Maternal postpartum infection risk following induction of labor: A Danish national cohort study

Introduction Induction of labor is a common procedure, and in Denmark, approximately one in four vaginal deliveries are induced. The association between induction and maternal postpartum infections such as endometritis, surgical site infection after cesarean section, urinary tract infection, and sep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2025-02, Vol.104 (2), p.309-318
Hauptverfasser: Hogh‐Poulsen, Sidsel, Carlsen, Sif Emilie, Bendix, Jane M., Clausen, Tine D., Lokkegaard, Ellen C. L., Axelsson, Paul Vignir Bryde
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 318
container_issue 2
container_start_page 309
container_title Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
container_volume 104
creator Hogh‐Poulsen, Sidsel
Carlsen, Sif Emilie
Bendix, Jane M.
Clausen, Tine D.
Lokkegaard, Ellen C. L.
Axelsson, Paul Vignir Bryde
description Introduction Induction of labor is a common procedure, and in Denmark, approximately one in four vaginal deliveries are induced. The association between induction and maternal postpartum infections such as endometritis, surgical site infection after cesarean section, urinary tract infection, and sepsis has been sparsely investigated. Our objective was to investigate the association between induction of labor and risk of maternal postpartum infection and to identify potential risk factors for infection. Material and Methods In a nationwide cohort study, all deliveries with live‐born singletons from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017 (n = 546 864) were included. Deliveries were grouped into categories of spontaneous onset of labor, induction of labor, and elective cesarean section. The primary outcome was any infection within 30 days postpartum based on discharge diagnosis codes and redeemed antibiotic prescriptions for endometritis, surgical site infection, urinary tract infection, and sepsis. Analyses were done using logistic regression. Results Infection within 30 days postpartum was found among 8.5% of the women undergoing induction of labor compared to 6.8% of the women with spontaneous onset of labor. In adjusted logistic regression analyses, the risk of postpartum infection was significantly increased after induction of labor compared to spontaneous onset of labor (adjusted ORs [aOR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21–1.27). Women with rupture of membranes were not at increased risk of postpartum infection (aOR 1.01; 95%CI 0.94–1.09). The risk of postpartum maternal sepsis was not significantly associated with induction of labor. Antibiotic treatment during pregnancy, pre‐eclampsia, and long education were all associated with increased risk of maternal postpartum infection, while either a low or high body mass index and previous deliveries were associated with decreased risk. Conclusions Induction of labor was associated with an increased risk of maternal postpartum infection. However, the absolute risk was 1.7% higher for the women with induced labor compared to spontaneous onset of labor, which we believe should not be a cause for concern. Unexpectedly, low and high body mass index was associated with decreased risk of infection, and rupture of membranes was not associated with increased risk after induction of labor, which might reflect actual clinical management. One in four Danish pregnant women undergo induction of labor (IOL), either
doi_str_mv 10.1111/aogs.15035
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3150345390</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3161608303</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2825-2cc36320ff4ad5de5754e6524315663d4437fbffc93632e8acaba1d445f91dc13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAYhoMobv64-AdIwIsInUmT9Ie3MXUKkx3Uc0jTZOtsm5q0jP33pnZ68OB3CV_ehxe-B4ALjCbYz60wKzfBDBF2AMY4QihAFIeHYIwQwkFEaDoCJ85t_BbGNDkGI5LGJGYkHQP-Ilpla1HCxri2EbbtKljUWsm2MDW0hfuA2pSl2Rb1ygd5NwRGw1Jkxt7BKbwXdeHWsBZ94pukWRvbQtd2-e4MHGlROnW-f0_B--PD2-wpWCznz7PpIpBhErIglJJEJERaU5GzXLGYURWxkBLMoojklJJYZ1rLtMdUIqTIBPbfTKc4l5icguuht7Hms1Ou5VXhpCpLUSvTOU56P9SfjDx69QfdmK5X0FOR95cQRDx1M1DSGues0ryxRSXsjmPEe-28186_tXv4cl_ZZZXKf9Efzx7AA7AtSrX7p4pPl_PXofQLLPqNNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3161608303</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maternal postpartum infection risk following induction of labor: A Danish national cohort study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hogh‐Poulsen, Sidsel ; Carlsen, Sif Emilie ; Bendix, Jane M. ; Clausen, Tine D. ; Lokkegaard, Ellen C. L. ; Axelsson, Paul Vignir Bryde</creator><creatorcontrib>Hogh‐Poulsen, Sidsel ; Carlsen, Sif Emilie ; Bendix, Jane M. ; Clausen, Tine D. ; Lokkegaard, Ellen C. L. ; Axelsson, Paul Vignir Bryde</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Induction of labor is a common procedure, and in Denmark, approximately one in four vaginal deliveries are induced. The association between induction and maternal postpartum infections such as endometritis, surgical site infection after cesarean section, urinary tract infection, and sepsis has been sparsely investigated. Our objective was to investigate the association between induction of labor and risk of maternal postpartum infection and to identify potential risk factors for infection. Material and Methods In a nationwide cohort study, all deliveries with live‐born singletons from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017 (n = 546 864) were included. Deliveries were grouped into categories of spontaneous onset of labor, induction of labor, and elective cesarean section. The primary outcome was any infection within 30 days postpartum based on discharge diagnosis codes and redeemed antibiotic prescriptions for endometritis, surgical site infection, urinary tract infection, and sepsis. Analyses were done using logistic regression. Results Infection within 30 days postpartum was found among 8.5% of the women undergoing induction of labor compared to 6.8% of the women with spontaneous onset of labor. In adjusted logistic regression analyses, the risk of postpartum infection was significantly increased after induction of labor compared to spontaneous onset of labor (adjusted ORs [aOR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21–1.27). Women with rupture of membranes were not at increased risk of postpartum infection (aOR 1.01; 95%CI 0.94–1.09). The risk of postpartum maternal sepsis was not significantly associated with induction of labor. Antibiotic treatment during pregnancy, pre‐eclampsia, and long education were all associated with increased risk of maternal postpartum infection, while either a low or high body mass index and previous deliveries were associated with decreased risk. Conclusions Induction of labor was associated with an increased risk of maternal postpartum infection. However, the absolute risk was 1.7% higher for the women with induced labor compared to spontaneous onset of labor, which we believe should not be a cause for concern. Unexpectedly, low and high body mass index was associated with decreased risk of infection, and rupture of membranes was not associated with increased risk after induction of labor, which might reflect actual clinical management. One in four Danish pregnant women undergo induction of labor (IOL), either by amniotomy when the cervix is partially dilated or by cervical ripening, which is achieved through medicinal or mechanical means. Often IOL involves two or more methods. Our national cohort study found a statistically significant association between IOL and maternal postpartum infection. The absolute risk was 1.7% higher among women with induced labor compared to spontaneous onset of labor. Risk factors for infection comprised antibiotics during pregnancy, pre‐eclampsia, and long education. Even though the risk of infection following IOL is statistically significant, the absolute risk is still very low and should not affect clinical decision making. Women undergoing IOL can be reassured that the risk of infection is low.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6349</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1600-0412</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0412</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aogs.15035</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39737539</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antibiotics ; birth ; birth complications ; Body mass index ; Cesarean section ; Cesarean Section - adverse effects ; Cohort analysis ; Cohort Studies ; Denmark - epidemiology ; endometritis ; Endometritis - epidemiology ; Endometritis - etiology ; Female ; Humans ; Induced labor ; infection ; Labor, Induced - adverse effects ; postpartum infection ; Postpartum period ; Pregnancy ; Puerperal Infection - epidemiology ; Puerperal Infection - etiology ; Regression analysis ; Risk Factors ; Sepsis ; surgical site infection ; Surgical site infections ; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - etiology ; Urinary tract diseases ; urinary tract infection ; Urinary tract infections ; Urinary Tract Infections - epidemiology ; Urogenital system</subject><ispartof>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025-02, Vol.104 (2), p.309-318</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2825-2cc36320ff4ad5de5754e6524315663d4437fbffc93632e8acaba1d445f91dc13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3341-6689 ; 0000-0002-8403-0084</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faogs.15035$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faogs.15035$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39737539$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hogh‐Poulsen, Sidsel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlsen, Sif Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bendix, Jane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clausen, Tine D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lokkegaard, Ellen C. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Axelsson, Paul Vignir Bryde</creatorcontrib><title>Maternal postpartum infection risk following induction of labor: A Danish national cohort study</title><title>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</title><addtitle>Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand</addtitle><description>Introduction Induction of labor is a common procedure, and in Denmark, approximately one in four vaginal deliveries are induced. The association between induction and maternal postpartum infections such as endometritis, surgical site infection after cesarean section, urinary tract infection, and sepsis has been sparsely investigated. Our objective was to investigate the association between induction of labor and risk of maternal postpartum infection and to identify potential risk factors for infection. Material and Methods In a nationwide cohort study, all deliveries with live‐born singletons from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017 (n = 546 864) were included. Deliveries were grouped into categories of spontaneous onset of labor, induction of labor, and elective cesarean section. The primary outcome was any infection within 30 days postpartum based on discharge diagnosis codes and redeemed antibiotic prescriptions for endometritis, surgical site infection, urinary tract infection, and sepsis. Analyses were done using logistic regression. Results Infection within 30 days postpartum was found among 8.5% of the women undergoing induction of labor compared to 6.8% of the women with spontaneous onset of labor. In adjusted logistic regression analyses, the risk of postpartum infection was significantly increased after induction of labor compared to spontaneous onset of labor (adjusted ORs [aOR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21–1.27). Women