Challenges of participatory design in apartment buildings’ renovation projects in Finland
Participatory and user-centered design has taken inspiration from each other, and the classical roles of users, researchers, and designers have merged in the co-designing process. Participatory methods consider the balance of power between the designer and residents and the needs and usefulness of t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of housing and the built environment 2023-09, Vol.38 (3), p.1889-1905 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1905 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1889 |
container_title | Journal of housing and the built environment |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Soikkeli, Anu Santamäki, Emmi Hynninen, Oona Äijälä, Saara |
description | Participatory and user-centered design has taken inspiration from each other, and the classical roles of users, researchers, and designers have merged in the co-designing process. Participatory methods consider the balance of power between the designer and residents and the needs and usefulness of the research. Community members should be involved as partners, advisors, and participants.
In Finland, participatory design is law mandated in urban planning projects, but participation that goes beyond the initial publicization of information, is genuinely interactive, and spans all stages of the project is underutilised and the methods of participatory practice are still unfamiliar to many designers. The methods commonly used are the research survey and the workshop, often mentioned as participatory design methods. From the residents’ perspective, participation only becomes participatory when the participant gains the experience of influencing the development and its outcomes. The article examines resident surveys and workshops as tools to produce information and evaluate their interactivity in two case studies. It shows that the diversification of methods is necessary to ensure genuine participatory planning in the renewal of suburban neighborhoods.
The research was done as part of the project Reshaping living: New structure and new life for old suburbs (AsuMut), funded by the Ministry of Environment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10901-023-10016-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153208355</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3153208355</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-bd332e438064ef1b9b0894912256bdbabe4fd114399a33448f1d6e149696eaeb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KxDAURoMoOI6-gKuCGzfVJLdNmqUM_sGAG125CGl7O2bopDXpCLPzNXw9n8TUCoILVzeXnO_ycQg5ZfSCUSovA6OKspRySOPORMr3yIzlElIpJd8f30KkmWL0kByFsKaUM5DFjDwvXkzbolthSLom6Y0fbGV7M3R-l9QY7Mol1iVm_NigG5Jya9vaulX4fP9IPLruzQy2c0nvuzVWQxjpG-ta4-pjctCYNuDJz5yTp5vrx8Vduny4vV9cLdMKlBjSsgbgmEFBRYYNK1VJCxWrcp6Lsi5NiVlTM5aBUgYgy4qG1QJZpoQSaLCEOTmf7sYOr1sMg97YUGEbO2C3DRpYDpwWkOcRPfuDrrutd7Gd5kWuQEZGRopPVOW7EDw2uvd2Y_xOM6pH33ryraNv_e1b8xiCKRQiHH3639P_pL4ARqSEFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2859375537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Challenges of participatory design in apartment buildings’ renovation projects in Finland</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Soikkeli, Anu ; Santamäki, Emmi ; Hynninen, Oona ; Äijälä, Saara</creator><creatorcontrib>Soikkeli, Anu ; Santamäki, Emmi ; Hynninen, Oona ; Äijälä, Saara</creatorcontrib><description>Participatory and user-centered design has taken inspiration from each other, and the classical roles of users, researchers, and designers have merged in the co-designing process. Participatory methods consider the balance of power between the designer and residents and the needs and usefulness of the research. Community members should be involved as partners, advisors, and participants.
In Finland, participatory design is law mandated in urban planning projects, but participation that goes beyond the initial publicization of information, is genuinely interactive, and spans all stages of the project is underutilised and the methods of participatory practice are still unfamiliar to many designers. The methods commonly used are the research survey and the workshop, often mentioned as participatory design methods. From the residents’ perspective, participation only becomes participatory when the participant gains the experience of influencing the development and its outcomes. The article examines resident surveys and workshops as tools to produce information and evaluate their interactivity in two case studies. It shows that the diversification of methods is necessary to ensure genuine participatory planning in the renewal of suburban neighborhoods.
The research was done as part of the project Reshaping living: New structure and new life for old suburbs (AsuMut), funded by the Ministry of Environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1566-4910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7772</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10901-023-10016-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Advisors ; Apartment buildings ; Apartments ; Balance of power ; Building design ; Case studies ; Co-design ; Designers ; Diversification ; Finland ; Geography ; Housing ; Human Geography ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; Neighborhoods ; Participation ; Participatory planning ; Polls & surveys ; Renewal ; Residential areas ; residential housing ; Residents ; Social Sciences ; Suburban areas ; Suburban development ; Suburbs ; Surveys ; Urban planning ; Usefulness ; Workshops</subject><ispartof>Journal of housing and the built environment, 2023-09, Vol.38 (3), p.1889-1905</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. corrected publication 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. corrected publication 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-bd332e438064ef1b9b0894912256bdbabe4fd114399a33448f1d6e149696eaeb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-bd332e438064ef1b9b0894912256bdbabe4fd114399a33448f1d6e149696eaeb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5127-558X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10901-023-10016-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10901-023-10016-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soikkeli, Anu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santamäki, Emmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hynninen, Oona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Äijälä, Saara</creatorcontrib><title>Challenges of participatory design in apartment buildings’ renovation projects in Finland</title><title>Journal of housing and the built environment</title><addtitle>J Hous and the Built Environ</addtitle><description>Participatory and user-centered design has taken inspiration from each other, and the classical roles of users, researchers, and designers have merged in the co-designing process. Participatory methods consider the balance of power between the designer and residents and the needs and usefulness of the research. Community members should be involved as partners, advisors, and participants.
