Ecotoxicological assessment of natural soil amended with sewage sludge: the impacts on soil edaphic organisms and microbial community
Sewage sludge usage as agricultural soil amendment is a well-known practice employed worldwide. However, certain components may pose risks to the soil ecosystem. For a better verification of the potential adverse effects on the soil biota, biological assays have become an indispensable tool for an a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental monitoring and assessment 2023-11, Vol.195 (11), p.1325-1325, Article 1325 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1325 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 1325 |
| container_title | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| container_volume | 195 |
| creator | Martins, Marcela Ravanelli Zanatta, Maraline Conservani Klingohr Ferreira, Wallace Gomes Poletti, Elaine Cristina Catapani Pires, Marta Siviero Guilherme |
| description | Sewage sludge usage as agricultural soil amendment is a well-known practice employed worldwide. However, certain components may pose risks to the soil ecosystem. For a better verification of the potential adverse effects on the soil biota, biological assays have become an indispensable tool for an accurate understanding of the residue’s behavior on soil, as well as its potential toxicity. Accordingly, to properly assess the effects of natural tropical soil (Oxisoil) amended with sewage sludge, we conducted toxicological tests with edaphic organisms (
Enchytraeus crypticus
and
Folsomia candida
) and microbial biomass (through respirometric assessment). Results indicate that
E. crypticus
and
F. candida
present similar reproduction sensitivity behavior to sewage sludge. For the microbiological analysis, the results suggest that microbial activity was stimulated by sludge application. For further evaluation of respiration of the microbial community and CO
2
stabilization values behavior, Ford-Walford modeling was applied and presented limit values for sludge application in soil for 1.5 g kg
−1
and 15.0 g kg
−1
of, approximately, 55 mg and 88 mg, respectively. CO
2
releases were faster and reached stability within 18 weeks for the soil with higher sludge content (15.0 g kg
−1
of dry soil). In contrast, CO
2
releases were slower for the soil with lower sludge content (1.5 g kg
−1
of dry soil), and until the experiment’s final period (21 weeks) respiration behavior did not reach stability. This study indicates that the stabilized sewage sludge, at the considered recommended application rate, presents a low toxicity risk for the studied bioindicators, being suitable for agricultural use. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10661-023-11953-9 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153561093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3153561093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-7fbf9db3d31add3d71912ba75b3a51c67612fc69ec4b44c1334b5aa6332db2123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFrFTEUhYNY8Nn2D7gKuHEzNjeZJC_upLRaKLix6yGTZOalzEyeuRlqf4D_2zxHEFzo6sK53zlwOIS8AfYeGNNXCEwpaBgXDYCRojEvyA6kFg030rwkOwZKN0oo84q8RnxkjBndmh35ceNSSd-jS1Mao7MTtYgBcQ5LoWmgiy1rriqmWF9V9cHTp1gOFMOTHQPFafVj-EDLIdA4H60rSNOy8cHb4yE6mvJol4gzUrt4OkeXUx9rqEvzvC6xPF-Qs8FOGC5_33PycHvz9fpzc__l0931x_vGib0sjR76wfheeAHWe-E1GOC91bIXVoJTWgEfnDLBtX3bOhCi7aW1Sgjuew5cnJN3W-4xp29rwNLNEV2YJruEtGInQAqpgBnxX5Tv9Z4bBppV9O1f6GNa81KLnCgttTbmRPGNqu0Rcxi6Y46zzc8dsO40YreN2NURu18jdqaaxGbCCi9jyH-i_-H6CYAboXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2877577990</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecotoxicological assessment of natural soil amended with sewage sludge: the impacts on soil edaphic organisms and microbial community</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Martins, Marcela Ravanelli ; Zanatta, Maraline Conservani Klingohr ; Ferreira, Wallace Gomes ; Poletti, Elaine Cristina Catapani ; Pires, Marta Siviero Guilherme</creator><creatorcontrib>Martins, Marcela Ravanelli ; Zanatta, Maraline Conservani Klingohr ; Ferreira, Wallace Gomes ; Poletti, Elaine Cristina Catapani ; Pires, Marta Siviero Guilherme</creatorcontrib><description>Sewage sludge usage as agricultural soil amendment is a well-known practice employed worldwide. However, certain components may pose risks to the soil ecosystem. For a better verification of the potential adverse effects on the soil biota, biological assays have become an indispensable tool for an accurate understanding of the residue’s behavior on soil, as well as its potential toxicity. Accordingly, to properly assess the effects of natural tropical soil (Oxisoil) amended with sewage sludge, we conducted toxicological tests with edaphic organisms (
Enchytraeus crypticus
and
Folsomia candida
) and microbial biomass (through respirometric assessment). Results indicate that
E. crypticus
and
F. candida
present similar reproduction sensitivity behavior to sewage sludge. For the microbiological analysis, the results suggest that microbial activity was stimulated by sludge application. For further evaluation of respiration of the microbial community and CO
2
stabilization values behavior, Ford-Walford modeling was applied and presented limit values for sludge application in soil for 1.5 g kg
−1
and 15.0 g kg
−1
of, approximately, 55 mg and 88 mg, respectively. CO
2
releases were faster and reached stability within 18 weeks for the soil with higher sludge content (15.0 g kg
−1
of dry soil). In contrast, CO
2
releases were slower for the soil with lower sludge content (1.5 g kg
−1
