Fluid management in adult patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A scoping review

The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a cardiocirculatory support has tremendously increased in critically ill patients. Although fluid therapy is an essential component of the hemodynamic management of VA-ECMO patients, the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy rem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of critical care 2025-04, Vol.86, p.155007, Article 155007
Hauptverfasser: Jendoubi, Ali, de Roux, Quentin, Ribot, Solène, Vanden Bulcke, Aurore, Miard, Camille, Tiquet, Bérénice, Ghaleh, Bijan, Tissier, Renaud, Kohlhauer, Matthias, Mongardon, Nicolas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 155007
container_title Journal of critical care
container_volume 86
creator Jendoubi, Ali
de Roux, Quentin
Ribot, Solène
Vanden Bulcke, Aurore
Miard, Camille
Tiquet, Bérénice
Ghaleh, Bijan
Tissier, Renaud
Kohlhauer, Matthias
Mongardon, Nicolas
description The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a cardiocirculatory support has tremendously increased in critically ill patients. Although fluid therapy is an essential component of the hemodynamic management of VA-ECMO patients, the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy remains controversial. We performed a scoping review to map out the existing knowledge on fluid management in terms of fluid type, dosing and the impact of fluid balance on VA-ECMO patient outcomes. A literature search within PubMed and EMBASE was conducted from database inception to April 2024. We included all studies involving critically ill adult patients, supported by VA-ECMO regardless of clinical indication (cardiogenic shock or extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation) with or without Renal Replacement Therapy and describing fluid resuscitation strategies or focusing on fluid type or reporting the impact of fluid balance on clinical outcomes and mortality. Details of study population, ECMO indications, fluid types, resuscitation strategies, fluid balance and outcome measures were extracted. Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria, including 14 clinical studies and two experimental animal studies. We found a lack of studies comparing restrictive and liberal approaches. No study has compared the efficacy and safety of balanced and saline solutions. The place of albumin, as an alternative fluid, should be investigated. Despite their heterogeneity, studies found a negative impact of both early and cumulative fluid overload on survival and renal outcomes. The available literature on the fluid management in VA-ECMO setting is scarce. More high-quality evidence is needed regarding optimal fluid dosing, type and resuscitation endpoints in order to standardize practice and improve outcomes. [Display omitted] •There is a significant amount of data to support the negative impact of fluid overload on survival and kidney outcomes in VA-ECMO patients.•There is no evidence on the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy in VA-ECMO patients in terms of volume and type.•There is no data comparing balanced versus unbalanced solutions in VA-ECMO setting. There is no evidence to support the use of albumin as a first line resuscitation fluid.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.155007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3148495040</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883944124004945</els_id><sourcerecordid>3148495040</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1523-18e4c9c4a22966e5f72bdd4a0048b86535c4eb45a9d6839623211e95c9148d6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtP3DAURq0KVIbHH-ii8pJNpn4mNuoGoQKVkNi0a8ux74w8SuxgJxT-fT0aYMnKD53v070HoW-UrCmh7Y_deueyWzPCxJpKSUj3Ba3qpWtUS-URWhGleKOFoCfotJQdIbTjXH5FJ1x3RCvCV2i6HZbg8Wij3cIIccYhYuuXYcaTnUP9KHiJHvI2hbjFzxCTzTPkYAcML3O2LuUpZajPEcY-2wg4vbxuIdZ0ilf4GheXpn02w3OAf-foeGOHAhdv5xn6e_vrz8198_B49_vm-qFxVDLeUAXCaScsY7ptQW461nsvLCFC9aqVXDoBvZBW-1Zx3TLOKAUtnaZC-Rb4Gbo89E45PS1QZjOG4mAY6oRpKYZXTmhJBKkoO6Aup1IybMyUw2jzq6HE7E2bndmbNnvT5mC6hr6_9S_9CP4j8q62Aj8PANQt6-bZFFd9OvAhg5uNT-Gz_v-kiZCj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3148495040</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fluid management in adult patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A scoping review</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jendoubi, Ali ; de Roux, Quentin ; Ribot, Solène ; Vanden Bulcke, Aurore ; Miard, Camille ; Tiquet, Bérénice ; Ghaleh, Bijan ; Tissier, Renaud ; Kohlhauer, Matthias ; Mongardon, Nicolas</creator><creatorcontrib>Jendoubi, Ali ; de Roux, Quentin ; Ribot, Solène ; Vanden Bulcke, Aurore ; Miard, Camille ; Tiquet, Bérénice ; Ghaleh, Bijan ; Tissier, Renaud ; Kohlhauer, Matthias ; Mongardon, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><description>The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a cardiocirculatory support has tremendously increased in critically ill patients. Although fluid therapy is an essential component of the hemodynamic management of VA-ECMO patients, the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy remains controversial. We performed a scoping review to map out the existing knowledge on fluid management in terms of fluid type, dosing and the impact of fluid balance on VA-ECMO patient outcomes. A literature search within PubMed and EMBASE was conducted from database inception to April 2024. We included all studies involving critically ill adult patients, supported by VA-ECMO regardless of clinical indication (cardiogenic shock or extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation) with or without Renal Replacement Therapy and describing fluid resuscitation strategies or focusing on fluid type or reporting the impact of fluid balance on clinical outcomes and mortality. Details of study population, ECMO indications, fluid types, resuscitation strategies, fluid balance and outcome measures were extracted. Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria, including 14 clinical studies and two experimental animal studies. We found a lack of studies comparing restrictive and liberal approaches. No study has compared the efficacy and safety of balanced and saline solutions. The place of albumin, as an alternative fluid, should be investigated. Despite their heterogeneity, studies found a negative impact of both early and cumulative fluid overload on survival and renal outcomes. The available literature on the fluid management in VA-ECMO setting is scarce. More high-quality evidence is needed regarding optimal fluid dosing, type and resuscitation endpoints in order to standardize practice and improve outcomes. [Display omitted] •There is a significant amount of data to support the negative impact of fluid overload on survival and kidney outcomes in VA-ECMO patients.•There is no evidence on the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy in VA-ECMO patients in terms of volume and type.•There is no data comparing balanced versus unbalanced solutions in VA-ECMO setting. There is no evidence to support the use of albumin as a first line resuscitation fluid.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-9441</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1557-8615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-8615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.155007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39709803</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Critically ill patients ; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ; Fluid management</subject><ispartof>Journal of critical care, 2025-04, Vol.86, p.155007, Article 155007</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1523-18e4c9c4a22966e5f72bdd4a0048b86535c4eb45a9d6839623211e95c9148d6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.155007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3538,27906,27907,45977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39709803$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jendoubi, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Roux, Quentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribot, Solène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanden Bulcke, Aurore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miard, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiquet, Bérénice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghaleh, Bijan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tissier, Renaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohlhauer, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mongardon, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><title>Fluid management in adult patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A scoping review</title><title>Journal of critical care</title><addtitle>J Crit Care</addtitle><description>The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a cardiocirculatory support has tremendously increased in critically ill patients. Although fluid therapy is an essential component of the hemodynamic management of VA-ECMO patients, the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy remains controversial. We performed a scoping review to map out the existing knowledge on fluid management in terms of fluid type, dosing and the impact of fluid balance on VA-ECMO patient outcomes. A literature search within PubMed and EMBASE was conducted from database inception to April 2024. We included all studies involving critically ill adult patients, supported by VA-ECMO regardless of clinical indication (cardiogenic shock or extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation) with or without Renal Replacement Therapy and describing fluid resuscitation strategies or focusing on fluid type or reporting the impact of fluid balance on clinical outcomes and mortality. Details of study population, ECMO indications, fluid types, resuscitation strategies, fluid balance and outcome measures were extracted. Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria, including 14 clinical studies and two experimental animal studies. We found a lack of studies comparing restrictive and liberal approaches. No study has compared the efficacy and safety of balanced and saline solutions. The place of albumin, as an alternative fluid, should be investigated. Despite their heterogeneity, studies found a negative impact of both early and cumulative fluid overload on survival and renal outcomes. The available literature on the fluid management in VA-ECMO setting is scarce. More high-quality evidence is needed regarding optimal fluid dosing, type and resuscitation endpoints in order to standardize practice and improve outcomes. [Display omitted] •There is a significant amount of data to support the negative impact of fluid overload on survival and kidney outcomes in VA-ECMO patients.•There is no evidence on the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy in VA-ECMO patients in terms of volume and type.•There is no data comparing balanced versus unbalanced solutions in VA-ECMO setting. There is no evidence to support the use of albumin as a first line resuscitation fluid.