In Finland, participatory design is law mandated in urban planning projects, but participation that goes beyond the initial publicization of information, is genuinely interactive, and spans all stages of the project is underutilised and the methods of participatory practice are still unfamiliar to many designers. The methods commonly used are the research survey and the workshop, often mentioned as participatory design methods. From the residents’ perspective, participation only becomes participatory when the participant gains the experience of influencing the development and its outcomes. The article examines resident surveys and workshops as tools to produce information and evaluate their interactivity in two case studies. It shows that the diversification of methods is necessary to ensure genuine participatory planning in the renewal of suburban neighborhoods.
The research was done as part of the project Reshaping living: New structure and new life for old suburbs (AsuMut), funded by the Ministry of Environment.</description><subject>Advisors</subject><subject>Apartment buildings</subject><subject>Apartments</subject><subject>Balance of power</subject><subject>Building design</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Co-design</subject><subject>Designers</subject><subject>Diversification</subject><subject>Finland</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Human Geography</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Participatory planning</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Renewal</subject><subject>Residential areas</subject><subject>residential housing</subject><subject>Residents</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Suburban areas</subject><subject>Suburban development</subject><subject>Suburbs</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><subject>Usefulness</subject><subject>Workshops</subject><issn>1566-4910</issn><issn>1573-7772</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KxDAURoMoOI6-gKuCGzfVJLdNmqUM_sGAG125CGl7O2bopDXpCLPzNXw9n8TUCoILVzeXnO_ycQg5ZfSCUSovA6OKspRySOPORMr3yIzlElIpJd8f30KkmWL0kByFsKaUM5DFjDwvXkzbolthSLom6Y0fbGV7M3R-l9QY7Mol1iVm_NigG5Jya9vaulX4fP9IPLruzQy2c0nvuzVWQxjpG-ta4-pjctCYNuDJz5yTp5vrx8Vduny4vV9cLdMKlBjSsgbgmEFBRYYNK1VJCxWrcp6Lsi5NiVlTM5aBUgYgy4qG1QJZpoQSaLCEOTmf7sYOr1sMg97YUGEbO2C3DRpYDpwWkOcRPfuDrrutd7Gd5kWuQEZGRopPVOW7EDw2uvd2Y_xOM6pH33ryraNv_e1b8xiCKRQiHH3639P_pL4ARqSEFg</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Soikkeli, Anu</creator><creator>Santamäki, Emmi</creator><creator>Hynninen, Oona</creator><creator>Äijälä, Saara</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5127-558X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Challenges of participatory design in apartment buildings’ renovation projects in Finland</title><author>Soikkeli, Anu ; Santamäki, Emmi ; Hynninen, Oona ; Äijälä, Saara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-bd332e438064ef1b9b0894912256bdbabe4fd114399a33448f1d6e149696eaeb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Advisors</topic><topic>Apartment buildings</topic><topic>Apartments</topic><topic>Balance of power</topic><topic>Building design</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Co-design</topic><topic>Designers</topic><topic>Diversification</topic><topic>Finland</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Human Geography</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Participatory planning</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Renewal</topic><topic>Residential areas</topic><topic>residential housing</topic><topic>Residents</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Suburban areas</topic><topic>Suburban development</topic><topic>Suburbs</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><topic>Usefulness</topic><topic>Workshops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soikkeli, Anu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santamäki, Emmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hynninen, Oona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Äijälä, Saara</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of housing and the built environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soikkeli, Anu</au><au>Santamäki, Emmi</au><au>Hynninen, Oona</au><au>Äijälä, Saara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Challenges of participatory design in apartment buildings’ renovation projects in Finland</atitle><jtitle>Journal of housing and the built environment</jtitle><stitle>J Hous and the Built Environ</stitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1889</spage><epage>1905</epage><pages>1889-1905</pages><issn>1566-4910</issn><eissn>1573-7772</eissn><abstract>Participatory and user-centered design has taken inspiration from each other, and the classical roles of users, researchers, and designers have merged in the co-designing process. Participatory methods consider the balance of power between the designer and residents and the needs and usefulness of the research. Community members should be involved as partners, advisors, and participants.
In Finland, participatory design is law mandated in urban planning projects, but participation that goes beyond the initial publicization of information, is genuinely interactive, and spans all stages of the project is underutilised and the methods of participatory practice are still unfamiliar to many designers. The methods commonly used are the research survey and the workshop, often mentioned as participatory design methods. From the residents’ perspective, participation only becomes participatory when the participant gains the experience of influencing the development and its outcomes. The article examines resident surveys and workshops as tools to produce information and evaluate their interactivity in two case studies. It shows that the diversification of methods is necessary to ensure genuine participatory planning in the renewal of suburban neighborhoods.
The research was done as part of the project Reshaping living: New structure and new life for old suburbs (AsuMut), funded by the Ministry of Environment.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10901-023-10016-2</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5127-558X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1566-4910 |
ispartof | Journal of housing and the built environment, 2023-09, Vol.38 (3), p.1889-1905 |
issn | 1566-4910 1573-7772 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153208355 |
source | PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Advisors Apartment buildings Apartments Balance of power Building design Case studies Co-design Designers Diversification Finland Geography Housing Human Geography Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning Neighborhoods Participation Participatory planning Polls & surveys Renewal Residential areas residential housing Residents Social Sciences Suburban areas Suburban development Suburbs Surveys Urban planning Usefulness Workshops |
title | Challenges of participatory design in apartment buildings’ renovation projects in Finland |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T23%3A47%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Challenges%20of%20participatory%20design%20in%20apartment%20buildings%E2%80%99%20renovation%20projects%20in%20Finland&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20housing%20and%20the%20built%20environment&rft.au=Soikkeli,%20Anu&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1889&rft.epage=1905&rft.pages=1889-1905&rft.issn=1566-4910&rft.eissn=1573-7772&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10901-023-10016-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153208355%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2859375537&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |