Movement Pattern Biofeedback Training After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Habitual movement compensations, such as decreased surgical peak knee extension moments (pKEM), persist years after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), are linked to poorer recovery, and may influence contralateral osteoarthritis progression. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to determine...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arthritis care & research (2010) 2024-12 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Arthritis care & research (2010) |
container_volume | |
creator | Bade, Michael J Christiansen, Cory L Zeni, Jr, Joseph A Dayton, Michael R Forster, Jeri E Cheuy, Victor A Christensen, Jesse C Hogan, Craig Koonce, Ryan Dennis, Doug Peters, Amy Stevens-Lapsley, Jennifer E |
description | Habitual movement compensations, such as decreased surgical peak knee extension moments (pKEM), persist years after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), are linked to poorer recovery, and may influence contralateral osteoarthritis progression. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to determine if a movement training program (MOVE) improves movement quality and recovery after TKA compared to a standardized rehabilitation program without movement training (CONTROL).
One hundred thirty-eight individuals were randomized to either MOVE or CONTROL groups after TKA. Participants were assessed preoperatively, 10 weeks after (end of intervention), and six months after (primary endpoint) TKA. Outcomes assessed were pKEM during walking, six-minute walk test, stair climb test, 30-second sit to stand test (30STS), timed up and go test (TUG), physical activity level, strength, range of motion, and self-reported outcomes.
At six months, there were no between-group differences in surgical pKEM during walking (primary outcome). The MOVE group exhibited less contralateral pKEM compared to CONTROL during self-selected gait speed (d = 0.44, P = 0.01). CONTROL performed better on TUG and 30STS at 10 weeks (P < 0.05), but differences attenuated at six months.
The MOVE intervention did not lead to improved surgical pKEM during walking after TKA compared to CONTROL. However, the MOVE group did demonstrate less contralateral pKEM during walking. The CONTROL group demonstrated faster recovery on the TUG and 30STS, but it is unknown if this is due to improved recovery in the surgical knee or increased movement compensation relying on contralateral knee function. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/acr.25489 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3148496363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3148496363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c907-b4180206dc33c5f844a7a98c9090da38a4c871bd7b77ef937798dd4a555d07fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kD1PwzAURS0EolXpwB9AHmFIsWMnttlCxZcoAqEMbJFjOxBI7GK7SOXXE2jpW96V7tEdDgDHGM0wQum5VH6WZpSLPTBOcYYTmmd8f5fpywhMQ3hHw5GUcyIOwYgIhjESbAzqB_dlemMjfJIxGm_hZesaY3Qt1QcsvWxta19h0QwdLF2UHby3xsDCxzfvlp0McX0BC_gsrXZ9-200nDsbveu6IZa-ld0ROGhkF8x0-yegvL4q57fJ4vHmbl4sEiUQS2qKOUpRrhUhKms4pZJJwYdOIC0Jl1RxhmvNasZMIwhjgmtNZZZlGrFGkwk43cwuvftcmRCrvg3KdJ20xq1CRTDlVOQkJwN6tkGVdyF401RL3_bSryuMql-p1SC1-pM6sCfb2VXdG70j_xWSHzMfceY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3148496363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Movement Pattern Biofeedback Training After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Bade, Michael J ; Christiansen, Cory L ; Zeni, Jr, Joseph A ; Dayton, Michael R ; Forster, Jeri E ; Cheuy, Victor A ; Christensen, Jesse C ; Hogan, Craig ; Koonce, Ryan ; Dennis, Doug ; Peters, Amy ; Stevens-Lapsley, Jennifer E</creator><creatorcontrib>Bade, Michael J ; Christiansen, Cory L ; Zeni, Jr, Joseph A ; Dayton, Michael R ; Forster, Jeri E ; Cheuy, Victor A ; Christensen, Jesse C ; Hogan, Craig ; Koonce, Ryan ; Dennis, Doug ; Peters, Amy ; Stevens-Lapsley, Jennifer E</creatorcontrib><description>Habitual movement compensations, such as decreased surgical peak knee extension moments (pKEM), persist years after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), are linked to poorer recovery, and may influence contralateral osteoarthritis progression. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to determine if a movement training program (MOVE) improves movement quality and recovery after TKA compared to a standardized rehabilitation program without movement training (CONTROL).
