Automatic MRI-TRUS Fusion Technique for Transperineal Biopsy Guidance: From Preoperative Planning to Intraoperative Navigation

Targeted and systematic transperineal biopsy of lesions guided by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion technique may optimize the biopsy procedure and enhance the detection of prostate cancer. We described the transperineal biopsy guided by an automatic MRI-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Prostate 2024-12, p.e24844
Hauptverfasser: Tang, Lu, Wu, Menglin, Chen, Ke, Gao, Fan, Zheng, Baohui, Zhao, Shu, Burstein, Pablo D, Ge, Sikai, Zhang, Xu, Zhu, Jie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page e24844
container_title The Prostate
container_volume
creator Tang, Lu
Wu, Menglin
Chen, Ke
Gao, Fan
Zheng, Baohui
Zhao, Shu
Burstein, Pablo D
Ge, Sikai
Zhang, Xu
Zhu, Jie
description Targeted and systematic transperineal biopsy of lesions guided by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion technique may optimize the biopsy procedure and enhance the detection of prostate cancer. We described the transperineal biopsy guided by an automatic MRI-TRUS fusion technique, and evaluated the accuracy and feasibility of this method in a prospective single-center study. The proposed method focuses on automating the delineation of prostate contours in both the MRI and TRUS images, the registration and fusion of MRI and TRUS images, the generation and visualiztion of the systematic biopsy cores in their corresponding locations within the 2D and the 3D views, as well as the computation and visualiztion of needle trajectories from preoperative planning to intraoperative navigation. A total of 76 patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer underwent systematic (SBx) and targeted (TBx) biopsies, all performed by a single urologist with more than 10 years of experience. The detection rates of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) were recorded. We also measured preoperative registration time, duration of the overall surgical procedure, and postoperative complication rates within the first week following the surgery. Descriptive analyses were presented in this study. PCa was identified in 73.7% (56/76) of the subjects, while csPCa was identified in 61.8% (47/76). The preoperative registration time was 5.0 min (IQR: 4.4-6.0), while the overall surgery duration was 24.8 min (IQR: 23.2-27.2). Postoperatively, 12 patients experienced immediate hematuria, and one patient reported dysuria 1 day following surgery. The automatic MRI-TRUS fusion technique for transperineal biopsy is feasible and safe, with preoperative planning to intraoperative navigation it offering convenient and efficient preoperative preparation and surgical procedure.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pros.24844
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3149538933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3149538933</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c176t-5cbb7f22566dce36fb20a2ce0948abe12d1d1e179abd770b2080d248c1e652463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4QOQlwgp4EcSN-ygolCpPFTSdeQ4k2LU2MVOKnXDt-NSHqsZ6R5dzRyETim5pISwq5Wz_pLFwzjeQ31KMhEREif7qE-YIFFMueihI-_fCQk4YYeoxzPBGM2yPvq86VrbyFYr_DibRPls_orHndfW4BzUm9EfHeDaOpw7afwKnDYgl_hW25Xf4PtOV9IouMZjZxv84sAGJLStAb8spTHaLHBr8cS0Tv5HT3KtF2G15hgd1HLp4eRnDtB8fJePHqLp8_1kdDONFBVpGyWqLEXNWJKmlQKe1iUjkikgWTyUJVBW0YoCFZksKyFISIekCkYUhTRhccoH6HzXG1yFj3xbNNorWIYbwXa-4DTOEj7MOA_oxQ5VQat3UBcrpxvpNgUlxdZ3sfVdfPsO8NlPb1c2UP2hv4L5F0OmfXI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3149538933</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automatic MRI-TRUS Fusion Technique for Transperineal Biopsy Guidance: From Preoperative Planning to Intraoperative Navigation</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tang, Lu ; Wu, Menglin ; Chen, Ke ; Gao, Fan ; Zheng, Baohui ; Zhao, Shu ; Burstein, Pablo D ; Ge, Sikai ; Zhang, Xu ; Zhu, Jie</creator><creatorcontrib>Tang, Lu ; Wu, Menglin ; Chen, Ke ; Gao, Fan ; Zheng, Baohui ; Zhao, Shu ; Burstein, Pablo D ; Ge, Sikai ; Zhang, Xu ; Zhu, Jie</creatorcontrib><description>Targeted and systematic transperineal biopsy of lesions guided by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion technique may optimize the biopsy procedure and enhance the detection of prostate cancer. We described the transperineal biopsy guided by an automatic MRI-TRUS fusion technique, and evaluated the accuracy and feasibility of this method in a prospective single-center study. The proposed method focuses on automating the delineation of prostate contours in both the MRI and TRUS images, the registration and fusion of MRI and TRUS images, the generation and visualiztion of the systematic biopsy cores in their corresponding locations within the 2D and the 3D views, as well as the computation and visualiztion of needle trajectories from preoperative planning to intraoperative navigation. A total of 76 patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer underwent systematic (SBx) and targeted (TBx) biopsies, all performed