with rupture of membranes were not at increased risk of postpartum infection (aOR 1.01; 95%CI 0.94–1.09). The risk of postpartum maternal sepsis was not significantly associated with induction of labor. Antibiotic treatment during pregnancy, pre‐eclampsia, and long education were all associated with increased risk of maternal postpartum infection, while either a low or high body mass index and previous deliveries were associated with decreased risk. Conclusions Induction of labor was associated with an increased risk of maternal postpartum infection. However, the absolute risk was 1.7% higher for the women with induced labor compared to spontaneous onset of labor, which we believe should not be a cause for concern. Unexpectedly, low and high body mass index was associated with decreased risk of infection, and rupture of membranes was not associated with increased risk after induction of labor, which might reflect actual clinical management. One in four Danish pregnant women undergo induction of labor (IOL), either by amniotomy when the cervix is partially dilated or by cervical ripening, which is achieved through medicinal or mechanical means. Often IOL involves two or more methods. Our national cohort study found a statistically significant association between IOL and maternal postpartum infection. The absolute risk was 1.7% higher among women with induced labor compared to spontaneous onset of labor. Risk factors for infection comprised antibiotics during pregnancy, pre‐eclampsia, and long education. Even though the risk of infection following IOL is statistically significant, the absolute risk is still very low and should not affect clinical decision making. Women undergoing IOL can be reassured that the risk of infection is low.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>birth</subject><subject>birth complications</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Cesarean Section - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Denmark - epidemiology</subject><subject>endometritis</subject><subject>Endometritis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Endometritis - etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Induced labor</subject><subject>infection</subject><subject>Labor, Induced - adverse effects</subject><subject>postpartum infection</subject><subject>Postpartum period</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Puerperal Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Puerperal Infection - etiology</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>surgical site infection</subject><subject>Surgical site infections</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</subject><subject>Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>urinary tract infection</subject><subject>Urinary tract infections</subject><subject>Urinary Tract Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Urogenital system</subject><issn>0001-6349</issn><issn>1600-0412</issn><issn>1600-0412</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAYhoMobv64-AdIwIsInUmT9Ie3MXUKkx3Uc0jTZOtsm5q0jP33pnZ68OB3CV_ehxe-B4ALjCbYz60wKzfBDBF2AMY4QihAFIeHYIwQwkFEaDoCJ85t_BbGNDkGI5LGJGYkHQP-Ilpla1HCxri2EbbtKljUWsm2MDW0hfuA2pSl2Rb1ygd5NwRGw1Jkxt7BKbwXdeHWsBZ94pukWRvbQtd2-e4MHGlROnW-f0_B--PD2-wpWCznz7PpIpBhErIglJJEJERaU5GzXLGYURWxkBLMoojklJJYZ1rLtMdUIqTIBPbfTKc4l5icguuht7Hms1Ou5VXhpCpLUSvTOU56P9SfjDx69QfdmK5X0FOR95cQRDx1M1DSGues0ryxRSXsjmPEe-28186_tXv4cl_ZZZXKf9Efzx7AA7AtSrX7p4pPl_PXofQLLPqNNg</recordid><startdate>202502</startdate><enddate>202502</enddate><creator>Hogh‐Poulsen, Sidsel</creator><creator>Carlsen, Sif Emilie</creator><creator>Bendix, Jane M.</creator><creator>Clausen, Tine D.</creator><creator>Lokkegaard, Ellen C. L.</creator><creator>Axelsson, Paul Vignir Bryde</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3341-6689</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8403-0084</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202502</creationdate><title>Maternal postpartum infection risk following induction of labor: A Danish national cohort study</title><author>Hogh‐Poulsen, Sidsel ; Carlsen, Sif Emilie ; Bendix, Jane M. ; Clausen, Tine D. ; Lokkegaard, Ellen C. L. ; Axelsson, Paul Vignir Bryde</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2825-2cc36320ff4ad5de5754e6524315663d4437fbffc93632e8acaba1d445f91dc13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>birth</topic><topic>birth complications</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Cesarean Section - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Denmark - epidemiology</topic><topic>endometritis</topic><topic>Endometritis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Endometritis - etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Induced labor</topic><topic>infection</topic><topic>Labor, Induced - adverse effects</topic><topic>postpartum infection</topic><topic>Postpartum period</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Puerperal Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Puerperal Infection - etiology</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>surgical site infection</topic><topic>Surgical site infections</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</topic><topic>Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>urinary tract infection</topic><topic>Urinary tract infections</topic><topic>Urinary Tract Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Urogenital system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hogh‐Poulsen, Sidsel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlsen, Sif Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bendix, Jane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clausen, Tine D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lokkegaard, Ellen C. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Axelsson, Paul Vignir Bryde</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hogh‐Poulsen, Sidsel</au><au>Carlsen, Sif Emilie</au><au>Bendix, Jane M.