Length of hospital stay not affected by empirical treatment with ceftriaxone versus cefuroxime for bacteraemia
The preferred antibiotic treatment for bacteraemia in infants continues to be debated. We examined the duration of hospital stays as a surrogate for the effectiveness of initial treatment with ceftriaxone versus cefuroxime. This was a retrospective review of the medical records of all infants aged 3...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta Paediatrica 2025-01 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Acta Paediatrica |
container_volume | |
creator | Hetzroni, Aviya Yosef, Plia Gillis Hedar, Muna Ishay, Rotem Tal-Ben Sharon, Nechama Rubinstein, Uri |
description | The preferred antibiotic treatment for bacteraemia in infants continues to be debated. We examined the duration of hospital stays as a surrogate for the effectiveness of initial treatment with ceftriaxone versus cefuroxime.
This was a retrospective review of the medical records of all infants aged 3-36 months, admitted with suspected occult bacteraemia to the paediatric department at Laniado Hospital, Israel, between 2016 and 2022. The effect of antibiotic treatment, namely ceftriaxone versus cefuroxime, on hospital stays was determined, in both the total study population and population subgroups.
We identified 217 patients (59.0% male) with a median age of 13 months and 12.4% had positive blood cultures. Approximately three-quarters (75.6%) received cefuroxime as their initial treatment for bacteraemia and the other quarter (24.4%) received ceftriaxone. The median length of hospital stay was 3.0 (interquartile range 3.0-4.0), with no statistically significant difference between the two drugs. However, we did notice a statistically significant shorter median length of hospital stay among fully vaccinated infants treated with cefuroxime rather than ceftriaxone (p = 0.055).
The length of hospital stay among infants diagnosed with bacteraemia was not affected by whether they initially received ceftriaxone or cefuroxime. Further studies in larger populations are needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/apa.17572 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3151584333</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3151584333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c175t-1f6e9943b7bcbfb351527906a34802962b9e37dd3be6de64ba88c7d7f2792d523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AeQl7BI8SOJkyWqeEmV2MA6sp0xNWriYDvQ_j0uLcxmpJkzV5qD0CUlc5rqVg5yTkUh2BGa0rKgGWNMHKMpqQjPClbwCToL4YMQxuu8PEUTXosiz4mYon4J_XtcYWfwyoXBRrnGIcot7l3E0hjQEVqsthi6wXqr0zp6kLGDPuJvmy41mOit3Lge8Bf4MIbdaPRuYzvAxnmsZArxEjorz9GJkesAF4c-Q28P96-Lp2z58vi8uFtmOv0RM2pKqOucK6G0MooXtGCiJqXkeUVYXTJVAxdtyxWULZS5klWlRStMolhbMD5D1_vcwbvPEUJsOhs0rNeyBzeGhtMUWeU81Qzd7FHtXQgeTDN420m_bShpdnqbpLf51ZvYq0PsqDpo_8k_n_wHR8d3TQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3151584333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Length of hospital stay not affected by empirical treatment with ceftriaxone versus cefuroxime for bacteraemia</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hetzroni, Aviya ; Yosef, Plia Gillis ; Hedar, Muna ; Ishay, Rotem Tal-Ben ; Sharon, Nechama ; Rubinstein, Uri</creator><creatorcontrib>Hetzroni, Aviya ; Yosef, Plia Gillis ; Hedar, Muna ; Ishay, Rotem Tal-Ben ; Sharon, Nechama ; Rubinstein, Uri</creatorcontrib><description>The preferred antibiotic treatment for bacteraemia in infants continues to be debated. We examined the duration of hospital stays as a surrogate for the effectiveness of initial treatment with ceftriaxone versus cefuroxime.
This was a retrospective review of the medical records of all infants aged 3-36 months, admitted with suspected occult bacteraemia to the paediatric department at Laniado Hospital, Israel, between 2016 and 2022. The effect of antibiotic treatment, namely ceftriaxone versus cefuroxime, on hospital stays was determined, in both the total study population and population subgroups.
We identified 217 patients (59.0% male) with a median age of 13 months and 12.4% had positive blood cultures. Approximately three-quarters (75.6%) received cefuroxime as their initial treatment for bacteraemia and the other quarter (24.4%) received ceftriaxone. The median length of hospital stay was 3.0 (interquartile range 3.0-4.0), with no statistically significant difference between the two drugs. However, we did notice a statistically significant shorter median length of hospital stay among fully vaccinated infants treated with cefuroxime rather than ceftriaxone (p = 0.055).
The length of hospital stay among infants diagnosed with bacteraemia was not affected by whether they initially received ceftriaxone or cefuroxime. Further studies in larger populations are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0803-5253</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1651-2227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1651-2227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/apa.17572</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39754407</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Norway</publisher><ispartof>Acta Paediatrica, 2025-01</ispartof><rights>2025 Foundation Acta Pædiatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c175t-1f6e9943b7bcbfb351527906a34802962b9e37dd3be6de64ba88c7d7f2792d523</cites><orcidid>0009-0008-6690-6274 ; 0000-0002-7241-5809</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39754407$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hetzroni, Aviya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yosef, Plia Gillis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hedar, Muna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishay, Rotem Tal-Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharon, Nechama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubinstein, Uri</creatorcontrib><title>Length of hospital stay not affected by empirical treatment with ceftriaxone versus cefuroxime for bacteraemia</title><title>Acta Paediatrica</title><addtitle>Acta Paediatr</addtitle><description>The preferred antibiotic treatment for bacteraemia in infants continues to be debated. We examined the duration of hospital stays as a surrogate for the effectiveness of initial treatment with ceftriaxone versus cefuroxime.
