Optical efficiency of parabolic troughs with a secondary flat reflector; effects of non-ideal primary mirrors

Secondary flat receivers enhance concentration of parabolic trough collectors with cylindrical receivers. An increase of 70 % was possible for commercial primary mirrors while allowing the optical efficiency to be less sensitive to misalignments. Including the secondary flat reflector close to a par...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy (Oxford) 2024-02, Vol.288, p.129521, Article 129521
Hauptverfasser: Rodriguez-Sanchez, David, Rosengarten, Gary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 129521
container_title Energy (Oxford)
container_volume 288
creator Rodriguez-Sanchez, David
Rosengarten, Gary
description Secondary flat receivers enhance concentration of parabolic trough collectors with cylindrical receivers. An increase of 70 % was possible for commercial primary mirrors while allowing the optical efficiency to be less sensitive to misalignments. Including the secondary flat reflector close to a parabolic-trough receiver may, however, reduce the optical efficiency of the trough due to the shadow projected. In this work ray-tracing simulations were conducted to compare the optical efficiency and the misalignment sensitivity of the standard absorber and its secondary flat reflector variation. In some cases, the required dimensions for the secondary flat reflector would make it a non-realistic solution due to the impossibility of encapsulating it within a glass cover. To overcome this issue, a truncated version of the secondary mirror is proposed and evaluated. A truncated secondary flat reflector will decrease the deleterious effects of the shading, enhancing concentration further but changing the tolerance to misalignments of the troughs. Analysis of two benchmark primary mirrors shows a worst-case scenario of optical efficiency reductions less than 3.5 and 2 %, with concentration increases of 20 and 80 % respectively. The reduction on absorber size offsets the lower optical efficiency by the reduction of radiation losses, especially for high-temperature applications.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129521
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153195415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3153195415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-9c73b0f093569e8e5d39ae21a41ddb58f2e310d83c432af968c93541e07279253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkD1PwzAQhj2ARCn8AwaPLAn-iNNYTKgCilSpC8yW65xbV04cbFeo_55E6XQ3PO-ruwehJ0pKSmj9ciqhh3i4lIwwXlImBaM3aEF4TQpRVewO3ad0IoSIRsoF6nZDdkZ7DNY646A3FxwsHnTU--CdwTmG8-GY8J_LR6xxAhP6VscLtl5nHMF6MDnE16lg3NKU7kNfuBbG1iG6boI7F2OI6QHdWu0TPF7nEv18vH-vN8V29_m1ftsWhq1kLqRZ8T2xRHJRS2hAtFxqYFRXtG33orEMOCVtw03FmbaybsyIVhTIaswzwZfoee4dYvg9Q8qqc8mA97qHcE6KU8GpHBMTWs2oiSGl8R91vVlRoiaj6qRmo2oyqmaj_B9baG8P</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3153195415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optical efficiency of parabolic troughs with a secondary flat reflector; effects of non-ideal primary mirrors</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rodriguez-Sanchez, David ; Rosengarten, Gary</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Sanchez, David ; Rosengarten, Gary</creatorcontrib><description>Secondary flat receivers enhance concentration of parabolic trough collectors with cylindrical receivers. An increase of 70 % was possible for commercial primary mirrors while allowing the optical efficiency to be less sensitive to misalignments. Including the secondary flat reflector close to a parabolic-trough receiver may, however, reduce the optical efficiency of the trough due to the shadow projected. In this work ray-tracing simulations were conducted to compare the optical efficiency and the misalignment sensitivity of the standard absorber and its secondary flat reflector variation. In some cases, the required dimensions for the secondary flat reflector would make it a non-realistic solution due to the impossibility of encapsulating it within a glass cover. To overcome this issue, a truncated version of the secondary mirror is proposed and evaluated. A truncated secondary flat reflector will decrease the deleterious effects of the shading, enhancing concentration further but changing the tolerance to misalignments of the troughs. Analysis of two benchmark primary mirrors shows a worst-case scenario of optical efficiency reductions less than 3.5 and 2 %, with concentration increases of 20 and 80 % respectively. The reduction on absorber size offsets the lower optical efficiency by the reduction of radiation losses, especially for high-temperature applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-5442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129521</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>energy ; glass ; solar collectors</subject><ispartof>Energy (Oxford), 2024-02, Vol.288, p.129521, Article 129521</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-9c73b0f093569e8e5d39ae21a41ddb58f2e310d83c432af968c93541e07279253</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1216-7794</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Sanchez, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosengarten, Gary</creatorcontrib><title>Optical efficiency of parabolic troughs with a secondary flat reflector; effects of non-ideal primary mirrors</title><title>Energy (Oxford)</title><description>Secondary flat receivers enhance concentration of parabolic trough collectors with cylindrical receivers. An increase of 70 % was possible