One hundred thirty-eight individuals were randomized to either MOVE or CONTROL groups after TKA. Participants were assessed preoperatively, 10 weeks after (end of intervention), and six months after (primary endpoint) TKA. Outcomes assessed were pKEM during walking, six-minute walk test, stair climb test, 30-second sit to stand test (30STS), timed up and go test (TUG), physical activity level, strength, range of motion, and self-reported outcomes.
At six months, there were no between-group differences in surgical pKEM during walking (primary outcome). The MOVE group exhibited less contralateral pKEM compared to CONTROL during self-selected gait speed (d = 0.44, P = 0.01). CONTROL performed better on TUG and 30STS at 10 weeks (P < 0.05), but differences attenuated at six months.
The MOVE intervention did not lead to improved surgical pKEM during walking after TKA compared to CONTROL. However, the MOVE group did demonstrate less contralateral pKEM during walking. The CONTROL group demonstrated faster recovery on the TUG and 30STS, but it is unknown if this is due to improved recovery in the surgical knee or increased movement compensation relying on contralateral knee function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2151-464X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2151-4658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-4658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acr.25489</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39711097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Arthritis care & research (2010), 2024-12</ispartof><rights>2024 American College of Rheumatology.</rights><rights>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c907-b4180206dc33c5f844a7a98c9090da38a4c871bd7b77ef937798dd4a555d07fd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1444-203X ; 0000-0002-7985-8565</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39711097$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bade, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Cory L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeni, Jr, Joseph A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayton, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forster, Jeri E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheuy, Victor A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Jesse C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koonce, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Doug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens-Lapsley, Jennifer E</creatorcontrib><title>Movement Pattern Biofeedback Training After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>Arthritis care & research (2010)</title><addtitle>Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)</addtitle><description>Habitual movement compensations, such as decreased surgical peak knee extension moments (pKEM), persist years after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), are linked to poorer recovery, and may influence contralateral osteoarthritis progression. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to determine if a movement training program (MOVE) improves movement quality and recovery after TKA compared to a standardized rehabilitation program without movement training (CONTROL).
One hundred thirty-eight individuals were randomized to either MOVE or CONTROL groups after TKA. Participants were assessed preoperatively, 10 weeks after (end of intervention), and six months after (primary endpoint) TKA. Outcomes assessed were pKEM during walking, six-minute walk test, stair climb test, 30-second sit to stand test (30STS), timed up and go test (TUG), physical activity level, strength, range of motion, and self-reported outcomes.
At six months, there were no between-group differences in surgical pKEM during walking (primary outcome). The MOVE group exhibited less contralateral pKEM compared to CONTROL during self-selected gait speed (d = 0.44, P = 0.01). CONTROL performed better on TUG and 30STS at 10 weeks (P < 0.05), but differences attenuated at six months.
The MOVE intervention did not lead to improved surgical pKEM during walking after TKA compared to CONTROL. However, the MOVE group did demonstrate less contralateral pKEM during walking. The CONTROL group demonstrated faster recovery on the TUG and 30STS, but it is unknown if this is due to improved recovery in the surgical knee or increased movement compensation relying on contralateral knee function.