Reducing weight bias and stigma in qualitative research interviews: Considerations for researchers
Summary Perceptions and biases influence how we interact with and experience the world, including in professional roles as researchers. Weight bias, defined as negative attitudes or perceptions towards people that have large bodies, can contribute to weight stigma and discrimination leading to negat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Obesity reviews 2024-07, Vol.25 (7), p.e13750-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e13750 |
container_title | Obesity reviews |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Hung, Pam Miciak, Maxi Godziuk, Kristine Gross, Douglas P. Forhan, Mary |
description | Summary
Perceptions and biases influence how we interact with and experience the world, including in professional roles as researchers. Weight bias, defined as negative attitudes or perceptions towards people that have large bodies, can contribute to weight stigma and discrimination leading to negative health and social consequences. Weight bias is experienced by people living with obesity in media, health care, education, employment and social settings. In research settings, there is potential for weight bias to impact various aspects of qualitative research including the participant‐researcher dynamic in interviews. However, evidence‐based strategies to reduce weight bias in qualitative research interviews have yet to be identified. We discuss how weight bias may influence research interviews and identify several considerations and strategies for researchers to minimize the impact of weight bias. Strategies include practicing reflexivity, planning and conducting interviews in ways that support rapport building, using inclusive language, and considering participatory methods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/obr.13750 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153588453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3065139882</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3810-a12cc61c06d5247b8fa470ebd6c299d15705bc47d0b1e5177e8bf3ad113869023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctKAzEUBuAgiveFLyABN7qozWkmk4w7Ld5AEETB3ZDLmRqZzmgy0-LbG23tQhCzySF8_OHwE3IA7BTSGbYmnAKXgq2RbchyOZCqeF5fzQq2yE6Mr4yBLDhski2uciVyxbaJeUDXW99M6Bz95KWjxutIdeNo7Pxkqqlv6Huva9_pzs-QBoyog31J7x2Gmcd5PKPjtoneYUgkTbRqw8phiHtko9J1xP3lvUueri4fxzeDu_vr2_H53cByBWygYWRtDpblTowyaVSlM8nQuNyOisKBkEwYm0nHDKAAKVGZimsHkLYp2IjvkuNF7lto33uMXTn10WJd6wbbPpYcBBdKZYL_T1lWSFBCQaJHv-hr24cmLZJULoAXSn39fbJQNrQxBqzKt-CnOnyUwMqvjsrUUfndUbKHy8TeTNGt5E8pCQwXYO5r_Pg7qby_eFhEfgKld5rq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3065139882</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reducing weight bias and stigma in qualitative research interviews: Considerations for researchers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hung, Pam ; Miciak, Maxi ; Godziuk, Kristine ; Gross, Douglas P. ; Forhan, Mary</creator><creatorcontrib>Hung, Pam ; Miciak, Maxi ; Godziuk, Kristine ; Gross, Douglas P. ; Forhan, Mary</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Perceptions and biases influence how we interact with and experience the world, including in professional roles as researchers. Weight bias, defined as negative attitudes or perceptions towards people that have large bodies, can contribute to weight stigma and discrimination leading to negative health and social consequences. Weight bias is experienced by people living with obesity in media, health care, education, employment and social settings. In research settings, there is potential for weight bias to impact various aspects of qualitative research including the participant‐researcher dynamic in interviews. However, evidence‐based strategies to reduce weight bias in qualitative research interviews have yet to be identified. We discuss how weight bias may influence research interviews and identify several considerations and strategies for researchers to minimize the impact of weight bias. Strategies include practicing reflexivity, planning and conducting interviews in ways that support rapport building, using inclusive language, and considering participatory methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-7881</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1467-789X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-789X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/obr.13750</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38685680</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Bias ; education ; employment ; health services ; Humans ; interview ; Interviews as Topic ; obesity ; Obesity - psychology ; people ; qualitative analysis ; Qualitative Research ; Research Design ; Research Personnel - psychology ; Social Stigma ; Stereotyping ; stigma ; Weight ; weight bias ; Weight Prejudice ; weight stigma</subject><ispartof>Obesity reviews, 2024-07, Vol.25 (7), p.e13750-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of World Obesity Federation.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. Obesity Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of World Obesity Federation.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3810-a12cc61c06d5247b8fa470ebd6c299d15705bc47d0b1e5177e8bf3ad113869023</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2087-0516 ; 0000-0001-9520-4302</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fobr.13750$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fobr.13750$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38685680$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hung, Pam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miciak, Maxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godziuk, Kristine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Douglas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forhan, Mary</creatorcontrib><title>Reducing weight bias and stigma in qualitative research interviews: Considerations for researchers</title><title>Obesity reviews</title><addtitle>Obes Rev</addtitle><description>Summary
