Cryopreserved sperm among patients with Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia

•Almost half of OAT patients adopted a "wait-and-see" approach, preserving sperm without decisions for over 10 years.•Age and parenthood didn't significantly influence decisions on sperm use or disposal after 10 years in OAT patients.•Unique decision-making in OAT patients underscores...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2025-02, Vol.305, p.248-252
Hauptverfasser: Bitan, Roy, Kedem, Alon, Avraham, Sarit, Youngster, Michal, Yerushalmi, Gil, Kaufman, Sarita, Umanski, Ana, Hourvitz, Ariel, Gat, Itai
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 252
container_issue
container_start_page 248
container_title European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology
container_volume 305
creator Bitan, Roy
Kedem, Alon
Avraham, Sarit
Youngster, Michal
Yerushalmi, Gil
Kaufman, Sarita
Umanski, Ana
Hourvitz, Ariel
Gat, Itai
description •Almost half of OAT patients adopted a "wait-and-see" approach, preserving sperm without decisions for over 10 years.•Age and parenthood didn't significantly influence decisions on sperm use or disposal after 10 years in OAT patients.•Unique decision-making in OAT patients underscores uncertainty about future fertility and long-term sperm cryopreservation. This study investigates sperm utilization and disposal patterns in Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) patients undergoing long-term sperm storage. OAT is a major contributor to male infertility. Cryopreservation is a common practice as a “fertility insurance” in case of further deterioration until azoospermia. However, long-term storage practices and utilization rates remain unclear. In this retrospective study spanning from October 1993 to December 2021, we examined men diagnosed with OAT who underwent spermatozoa cryopreservation. Data from medical records included utilization and disposal of sperm samples, age and paternity status at initial cryopreservation. We analyzed the data over 10 years using Kaplan-Meier curves, compared age and paternity status with the log-rank test. Among 238 patients undergoing semen cryopreservation due to the indication of OAT, 45 utilized sperm for fertility treatments, with a third using all frozen straws and others using only a portion. Sixteen patients used sperm due to azoospermia. Additionally, 54 requested the disposal of all cryopreserved straws. A Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that after 10 years, 25.9 % of men used cryopreserved sperm, while 31.2 % opted for disposal. Most participants did not use or dispose of preserved sperm. After 10 years, no significant differences were observed in usage or disposal based on age or paternity status. Our analysis of sperm utilization in OAT patients undergoing cryopreservation revealed a key finding: nearly half exhibited a “wait-and-see” approach. Unlike other indication for sperm preservation, age and paternity did not significantly influence utilization or disposal decisions. This suggests unique factors drive decision-making in OAT patients, highlighting the need for tailored cryopreservation management strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.12.034
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3149541438</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301211524007085</els_id><sourcerecordid>3149541438</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1566-85da705e3d5cc40e24bfbdde461efd995da4e1b219c59a23d65f332135c38ec13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwDxDqkUtLnI92vSCh8SlN2gXOUZq4W6Z1KUkHGr-ejg2O-OKDn9eWH0IugWZAIb9ZZrj081BljDKRAcsoF0dkCOOCpUUuxTEZUk4hZQByQM5iXNK-OC9PyYCXBRNFkQ_J_SRsfRswYvhAm8QWQ5Poxq_nSas7h-suJp-uWySzlZt7HbsFrn2HQXf-y_sf3OlzclLrVcSLQx-Rt8eH18lzOp09vUzupqkBmefpWFpdUIncSmMERSaqurIWRQ5Y27LsxwKhYlAaWWrGbS5rzhlwafgYDfARud7vbYN_32DsVOOiwdVKr9FvouIgSilA8HGPij1qgo8xYK3a4Bodtgqo2vlTS7X3p3b-FDDV--tjV4cLm6pB-xf6FdYDt3sA-z8_HAYVTW_JoHUBTaesd_9f-AY8QYSW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3149541438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cryopreserved sperm among patients with Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Bitan, Roy ; Kedem, Alon ; Avraham, Sarit ; Youngster, Michal ; Yerushalmi, Gil ; Kaufman, Sarita ; Umanski, Ana ; Hourvitz, Ariel ; Gat, Itai</creator><creatorcontrib>Bitan, Roy ; Kedem, Alon ; Avraham, Sarit ; Youngster, Michal ; Yerushalmi, Gil ; Kaufman, Sarita ; Umanski, Ana ; Hourvitz, Ariel ; Gat, Itai</creatorcontrib><description>•Almost half of OAT patients adopted a "wait-and-see" approach, preserving sperm without decisions for over 10 years.•Age and parenthood didn't significantly influence decisions on sperm use or disposal after 10 years in OAT patients.•Unique decision-making in OAT patients underscores uncertainty about future fertility and long-term sperm cryopreservation. This study investigates sperm utilization and disposal patterns in Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) patients undergoing long-term sperm storage. OAT is a major contributor to male infertility. Cryopreservation is a common practice as a “fertility insurance” in case of further deterioration until azoospermia. However, long-term storage practices and utilization rates remain unclear. In this retrospective study spanning from October 1993 to December 2021, we examined men diagnosed with OAT who underwent spermatozoa cryopreservation. Data from medical records included utilization and disposal of sperm samples, age and paternity status at initial cryopreservation. We analyzed the data over 10 years using Kaplan-Meier curves, compared age and paternity status with the log-rank