</au><au>Clausen, Tine D.</au><au>Lokkegaard, Ellen C. L.</au><au>Axelsson, Paul Vignir Bryde</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maternal postpartum infection risk following induction of labor: A Danish national cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand</addtitle><date>2025-02</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>318</epage><pages>309-318</pages><issn>0001-6349</issn><issn>1600-0412</issn><eissn>1600-0412</eissn><abstract>Introduction Induction of labor is a common procedure, and in Denmark, approximately one in four vaginal deliveries are induced. The association between induction and maternal postpartum infections such as endometritis, surgical site infection after cesarean section, urinary tract infection, and sepsis has been sparsely investigated. Our objective was to investigate the association between induction of labor and risk of maternal postpartum infection and to identify potential risk factors for infection. Material and Methods In a nationwide cohort study, all deliveries with live‐born singletons from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017 (n = 546 864) were included. Deliveries were grouped into categories of spontaneous onset of labor, induction of labor, and elective cesarean section. The primary outcome was any infection within 30 days postpartum based on discharge diagnosis codes and redeemed antibiotic prescriptions for endometritis, surgical site infection, urinary tract infection, and sepsis. Analyses were done using logistic regression. Results Infection within 30 days postpartum was found among 8.5% of the women undergoing induction of labor compared to 6.8% of the women with spontaneous onset of labor. In adjusted logistic regression analyses, the risk of postpartum infection was significantly increased after induction of labor compared to spontaneous onset of labor (adjusted ORs [aOR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21–1.27). Women with rupture of membranes were not at increased risk of postpartum infection (aOR 1.01; 95%CI 0.94–1.09). The risk of postpartum maternal sepsis was not significantly associated with induction of labor. Antibiotic treatment during pregnancy, pre‐eclampsia, and long education were all associated with increased risk of maternal postpartum infection, while either a low or high body mass index and previous deliveries were associated with decreased risk. Conclusions Induction of labor was associated with an increased risk of maternal postpartum infection. However, the absolute risk was 1.7% higher for the women with induced labor compared to spontaneous onset of labor, which we believe should not be a cause for concern. Unexpectedly, low and high body mass index was associated with decreased risk of infection, and rupture of membranes was not associated with increased risk after induction of labor, which might reflect actual clinical management. One in four Danish pregnant women undergo induction of labor (IOL), either by amniotomy when the cervix is partially dilated or by cervical ripening, which is achieved through medicinal or mechanical means. Often IOL involves two or more methods. Our national cohort study found a statistically significant association between IOL and maternal postpartum infection. The absolute risk was 1.7% higher among women with induced labor compared to spontaneous onset of labor. Risk factors for infection comprised antibiotics during pregnancy, pre‐eclampsia, and long education. Even though the risk of infection following IOL is statistically significant, the absolute risk is still very low and should not affect clinical decision making. Women undergoing IOL can be reassured that the risk of infection is low.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>39737539</pmid><doi>10.1111/aogs.15035</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3341-6689</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8403-0084</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-6349
ispartof Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025-02, Vol.104 (2), p.309-318
issn 0001-6349
1600-0412
1600-0412
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3150345390
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Open Access; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Antibiotics
birth
birth complications
Body mass index
Cesarean section
Cesarean Section - adverse effects
Cohort analysis
Cohort Studies
Denmark - epidemiology
endometritis
Endometritis - epidemiology
Endometritis - etiology
Female
Humans
Induced labor
infection
Labor, Induced - adverse effects
postpartum infection
Postpartum period
Pregnancy
Puerperal Infection - epidemiology
Puerperal Infection - etiology
Regression analysis
Risk Factors
Sepsis
surgical site infection
Surgical site infections
Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology
Surgical Wound Infection - etiology
Urinary tract diseases
urinary tract infection
Urinary tract infections
Urinary Tract Infections - epidemiology
Urogenital system
title Maternal postpartum infection risk following induction of labor: A Danish national cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T21%3A31%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maternal%20postpartum%20infection%20risk%20following%20induction%20of%20labor:%20A%20Danish%20national%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Acta%20obstetricia%20et%20gynecologica%20Scandinavica&rft.au=Hogh%E2%80%90Poulsen,%20Sidsel&rft.date=2025-02&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=318&rft.pages=309-318&rft.issn=0001-6349&rft.eissn=1600-0412&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aogs.15035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3161608303%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3161608303&rft_id=info:pmid/39737539&rfr_iscdi=true