Comparing auditory and visual aspects of multisensory working memory using bimodally matched feature patterns
Working memory (WM) reflects the transient maintenance of information in the absence of external input, which can be attained via multiple senses separately or simultaneously. Pertaining to WM, the prevailing literature suggests the dominance of vision over other sensory systems. However, this imbal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental brain research 2025-01, Vol.243 (1), p.38, Article 38 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 38 |
container_title | Experimental brain research |
container_volume | 243 |
creator | Uluç, Işıl Turpin, Tori Kotlarz, Parker Lankinen, Kaisu Mamashli, Fahimeh Ahveninen, Jyrki |
description | Working memory (WM) reflects the transient maintenance of information in the absence of external input, which can be attained via multiple senses separately or simultaneously. Pertaining to WM, the prevailing literature suggests the dominance of vision over other sensory systems. However, this imbalance may be stemming from challenges in finding comparable stimuli across modalities. Here, we addressed this problem by using a balanced multisensory retro-cue WM design, which employed combinations of auditory (ripple sounds) and visuospatial (Gabor patches) patterns, adjusted relative to each participant’s discrimination ability. In three separate experiments, the participant was asked to determine whether the (retro-cued) auditory and/or visual items maintained in WM matched or mismatched the subsequent probe stimulus. In Experiment 1, all stimuli were audiovisual, and the probes were either fully mismatching, only partially mismatching, or fully matching the memorized item. Experiment 2 was otherwise the same as Experiment 1, but the probes were unimodal. In Experiment 3, the participant was cued to maintain only the auditory or visual aspect of an audiovisual item pair. In Experiments 1 and 3, the participant’s matching performance was significantly more accurate for the auditory than visual attributes of probes. When the perceptual and task demands are bimodally equated, auditory attributes can be matched to multisensory items in WM at least as accurately as, if not more precisely than, their visual counterparts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00221-024-06991-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3150520971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3150436815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-c02b48d7dd3eb44272cd874525604cf4938874106dbc426fd947d14036f34b3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuPFSEQhYnRONfRP-DCkLhx01o8-sHS3PiYZBI3uiY00Npj07QUaO6_l547ajILV-SE75yCOoQ8Z_CaAfRvEIBz1gCXDXRKsUY9IAcmBW8Yg-4hOQAw2ciBqQvyBPFml6KHx-RCqF4MreoOJBxj2Eya16_UFDfnmE7UrI7-nLGYhRrcvM1I40RDWfKMfsUd-RXT990TfNhlwV2Mc4jOLMuJBpPtN-_o5E0uydPN5OzTik_Jo8ks6J_dnZfky_t3n48fm-tPH66Ob68by9suNxb4KAfXOyf8KCXvuXVDL9t6CdJOUomhyvpHN1rJu8kp2TsmQXSTkKOYxCV5dc7dUvxRPGYdZrR-WczqY0EtWAstB9Wzir68h97Ektb6ultKim5gbaX4mbIpIiY_6S3NwaSTZqD3MvS5DF3L0LdlaFVNL-6iyxi8-2v5s_0KiDOA296AT_9m_yf2N8Vvlbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3150436815</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing auditory and visual aspects of multisensory working memory using bimodally matched feature patterns</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Uluç, Işıl ; Turpin, Tori ; Kotlarz, Parker ; Lankinen, Kaisu ; Mamashli, Fahimeh ; Ahveninen, Jyrki</creator><creatorcontrib>Uluç, Işıl ; Turpin, Tori ; Kotlarz, Parker ; Lankinen, Kaisu ; Mamashli, Fahimeh ; Ahveninen, Jyrki</creatorcontrib><description>Working memory (WM) reflects the transient maintenance of information in the absence of external input, which can be attained via multiple senses separately or simultaneously. Pertaining to WM, the prevailing literature suggests the dominance of vision over other sensory systems. However, this imbalance may be stemming from challenges in finding comparable stimuli across modalities. Here, we addressed this problem by using a balanced multisensory retro-cue WM design, which employed combinations of auditory (ripple sounds) and visuospatial (Gabor patches) patterns, adjusted relative to each participant’s discrimination ability. In three separate experiments, the participant was asked to determine whether the (retro-cued) auditory and/or visual items maintained in WM matched or mismatched the subsequent probe stimulus. In Experiment 1, all stimuli were audiovisual, and the probes were either fully mismatching, only partially mismatching, or fully matching the memorized item. Experiment 2 was otherwise the same as Experiment 1, but the probes were unimodal. In Experiment 3, the participant was cued to maintain only the auditory or visual aspect of an audiovisual item pair. In Experiments 1 and 3, the participant’s matching performance was significantly more accurate for the auditory than visual attributes of probes. When the perceptual and task demands are bimodally equated, auditory attributes can be matched to multisensory items in WM at least as accurately as, if not more precisely than, their visual counterparts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4819</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06991-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39738596</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Auditory discrimination ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cues ; Experiments ; Female ; Hearing ; Humans ; Male ; Memory ; Memory, Short-Term - physiology ; Neurology ; Neurosciences ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Probes ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Research Article ; Sensory integration ; Sensory systems ; Visual discrimination ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Visual stimuli ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Experimental brain research, 2025-01, Vol.243 (1), p.38, Article 38</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024 Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Jan 2025</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-c02b48d7dd3eb44272cd874525604cf4938874106dbc426fd947d14036f34b3f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00221-024-06991-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00221-024-06991-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39738596$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uluç, Işıl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turpin, Tori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotlarz, Parker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lankinen, Kaisu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamashli, Fahimeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahveninen, Jyrki</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing auditory and visual aspects of multisensory working memory using bimodally matched feature patterns</title><title>Experimental brain research</title><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><description>Working memory (WM) reflects the transient maintenance of information in the absence of external input, which can be attained via multiple senses separately or simultaneously. Pertaining to WM, the prevailing literature suggests the dominance of vision over other sensory systems. However, this imbalance may be stemming from challenges in finding comparable stimuli across modalities. Here, we addressed this problem by using a balanced multisensory retro-cue WM design, which employed combinations of auditory (ripple sounds) and visuospatial (Gabor patches) patterns, adjusted relative to each participant’s discrimination ability. In three separate experiments, the participant was asked to determine whether the (retro-cued) auditory and/or visual items maintained in WM matched or mismatched the subsequent probe stimulus. In Experiment 1, all stimuli were audiovisual, and the probes were either fully mismatching, only partially mismatching, or fully matching the memorized item. Experiment 2 was otherwise the same as Experiment 1, but the probes were unimodal. In Experiment 3, the participant was cued to maintain only the auditory or visual aspect of an audiovisual item pair. In Experiments 1 and 3, the participant’s matching performance was significantly more accurate for the auditory than visual attributes of probes. When the perceptual and task demands are bimodally equated, auditory attributes can be matched to multisensory items in WM at least as accurately as, if not more precisely than, their visual counterparts.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Auditory discrimination</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Probes</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Sensory integration</subject><subject>Sensory systems</subject><subject>Visual discrimination</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Visual stimuli</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUuPFSEQhYnRONfRP-DCkLhx01o8-sHS3PiYZBI3uiY00Npj07QUaO6_l547ajILV-SE75yCOoQ8Z_CaAfRvEIBz1gCXDXRKsUY9IAcmBW8Yg-4hOQAw2ciBqQvyBPFml6KHx-RCqF4MreoOJBxj2Eya16_UFDfnmE7UrI7-nLGYhRrcvM1I40RDWfKMfsUd-RXT990TfNhlwV2Mc4jOLMuJBpPtN-_o5E0uydPN5OzTik_Jo8ks6J_dnZfky_t3n48fm-tPH66Ob68by9suNxb4KAfXOyf8KCXvuXVDL9t6CdJOUomhyvpHN1rJu8kp2TsmQXSTkKOYxCV5dc7dUvxRPGYdZrR-WczqY0EtWAstB9Wzir68h97Ektb6ultKim5gbaX4mbIpIiY_6S3NwaSTZqD3MvS5DF3L0LdlaFVNL-6iyxi8-2v5s_0KiDOA296AT_9m_yf2N8Vvlbw</recordid><startdate>20250101</startdate><enddate>20250101</enddate><creator>Uluç, Işıl</creator><creator>Turpin, Tori</creator><creator>Kotlarz, Parker</creator><creator>Lankinen, Kaisu</creator><creator>Mamashli, Fahimeh</creator><creator>Ahveninen, Jyrki</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20250101</creationdate><title>Comparing auditory and visual aspects of multisensory working memory using bimodally matched feature patterns</title><author>Uluç, Işıl ; Turpin, Tori ; Kotlarz, Parker ; Lankinen, Kaisu ; Mamashli, Fahimeh ; Ahveninen, Jyrki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-c02b48d7dd3eb44272cd874525604cf4938874106dbc426fd947d14036f34b3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Auditory discrimination</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Probes</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Sensory integration</topic><topic>Sensory systems</topic><topic>Visual discrimination</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Visual stimuli</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uluç, Işıl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turpin, Tori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotlarz, Parker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lankinen, Kaisu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamashli, Fahimeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahveninen, Jyrki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uluç, Işıl</au><au>Turpin, Tori</au><au>Kotlarz, Parker</au><au>Lankinen, Kaisu</au><au>Mamashli, Fahimeh</au><au>Ahveninen, Jyrki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing auditory and visual aspects of multisensory working memory using bimodally matched feature patterns</atitle><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle><stitle>Exp Brain Res</stitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><date>2025-01-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>243</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>38</spage><pages>38-</pages><artnum>38</artnum><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><eissn>1432-1106</eissn><abstract>Working memory (WM) reflects the transient maintenance of information in the absence of external input, which can be attained via multiple senses separately or simultaneously. Pertaining to WM, the prevailing literature suggests the dominance of vision over other sensory systems. However, this imbalance may be stemming from challenges in finding comparable stimuli across modalities. Here, we addressed this problem by using a balanced multisensory retro-cue WM design, which employed combinations of auditory (ripple sounds) and visuospatial (Gabor patches) patterns, adjusted relative to each participant’s discrimination ability. In three separate experiments, the participant was asked to determine whether the (retro-cued) auditory and/or visual items maintained in WM matched or mismatched the subsequent probe stimulus. In Experiment 1, all stimuli were audiovisual, and the probes were either fully mismatching, only partially mismatching, or fully matching the memorized item. Experiment 2 was otherwise the same as Experiment 1, but the probes were unimodal. In Experiment 3, the participant was cued to maintain only the auditory or visual aspect of an audiovisual item pair. In Experiments 1 and 3, the participant’s matching performance was significantly more accurate for the auditory than visual attributes of probes. When the perceptual and task demands are bimodally equated, auditory attributes can be matched to multisensory items in WM at least as accurately as, if not more precisely than, their visual counterparts.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>39738596</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00221-024-06991-9</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-4819 |
ispartof | Experimental brain research, 2025-01, Vol.243 (1), p.38, Article 38 |
issn | 0014-4819 1432-1106 1432-1106 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3150520971 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Acoustic Stimulation - methods Adolescent Adult Auditory discrimination Auditory Perception - physiology Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Cues Experiments Female Hearing Humans Male Memory Memory, Short-Term - physiology Neurology Neurosciences Photic Stimulation - methods Probes Reaction Time - physiology Research Article Sensory integration Sensory systems Visual discrimination Visual Perception - physiology Visual stimuli Young Adult |
title | Comparing auditory and visual aspects of multisensory working memory using bimodally matched feature patterns |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T00%3A51%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20auditory%20and%20visual%20aspects%20of%20multisensory%20working%20memory%20using%20bimodally%20matched%20feature%20patterns&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20brain%20research&rft.au=Ulu%C3%A7,%20I%C5%9F%C4%B1l&rft.date=2025-01-01&rft.volume=243&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=38&rft.pages=38-&rft.artnum=38&rft.issn=0014-4819&rft.eissn=1432-1106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00221-024-06991-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3150436815%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3150436815&rft_id=info:pmid/39738596&rfr_iscdi=true |