</description><issn>2151-464X</issn><issn>2151-4658</issn><issn>2151-4658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kD1PwzAURS0EolXpwB9AHmFIsWMnttlCxZcoAqEMbJFjOxBI7GK7SOXXE2jpW96V7tEdDgDHGM0wQum5VH6WZpSLPTBOcYYTmmd8f5fpywhMQ3hHw5GUcyIOwYgIhjESbAzqB_dlemMjfJIxGm_hZesaY3Qt1QcsvWxta19h0QwdLF2UHby3xsDCxzfvlp0McX0BC_gsrXZ9-200nDsbveu6IZa-ld0ROGhkF8x0-yegvL4q57fJ4vHmbl4sEiUQS2qKOUpRrhUhKms4pZJJwYdOIC0Jl1RxhmvNasZMIwhjgmtNZZZlGrFGkwk43cwuvftcmRCrvg3KdJ20xq1CRTDlVOQkJwN6tkGVdyF401RL3_bSryuMql-p1SC1-pM6sCfb2VXdG70j_xWSHzMfceY</recordid><startdate>20241222</startdate><enddate>20241222</enddate><creator>Bade, Michael J</creator><creator>Christiansen, Cory L</creator><creator>Zeni, Jr, Joseph A</creator><creator>Dayton, Michael R</creator><creator>Forster, Jeri E</creator><creator>Cheuy, Victor A</creator><creator>Christensen, Jesse C</creator><creator>Hogan, Craig</creator><creator>Koonce, Ryan</creator><creator>Dennis, Doug</creator><creator>Peters, Amy</creator><creator>Stevens-Lapsley, Jennifer E</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1444-203X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7985-8565</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241222</creationdate><title>Movement Pattern Biofeedback Training After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Bade, Michael J ; Christiansen, Cory L ; Zeni, Jr, Joseph A ; Dayton, Michael R ; Forster, Jeri E ; Cheuy, Victor A ; Christensen, Jesse C ; Hogan, Craig ; Koonce, Ryan ; Dennis, Doug ; Peters, Amy ; Stevens-Lapsley, Jennifer E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c907-b4180206dc33c5f844a7a98c9090da38a4c871bd7b77ef937798dd4a555d07fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bade, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Cory L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeni, Jr, Joseph A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayton, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forster, Jeri E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheuy, Victor A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Jesse C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koonce, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Doug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens-Lapsley, Jennifer E</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthritis care & research (2010)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bade, Michael J</au><au>Christiansen, Cory L</au><au>Zeni, Jr, Joseph A</au><au>Dayton, Michael R</au><au>Forster, Jeri E</au><au>Cheuy, Victor A</au><au>Christensen, Jesse C</au><au>Hogan, Craig</au><au>Koonce, Ryan</au><au>Dennis, Doug</au><au>Peters, Amy</au><au>Stevens-Lapsley, Jennifer E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Movement Pattern Biofeedback Training After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Arthritis care & research (2010)</jtitle><addtitle>Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)</addtitle><date>2024-12-22</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>2151-464X</issn><issn>2151-4658</issn><eissn>2151-4658</eissn><abstract>Habitual movement compensations, such as decreased surgical peak knee extension moments (pKEM), persist years after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), are linked to poorer recovery, and may influence contralateral osteoarthritis progression. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to determine if a movement training program (MOVE) improves movement quality and recovery after TKA compared to a standardized rehabilitation program without movement training (CONTROL).
One hundred thirty-eight individuals were randomized to either MOVE or CONTROL groups after TKA. Participants were assessed preoperatively, 10 weeks after (end of intervention), and six months after (primary endpoint) TKA. Outcomes assessed were pKEM during walking, six-minute walk test, stair climb test, 30-second sit to stand test (30STS), timed up and go test (TUG), physical activity level, strength, range of motion, and self-reported outcomes.
At six months, there were no between-group differences in surgical pKEM during walking (primary outcome). The MOVE group exhibited less contralateral pKEM compared to CONTROL during self-selected gait speed (d = 0.44, P = 0.01). CONTROL performed better on TUG and 30STS at 10 weeks (P < 0.05), but differences attenuated at six months.
The MOVE intervention did not lead to improved surgical pKEM during walking after TKA compared to CONTROL. However, the MOVE group did demonstrate less contralateral pKEM during walking. The CONTROL group demonstrated faster recovery on the TUG and 30STS, but it is unknown if this is due to improved recovery in the surgical knee or increased movement compensation relying on contralateral knee function.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>39711097</pmid><doi>10.1002/acr.25489</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1444-203X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7985-8565</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2151-464X |
ispartof | Arthritis care & research (2010), 2024-12 |
issn | 2151-464X 2151-4658 2151-4658 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3148496363 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
title | Movement Pattern Biofeedback Training After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T01%3A47%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Movement%20Pattern%20Biofeedback%20Training%20After%20Total%20Knee%20Arthroplasty:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Arthritis%20care%20&%20research%20(2010)&rft.au=Bade,%20Michael%20J&rft.date=2024-12-22&rft.issn=2151-464X&rft.eissn=2151-4658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acr.25489&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3148496363%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3148496363&rft_id=info:pmid/39711097&rfr_iscdi=true |