of dry soil), and until the experiment’s final period (21 weeks) respiration behavior did not reach stability. This study indicates that the stabilized sewage sludge, at the considered recommended application rate, presents a low toxicity risk for the studied bioindicators, being suitable for agricultural use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-023-11953-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; agricultural soils ; application rate ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Bio-assays ; Bioindicators ; Biological activity ; Biota ; Carbon dioxide ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Ecotoxicology ; Enchytraeus ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Environmental monitoring ; Folsomia candida ; Indicator organisms ; Indicator species ; Microbial activity ; microbial biomass ; microbial communities ; Microbiological analysis ; Microbiomes ; Microorganisms ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; reproduction ; Respiration ; risk ; Sewage ; Sewage sludge ; Sludge ; Soil ; Soil amendment ; soil amendments ; soil biota ; soil ecosystems ; Soil microorganisms ; Toxicity ; Tropical environments ; Tropical soils</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2023-11, Vol.195 (11), p.1325-1325, Article 1325</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-7fbf9db3d31add3d71912ba75b3a51c67612fc69ec4b44c1334b5aa6332db2123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-7fbf9db3d31add3d71912ba75b3a51c67612fc69ec4b44c1334b5aa6332db2123</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8601-7414</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-023-11953-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10661-023-11953-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martins, Marcela Ravanelli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanatta, Maraline Conservani Klingohr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Wallace Gomes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poletti, Elaine Cristina Catapani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pires, Marta Siviero Guilherme</creatorcontrib><title>Ecotoxicological assessment of natural soil amended with sewage sludge: the impacts on soil edaphic organisms and microbial community</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>Sewage sludge usage as agricultural soil amendment is a well-known practice employed worldwide. However, certain components may pose risks to the soil ecosystem. For a better verification of the potential adverse effects on the soil biota, biological assays have become an indispensable tool for an accurate understanding of the residue’s behavior on soil, as well as its potential toxicity. Accordingly, to properly assess the effects of natural tropical soil (Oxisoil) amended with sewage sludge, we conducted toxicological tests with edaphic organisms (
Enchytraeus crypticus
and
Folsomia candida
) and microbial biomass (through respirometric assessment). Results indicate that
E. crypticus
and
F. candida
present similar reproduction sensitivity behavior to sewage sludge. For the microbiological analysis, the results suggest that microbial activity was stimulated by sludge application. For further evaluation of respiration of the microbial community and CO
2
stabilization values behavior, Ford-Walford modeling was applied and presented limit values for sludge application in soil for 1.5 g kg
−1
and 15.0 g kg
−1
of, approximately, 55 mg and 88 mg, respectively. CO
2
releases were faster and reached stability within 18 weeks for the soil with higher sludge content (15.0 g kg
−1
of dry soil). In contrast, CO
2
releases were slower for the soil with lower sludge content (1.5 g kg
−1
of dry soil), and until the experiment’s final period (21 weeks) respiration behavior did not reach stability. This study indicates that the stabilized sewage sludge, at the considered recommended application rate, presents a low toxicity risk for the studied bioindicators, being suitable for agricultural use.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>agricultural soils</subject><subject>application rate</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Bio-assays</subject><subject>Bioindicators</subject><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Enchytraeus</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Folsomia candida</subject><subject>Indicator organisms</subject><subject>Indicator species</subject><subject>Microbial activity</subject><subject>microbial biomass</subject><subject>microbial communities</subject><subject>Microbiological analysis</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>reproduction</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Sewage sludge</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil amendment</subject><subject>soil amendments</subject><subject>soil biota</subject><subject>soil ecosystems</subject><subject>Soil microorganisms</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Tropical environments</subject><subject>Tropical soils</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFrFTEUhYNY8Nn2D7gKuHEzNjeZJC_upLRaKLix6yGTZOalzEyeuRlqf4D_2zxHEFzo6sK53zlwOIS8AfYeGNNXCEwpaBgXDYCRojEvyA6kFg030rwkOwZKN0oo84q8RnxkjBndmh35ceNSSd-jS1Mao7MTtYgBcQ5LoWmgiy1rriqmWF9V9cHTp1gOFMOTHQPFafVj-EDLIdA4H60rSNOy8cHb4yE6mvJol4gzUrt4OkeXUx9rqEvzvC6xPF-Qs8FOGC5_33PycHvz9fpzc__l0931x_vGib0sjR76wfheeAHWe-E1GOC91bIXVoJTWgEfnDLBtX3bOhCi7aW1Sgjuew5cnJN3W-4xp29rwNLNEV2YJruEtGInQAqpgBnxX5Tv9Z4bBppV9O1f6GNa81KLnCgttTbmRPGNqu0Rcxi6Y46zzc8dsO40YreN2NURu18jdqaaxGbCCi9jyH-i_-H6CYAboXQ</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Martins, Marcela Ravanelli</creator><creator>Zanatta, Maraline Conservani Klingohr</creator><creator>Ferreira, Wallace Gomes</creator><creator>Poletti, Elaine Cristina Catapani</creator><creator>Pires, Marta Siviero Guilherme</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8601-7414</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Ecotoxicological assessment of natural soil amended with sewage sludge: the impacts on soil edaphic organisms and microbial community</title><author>Martins, Marcela Ravanelli ; Zanatta, Maraline Conservani Klingohr ; Ferreira, Wallace Gomes ; Poletti, Elaine Cristina Catapani ; Pires, Marta Siviero