Ecological drivers of flower–leaf sequences: aridity and proxies for pollinator attraction select for flowering‐first in the American plums
Summary Across temperate forests, many tree species produce flowers before their leaves emerge. This flower–leaf phenological sequence, known as hysteranthy, is generally described as an adaptation for wind pollination. However, this explanation does not address why hysteranthy is also common in bio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New phytologist 2024-06, Vol.242 (5), p.2312-2321 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2321 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2312 |
container_title | The New phytologist |
container_volume | 242 |
creator | Buonaiuto, D. M. Davies, T. J. Collins, S. C. Wolkovich, E. M. |
description | Summary
Across temperate forests, many tree species produce flowers before their leaves emerge. This flower–leaf phenological sequence, known as hysteranthy, is generally described as an adaptation for wind pollination. However, this explanation does not address why hysteranthy is also common in biotically pollinated taxa.
We quantified flower–leaf sequence variation in the American plums (Prunus, subg. Prunus sect. Prunocerasus), a clade of insect‐pollinated trees, using herbaria specimens and Bayesian hierarchical modeling. We tested two common, but rarely interrogated hypotheses – that hysteranthy confers aridity tolerance and/or pollinator visibility – by modeling the associations between hysteranthy and related traits. To understand how these phenology–trait associations were sensitive to taxonomic scale and flower–leaf sequence classification, we then extended these analyses to all Prunus species in North America.
Our findings across two taxonomic levels support the hypotheses that hysteranthy may help temporally partition hydraulic demand to reduce water stress and increase pollinator visibility – thereby reducing selective pressure on inflorescence size.
Our results provide foundational insights into the evolution of flower–leaf sequences in the genus Prunus, with implications for understanding these patterns in biotically pollinated plants in general. Our approach suggests a path to advance these hypotheses to other clades, but teasing out drivers fully will require new experiments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/nph.19685 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153559716</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3052224055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3465-7449a513fece625067632cb9f343612c3aab448ca5029f1f1e8964a0ee13c34e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1qFTEYhoMo9rS68AYk4EYX0-b_zLgrpVqhWBcK7oacnC9tSiYZk0zr2fUOKvQOeyWNndqFIGaTEJ7vgfd7EXpFyS6tZy-MZ7u0U618ghZUqK5pKV8-RQtCWNsoob5voe2czwkhnVTsOdrirVRUcbVA14cm-njqjPZ4ndwFpIyjxdbHS0i3VzcetMUZfkwQDOT3WCe3dmWDdVjjMcWfDjK2MeExeu-CLvWpS0naFBdDHfRgyj0wG104vb36ZV3KBbuAyxng_aF-Gx3w6Kchv0DPrPYZXj7cO-jbh8OvB0fN8cnHTwf7x43hQslmKUSnJeUWDCgmiVoqzsyqs1xwRZnhWq-EaI2WhHWWWgptp4QmAJRXA_Ad9Hb21hA1XC794LIB73WAOOWeU8ml7JZ1S_9FCaeU01a1FX3zF3oepxRqkEpJxpggUlbq3UyZFHNOYPsxuUGnTU9J_7vQvhba3xda2dcPxmk1wPqR_NNgBfZm4NJ52Pzb1H_-cjQr7wByD62k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3052224055</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecological drivers of flower–leaf sequences: aridity and proxies for pollinator attraction select for flowering‐first in the American plums</title><source>Wiley Blackwell Single Titles</source><creator>Buonaiuto, D. M. ; Davies, T. J. ; Collins, S. C. ; Wolkovich, E. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buonaiuto, D. M. ; Davies, T. J. ; Collins, S. C. ; Wolkovich, E. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Across temperate forests, many tree species produce flowers before their leaves emerge. This flower–leaf phenological sequence, known as hysteranthy, is generally described as an adaptation for wind pollination. However, this explanation does not address why hysteranthy is also common in biotically pollinated taxa.
We quantified flower–leaf sequence variation in the American plums (Prunus, subg. Prunus sect. Prunocerasus), a clade of insect‐pollinated trees, using herbaria specimens and Bayesian hierarchical modeling. We tested two common, but rarely interrogated hypotheses – that hysteranthy confers aridity tolerance and/or pollinator visibility – by modeling the associations between hysteranthy and related traits. To understand how these phenology–trait associations were sensitive to taxonomic scale and flower–leaf sequence classification, we then extended these analyses to all Prunus species in North America.
Our findings across two taxonomic levels support the hypotheses that hysteranthy may help temporally partition hydraulic demand to reduce water stress and increase pollinator visibility – thereby reducing selective pressure on inflorescence size.
Our results provide foundational insights into the evolution of flower–leaf sequences in the genus Prunus, with implications for understanding these patterns in biotically pollinated plants in general. Our approach suggests a path to advance these hypotheses to other clades, but teasing out drivers fully will require new experiments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-646X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nph.19685</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38561636</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aridity ; Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian theory ; deciduous forests ; dry environmental conditions ; Flowering ; Flowers ; flower–leaf sequences ; Hypotheses ; hysteranthy ; insect pollination ; Insects ; Leaves ; Modelling ; North America ; phenology ; phylogeny ; plant hydraulics ; Plant species ; Plums ; Pollination ; Pollinators ; Probability theory ; Prunus ; sequence diversity ; Taxonomy ; Temperate forests ; trees ; Visibility ; Water stress ; wind pollination</subject><ispartof>The New phytologist, 2024-06, Vol.242 (5), p.2312-2321</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. © 2024 New Phytologist Foundation</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2024 New Phytologist Foundation.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 New Phytologist Trust</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3465-7449a513fece625067632cb9f343612c3aab448ca5029f1f1e8964a0ee13c34e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3318-5948 ; 0009-0004-0678-3920 ; 0000-0003-4022-2591 ; 0000-0001-7653-893X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fnph.19685$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fnph.19685$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38561636$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buonaiuto, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, T. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, S. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolkovich, E. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Ecological drivers of flower–leaf sequences: aridity and proxies for pollinator attraction select for flowering‐first in the American plums</title><title>The New phytologist</title><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><description>Summary
Across temperate forests, many tree species produce flowers before their leaves emerge. This flower–leaf phenological sequence, known as hysteranthy, is generally described as an adaptation for wind pollination. However, this explanation does not address why hysteranthy is also common in biotically pollinated taxa.
We quantified flower–leaf sequence variation in the American plums (Prunus, subg. Prunus sect. Prunocerasus), a clade of insect‐pollinated trees, using herbaria specimens and Bayesian hierarchical modeling. We tested two common, but rarely interrogated hypotheses – that hysteranthy confers aridity tolerance and/or pollinator visibility – by modeling the associations between hysteranthy and related traits. To understand how these phenology–trait associations were sensitive to taxonomic scale and flower–leaf sequence classification, we then extended these analyses to all Prunus species in North America.
Our findings across two taxonomic levels support the hypotheses that hysteranthy may help temporally partition hydraulic demand to reduce water stress and increase pollinator visibility – thereby reducing selective pressure on inflorescence size.
Our results provide foundational insights into the evolution of flower–leaf sequences in the genus Prunus, with implications for understanding these patterns in biotically pollinated plants in general. Our approach suggests a path to advance these hypotheses to other clades, but teasing out drivers fully will require new experiments.</description><subject>Aridity</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian theory</subject><subject>deciduous forests</subject><subject>dry environmental conditions</subject><subject>Flowering</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>flower–leaf sequences</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>hysteranthy</subject><subject>insect pollination</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>phenology</subject><subject>phylogeny</subject><subject>plant hydraulics</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Plums</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Prunus</subject><subject>sequence diversity</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Temperate forests</subject><subject>trees</subject><subject>Visibility</subject><subject>Water stress</subject><subject>wind pollination</subject><issn>0028-646X</issn><issn>1469-8137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1qFTEYhoMo9rS68AYk4EYX0-b_zLgrpVqhWBcK7oacnC9tSiYZk0zr2fUOKvQOeyWNndqFIGaTEJ7vgfd7EXpFyS6tZy-MZ7u0U618ghZUqK5pKV8-RQtCWNsoob5voe2czwkhnVTsOdrirVRUcbVA14cm-njqjPZ4ndwFpIyjxdbHS0i3VzcetMUZfkwQDOT3WCe3dmWDdVjjMcWfDjK2MeExeu-CLvWpS0naFBdDHfRgyj0wG104vb36ZV3KBbuAyxng_aF-Gx3w6Kchv0DPrPYZXj7cO-jbh8OvB0fN8cnHTwf7x43hQslmKUSnJeUWDCgmiVoqzsyqs1xwRZnhWq-EaI2WhHWWWgptp4QmAJRXA_Ad9Hb21hA1XC794LIB73WAOOWeU8ml7JZ1S_9FCaeU01a1FX3zF3oepxRqkEpJxpggUlbq3UyZFHNOYPsxuUGnTU9J_7vQvhba3xda2dcPxmk1wPqR_NNgBfZm4NJ52Pzb1H_-cjQr7wByD62k</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Buonaiuto, D. M.</creator><creator>Davies, T. J.</creator><creator>Collins, S. C.</creator><creator>Wolkovich, E. M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3318-5948</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0678-3920</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4022-2591</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7653-893X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Ecological drivers of flower–leaf sequences: aridity and proxies for pollinator attraction select for flowering‐first in the American plums</title><author>Buonaiuto, D. M. ; Davies, T. J. ; Collins, S. C. ; Wolkovich, E. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3465-7449a513fece625067632cb9f343612c3aab448ca5029f1f1e8964a0ee13c34e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aridity</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian theory</topic><topic>deciduous forests</topic><topic>dry environmental conditions</topic><topic>Flowering</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>flower–leaf sequences</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>hysteranthy</topic><topic>insect pollination</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>phenology</topic><topic>phylogeny</topic><topic>plant hydraulics</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Plums</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Prunus</topic><topic>sequence diversity</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Temperate forests</topic><topic>trees</topic><topic>Visibility</topic><topic>Water stress</topic><topic>wind pollination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buonaiuto, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, T. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, S. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolkovich, E. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buonaiuto, D. M.</au><au>Davies, T. J.</au><au>Collins, S. C.</au><au>Wolkovich, E. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecological drivers of flower–leaf sequences: aridity and proxies for pollinator attraction select for flowering‐first in the American plums</atitle><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>242</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2312</spage><epage>2321</epage><pages>2312-2321</pages><issn>0028-646X</issn><eissn>1469-8137</eissn><abstract>Summary
Across temperate forests, many tree species produce flowers before their leaves emerge. This flower–leaf phenological sequence, known as hysteranthy, is generally described as an adaptation for wind pollination. However, this explanation does not address why hysteranthy is also common in biotically pollinated taxa.
We quantified flower–leaf sequence variation in the American plums (Prunus, subg. Prunus sect. Prunocerasus), a clade of insect‐pollinated trees, using herbaria specimens and Bayesian hierarchical modeling. We tested two common, but rarely interrogated hypotheses – that hysteranthy confers aridity tolerance and/or pollinator visibility – by modeling the associations between hysteranthy and related traits. To understand how these phenology–trait associations were sensitive to taxonomic scale and flower–leaf sequence classification, we then extended these analyses to all Prunus species in North America.
Our findings across two taxonomic levels support the hypotheses that hysteranthy may help temporally partition hydraulic demand to reduce water stress and increase pollinator visibility – thereby reducing selective pressure on inflorescence size.
Our results provide foundational insights into the evolution of flower–leaf sequences in the genus Prunus, with implications for understanding these patterns in biotically pollinated plants in general. Our approach suggests a path to advance these hypotheses to other clades, but teasing out drivers fully will require new experiments.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38561636</pmid><doi>10.1111/nph.19685</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3318-5948</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0678-3920</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4022-2591</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7653-893X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-646X |
ispartof | The New phytologist, 2024-06, Vol.242 (5), p.2312-2321 |
issn | 0028-646X 1469-8137 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153559716 |
source | Wiley Blackwell Single Titles |
subjects | Aridity Bayesian analysis Bayesian theory deciduous forests dry environmental conditions Flowering Flowers flower–leaf sequences Hypotheses hysteranthy insect pollination Insects Leaves Modelling North America phenology phylogeny plant hydraulics Plant species Plums Pollination Pollinators Probability theory Prunus sequence diversity Taxonomy Temperate forests trees Visibility Water stress wind pollination |
title | Ecological drivers of flower–leaf sequences: aridity and proxies for pollinator attraction select for flowering‐first in the American plums |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T18%3A43%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecological%20drivers%20of%20flower%E2%80%93leaf%20sequences:%20aridity%20and%20proxies%20for%20pollinator%20attraction%20select%20for%20flowering%E2%80%90first%20in%20the%20American%20plums&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20phytologist&rft.au=Buonaiuto,%20D.%20M.&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=242&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2312&rft.epage=2321&rft.pages=2312-2321&rft.issn=0028-646X&rft.eissn=1469-8137&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nph.19685&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3052224055%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3052224055&rft_id=info:pmid/38561636&rfr_iscdi=true |