test. Among 238 patients undergoing semen cryopreservation due to the indication of OAT, 45 utilized sperm for fertility treatments, with a third using all frozen straws and others using only a portion. Sixteen patients used sperm due to azoospermia. Additionally, 54 requested the disposal of all cryopreserved straws. A Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that after 10 years, 25.9 % of men used cryopreserved sperm, while 31.2 % opted for disposal. Most participants did not use or dispose of preserved sperm. After 10 years, no significant differences were observed in usage or disposal based on age or paternity status. Our analysis of sperm utilization in OAT patients undergoing cryopreservation revealed a key finding: nearly half exhibited a “wait-and-see” approach. Unlike other indication for sperm preservation, age and paternity did not significantly influence utilization or disposal decisions. This suggests unique factors drive decision-making in OAT patients, highlighting the need for tailored cryopreservation management strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-2115</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.12.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39724776</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Demographic characteristics ; Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) ; Sperm bank ; Sperm cryopreservation ; Sperm usage</subject><ispartof>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology, 2025-02, Vol.305, p.248-252</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1566-85da705e3d5cc40e24bfbdde461efd995da4e1b219c59a23d65f332135c38ec13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1536-5072</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.12.034$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39724776$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bitan, Roy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kedem, Alon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avraham, Sarit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youngster, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yerushalmi, Gil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Sarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umanski, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hourvitz, Ariel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gat, Itai</creatorcontrib><title>Cryopreserved sperm among patients with Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia</title><title>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><description>•Almost half of OAT patients adopted a "wait-and-see" approach, preserving sperm without decisions for over 10 years.•Age and parenthood didn't significantly influence decisions on sperm use or disposal after 10 years in OAT patients.•Unique decision-making in OAT patients underscores uncertainty about future fertility and long-term sperm cryopreservation. This study investigates sperm utilization and disposal patterns in Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) patients undergoing long-term sperm storage. OAT is a major contributor to male infertility. Cryopreservation is a common practice as a “fertility insurance” in case of further deterioration until azoospermia. However, long-term storage practices and utilization rates remain unclear. In this retrospective study spanning from October 1993 to December 2021, we examined men diagnosed with OAT who underwent spermatozoa cryopreservation. Data from medical records included utilization and disposal of sperm samples, age and paternity status at initial cryopreservation. We analyzed the data over 10 years using Kaplan-Meier curves, compared age and paternity status with the log-rank test. Among 238 patients undergoing semen cryopreservation due to the indication of OAT, 45 utilized sperm for fertility treatments, with a third using all frozen straws and others using only a portion. Sixteen patients used sperm due to azoospermia. Additionally, 54 requested the disposal of all cryopreserved straws. A Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that after 10 years, 25.9 % of men used cryopreserved sperm, while 31.2 % opted for disposal. Most participants did not use or dispose of preserved sperm. After 10 years, no significant differences were observed in usage or disposal based on age or paternity status. Our analysis of sperm utilization in OAT patients undergoing cryopreservation revealed a key finding: nearly half exhibited a “wait-and-see” approach. Unlike other indication for sperm preservation, age and paternity did not significantly influence utilization or disposal decisions. This suggests unique factors drive decision-making in OAT patients, highlighting the need for tailored cryopreservation management strategies.</description><subject>Demographic characteristics</subject><subject>Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT)</subject><subject>Sperm bank</subject><subject>Sperm cryopreservation</subject><subject>Sperm usage</subject><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwDxDqkUtLnI92vSCh8SlN2gXOUZq4W6Z1KUkHGr-ejg2O-OKDn9eWH0IugWZAIb9ZZrj081BljDKRAcsoF0dkCOOCpUUuxTEZUk4hZQByQM5iXNK-OC9PyYCXBRNFkQ_J_SRsfRswYvhAm8QWQ5Poxq_nSas7h-suJp-uWySzlZt7HbsFrn2HQXf-y_sf3OlzclLrVcSLQx-Rt8eH18lzOp09vUzupqkBmefpWFpdUIncSmMERSaqurIWRQ5Y27LsxwKhYlAaWWrGbS5rzhlwafgYDfARud7vbYN_32DsVOOiwdVKr9FvouIgSilA8HGPij1qgo8xYK3a4Bodtgqo2vlTS7X3p3b-FDDV--tjV4cLm6pB-xf6FdYDt3sA-z8_HAYVTW_JoHUBTaesd_9f-AY8QYSW</recordid><startdate>202502</startdate><enddate>202502</enddate><creator>Bitan, Roy</creator><creator>Kedem, Alon</creator><creator>Avraham, Sarit</creator><creator>Youngster, Michal</creator><creator>Yerushalmi, Gil</creator><creator>Kaufman, Sarita</creator><creator>Umanski, Ana</creator><creator>Hourvitz, Ariel</creator><creator>Gat, Itai</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1536-5072</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202502</creationdate><title>Cryopreserved