Guilherme</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-7fbf9db3d31add3d71912ba75b3a51c67612fc69ec4b44c1334b5aa6332db2123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>agricultural soils</topic><topic>application rate</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Bio-assays</topic><topic>Bioindicators</topic><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Enchytraeus</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Folsomia candida</topic><topic>Indicator organisms</topic><topic>Indicator species</topic><topic>Microbial activity</topic><topic>microbial biomass</topic><topic>microbial communities</topic><topic>Microbiological analysis</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>reproduction</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Sewage sludge</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil amendment</topic><topic>soil amendments</topic><topic>soil biota</topic><topic>soil ecosystems</topic><topic>Soil microorganisms</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Tropical environments</topic><topic>Tropical soils</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martins, Marcela Ravanelli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanatta, Maraline Conservani Klingohr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Wallace Gomes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poletti, Elaine Cristina Catapani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pires, Marta Siviero Guilherme</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martins, Marcela Ravanelli</au><au>Zanatta, Maraline Conservani Klingohr</au><au>Ferreira, Wallace Gomes</au><au>Poletti, Elaine Cristina Catapani</au><au>Pires, Marta Siviero Guilherme</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecotoxicological assessment of natural soil amended with sewage sludge: the impacts on soil edaphic organisms and microbial community</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>195</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1325</spage><epage>1325</epage><pages>1325-1325</pages><artnum>1325</artnum><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><abstract>Sewage sludge usage as agricultural soil amendment is a well-known practice employed worldwide. However, certain components may pose risks to the soil ecosystem. For a better verification of the potential adverse effects on the soil biota, biological assays have become an indispensable tool for an accurate understanding of the residue’s behavior on soil, as well as its potential toxicity. Accordingly, to properly assess the effects of natural tropical soil (Oxisoil) amended with sewage sludge, we conducted toxicological tests with edaphic organisms (
Enchytraeus crypticus
and
Folsomia candida
) and microbial biomass (through respirometric assessment). Results indicate that
E. crypticus
and
F. candida
present similar reproduction sensitivity behavior to sewage sludge. For the microbiological analysis, the results suggest that microbial activity was stimulated by sludge application. For further evaluation of respiration of the microbial community and CO
2
stabilization values behavior, Ford-Walford modeling was applied and presented limit values for sludge application in soil for 1.5 g kg
−1
and 15.0 g kg
−1
of, approximately, 55 mg and 88 mg, respectively. CO
2
releases were faster and reached stability within 18 weeks for the soil with higher sludge content (15.0 g kg
−1
of dry soil). In contrast, CO
2
releases were slower for the soil with lower sludge content (1.5 g kg
−1
of dry soil), and until the experiment’s final period (21 weeks) respiration behavior did not reach stability. This study indicates that the stabilized sewage sludge, at the considered recommended application rate, presents a low toxicity risk for the studied bioindicators, being suitable for agricultural use.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10661-023-11953-9</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8601-7414</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0167-6369 |
| ispartof | Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2023-11, Vol.195 (11), p.1325-1325, Article 1325 |
| issn | 0167-6369 1573-2959 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153561093 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Agricultural land agricultural soils application rate Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Bio-assays Bioindicators Biological activity Biota Carbon dioxide Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Ecotoxicology Enchytraeus Environment Environmental Management Environmental monitoring Folsomia candida Indicator organisms Indicator species Microbial activity microbial biomass microbial communities Microbiological analysis Microbiomes Microorganisms Monitoring/Environmental Analysis reproduction Respiration risk Sewage Sewage sludge Sludge Soil Soil amendment soil amendments soil biota soil ecosystems Soil microorganisms Toxicity Tropical environments Tropical soils |
| title | Ecotoxicological assessment of natural soil amended with sewage sludge: the impacts on soil edaphic organisms and microbial community |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T08%3A32%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecotoxicological%20assessment%20of%20natural%20soil%20amended%20with%20sewage%20sludge:%20the%20impacts%20on%20soil%20edaphic%20organisms%20and%20microbial%20community&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Martins,%20Marcela%20Ravanelli&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=195&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1325&rft.epage=1325&rft.pages=1325-1325&rft.artnum=1325&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-023-11953-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153561093%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2877577990&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |