Comparing auditory and visual aspects of multisensory working memory using bimodally matched feature patterns

Working memory (WM) reflects the transient maintenance of information in the absence of external input, which can be attained via multiple senses separately or simultaneously. Pertaining to WM, the prevailing literature suggests the dominance of vision over other sensory systems. However, this imbal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental brain research 2025-01, Vol.243 (1), p.38, Article 38
Hauptverfasser: Uluç, Işıl, Turpin, Tori, Kotlarz, Parker, Lankinen, Kaisu, Mamashli, Fahimeh, Ahveninen, Jyrki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 38
container_title Experimental brain research
container_volume 243
creator Uluç, Işıl
Turpin, Tori
Kotlarz, Parker
Lankinen, Kaisu
Mamashli, Fahimeh
Ahveninen, Jyrki
description Working memory (WM) reflects the transient maintenance of information in the absence of external input, which can be attained via multiple senses separately or simultaneously. Pertaining to WM, the prevailing literature suggests the dominance of vision over other sensory systems. However, this imbalance may be stemming from challenges in finding comparable stimuli across modalities. Here, we addressed this problem by using a balanced multisensory retro-cue WM design, which employed combinations of auditory (ripple sounds) and visuospatial (Gabor patches) patterns, adjusted relative to each participant’s discrimination ability. In three separate experiments, the participant was asked to determine whether the (retro-cued) auditory and/or visual items maintained in WM matched or mismatched the subsequent probe stimulus. In Experiment 1, all stimuli were audiovisual, and the probes were either fully mismatching, only partially mismatching, or fully matching the memorized item. Experiment 2 was otherwise the same as Experiment 1, but the probes were unimodal. In Experiment 3, the participant was cued to maintain only the auditory or visual aspect of an audiovisual item pair. In Experiments 1 and 3, the participant’s matching performance was significantly more accurate for the auditory than visual attributes of probes. When the perceptual and task demands are bimodally equated, auditory attributes can be matched to multisensory items in WM at least as accurately as, if not more precisely than, their visual counterparts.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00221-024-06991-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3150520971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3150436815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-c02b48d7dd3eb44272cd874525604cf4938874106dbc426fd947d14036f34b3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuPFSEQhYnRONfRP-DCkLhx01o8-sHS3PiYZBI3uiY00Npj07QUaO6_l547ajILV-SE75yCOoQ8Z_CaAfRvEIBz1gCXDXRKsUY9IAcmBW8Yg-4hOQAw2ciBqQvyBPFml6KHx-RCqF4MreoOJBxj2Eya16_UFDfnmE7UrI7-nLGYhRrcvM1I40RDWfKMfsUd-RXT990TfNhlwV2Mc4jOLMuJBpPtN-_o5E0uydPN5OzTik_Jo8ks6J_dnZfky_t3n48fm-tPH66Ob68by9suNxb4KAfXOyf8KCXvuXVDL9t6CdJOUomhyvpHN1rJu8kp2TsmQXSTkKOYxCV5dc7dUvxRPGYdZrR-WczqY0EtWAstB9Wzir68h97Ektb6ultKim5gbaX4mbIpIiY_6S3NwaSTZqD3MvS5DF3L0LdlaFVNL-6iyxi8-2v5s_0KiDOA296AT_9m_yf2N8Vvlbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3150436815</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing auditory and visual aspects of multisensory working memory using bimodally matched feature patterns</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Uluç, Işıl ; Turpin, Tori ; Kotlarz, Parker ; Lankinen, Kaisu ; Mamashli, Fahimeh ; Ahveninen, Jyrki</creator><creatorcontrib>Uluç, Işıl ; Turpin, Tori ; Kotlarz, Parker ; Lankinen, Kaisu ; Mamashli, Fahimeh ; Ahveninen, Jyrki</creatorcontrib><description>Working memory (WM) reflects the transient maintenance of information in the absence of external input, which can be attained via multiple senses separately or simultaneously. Pertaining to WM, the prevailing literature suggests the dominance of vision over other sensory systems. However, this imbalance may be stemming from challenges in finding comparable stimuli across modalities. Here, we addressed this problem by using a balanced multisensory retro-cue WM design, which employed combinations of auditory (ripple sounds) and visuospatial (Gabor patches) patterns, adjusted relative to each participant’s discrimination ability. In three separate experiments, the participant was asked to determine whether the (retro-cued) auditory and/or visual items maintained in WM matched or mismatched the subsequent probe stimulus. In Experiment 1, all stimuli were audiovisual, and the probes were either fully mismatching, only partially mismatching, or fully matching the memorized item. Experiment 2 was otherwise the same as Experiment 1, but the probes were unimodal. In Experiment 3, the participant was cued to maintain only the auditory or visual aspect of an audiovisual item pair. In Experiments 1 and 3, the participant’s matching performance was significantly