by a single urologist with more than 10 years of experience. The detection rates of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) were recorded. We also measured preoperative registration time, duration of the overall surgical procedure, and postoperative complication rates within the first week following the surgery. Descriptive analyses were presented in this study. PCa was identified in 73.7% (56/76) of the subjects, while csPCa was identified in 61.8% (47/76). The preoperative registration time was 5.0 min (IQR: 4.4-6.0), while the overall surgery duration was 24.8 min (IQR: 23.2-27.2). Postoperatively, 12 patients experienced immediate hematuria, and one patient reported dysuria 1 day following surgery. The automatic MRI-TRUS fusion technique for transperineal biopsy is feasible and safe, with preoperative planning to intraoperative navigation it offering convenient and efficient preoperative preparation and surgical procedure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-4137</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0045</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0045</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pros.24844</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39722199</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>The Prostate, 2024-12, p.e24844</ispartof><rights>2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c176t-5cbb7f22566dce36fb20a2ce0948abe12d1d1e179abd770b2080d248c1e652463</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6908-6768 ; 0000-0002-5545-3811 ; 0009-0004-5513-5671</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39722199$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tang, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Menglin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Fan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Baohui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Shu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burstein, Pablo D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Sikai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jie</creatorcontrib><title>Automatic MRI-TRUS Fusion Technique for Transperineal Biopsy Guidance: From Preoperative Planning to Intraoperative Navigation</title><title>The Prostate</title><addtitle>Prostate</addtitle><description>Targeted and systematic transperineal biopsy of lesions guided by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion technique may optimize the biopsy procedure and enhance the detection of prostate cancer. We described the transperineal biopsy guided by an automatic MRI-TRUS fusion technique, and evaluated the accuracy and feasibility of this method in a prospective single-center study. The proposed method focuses on automating the delineation of prostate contours in both the MRI and TRUS images, the registration and fusion of MRI and TRUS images, the generation and visualiztion of the systematic biopsy cores in their corresponding locations within the 2D and the 3D views, as well as the computation and visualiztion of needle trajectories from preoperative planning to intraoperative navigation. A total of 76 patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer underwent systematic (SBx) and targeted (TBx) biopsies, all performed by a single urologist with more than 10 years of experience. The detection rates of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) were recorded. We also measured preoperative registration time, duration of the overall surgical procedure, and postoperative complication rates within the first week following the surgery. Descriptive analyses were presented in this study. PCa was identified in 73.7% (56/76) of the subjects, while csPCa was identified in 61.8% (47/76). The preoperative registration time was 5.0 min (IQR: 4.4-6.0), while the overall surgery duration was 24.8 min (IQR: 23.2-27.2). Postoperatively, 12 patients experienced immediate hematuria, and one patient reported dysuria 1 day following surgery. The automatic MRI-TRUS fusion technique for transperineal biopsy is feasible and safe, with preoperative planning to intraoperative navigation it offering convenient and efficient preoperative preparation and surgical procedure.</description><issn>0270-4137</issn><issn>1097-0045</issn><issn>1097-0045</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4QOQlwgp4EcSN-ygolCpPFTSdeQ4k2LU2MVOKnXDt-NSHqsZ6R5dzRyETim5pISwq5Wz_pLFwzjeQ31KMhEREif7qE-YIFFMueihI-_fCQk4YYeoxzPBGM2yPvq86VrbyFYr_DibRPls_orHndfW4BzUm9EfHeDaOpw7afwKnDYgl_hW25Xf4PtOV9IouMZjZxv84sAGJLStAb8spTHaLHBr8cS0Tv5HT3KtF2G15hgd1HLp4eRnDtB8fJePHqLp8_1kdDONFBVpGyWqLEXNWJKmlQKe1iUjkikgWTyUJVBW0YoCFZksKyFISIekCkYUhTRhccoH6HzXG1yFj3xbNNorWIYbwXa-4DTOEj7MOA_oxQ5VQat3UBcrpxvpNgUlxdZ3sfVdfPsO8NlPb1c2UP2hv4L5F0OmfXI</recordid><startdate>20241225</startdate><enddate>20241225</enddate><creator>Tang, Lu</creator><creator>Wu, Menglin</creator><creator>Chen, Ke</creator><creator>Gao, Fan</creator><creator>Zheng, Baohui</creator><creator>Zhao, Shu</creator><creator>Burstein, Pablo