This was a retrospective review of the medical records of all infants aged 3-36 months, admitted with suspected occult bacteraemia to the paediatric department at Laniado Hospital, Israel, between 2016 and 2022. The effect of antibiotic treatment, namely ceftriaxone versus cefuroxime, on hospital stays was determined, in both the total study population and population subgroups.
We identified 217 patients (59.0% male) with a median age of 13 months and 12.4% had positive blood cultures. Approximately three-quarters (75.6%) received cefuroxime as their initial treatment for bacteraemia and the other quarter (24.4%) received ceftriaxone. The median length of hospital stay was 3.0 (interquartile range 3.0-4.0), with no statistically significant difference between the two drugs. However, we did notice a statistically significant shorter median length of hospital stay among fully vaccinated infants treated with cefuroxime rather than ceftriaxone (p = 0.055).
The length of hospital stay among infants diagnosed with bacteraemia was not affected by whether they initially received ceftriaxone or cefuroxime. Further studies in larger populations are needed.</description><issn>0803-5253</issn><issn>1651-2227</issn><issn>1651-2227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AeQl7BI8SOJkyWqeEmV2MA6sp0xNWriYDvQ_j0uLcxmpJkzV5qD0CUlc5rqVg5yTkUh2BGa0rKgGWNMHKMpqQjPClbwCToL4YMQxuu8PEUTXosiz4mYon4J_XtcYWfwyoXBRrnGIcot7l3E0hjQEVqsthi6wXqr0zp6kLGDPuJvmy41mOit3Lge8Bf4MIbdaPRuYzvAxnmsZArxEjorz9GJkesAF4c-Q28P96-Lp2z58vi8uFtmOv0RM2pKqOucK6G0MooXtGCiJqXkeUVYXTJVAxdtyxWULZS5klWlRStMolhbMD5D1_vcwbvPEUJsOhs0rNeyBzeGhtMUWeU81Qzd7FHtXQgeTDN420m_bShpdnqbpLf51ZvYq0PsqDpo_8k_n_wHR8d3TQ</recordid><startdate>20250104</startdate><enddate>20250104</enddate><creator>Hetzroni, Aviya</creator><creator>Yosef, Plia Gillis</creator><creator>Hedar, Muna</creator><creator>Ishay, Rotem Tal-Ben</creator><creator>Sharon, Nechama</creator><creator>Rubinstein, Uri</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6690-6274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7241-5809</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250104</creationdate><title>Length of hospital stay not affected by empirical treatment with ceftriaxone versus cefuroxime for bacteraemia</title><author>Hetzroni, Aviya ; Yosef, Plia Gillis ; Hedar, Muna ; Ishay, Rotem Tal-Ben ; Sharon, Nechama ; Rubinstein, Uri</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c175t-1f6e9943b7bcbfb351527906a34802962b9e37dd3be6de64ba88c7d7f2792d523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hetzroni, Aviya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yosef, Plia Gillis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hedar, Muna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishay, Rotem Tal-Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharon, Nechama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubinstein, Uri</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta Paediatrica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hetzroni, Aviya</au><au>Yosef, Plia Gillis</au><au>Hedar, Muna</au><au>Ishay, Rotem Tal-Ben</au><au>Sharon, Nechama</au><au>Rubinstein, Uri</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Length of hospital stay not affected by empirical treatment with ceftriaxone versus cefuroxime for bacteraemia</atitle><jtitle>Acta Paediatrica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Paediatr</addtitle><date>2025-01-04</date><risdate>2025</risdate><issn>0803-5253</issn><issn>1651-2227</issn><eissn>1651-2227</eissn><abstract>The preferred antibiotic treatment for bacteraemia in infants continues to be debated. We examined the duration of hospital stays as a surrogate for the effectiveness of initial treatment with ceftriaxone versus cefuroxime.
This was a retrospective review of the medical records of all infants aged 3-36 months, admitted with suspected occult bacteraemia to the paediatric department at Laniado Hospital, Israel, between 2016 and 2022. The effect of antibiotic treatment, namely ceftriaxone versus cefuroxime, on hospital stays was determined, in both the total study population and population subgroups.
We identified 217 patients (59.0% male) with a median age of 13 months and 12.4% had positive blood cultures. Approximately three-quarters (75.6%) received cefuroxime as their initial treatment for bacteraemia and the other quarter (24.4%) received ceftriaxone. The median length of hospital stay was 3.0 (interquartile range 3.0-4.0), with no statistically significant difference between the two drugs. However, we did notice a statistically significant shorter median length of hospital stay among fully vaccinated infants treated with cefuroxime rather than ceftriaxone (p = 0.055).
The length of hospital stay among infants diagnosed with bacteraemia was not affected by whether they initially received ceftriaxone or cefuroxime. Further studies in larger populations are needed.</abstract><cop>Norway</cop><pmid>39754407</pmid><doi>10.1111/apa.17572</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6690-6274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7241-5809</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0803-5253 |
ispartof | Acta Paediatrica, 2025-01 |
issn | 0803-5253 1651-2227 1651-2227 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3151584333 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Open Access; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Length of hospital stay not affected by empirical treatment with ceftriaxone versus cefuroxime for bacteraemia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T13%3A48%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Length%20of%20hospital%20stay%20not%20affected%20by%20empirical%20treatment%20with%20ceftriaxone%20versus%20cefuroxime%20for%20bacteraemia&rft.jtitle=Acta%20Paediatrica&rft.au=Hetzroni,%20Aviya&rft.date=2025-01-04&rft.issn=0803-5253&rft.eissn=1651-2227&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/apa.17572&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3151584333%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3151584333&rft_id=info:pmid/39754407&rfr_iscdi=true |