Perceptions and biases influence how we interact with and experience the world, including in professional roles as researchers. Weight bias, defined as negative attitudes or perceptions towards people that have large bodies, can contribute to weight stigma and discrimination leading to negative health and social consequences. Weight bias is experienced by people living with obesity in media, health care, education, employment and social settings. In research settings, there is potential for weight bias to impact various aspects of qualitative research including the participant‐researcher dynamic in interviews. However, evidence‐based strategies to reduce weight bias in qualitative research interviews have yet to be identified. We discuss how weight bias may influence research interviews and identify several considerations and strategies for researchers to minimize the impact of weight bias. Strategies include practicing reflexivity, planning and conducting interviews in ways that support rapport building, using inclusive language, and considering participatory methods.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>education</subject><subject>employment</subject><subject>health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>interview</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>obesity</subject><subject>Obesity - psychology</subject><subject>people</subject><subject>qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Research Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Social Stigma</subject><subject>Stereotyping</subject><subject>stigma</subject><subject>Weight</subject><subject>weight bias</subject><subject>Weight Prejudice</subject><subject>weight stigma</subject><issn>1467-7881</issn><issn>1467-789X</issn><issn>1467-789X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ctKAzEUBuAgiveFLyABN7qozWkmk4w7Ld5AEETB3ZDLmRqZzmgy0-LbG23tQhCzySF8_OHwE3IA7BTSGbYmnAKXgq2RbchyOZCqeF5fzQq2yE6Mr4yBLDhski2uciVyxbaJeUDXW99M6Bz95KWjxutIdeNo7Pxkqqlv6Huva9_pzs-QBoyog31J7x2Gmcd5PKPjtoneYUgkTbRqw8phiHtko9J1xP3lvUueri4fxzeDu_vr2_H53cByBWygYWRtDpblTowyaVSlM8nQuNyOisKBkEwYm0nHDKAAKVGZimsHkLYp2IjvkuNF7lto33uMXTn10WJd6wbbPpYcBBdKZYL_T1lWSFBCQaJHv-hr24cmLZJULoAXSn39fbJQNrQxBqzKt-CnOnyUwMqvjsrUUfndUbKHy8TeTNGt5E8pCQwXYO5r_Pg7qby_eFhEfgKld5rq</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Hung, Pam</creator><creator>Miciak, Maxi</creator><creator>Godziuk, Kristine</creator><creator>Gross, Douglas P.</creator><creator>Forhan, Mary</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2087-0516</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9520-4302</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Reducing weight bias and stigma in qualitative research interviews: Considerations for researchers</title><author>Hung, Pam ; Miciak, Maxi ; Godziuk, Kristine ; Gross, Douglas P. ; Forhan, Mary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3810-a12cc61c06d5247b8fa470ebd6c299d15705bc47d0b1e5177e8bf3ad113869023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>education</topic><topic>employment</topic><topic>health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>interview</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>obesity</topic><topic>Obesity - psychology</topic><topic>people</topic><topic>qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Research Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Social Stigma</topic><topic>Stereotyping</topic><topic>stigma</topic><topic>Weight</topic><topic>weight bias</topic><topic>Weight Prejudice</topic><topic>weight stigma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hung, Pam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miciak, Maxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godziuk, Kristine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Douglas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forhan, Mary</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obesity reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hung, Pam</au><au>Miciak, Maxi</au><au>Godziuk, Kristine</au><au>Gross, Douglas P.</au><au>Forhan, Mary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reducing weight bias and stigma in qualitative research interviews: Considerations for researchers</atitle><jtitle>Obesity reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Obes Rev</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e13750</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e13750-n/a</pages><issn>1467-7881</issn><issn>1467-789X</issn><eissn>1467-789X</eissn><abstract>Summary
Perceptions and biases influence how we interact with and experience the world, including in professional roles as researchers. Weight bias, defined as negative attitudes or perceptions towards people that have large bodies, can contribute to weight stigma and discrimination leading to negative health and social consequences. Weight bias is experienced by people living with obesity in media, health care, education, employment and social settings. In research settings, there is potential for weight bias to impact various aspects of qualitative research including the participant‐researcher dynamic in interviews. However, evidence‐based strategies to reduce weight bias in qualitative research interviews have yet to be identified. We discuss how weight bias may influence research interviews and identify several considerations and strategies for researchers to minimize the impact of weight bias. Strategies include practicing reflexivity, planning and conducting interviews in ways that support rapport building, using inclusive language, and considering participatory methods.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38685680</pmid><doi>10.1111/obr.13750</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2087-0516</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9520-4302</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1467-7881 |
ispartof | Obesity reviews, 2024-07, Vol.25 (7), p.e13750-n/a |
issn | 1467-7881 1467-789X 1467-789X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153588453 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Bias education employment health services Humans interview Interviews as Topic obesity Obesity - psychology people qualitative analysis Qualitative Research Research Design Research Personnel - psychology Social Stigma Stereotyping stigma Weight weight bias Weight Prejudice weight stigma |
title | Reducing weight bias and stigma in qualitative research interviews: Considerations for researchers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T11%3A24%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reducing%20weight%20bias%20and%20stigma%20in%20qualitative%20research%20interviews:%20Considerations%20for%20researchers&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20reviews&rft.au=Hung,%20Pam&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e13750&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e13750-n/a&rft.issn=1467-7881&rft.eissn=1467-789X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/obr.13750&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3065139882%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3065139882&rft_id=info:pmid/38685680&rfr_iscdi=true |