more accurate for the auditory than visual attributes of probes. When the perceptual and task demands are bimodally equated, auditory attributes can be matched to multisensory items in WM at least as accurately as, if not more precisely than, their visual counterparts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4819</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06991-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39738596</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Auditory discrimination ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cues ; Experiments ; Female ; Hearing ; Humans ; Male ; Memory ; Memory, Short-Term - physiology ; Neurology ; Neurosciences ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Probes ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Research Article ; Sensory integration ; Sensory systems ; Visual discrimination ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Visual stimuli ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Experimental brain research, 2025-01, Vol.243 (1), p.38, Article 38</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024 Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Jan 2025</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-c02b48d7dd3eb44272cd874525604cf4938874106dbc426fd947d14036f34b3f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00221-024-06991-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00221-024-06991-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39738596$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uluç, Işıl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turpin, Tori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotlarz, Parker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lankinen, Kaisu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamashli, Fahimeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahveninen, Jyrki</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing auditory and visual aspects of multisensory working memory using bimodally matched feature patterns</title><title>Experimental brain research</title><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><description>Working memory (WM) reflects the transient maintenance of information in the absence of external input, which can be attained via multiple senses separately or simultaneously. Pertaining to WM, the prevailing literature suggests the dominance of vision over other sensory systems. However, this imbalance may be stemming from challenges in finding comparable stimuli across modalities. Here, we addressed this problem by using a balanced multisensory retro-cue WM design, which employed combinations of auditory (ripple sounds) and visuospatial (Gabor patches) patterns, adjusted relative to each participant’s discrimination ability. In three separate experiments, the participant was asked to determine whether the (retro-cued) auditory and/or visual items maintained in WM matched or mismatched the subsequent probe stimulus. In Experiment 1, all stimuli were audiovisual, and the probes were either fully mismatching, only partially mismatching, or fully matching the memorized item. Experiment 2 was otherwise the same as Experiment 1, but the probes were unimodal. In Experiment 3, the participant was cued to maintain only the auditory or visual aspect of an audiovisual item pair. In Experiments 1 and 3, the participant’s matching performance was significantly more accurate for the auditory than visual attributes of probes. When the perceptual and task demands are bimodally equated, auditory attributes can be matched to multisensory items in WM at least as accurately as, if not more precisely than, their visual counterparts.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Auditory discrimination</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Probes</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Sensory integration</subject><subject>Sensory systems</subject><subject>Visual discrimination</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Visual stimuli</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUuPFSEQhYnRONfRP-DCkLhx01o8-sHS3PiYZBI3uiY00Npj07QUaO6_l547ajILV-SE75yCOoQ8Z_CaAfRvEIBz1gCXDXRKsUY9IAcmBW8Yg-4hOQAw2ciBqQvyBPFml6KHx-RCqF4MreoOJBxj2Eya16_UFDfnmE7UrI7-nLGYhRrcvM1I40RDWfKMfsUd-RXT990TfNhlwV2Mc4jOLMuJBpPtN-_o5E0uydPN5OzTik_Jo8ks6J_dnZfky_t3n48fm-tPH66Ob68by9suNxb4KAfXOyf8KCXvuXVDL9t6CdJOUomhyvpHN1rJu8kp2TsmQXSTkKOYxCV5dc7dUvxRPGYdZrR-WczqY0EtWAstB9Wzir68h97Ektb6ultKim5gbaX4mbIpIiY_6S3NwaSTZqD3MvS5DF3L0LdlaFVNL-6iyxi8-2v5s_0KiDOA296AT_9m_yf2N8Vvlbw</recordid><startdate>20250101</startdate><enddate>20250101</enddate><creator>Uluç, Işıl</creator><creator>Turpin, Tori</creator><creator>Kotlarz, Parker</creator><creator>Lankinen, Kaisu</creator><creator>Mamashli, Fahimeh</creator><creator>Ahveninen, Jyrki</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20250101</creationdate><title>Comparing auditory and visual aspects of multisensory working memory using bimodally