A multi-objective planning method for multi-energy complementary distributed energy system: Tackling thermal integration and process synergy
This study proposes a multi-objective optimization methodology for planning multi-energy complementary distributed energy systems considering process synergy and thermal integration. The process integration technique is integrated into the Energy Hub model to deal with the multi-process synergy and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cleaner production 2023-03, Vol.390, p.135905, Article 135905 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 135905 |
container_title | Journal of cleaner production |
container_volume | 390 |
creator | Li, Chengzhou Wang, Ligang Zhang, Yumeng Yu, Hangyu Wang, Zhuo Li, Liang Wang, Ningling Yang, Zhiping Maréchal, François Yang, Yongping |
description | This study proposes a multi-objective optimization methodology for planning multi-energy complementary distributed energy systems considering process synergy and thermal integration. The process integration technique is integrated into the Energy Hub model to deal with the multi-process synergy and temporal source-load matching. The system design and dispatch strategy are optimized by an augmented ε-constraint method with three objectives (economics, carbon emission, and fossil fuel consumption), and then the optimal tradeoff solution is identified by the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution. Moreover, a novel multi-energy complementary distributed energy system is developed, which includes comprehensive utilization of solar energy (photovoltaic, photothermal, and thermochemical) and middle-low temperature heat utilization technologies, as well as hybrid energy storage technologies. Finally, a case study located in Beijing is selected as an illustrated example. The obtained single-objective optimization solutions and Pareto optimal solutions are further analyzed and compared in terms of system configuration, hourly/yearly energy balance, and thermal integration condition. The results show that the multi-energy complementary distributed energy system presents an economic benefit (reducing 25% of the annual total cost) compared to a gas turbine-based integrated energy system. Considering thermal integration contributes to 5.13% of the cost reduction. The configuration of the energy storage devices will reduce 18% energy supply cost, 9% fossil fuel consumption, and 42% carbon emission with the storage devices' boundary increase from 2 MWh to 60 MWh. Moreover, the optimal design of the system provides a reference for decision-making and a basis for flexible operation. The annual total cost, carbon emission, and fossil fuel consumption of the optimal solution in the Pareto frontier are 8.19 million CNY, 2.91 kt CO2-eq./year, and 18.4 GWh, respectively.
[Display omitted] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135905 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153151790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S095965262300063X</els_id><sourcerecordid>3153151790</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-17a0946c5b2a48885b064f97c65c90fe386e30f4208c87f96ce0a8b40fb290003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFr3DAQhUVoINukPyGgYy_ejGxLlnopITRpIJBLchayPN7IsaWtpA3sf8iPrra798LAXN57M-8j5JrBmgETN9N6sjNuY1jXUDdr1nAF_IysmOxUxTopvpAVKK4qwWtxQb6mNAGwDrp2RT5v6bKbs6tCP6HN7gPpdjbeO7-hC-a3MNAxxJMGPcbNntqwbGdc0GcT93RwKUfX7zIO9CRI-5Rx-UFfjH2fD0n5DeNiZup8xk002QVPjR9o-dliSsXwz3hFzkczJ_x22pfk9f7Xy93v6un54fHu9qmyTVvnUsmAaoXlfW1aKSXvQbSj6qzgVsGIjRTYwNjWIK3sRiUsgpF9C2NfKwBoLsn3Y265_2eHKevFJYtzKY5hl3TDeBnWqYOUH6U2hpQijnob3VJ6awb6QF9P-kRfH-jrI_3i-3n0Yenx4TDqZB16i4OLhbMegvtPwl_E3pQi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3153151790</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A multi-objective planning method for multi-energy complementary distributed energy system: Tackling thermal integration and process synergy</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Li, Chengzhou ; Wang, Ligang ; Zhang, Yumeng ; Yu, Hangyu ; Wang, Zhuo ; Li, Liang ; Wang, Ningling ; Yang, Zhiping ; Maréchal, François ; Yang, Yongping</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Chengzhou ; Wang, Ligang ; Zhang, Yumeng ; Yu, Hangyu ; Wang, Zhuo ; Li, Liang ; Wang, Ningling ; Yang, Zhiping ; Maréchal, François ; Yang, Yongping</creatorcontrib><description>This study proposes a multi-objective optimization methodology for planning multi-energy complementary distributed energy systems considering process synergy and thermal integration. The process integration technique is integrated into the Energy Hub model to deal with the multi-process synergy and temporal source-load matching. The system design and dispatch strategy are optimized by an augmented ε-constraint method with three objectives (economics, carbon emission, and fossil fuel consumption), and then the optimal tradeoff solution is identified by the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution. Moreover, a novel multi-energy complementary distributed energy system is developed, which includes comprehensive utilization of solar energy (photovoltaic, photothermal, and thermochemical) and middle-low temperature heat utilization technologies, as well as hybrid energy storage technologies. Finally, a case study located in Beijing is selected as an illustrated example. The obtained single-objective optimization solutions and Pareto optimal solutions are further analyzed and compared in terms of system configuration, hourly/yearly energy balance, and thermal integration condition. The results show that the multi-energy complementary distributed energy system presents an economic benefit (reducing 25% of the annual total cost) compared to a gas turbine-based integrated energy system. Considering thermal integration contributes to 5.13% of the cost reduction. The configuration of the energy storage devices will reduce 18% energy supply cost, 9% fossil fuel consumption, and 42% carbon emission with the storage devices' boundary increase from 2 MWh to 60 MWh. Moreover, the optimal design of the system provides a reference for decision-making and a basis for flexible operation. The annual total cost, carbon emission, and fossil fuel consumption of the optimal solution in the Pareto frontier are 8.19 million CNY, 2.91 kt CO2-eq./year, and 18.4 GWh, respectively.
[Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-6526</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>carbon ; case studies ; China ; cost effectiveness ; decision making ; Distributed energy system ; energy balance ; Energy hub ; Energy planning ; energy use and consumption ; financial economics ; fossil fuels ; heat ; Multi-energy complementary ; Multi-objective optimization ; Process integration ; solar energy ; systems engineering ; temperature</subject><ispartof>Journal of cleaner production, 2023-03, Vol.390, p.135905, Article 135905</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-17a0946c5b2a48885b064f97c65c90fe386e30f4208c87f96ce0a8b40fb290003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-17a0946c5b2a48885b064f97c65c90fe386e30f4208c87f96ce0a8b40fb290003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095965262300063X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Chengzhou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ligang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yumeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Hangyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ningling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maréchal, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yongping</creatorcontrib><title>A multi-objective planning method for multi-energy complementary distributed energy system: Tackling thermal integration and process synergy</title><title>Journal of cleaner production</title><description>This study proposes a multi-objective optimization methodology for planning multi-energy complementary distributed energy systems considering process synergy and thermal integration. The process integration technique is integrated into the Energy Hub model to deal with the multi-process synergy and temporal source-load matching. The system design and dispatch strategy are optimized by an augmented ε-constraint method with three objectives (economics, carbon emission, and fossil fuel consumption), and then the optimal tradeoff solution is identified by the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution. Moreover, a novel multi-energy complementary distributed energy system is developed, which includes comprehensive utilization of solar energy (photovoltaic, photothermal, and thermochemical) and middle-low temperature heat utilization technologies, as well as hybrid energy storage technologies. Finally, a case study located in Beijing is selected as an illustrated example. The obtained single-objective optimization solutions and Pareto optimal solutions are further analyzed and compared in terms of system configuration, hourly/yearly energy balance, and thermal integration condition. The results show that the multi-energy complementary distributed energy system presents an economic benefit (reducing 25% of the annual total cost) compared to a gas turbine-based integrated energy system. Considering thermal integration contributes to 5.13% of the cost reduction. The configuration of the energy storage devices will reduce 18% energy supply cost, 9% fossil fuel consumption, and 42% carbon emission with the storage devices' boundary increase from 2 MWh to 60 MWh. Moreover, the optimal design of the system provides a reference for decision-making and a basis for flexible operation. The annual total cost, carbon emission, and fossil fuel consumption of the optimal solution in the Pareto frontier are 8.19 million CNY, 2.91 kt CO2-eq./year, and 18.4 GWh, respectively.
[Display omitted]</description><subject>carbon</subject><subject>case studies</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>cost effectiveness</subject><subject>decision making</subject><subject>Distributed energy system</subject><subject>energy balance</subject><subject>Energy hub</subject><subject>Energy planning</subject><subject>energy use and consumption</subject><subject>financial economics</subject><subject>fossil fuels</subject><subject>heat</subject><subject>Multi-energy complementary</subject><subject>Multi-objective optimization</subject><subject>Process integration</subject><subject>solar energy</subject><subject>systems engineering</subject><subject>temperature</subject><issn>0959-6526</issn><issn>1879-1786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFr3DAQhUVoINukPyGgYy_ejGxLlnopITRpIJBLchayPN7IsaWtpA3sf8iPrra798LAXN57M-8j5JrBmgETN9N6sjNuY1jXUDdr1nAF_IysmOxUxTopvpAVKK4qwWtxQb6mNAGwDrp2RT5v6bKbs6tCP6HN7gPpdjbeO7-hC-a3MNAxxJMGPcbNntqwbGdc0GcT93RwKUfX7zIO9CRI-5Rx-UFfjH2fD0n5DeNiZup8xk002QVPjR9o-dliSsXwz3hFzkczJ_x22pfk9f7Xy93v6un54fHu9qmyTVvnUsmAaoXlfW1aKSXvQbSj6qzgVsGIjRTYwNjWIK3sRiUsgpF9C2NfKwBoLsn3Y265_2eHKevFJYtzKY5hl3TDeBnWqYOUH6U2hpQijnob3VJ6awb6QF9P-kRfH-jrI_3i-3n0Yenx4TDqZB16i4OLhbMegvtPwl_E3pQi</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Li, Chengzhou</creator><creator>Wang, Ligang</creator><creator>Zhang, Yumeng</creator><creator>Yu, Hangyu</creator><creator>Wang, Zhuo</creator><creator>Li, Liang</creator><creator>Wang, Ningling</creator><creator>Yang, Zhiping</creator><creator>Maréchal, François</creator><creator>Yang, Yongping</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>A multi-objective planning method for multi-energy complementary distributed energy system: Tackling thermal integration and process synergy</title><author>Li, Chengzhou ; Wang, Ligang ; Zhang, Yumeng ; Yu, Hangyu ; Wang, Zhuo ; Li, Liang ; Wang, Ningling ; Yang, Zhiping ; Maréchal, François ; Yang, Yongping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-17a0946c5b2a48885b064f97c65c90fe386e30f4208c87f96ce0a8b40fb290003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>carbon</topic><topic>case studies</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>cost effectiveness</topic><topic>decision making</topic><topic>Distributed energy system</topic><topic>energy balance</topic><topic>Energy hub</topic><topic>Energy planning</topic><topic>energy use and consumption</topic><topic>financial economics</topic><topic>fossil fuels</topic><topic>heat</topic><topic>Multi-energy complementary</topic><topic>Multi-objective optimization</topic><topic>Process integration</topic><topic>solar energy</topic><topic>systems engineering</topic><topic>temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Chengzhou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ligang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yumeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Hangyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ningling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maréchal, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yongping</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Chengzhou</au><au>Wang, Ligang</au><au>Zhang, Yumeng</au><au>Yu, Hangyu</au><au>Wang, Zhuo</au><au>Li, Liang</au><au>Wang, Ningling</au><au>Yang, Zhiping</au><au>Maréchal, François</au><au>Yang, Yongping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A multi-objective planning method for multi-energy complementary distributed energy system: Tackling thermal integration and process synergy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>390</volume><spage>135905</spage><pages>135905-</pages><artnum>135905</artnum><issn>0959-6526</issn><eissn>1879-1786</eissn><abstract>This study proposes a multi-objective optimization methodology for planning multi-energy complementary distributed energy systems considering process synergy and thermal integration. The process integration technique is integrated into the Energy Hub model to deal with the multi-process synergy and temporal source-load matching. The system design and dispatch strategy are optimized by an augmented ε-constraint method with three objectives (economics, carbon emission, and fossil fuel consumption), and then the optimal tradeoff solution is identified by the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution. Moreover, a novel multi-energy complementary distributed energy system is developed, which includes comprehensive utilization of solar energy (photovoltaic, photothermal, and thermochemical) and middle-low temperature heat utilization technologies, as well as hybrid energy storage technologies. Finally, a case study located in Beijing is selected as an illustrated example. The obtained single-objective optimization solutions and Pareto optimal solutions are further analyzed and compared in terms of system configuration, hourly/yearly energy balance, and thermal integration condition. The results show that the multi-energy complementary distributed energy system presents an economic benefit (reducing 25% of the annual total cost) compared to a gas turbine-based integrated energy system. Considering thermal integration contributes to 5.13% of the cost reduction. The configuration of the energy storage devices will reduce 18% energy supply cost, 9% fossil fuel consumption, and 42% carbon emission with the storage devices' boundary increase from 2 MWh to 60 MWh. Moreover, the optimal design of the system provides a reference for decision-making and a basis for flexible operation. The annual total cost, carbon emission, and fossil fuel consumption of the optimal solution in the Pareto frontier are 8.19 million CNY, 2.91 kt CO2-eq./year, and 18.4 GWh, respectively.
[Display omitted]</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135905</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-6526 |
ispartof | Journal of cleaner production, 2023-03, Vol.390, p.135905, Article 135905 |
issn | 0959-6526 1879-1786 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153151790 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | carbon case studies China cost effectiveness decision making Distributed energy system energy balance Energy hub Energy planning energy use and consumption financial economics fossil fuels heat Multi-energy complementary Multi-objective optimization Process integration solar energy systems engineering temperature |
title | A multi-objective planning method for multi-energy complementary distributed energy system: Tackling thermal integration and process synergy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T18%3A20%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20multi-objective%20planning%20method%20for%20multi-energy%20complementary%20distributed%20energy%20system:%20Tackling%20thermal%20integration%20and%20process%20synergy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cleaner%20production&rft.au=Li,%20Chengzhou&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=390&rft.spage=135905&rft.pages=135905-&rft.artnum=135905&rft.issn=0959-6526&rft.eissn=1879-1786&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135905&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153151790%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3153151790&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S095965262300063X&rfr_iscdi=true |