for commercial primary mirrors while allowing the optical efficiency to be less sensitive to misalignments. Including the secondary flat reflector close to a parabolic-trough receiver may, however, reduce the optical efficiency of the trough due to the shadow projected. In this work ray-tracing simulations were conducted to compare the optical efficiency and the misalignment sensitivity of the standard absorber and its secondary flat reflector variation. In some cases, the required dimensions for the secondary flat reflector would make it a non-realistic solution due to the impossibility of encapsulating it within a glass cover. To overcome this issue, a truncated version of the secondary mirror is proposed and evaluated. A truncated secondary flat reflector will decrease the deleterious effects of the shading, enhancing concentration further but changing the tolerance to misalignments of the troughs. Analysis of two benchmark primary mirrors shows a worst-case scenario of optical efficiency reductions less than 3.5 and 2 %, with concentration increases of 20 and 80 % respectively. The reduction on absorber size offsets the lower optical efficiency by the reduction of radiation losses, especially for high-temperature applications.</description><subject>energy</subject><subject>glass</subject><subject>solar collectors</subject><issn>0360-5442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkD1PwzAQhj2ARCn8AwaPLAn-iNNYTKgCilSpC8yW65xbV04cbFeo_55E6XQ3PO-ruwehJ0pKSmj9ciqhh3i4lIwwXlImBaM3aEF4TQpRVewO3ad0IoSIRsoF6nZDdkZ7DNY646A3FxwsHnTU--CdwTmG8-GY8J_LR6xxAhP6VscLtl5nHMF6MDnE16lg3NKU7kNfuBbG1iG6boI7F2OI6QHdWu0TPF7nEv18vH-vN8V29_m1ftsWhq1kLqRZ8T2xRHJRS2hAtFxqYFRXtG33orEMOCVtw03FmbaybsyIVhTIaswzwZfoee4dYvg9Q8qqc8mA97qHcE6KU8GpHBMTWs2oiSGl8R91vVlRoiaj6qRmo2oyqmaj_B9baG8P</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Rodriguez-Sanchez, David</creator><creator>Rosengarten, Gary</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1216-7794</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Optical efficiency of parabolic troughs with a secondary flat reflector; effects of non-ideal primary mirrors</title><author>Rodriguez-Sanchez, David ; Rosengarten, Gary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-9c73b0f093569e8e5d39ae21a41ddb58f2e310d83c432af968c93541e07279253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>energy</topic><topic>glass</topic><topic>solar collectors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Sanchez, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosengarten, Gary</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodriguez-Sanchez, David</au><au>Rosengarten, Gary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optical efficiency of parabolic troughs with a secondary flat reflector; effects of non-ideal primary mirrors</atitle><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>288</volume><spage>129521</spage><pages>129521-</pages><artnum>129521</artnum><issn>0360-5442</issn><abstract>Secondary flat receivers enhance concentration of parabolic trough collectors with cylindrical receivers. An increase of 70 % was possible for commercial primary mirrors while allowing the optical efficiency to be less sensitive to misalignments. Including the secondary flat reflector close to a parabolic-trough receiver may, however, reduce the optical efficiency of the trough due to the shadow projected. In this work ray-tracing simulations were conducted to compare the optical efficiency and the misalignment sensitivity of the standard absorber and its secondary flat reflector variation. In some cases, the required dimensions for the secondary flat reflector would make it a non-realistic solution due to the impossibility of encapsulating it within a glass cover. To overcome this issue, a truncated version of the secondary mirror is proposed and evaluated. A truncated secondary flat reflector will decrease the deleterious effects of the shading, enhancing concentration further but changing the tolerance to misalignments of the troughs. Analysis of two benchmark primary mirrors shows a worst-case scenario of optical efficiency reductions less than 3.5 and 2 %, with concentration increases of 20 and 80 % respectively. The reduction on absorber size offsets the lower optical efficiency by the reduction of radiation losses, especially for high-temperature applications.</abstract><doi>10.1016/j.energy.2023.129521</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1216-7794</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-5442
ispartof Energy (Oxford), 2024-02, Vol.288, p.129521, Article 129521
issn 0360-5442
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153195415
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects energy
glass
solar collectors
title Optical efficiency of parabolic troughs with a secondary flat reflector; effects of non-ideal primary mirrors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T00%3A00%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optical%20efficiency%20of%20parabolic%20troughs%20with%20a%20secondary%20flat%20reflector;%20effects%20of%20non-ideal%20primary%20mirrors&rft.jtitle=Energy%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Rodriguez-Sanchez,%20David&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=288&rft.spage=129521&rft.pages=129521-&rft.artnum=129521&rft.issn=0360-5442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129521&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153195415%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3153195415&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true