matched feature patterns</title><author>Uluç, Işıl ; Turpin, Tori ; Kotlarz, Parker ; Lankinen, Kaisu ; Mamashli, Fahimeh ; Ahveninen, Jyrki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-c02b48d7dd3eb44272cd874525604cf4938874106dbc426fd947d14036f34b3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Auditory discrimination</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Probes</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Sensory integration</topic><topic>Sensory systems</topic><topic>Visual discrimination</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Visual stimuli</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uluç, Işıl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turpin, Tori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotlarz, Parker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lankinen, Kaisu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamashli, Fahimeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahveninen, Jyrki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uluç, Işıl</au><au>Turpin, Tori</au><au>Kotlarz, Parker</au><au>Lankinen, Kaisu</au><au>Mamashli, Fahimeh</au><au>Ahveninen, Jyrki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing auditory and visual aspects of multisensory working memory using bimodally matched feature patterns</atitle><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle><stitle>Exp Brain Res</stitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><date>2025-01-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>243</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>38</spage><pages>38-</pages><artnum>38</artnum><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><eissn>1432-1106</eissn><abstract>Working memory (WM) reflects the transient maintenance of information in the absence of external input, which can be attained via multiple senses separately or simultaneously. Pertaining to WM, the prevailing literature suggests the dominance of vision over other sensory systems. However, this imbalance may be stemming from challenges in finding comparable stimuli across modalities. Here, we addressed this problem by using a balanced multisensory retro-cue WM design, which employed combinations of auditory (ripple sounds) and visuospatial (Gabor patches) patterns, adjusted relative to each participant’s discrimination ability. In three separate experiments, the participant was asked to determine whether the (retro-cued) auditory and/or visual items maintained in WM matched or mismatched the subsequent probe stimulus. In Experiment 1, all stimuli were audiovisual, and the probes were either fully mismatching, only partially mismatching, or fully matching the memorized item. Experiment 2 was otherwise the same as Experiment 1, but the probes were unimodal. In Experiment 3, the participant was cued to maintain only the auditory or visual aspect of an audiovisual item pair. In Experiments 1 and 3, the participant’s matching performance was significantly more accurate for the auditory than visual attributes of probes. When the perceptual and task demands are bimodally equated, auditory attributes can be matched to multisensory items in WM at least as accurately as, if not more precisely than, their visual counterparts.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>39738596</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00221-024-06991-9</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-4819
ispartof Experimental brain research, 2025-01, Vol.243 (1), p.38, Article 38
issn 0014-4819
1432-1106
1432-1106
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3150520971
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Acoustic Stimulation - methods
Adolescent
Adult
Auditory discrimination
Auditory Perception - physiology
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Cues
Experiments
Female
Hearing
Humans
Male
Memory
Memory, Short-Term - physiology
Neurology
Neurosciences
Photic Stimulation - methods
Probes
Reaction Time - physiology
Research Article
Sensory integration
Sensory systems
Visual discrimination
Visual Perception - physiology
Visual stimuli
Young Adult
title Comparing auditory and visual aspects of multisensory working memory using bimodally matched feature patterns
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T00%3A51%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20auditory%20and%20visual%20aspects%20of%20multisensory%20working%20memory%20using%20bimodally%20matched%20feature%20patterns&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20brain%20research&rft.au=Ulu%C3%A7,%20I%C5%9F%C4%B1l&rft.date=2025-01-01&rft.volume=243&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=38&rft.pages=38-&rft.artnum=38&rft.issn=0014-4819&rft.eissn=1432-1106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00221-024-06991-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3150436815%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3150436815&rft_id=info:pmid/39738596&rfr_iscdi=true