards people that have large bodies, can contribute to weight stigma and discrimination leading to negative health and social consequences. Weight bias is experienced by people living with obesity in media, health care, education, employment and social settings. In research settings, there is potential for weight bias to impact various aspects of qualitative research including the participant‐researcher dynamic in interviews. However, evidence‐based strategies to reduce weight bias in qualitative research interviews have yet to be identified. We discuss how weight bias may influence research interviews and identify several considerations and strategies for researchers to minimize the impact of weight bias. Strategies include practicing reflexivity, planning and conducting interviews in ways that support rapport building, using inclusive language, and considering participatory methods.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38685680</pmid><doi>10.1111/obr.13750</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2087-0516</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9520-4302</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1467-7881
ispartof Obesity reviews, 2024-07, Vol.25 (7), p.e13750-n/a
issn 1467-7881
1467-789X
1467-789X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153588453
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Bias
education
employment
health services
Humans
interview
Interviews as Topic
obesity
Obesity - psychology
people
qualitative analysis
Qualitative Research
Research Design
Research Personnel - psychology
Social Stigma
Stereotyping
stigma
Weight
weight bias
Weight Prejudice
weight stigma
title Reducing weight bias and stigma in qualitative research interviews: Considerations for researchers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T11%3A24%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reducing%20weight%20bias%20and%20stigma%20in%20qualitative%20research%20interviews:%20Considerations%20for%20researchers&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20reviews&rft.au=Hung,%20Pam&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e13750&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e13750-n/a&rft.issn=1467-7881&rft.eissn=1467-789X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/obr.13750&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3065139882%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3065139882&rft_id=info:pmid/38685680&rfr_iscdi=true