Territorial Assessment and Prioritization for Biodiversity Conservation Using the Example of the Center of European Russia

For an adequate assessment and effective management of biodiversity and ecosystem services in the vast and extremely heterogeneous territory of Russia, a multilevel approach is required that integrates the tasks of biodiversity conservation on different hierarchical levels (diversity of ecosystems a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contemporary problems of ecology 2023-12, Vol.16 (7), p.921-938
Hauptverfasser: Bukvareva, Ye. N., Aleynikov, A. A., Klimanova, O. A., Titova, L. A., Sviridova, T. V., Shcherbakov, A. V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 938
container_issue 7
container_start_page 921
container_title Contemporary problems of ecology
container_volume 16
creator Bukvareva, Ye. N.
Aleynikov, A. A.
Klimanova, O. A.
Titova, L. A.
Sviridova, T. V.
Shcherbakov, A. V.
description For an adequate assessment and effective management of biodiversity and ecosystem services in the vast and extremely heterogeneous territory of Russia, a multilevel approach is required that integrates the tasks of biodiversity conservation on different hierarchical levels (diversity of ecosystems and species) and on different levels of territorial administration. Using the example of the Central Federal District of the Russian Federation, a preliminary methodology for prioritizing territories for biodiversity conservation at three levels of government (federal district, subjects of the Russian Federation, and municipal districts) is considered. To prioritize the territories, the rarity indicators of generalized ecosystem types within these territories and the value of territories for the conservation of “red-listed” animal and plant species are used. It is shown that the high-priority for biodiversity conservation purposes generalized types of ecosystems can be distinguished both on different territorial levels and in different territories within the same level. There is also a contradiction between the management tasks of preserving the diversity of species, requiring spacious habitats and the conservation of rare ecosystems that have a small area. These contradictions can be resolved through the development of environmental strategies for different levels of territorial administration.
doi_str_mv 10.1134/S1995425523070028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153566373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2906807827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-74ca4282f197bdf4e0560178880a7d36e41783eabb0f386100e21eed85f54e963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1Lw0AQhoMoWKs_wNuCFy_V_chuNsda6gcUFG3PYdtM6pZkN-4kxfbXm1pRUDzNvDPP-zIwUXTO6BVjIr5-YWkqYy4lFzShlOuDqLcbDWKuxOF3L-VxdIK4olTJVIpetJ1CCLbxwZqSDBEBsQLXEONy8hRsN2_s1jTWO1L4QG6sz-0aAtpmQ0beIYT1fjtD65akeQUyfjdVXQLxxaccdXEQdmrcBl-DceS5RbTmNDoqTIlw9lX70ex2PB3dDyaPdw-j4WSwEJQ1gyRemJhrXrA0medFDFQqyhKtNTVJLhTEnRBg5nNaCK0YpcAZQK5lIWNIlehHl_vcOvi3FrDJKosLKEvjwLeYCSaFVEokokMvfqEr3wbXXZfxlCpNE82TjmJ7ahE8YoAiq4OtTNhkjGa7b2R_vtF5-N6DHeuWEH6S_zd9ANn2jJ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2906807827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Territorial Assessment and Prioritization for Biodiversity Conservation Using the Example of the Center of European Russia</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Bukvareva, Ye. N. ; Aleynikov, A. A. ; Klimanova, O. A. ; Titova, L. A. ; Sviridova, T. V. ; Shcherbakov, A. V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bukvareva, Ye. N. ; Aleynikov, A. A. ; Klimanova, O. A. ; Titova, L. A. ; Sviridova, T. V. ; Shcherbakov, A. V.</creatorcontrib><description>For an adequate assessment and effective management of biodiversity and ecosystem services in the vast and extremely heterogeneous territory of Russia, a multilevel approach is required that integrates the tasks of biodiversity conservation on different hierarchical levels (diversity of ecosystems and species) and on different levels of territorial administration. Using the example of the Central Federal District of the Russian Federation, a preliminary methodology for prioritizing territories for biodiversity conservation at three levels of government (federal district, subjects of the Russian Federation, and municipal districts) is considered. To prioritize the territories, the rarity indicators of generalized ecosystem types within these territories and the value of territories for the conservation of “red-listed” animal and plant species are used. It is shown that the high-priority for biodiversity conservation purposes generalized types of ecosystems can be distinguished both on different territorial levels and in different territories within the same level. There is also a contradiction between the management tasks of preserving the diversity of species, requiring spacious habitats and the conservation of rare ecosystems that have a small area. These contradictions can be resolved through the development of environmental strategies for different levels of territorial administration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1995-4255</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1995-4263</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1134/S1995425523070028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Animal species ; animals ; Biodiversity ; biodiversity conservation ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Conservation ; Ecology ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Life Sciences ; Plant species ; prioritization ; Russia ; species ; Species diversity ; Territorial behavior ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Contemporary problems of ecology, 2023-12, Vol.16 (7), p.921-938</ispartof><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2023. ISSN 1995-4255, Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 2023, Vol. 16, No. 7, pp. 921–938. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2023. Russian Text © The Author(s), 2022, published in Lesovedenie, 2022, No. 6, pp. 595–616.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-74ca4282f197bdf4e0560178880a7d36e41783eabb0f386100e21eed85f54e963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1134/S1995425523070028$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1134/S1995425523070028$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bukvareva, Ye. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aleynikov, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klimanova, O. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Titova, L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sviridova, T. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shcherbakov, A. V.