Assessment of exposure to pesticides: residues in 24 h duplicate diets versus their metabolites in 24 h urine using suspect screening and target analysis
Human biomonitoring can add value to chemical risk assessment by reducing the assumptions regarding consumption rates, residue occurrence, and processing effects and by integrating exposures from different sources (diet, household use, environmental). However, the relationship between exposure and c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry 2024, Vol.416 (3), p.635-650 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 650 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 635 |
container_title | Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry |
container_volume | 416 |
creator | Nijssen, R. Lommen, A. van den Top, H. van Dam, R. Meuleman-Bot, C. Tienstra, M. Zomer, P. Sunarto, S. van Tricht, F. Blokland, M. Mol, H. |
description | Human biomonitoring can add value to chemical risk assessment by reducing the assumptions regarding consumption rates, residue occurrence, and processing effects and by integrating exposures from different sources (diet, household use, environmental). However, the relationship between exposure and concentration in human matrices is unknown for most pesticides. Therefore, we conducted a pilot study to gain more insight into the qualitative and quantitative relationship between dietary intake of pesticides (external exposure) and urinary excretion (reflecting internal exposure). In this cross-sectional observational study, 35 healthy consumers aged 18–65 years from the region of Wageningen, Netherlands, collected an exact duplicate portion of their diets during 24 h. On the same day, they also collected all their urine. The duplicate diets were analyzed using target screening by GC- and LC-HRMS; each duplicate diet contained at least five, up to 21, pesticide residues. The 24 h urine samples were analyzed using LC-HRMS in a suspect screening workflow. Metabolites were tentatively detected in all 24 h urine samples, ranging from six metabolites corresponding to four pesticides up to 40 metabolites originating from 16 pesticides in a single urine sample. In total, 65 metabolites originating from 28 pesticides were tentatively detected. After prioritization and additional confirmation experiments, 28 metabolites originating from 10 pesticides were identified with confidence level 1 or 2b. Next, quantitative analysis was performed for a selection of pesticides in duplicate diets and their metabolites in 24 h urine to assess quantitative relationships. In the quantitative comparisons between duplicate diet and 24 h urine, it was found that some metabolites were already present in the duplicate diet, which may give an overestimation of exposure to the parent pesticide based on measurement of the metabolites in urine. Additionally, the quantitative comparisons suggest a background exposure through other exposure routes. We conclude that suspect screening of 24 h urine samples can disclose exposure to mixtures of pesticide on the same day in the general population. However, more research is needed to obtain quantitative relationships between dietary intake and exposure.
Graphical Abstract |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00216-023-04918-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153547181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A778332666</galeid><sourcerecordid>A778332666</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-635bd3d66add065e585abb2888643bfefd078109f7b4cd07d7aac852e1a60d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1u1TAQhSMEoqXwAiyQJTZsUvwTO77srir-pEpsurcce3LrKrGDx0Hto_Rt8eWWFhACeeGj8XdGHs1pmpeMnjJK-7dIKWeqpVy0tNsw3V4_ao6ZqoIrSR_f644fNc8QryhlUjP1tDkSfS-U7uhxc7tFBMQZYiFpJHC9JFwzkJLIAliCCx7wHcmAwa-AJETCO3JJ_LpMwdkCxAcoSL5BxhVJuYSQyQzFDmkK5RfDmkMEsmKIO1LJBVwh6DJA3Fds9KTYvINSpZ1uMODz5sloJ4QXd_dJc_Hh_cXZp_b8y8fPZ9vz1km2Ka0ScvDCK2W9p0qC1NIOA9daq04MI4ye9prRzdgPnava99Y6LTkwq6iX4qR5c2i75PS1TljMHNDBNNkIaUUjmBSy65lm_0W5Vppx0dE9-voP9CqtuU5WqU1dXl2Q6h-onZ3AhDimkq3bNzXbvtdCcKVUpU7_QtXjYQ4uRRhDrf9m4AeDywkxw2iWHGabbwyjZp8cc0iOqckxP5Jjrqvp1d2P12EGf2_5GZUKiAOA9SnuID-M9I-23wFEWs8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2910026567</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of exposure to pesticides: residues in 24 h duplicate diets versus their metabolites in 24 h urine using suspect screening and target analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Nijssen, R. ; Lommen, A. ; van den Top, H. ; van Dam, R. ; Meuleman-Bot, C. ; Tienstra, M. ; Zomer, P. ; Sunarto, S. ; van Tricht, F. ; Blokland, M. ; Mol, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nijssen, R. ; Lommen, A. ; van den Top, H. ; van Dam, R. ; Meuleman-Bot, C. ; Tienstra, M. ; Zomer, P. ; Sunarto, S. ; van Tricht, F. ; Blokland, M. ; Mol, H.</creatorcontrib><description>Human biomonitoring can add value to chemical risk assessment by reducing the assumptions regarding consumption rates, residue occurrence, and processing effects and by integrating exposures from different sources (diet, household use, environmental). However, the relationship between exposure and concentration in human matrices is unknown for most pesticides. Therefore, we conducted a pilot study to gain more insight into the qualitative and quantitative relationship between dietary intake of pesticides (external exposure) and urinary excretion (reflecting internal exposure). In this cross-sectional observational study, 35 healthy consumers aged 18–65 years from the region of Wageningen, Netherlands, collected an exact duplicate portion of their diets during 24 h. On the same day, they also collected all their urine. The duplicate diets were analyzed using target screening by GC- and LC-HRMS; each duplicate diet contained at least five, up to 21, pesticide residues. The 24 h urine samples were analyzed using LC-HRMS in a suspect screening workflow. Metabolites were tentatively detected in all 24 h urine samples, ranging from six metabolites corresponding to four pesticides up to 40 metabolites originating from 16 pesticides in a single urine sample. In total, 65 metabolites originating from 28 pesticides were tentatively detected. After prioritization and additional confirmation experiments, 28 metabolites originating from 10 pesticides were identified with confidence level 1 or 2b. Next, quantitative analysis was performed for a selection of pesticides in duplicate diets and their metabolites in 24 h urine to assess quantitative relationships. In the quantitative comparisons between duplicate diet and 24 h urine, it was found that some metabolites were already present in the duplicate diet, which may give an overestimation of exposure to the parent pesticide based on measurement of the metabolites in urine. Additionally, the quantitative comparisons suggest a background exposure through other exposure routes. We conclude that suspect screening of 24 h urine samples can disclose exposure to mixtures of pesticide on the same day in the general population. However, more research is needed to obtain quantitative relationships between dietary intake and exposure.
Graphical Abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 1618-2642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-2650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00216-023-04918-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37736840</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Analytical Chemistry ; Biochemistry ; Biomonitoring ; Characterization and Evaluation of Materials ; Chemical properties ; chemical risk assessment ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Confidence intervals ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Diet ; Dietary intake ; Environmental Exposure - adverse effects ; Environmental Exposure - analysis ; environmental monitoring ; excretion ; Exposure ; Food intake ; Food Safety Analysis 2.0 ; Food Science ; Humans ; Laboratory Medicine ; Measurement ; Metabolites ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Observational studies ; Paper in Forefront ; Pesticide residues ; Pesticide Residues - analysis ; Pesticides ; Pesticides - analysis ; Pilot Projects ; prioritization ; Quantitative analysis ; Residues ; Risk assessment ; Screening ; Urine ; Workflow</subject><ispartof>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2024, Vol.416 (3), p.635-650</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-635bd3d66add065e585abb2888643bfefd078109f7b4cd07d7aac852e1a60d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-635bd3d66add065e585abb2888643bfefd078109f7b4cd07d7aac852e1a60d53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3751-6065 ; 0000-0002-7200-9210 ; 0000-0003-3132-7674 ; 0000-0003-0087-6910 ; 0000-0002-2498-963X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00216-023-04918-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00216-023-04918-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37736840$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nijssen, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lommen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Top, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dam, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meuleman-Bot, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tienstra, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zomer, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunarto, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Tricht, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blokland, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mol, H.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of exposure to pesticides: residues in 24 h duplicate diets versus their metabolites in 24 h urine using suspect screening and target analysis</title><title>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry</title><addtitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</addtitle><addtitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</addtitle><description>Human biomonitoring can add value to chemical risk assessment by reducing the assumptions regarding consumption rates, residue occurrence, and processing effects and by integrating exposures from different sources (diet, household use, environmental). However, the relationship between exposure and concentration in human matrices is unknown for most pesticides. Therefore, we conducted a pilot study to gain more insight into the qualitative and quantitative relationship between dietary intake of pesticides (external exposure) and urinary excretion (reflecting internal exposure). In this cross-sectional observational study, 35 healthy consumers aged 18–65 years from the region of Wageningen, Netherlands, collected an exact duplicate portion of their diets during 24 h. On the same day, they also collected all their urine. The duplicate diets were analyzed using target screening by GC- and LC-HRMS; each duplicate diet contained at least five, up to 21, pesticide residues. The 24 h urine samples were analyzed using LC-HRMS in a suspect screening workflow. Metabolites were tentatively detected in all 24 h urine samples, ranging from six metabolites corresponding to four pesticides up to 40 metabolites originating from 16 pesticides in a single urine sample. In total, 65 metabolites originating from 28 pesticides were tentatively detected. After prioritization and additional confirmation experiments, 28 metabolites originating from 10 pesticides were identified with confidence level 1 or 2b. Next, quantitative analysis was performed for a selection of pesticides in duplicate diets and their metabolites in 24 h urine to assess quantitative relationships. In the quantitative comparisons between duplicate diet and 24 h urine, it was found that some metabolites were already present in the duplicate diet, which may give an overestimation of exposure to the parent pesticide based on measurement of the metabolites in urine. Additionally, the quantitative comparisons suggest a background exposure through other exposure routes. We conclude that suspect screening of 24 h urine samples can disclose exposure to mixtures of pesticide on the same day in the general population. However, more research is needed to obtain quantitative relationships between dietary intake and exposure.
Graphical Abstract</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biomonitoring</subject><subject>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</subject><subject>Chemical properties</subject><subject>chemical risk assessment</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dietary intake</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure - adverse effects</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>environmental monitoring</subject><subject>excretion</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Food intake</subject><subject>Food Safety Analysis 2.0</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Paper in Forefront</subject><subject>Pesticide residues</subject><subject>Pesticide Residues - analysis</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Pesticides - analysis</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>prioritization</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Residues</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><issn>1618-2642</issn><issn>1618-2650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1u1TAQhSMEoqXwAiyQJTZsUvwTO77srir-pEpsurcce3LrKrGDx0Hto_Rt8eWWFhACeeGj8XdGHs1pmpeMnjJK-7dIKWeqpVy0tNsw3V4_ao6ZqoIrSR_f644fNc8QryhlUjP1tDkSfS-U7uhxc7tFBMQZYiFpJHC9JFwzkJLIAliCCx7wHcmAwa-AJETCO3JJ_LpMwdkCxAcoSL5BxhVJuYSQyQzFDmkK5RfDmkMEsmKIO1LJBVwh6DJA3Fds9KTYvINSpZ1uMODz5sloJ4QXd_dJc_Hh_cXZp_b8y8fPZ9vz1km2Ka0ScvDCK2W9p0qC1NIOA9daq04MI4ye9prRzdgPnava99Y6LTkwq6iX4qR5c2i75PS1TljMHNDBNNkIaUUjmBSy65lm_0W5Vppx0dE9-voP9CqtuU5WqU1dXl2Q6h-onZ3AhDimkq3bNzXbvtdCcKVUpU7_QtXjYQ4uRRhDrf9m4AeDywkxw2iWHGabbwyjZp8cc0iOqckxP5Jjrqvp1d2P12EGf2_5GZUKiAOA9SnuID-M9I-23wFEWs8Q</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Nijssen, R.</creator><creator>Lommen, A.</creator><creator>van den Top, H.</creator><creator>van Dam, R.</creator><creator>Meuleman-Bot, C.</creator><creator>Tienstra, M.</creator><creator>Zomer, P.</creator><creator>Sunarto, S.</creator><creator>van Tricht, F.</creator><creator>Blokland, M.</creator><creator>Mol, H.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3751-6065</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7200-9210</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3132-7674</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0087-6910</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2498-963X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Assessment of exposure to pesticides: residues in 24 h duplicate diets versus their metabolites in 24 h urine using suspect screening and target analysis</title><author>Nijssen, R. ; Lommen, A. ; van den Top, H. ; van Dam, R. ; Meuleman-Bot, C. ; Tienstra, M. ; Zomer, P. ; Sunarto, S. ; van Tricht, F. ; Blokland, M. ; Mol, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-635bd3d66add065e585abb2888643bfefd078109f7b4cd07d7aac852e1a60d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biomonitoring</topic><topic>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</topic><topic>Chemical properties</topic><topic>chemical risk assessment</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dietary intake</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure - adverse effects</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>environmental monitoring</topic><topic>excretion</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Food intake</topic><topic>Food Safety Analysis 2.0</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Paper in Forefront</topic><topic>Pesticide residues</topic><topic>Pesticide Residues - analysis</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Pesticides - analysis</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>prioritization</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Residues</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nijssen, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lommen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Top, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dam, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meuleman-Bot, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tienstra, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zomer, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunarto, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Tricht, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blokland, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mol, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nijssen, R.</au><au>Lommen, A.</au><au>van den Top, H.</au><au>van Dam, R.</au><au>Meuleman-Bot, C.</au><au>Tienstra, M.</au><au>Zomer, P.</au><au>Sunarto, S.</au><au>van Tricht, F.</au><au>Blokland, M.</au><au>Mol, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of exposure to pesticides: residues in 24 h duplicate diets versus their metabolites in 24 h urine using suspect screening and target analysis</atitle><jtitle>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry</jtitle><stitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</stitle><addtitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</addtitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>416</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>635</spage><epage>650</epage><pages>635-650</pages><issn>1618-2642</issn><eissn>1618-2650</eissn><abstract>Human biomonitoring can add value to chemical risk assessment by reducing the assumptions regarding consumption rates, residue occurrence, and processing effects and by integrating exposures from different sources (diet, household use, environmental). However, the relationship between exposure and concentration in human matrices is unknown for most pesticides. Therefore, we conducted a pilot study to gain more insight into the qualitative and quantitative relationship between dietary intake of pesticides (external exposure) and urinary excretion (reflecting internal exposure). In this cross-sectional observational study, 35 healthy consumers aged 18–65 years from the region of Wageningen, Netherlands, collected an exact duplicate portion of their diets during 24 h. On the same day, they also collected all their urine. The duplicate diets were analyzed using target screening by GC- and LC-HRMS; each duplicate diet contained at least five, up to 21, pesticide residues. The 24 h urine samples were analyzed using LC-HRMS in a suspect screening workflow. Metabolites were tentatively detected in all 24 h urine samples, ranging from six metabolites corresponding to four pesticides up to 40 metabolites originating from 16 pesticides in a single urine sample. In total, 65 metabolites originating from 28 pesticides were tentatively detected. After prioritization and additional confirmation experiments, 28 metabolites originating from 10 pesticides were identified with confidence level 1 or 2b. Next, quantitative analysis was performed for a selection of pesticides in duplicate diets and their metabolites in 24 h urine to assess quantitative relationships. In the quantitative comparisons between duplicate diet and 24 h urine, it was found that some metabolites were already present in the duplicate diet, which may give an overestimation of exposure to the parent pesticide based on measurement of the metabolites in urine. Additionally, the quantitative comparisons suggest a background exposure through other exposure routes. We conclude that suspect screening of 24 h urine samples can disclose exposure to mixtures of pesticide on the same day in the general population. However, more research is needed to obtain quantitative relationships between dietary intake and exposure.
Graphical Abstract</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>37736840</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00216-023-04918-x</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3751-6065</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7200-9210</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3132-7674</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0087-6910</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2498-963X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1618-2642 |
ispartof | Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2024, Vol.416 (3), p.635-650 |
issn | 1618-2642 1618-2650 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153547181 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Analysis Analytical Chemistry Biochemistry Biomonitoring Characterization and Evaluation of Materials Chemical properties chemical risk assessment Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Confidence intervals Cross-Sectional Studies Diet Dietary intake Environmental Exposure - adverse effects Environmental Exposure - analysis environmental monitoring excretion Exposure Food intake Food Safety Analysis 2.0 Food Science Humans Laboratory Medicine Measurement Metabolites Monitoring/Environmental Analysis Observational studies Paper in Forefront Pesticide residues Pesticide Residues - analysis Pesticides Pesticides - analysis Pilot Projects prioritization Quantitative analysis Residues Risk assessment Screening Urine Workflow |
title | Assessment of exposure to pesticides: residues in 24 h duplicate diets versus their metabolites in 24 h urine using suspect screening and target analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T13%3A28%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20exposure%20to%20pesticides:%20residues%20in%2024%20h%20duplicate%20diets%20versus%20their%20metabolites%20in%2024%20h%20urine%20using%20suspect%20screening%20and%20target%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Analytical%20and%20bioanalytical%20chemistry&rft.au=Nijssen,%20R.&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=416&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=635&rft.epage=650&rft.pages=635-650&rft.issn=1618-2642&rft.eissn=1618-2650&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00216-023-04918-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA778332666%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2910026567&rft_id=info:pmid/37736840&rft_galeid=A778332666&rfr_iscdi=true |