D</creator><creator>Ge, Sikai</creator><creator>Zhang, Xu</creator><creator>Zhu, Jie</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6908-6768</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5545-3811</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5513-5671</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241225</creationdate><title>Automatic MRI-TRUS Fusion Technique for Transperineal Biopsy Guidance: From Preoperative Planning to Intraoperative Navigation</title><author>Tang, Lu ; Wu, Menglin ; Chen, Ke ; Gao, Fan ; Zheng, Baohui ; Zhao, Shu ; Burstein, Pablo D ; Ge, Sikai ; Zhang, Xu ; Zhu, Jie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c176t-5cbb7f22566dce36fb20a2ce0948abe12d1d1e179abd770b2080d248c1e652463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tang, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Menglin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Fan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Baohui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Shu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burstein, Pablo D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Sikai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jie</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Prostate</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tang, Lu</au><au>Wu, Menglin</au><au>Chen, Ke</au><au>Gao, Fan</au><au>Zheng, Baohui</au><au>Zhao, Shu</au><au>Burstein, Pablo D</au><au>Ge, Sikai</au><au>Zhang, Xu</au><au>Zhu, Jie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automatic MRI-TRUS Fusion Technique for Transperineal Biopsy Guidance: From Preoperative Planning to Intraoperative Navigation</atitle><jtitle>The Prostate</jtitle><addtitle>Prostate</addtitle><date>2024-12-25</date><risdate>2024</risdate><spage>e24844</spage><pages>e24844-</pages><issn>0270-4137</issn><issn>1097-0045</issn><eissn>1097-0045</eissn><abstract>Targeted and systematic transperineal biopsy of lesions guided by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion technique may optimize the biopsy procedure and enhance the detection of prostate cancer. We described the transperineal biopsy guided by an automatic MRI-TRUS fusion technique, and evaluated the accuracy and feasibility of this method in a prospective single-center study. The proposed method focuses on automating the delineation of prostate contours in both the MRI and TRUS images, the registration and fusion of MRI and TRUS images, the generation and visualiztion of the systematic biopsy cores in their corresponding locations within the 2D and the 3D views, as well as the computation and visualiztion of needle trajectories from preoperative planning to intraoperative navigation. A total of 76 patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer underwent systematic (SBx) and targeted (TBx) biopsies, all performed by a single urologist with more than 10 years of experience. The detection rates of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) were recorded. We also measured preoperative registration time, duration of the overall surgical procedure, and postoperative complication rates within the first week following the surgery. Descriptive analyses were presented in this study. PCa was identified in 73.7% (56/76) of the subjects, while csPCa was identified in 61.8% (47/76). The preoperative registration time was 5.0 min (IQR: 4.4-6.0), while the overall surgery duration was 24.8 min (IQR: 23.2-27.2). Postoperatively, 12 patients experienced immediate hematuria, and one patient reported dysuria 1 day following surgery. The automatic MRI-TRUS fusion technique for transperineal biopsy is feasible and safe, with preoperative planning to intraoperative navigation it offering convenient and efficient preoperative preparation and surgical procedure.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>39722199</pmid><doi>10.1002/pros.24844</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6908-6768</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5545-3811</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5513-5671</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0270-4137
ispartof The Prostate, 2024-12, p.e24844
issn 0270-4137
1097-0045
1097-0045
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3149538933
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
title Automatic MRI-TRUS Fusion Technique for Transperineal Biopsy Guidance: From Preoperative Planning to Intraoperative Navigation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T12%3A49%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automatic%20MRI-TRUS%20Fusion%20Technique%20for%20Transperineal%20Biopsy%20Guidance:%20From%20Preoperative%20Planning%20to%20Intraoperative%20Navigation&rft.jtitle=The%20Prostate&rft.au=Tang,%20Lu&rft.date=2024-12-25&rft.spage=e24844&rft.pages=e24844-&rft.issn=0270-4137&rft.eissn=1097-0045&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pros.24844&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3149538933%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3149538933&rft_id=info:pmid/39722199&rfr_iscdi=true