</description><subject>Critically ill patients</subject><subject>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation</subject><subject>Fluid management</subject><issn>0883-9441</issn><issn>1557-8615</issn><issn>1557-8615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtP3DAURq0KVIbHH-ii8pJNpn4mNuoGoQKVkNi0a8ux74w8SuxgJxT-fT0aYMnKD53v070HoW-UrCmh7Y_deueyWzPCxJpKSUj3Ba3qpWtUS-URWhGleKOFoCfotJQdIbTjXH5FJ1x3RCvCV2i6HZbg8Wij3cIIccYhYuuXYcaTnUP9KHiJHvI2hbjFzxCTzTPkYAcML3O2LuUpZajPEcY-2wg4vbxuIdZ0ilf4GheXpn02w3OAf-foeGOHAhdv5xn6e_vrz8198_B49_vm-qFxVDLeUAXCaScsY7ptQW461nsvLCFC9aqVXDoBvZBW-1Zx3TLOKAUtnaZC-Rb4Gbo89E45PS1QZjOG4mAY6oRpKYZXTmhJBKkoO6Aup1IybMyUw2jzq6HE7E2bndmbNnvT5mC6hr6_9S_9CP4j8q62Aj8PANQt6-bZFFd9OvAhg5uNT-Gz_v-kiZCj</recordid><startdate>202504</startdate><enddate>202504</enddate><creator>Jendoubi, Ali</creator><creator>de Roux, Quentin</creator><creator>Ribot, Solène</creator><creator>Vanden Bulcke, Aurore</creator><creator>Miard, Camille</creator><creator>Tiquet, Bérénice</creator><creator>Ghaleh, Bijan</creator><creator>Tissier, Renaud</creator><creator>Kohlhauer, Matthias</creator><creator>Mongardon, Nicolas</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202504</creationdate><title>Fluid management in adult patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A scoping review</title><author>Jendoubi, Ali ; de Roux, Quentin ; Ribot, Solène ; Vanden Bulcke, Aurore ; Miard, Camille ; Tiquet, Bérénice ; Ghaleh, Bijan ; Tissier, Renaud ; Kohlhauer, Matthias ; Mongardon, Nicolas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1523-18e4c9c4a22966e5f72bdd4a0048b86535c4eb45a9d6839623211e95c9148d6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Critically ill patients</topic><topic>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation</topic><topic>Fluid management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jendoubi, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Roux, Quentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribot, Solène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanden Bulcke, Aurore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miard, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiquet, Bérénice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghaleh, Bijan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tissier, Renaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohlhauer, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mongardon, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of critical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jendoubi, Ali</au><au>de Roux, Quentin</au><au>Ribot, Solène</au><au>Vanden Bulcke, Aurore</au><au>Miard, Camille</au><au>Tiquet, Bérénice</au><au>Ghaleh, Bijan</au><au>Tissier, Renaud</au><au>Kohlhauer, Matthias</au><au>Mongardon, Nicolas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fluid management in adult patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A scoping review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of critical care</jtitle><addtitle>J Crit Care</addtitle><date>2025-04</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>86</volume><spage>155007</spage><pages>155007-</pages><artnum>155007</artnum><issn>0883-9441</issn><issn>1557-8615</issn><eissn>1557-8615</eissn><abstract>The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a cardiocirculatory support has tremendously increased in critically ill patients. Although fluid therapy is an essential component of the hemodynamic management of VA-ECMO patients, the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy remains controversial. We performed a scoping review to map out the existing knowledge on fluid management in terms of fluid type, dosing and the impact of fluid balance on VA-ECMO patient outcomes. A literature search within PubMed and EMBASE was conducted from database inception to April 2024. We included all studies involving critically ill adult patients, supported by VA-ECMO regardless of clinical indication (cardiogenic shock or extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation) with or without Renal Replacement Therapy and describing fluid resuscitation strategies or focusing on fluid type or reporting the impact of fluid balance on clinical outcomes and mortality. Details of study population, ECMO indications, fluid types, resuscitation strategies, fluid balance and outcome measures were extracted. Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria, including 14 clinical studies and two experimental animal studies. We found a lack of studies comparing restrictive and liberal approaches. No study has compared the efficacy and safety of balanced and saline solutions. The place of albumin, as an alternative fluid, should be investigated. Despite their heterogeneity, studies found a negative impact of both early and cumulative fluid overload on survival and renal outcomes. The available literature on the fluid management in VA-ECMO setting is scarce. More high-quality evidence is needed regarding optimal fluid dosing, type and resuscitation endpoints in order to standardize practice and improve outcomes. [Display omitted] •There is a significant amount of data to support the negative impact of fluid overload on survival and kidney outcomes in VA-ECMO patients.•There is no evidence on the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy in VA-ECMO patients in terms of volume and type.•There is no data comparing balanced versus unbalanced solutions in VA-ECMO setting. There is no evidence to support the use of albumin as a first line resuscitation fluid.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39709803</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.155007</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-9441
ispartof Journal of critical care, 2025-04, Vol.86, p.155007, Article 155007
issn 0883-9441
1557-8615
1557-8615
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3148495040
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Critically ill patients
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
Fluid management
title Fluid management in adult patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A scoping review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T10%3A50%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fluid%20management%20in%20adult%20patients%20undergoing%20venoarterial%20extracorporeal%20membrane%20oxygenation:%20A%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20critical%20care&rft.au=Jendoubi,%20Ali&rft.date=2025-04&rft.volume=86&rft.spage=155007&rft.pages=155007-&rft.artnum=155007&rft.issn=0883-9441&rft.eissn=1557-8615&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.155007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3148495040%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3148495040&rft_id=info:pmid/39709803&rft_els_id=S0883944124004945&rfr_iscdi=true