</creatorcontrib><title>Territorial Assessment and Prioritization for Biodiversity Conservation Using the Example of the Center of European Russia</title><title>Contemporary problems of ecology</title><addtitle>Contemp. Probl. Ecol</addtitle><description>For an adequate assessment and effective management of biodiversity and ecosystem services in the vast and extremely heterogeneous territory of Russia, a multilevel approach is required that integrates the tasks of biodiversity conservation on different hierarchical levels (diversity of ecosystems and species) and on different levels of territorial administration. Using the example of the Central Federal District of the Russian Federation, a preliminary methodology for prioritizing territories for biodiversity conservation at three levels of government (federal district, subjects of the Russian Federation, and municipal districts) is considered. To prioritize the territories, the rarity indicators of generalized ecosystem types within these territories and the value of territories for the conservation of “red-listed” animal and plant species are used. It is shown that the high-priority for biodiversity conservation purposes generalized types of ecosystems can be distinguished both on different territorial levels and in different territories within the same level. There is also a contradiction between the management tasks of preserving the diversity of species, requiring spacious habitats and the conservation of rare ecosystems that have a small area. These contradictions can be resolved through the development of environmental strategies for different levels of territorial administration.</description><subject>Animal species</subject><subject>animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>prioritization</subject><subject>Russia</subject><subject>species</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Territorial behavior</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1995-4255</issn><issn>1995-4263</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1Lw0AQhoMoWKs_wNuCFy_V_chuNsda6gcUFG3PYdtM6pZkN-4kxfbXm1pRUDzNvDPP-zIwUXTO6BVjIr5-YWkqYy4lFzShlOuDqLcbDWKuxOF3L-VxdIK4olTJVIpetJ1CCLbxwZqSDBEBsQLXEONy8hRsN2_s1jTWO1L4QG6sz-0aAtpmQ0beIYT1fjtD65akeQUyfjdVXQLxxaccdXEQdmrcBl-DceS5RbTmNDoqTIlw9lX70ex2PB3dDyaPdw-j4WSwEJQ1gyRemJhrXrA0medFDFQqyhKtNTVJLhTEnRBg5nNaCK0YpcAZQK5lIWNIlehHl_vcOvi3FrDJKosLKEvjwLeYCSaFVEokokMvfqEr3wbXXZfxlCpNE82TjmJ7ahE8YoAiq4OtTNhkjGa7b2R_vtF5-N6DHeuWEH6S_zd9ANn2jJ0</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Bukvareva, Ye. N.</creator><creator>Aleynikov, A. A.</creator><creator>Klimanova, O. A.</creator><creator>Titova, L. A.</creator><creator>Sviridova, T. V.</creator><creator>Shcherbakov, A. V.</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Territorial Assessment and Prioritization for Biodiversity Conservation Using the Example of the Center of European Russia</title><author>Bukvareva, Ye. N. ; Aleynikov, A. A. ; Klimanova, O. A. ; Titova, L. A. ; Sviridova, T. V. ; Shcherbakov, A. V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-74ca4282f197bdf4e0560178880a7d36e41783eabb0f386100e21eed85f54e963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Animal species</topic><topic>animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>prioritization</topic><topic>Russia</topic><topic>species</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Territorial behavior</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bukvareva, Ye. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aleynikov, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klimanova, O. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Titova, L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sviridova, T. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shcherbakov, A. V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contemporary problems of ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bukvareva, Ye. N.</au><au>Aleynikov, A. A.</au><au>Klimanova, O. A.</au><au>Titova, L. A.</au><au>Sviridova, T. V.</au><au>Shcherbakov, A. V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Territorial Assessment and Prioritization for Biodiversity Conservation Using the Example of the Center of European Russia</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary problems of ecology</jtitle><stitle>Contemp. Probl. Ecol</stitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>921</spage><epage>938</epage><pages>921-938</pages><issn>1995-4255</issn><eissn>1995-4263</eissn><abstract>For an adequate assessment and effective management of biodiversity and ecosystem services in the vast and extremely heterogeneous territory of Russia, a multilevel approach is required that integrates the tasks of biodiversity conservation on different hierarchical levels (diversity of ecosystems and species) and on different levels of territorial administration. Using the example of the Central Federal District of the Russian Federation, a preliminary methodology for prioritizing territories for biodiversity conservation at three levels of government (federal district, subjects of the Russian Federation, and municipal districts) is considered. To prioritize the territories, the rarity indicators of generalized ecosystem types within these territories and the value of territories for the conservation of “red-listed” animal and plant species are used. It is shown that the high-priority for biodiversity conservation purposes generalized types of ecosystems can be distinguished both on different territorial levels and in different territories within the same level. There is also a contradiction between the management tasks of preserving the diversity of species, requiring spacious habitats and the conservation of rare ecosystems that have a small area. These contradictions can be resolved through the development of environmental strategies for different levels of territorial administration.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.1134/S1995425523070028</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1995-4255
ispartof Contemporary problems of ecology, 2023-12, Vol.16 (7), p.921-938
issn 1995-4255
1995-4263
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153566373
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Animal species
animals
Biodiversity
biodiversity conservation
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Conservation
Ecology
Ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Life Sciences
Plant species
prioritization
Russia
species
Species diversity
Territorial behavior
Wildlife conservation
title Territorial Assessment and Prioritization for Biodiversity Conservation Using the Example of the Center of European Russia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T10%3A32%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Territorial%20Assessment%20and%20Prioritization%20for%20Biodiversity%20Conservation%20Using%20the%20Example%20of%20the%20Center%20of%20European%20Russia&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20problems%20of%20ecology&rft.au=Bukvareva,%20Ye.%20N.&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=921&rft.epage=938&rft.pages=921-938&rft.issn=1995-4255&rft.eissn=1995-4263&rft_id=info:doi/10.1134/S1995425523070028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2906807827%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2906807827&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true