sperm among patients with Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia</title><author>Bitan, Roy ; Kedem, Alon ; Avraham, Sarit ; Youngster, Michal ; Yerushalmi, Gil ; Kaufman, Sarita ; Umanski, Ana ; Hourvitz, Ariel ; Gat, Itai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1566-85da705e3d5cc40e24bfbdde461efd995da4e1b219c59a23d65f332135c38ec13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Demographic characteristics</topic><topic>Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT)</topic><topic>Sperm bank</topic><topic>Sperm cryopreservation</topic><topic>Sperm usage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bitan, Roy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kedem, Alon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avraham, Sarit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youngster, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yerushalmi, Gil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Sarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umanski, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hourvitz, Ariel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gat, Itai</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bitan, Roy</au><au>Kedem, Alon</au><au>Avraham, Sarit</au><au>Youngster, Michal</au><au>Yerushalmi, Gil</au><au>Kaufman, Sarita</au><au>Umanski, Ana</au><au>Hourvitz, Ariel</au><au>Gat, Itai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cryopreserved sperm among patients with Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia</atitle><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><date>2025-02</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>305</volume><spage>248</spage><epage>252</epage><pages>248-252</pages><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><eissn>1872-7654</eissn><abstract>•Almost half of OAT patients adopted a "wait-and-see" approach, preserving sperm without decisions for over 10 years.•Age and parenthood didn't significantly influence decisions on sperm use or disposal after 10 years in OAT patients.•Unique decision-making in OAT patients underscores uncertainty about future fertility and long-term sperm cryopreservation. This study investigates sperm utilization and disposal patterns in Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) patients undergoing long-term sperm storage. OAT is a major contributor to male infertility. Cryopreservation is a common practice as a “fertility insurance” in case of further deterioration until azoospermia. However, long-term storage practices and utilization rates remain unclear. In this retrospective study spanning from October 1993 to December 2021, we examined men diagnosed with OAT who underwent spermatozoa cryopreservation. Data from medical records included utilization and disposal of sperm samples, age and paternity status at initial cryopreservation. We analyzed the data over 10 years using Kaplan-Meier curves, compared age and paternity status with the log-rank test. Among 238 patients undergoing semen cryopreservation due to the indication of OAT, 45 utilized sperm for fertility treatments, with a third using all frozen straws and others using only a portion. Sixteen patients used sperm due to azoospermia. Additionally, 54 requested the disposal of all cryopreserved straws. A Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that after 10 years, 25.9 % of men used cryopreserved sperm, while 31.2 % opted for disposal. Most participants did not use or dispose of preserved sperm. After 10 years, no significant differences were observed in usage or disposal based on age or paternity status. Our analysis of sperm utilization in OAT patients undergoing cryopreservation revealed a key finding: nearly half exhibited a “wait-and-see” approach. Unlike other indication for sperm preservation, age and paternity did not significantly influence utilization or disposal decisions. This suggests unique factors drive decision-making in OAT patients, highlighting the need for tailored cryopreservation management strategies.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>39724776</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.12.034</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1536-5072</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-2115
ispartof European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2025-02, Vol.305, p.248-252
issn 0301-2115
1872-7654
1872-7654
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3149541438
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Demographic characteristics
Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT)
Sperm bank
Sperm cryopreservation
Sperm usage
title Cryopreserved sperm among patients with Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T02%3A29%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cryopreserved%20sperm%20among%20patients%20with%20Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20and%20reproductive%20biology&rft.au=Bitan,%20Roy&rft.date=2025-02&rft.volume=305&rft.spage=248&rft.epage=252&rft.pages=248-252&rft.issn=0301-2115&rft.eissn=1872-7654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.12.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3149541438%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3149541438&rft_id=info:pmid/39724776&rft_els_id=S0301211524007085&rfr_iscdi=true