Fluid management in adult patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A scoping review
The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a cardiocirculatory support has tremendously increased in critically ill patients. Although fluid therapy is an essential component of the hemodynamic management of VA-ECMO patients, the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy rem...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of critical care 2025-04, Vol.86, p.155007, Article 155007 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 155007 |
container_title | Journal of critical care |
container_volume | 86 |
creator | Jendoubi, Ali de Roux, Quentin Ribot, Solène Vanden Bulcke, Aurore Miard, Camille Tiquet, Bérénice Ghaleh, Bijan Tissier, Renaud Kohlhauer, Matthias Mongardon, Nicolas |
description | The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a cardiocirculatory support has tremendously increased in critically ill patients. Although fluid therapy is an essential component of the hemodynamic management of VA-ECMO patients, the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy remains controversial. We performed a scoping review to map out the existing knowledge on fluid management in terms of fluid type, dosing and the impact of fluid balance on VA-ECMO patient outcomes.
A literature search within PubMed and EMBASE was conducted from database inception to April 2024. We included all studies involving critically ill adult patients, supported by VA-ECMO regardless of clinical indication (cardiogenic shock or extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation) with or without Renal Replacement Therapy and describing fluid resuscitation strategies or focusing on fluid type or reporting the impact of fluid balance on clinical outcomes and mortality. Details of study population, ECMO indications, fluid types, resuscitation strategies, fluid balance and outcome measures were extracted.
Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria, including 14 clinical studies and two experimental animal studies. We found a lack of studies comparing restrictive and liberal approaches. No study has compared the efficacy and safety of balanced and saline solutions. The place of albumin, as an alternative fluid, should be investigated. Despite their heterogeneity, studies found a negative impact of both early and cumulative fluid overload on survival and renal outcomes.
The available literature on the fluid management in VA-ECMO setting is scarce. More high-quality evidence is needed regarding optimal fluid dosing, type and resuscitation endpoints in order to standardize practice and improve outcomes.
[Display omitted]
•There is a significant amount of data to support the negative impact of fluid overload on survival and kidney outcomes in VA-ECMO patients.•There is no evidence on the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy in VA-ECMO patients in terms of volume and type.•There is no data comparing balanced versus unbalanced solutions in VA-ECMO setting. There is no evidence to support the use of albumin as a first line resuscitation fluid. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.155007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3148495040</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883944124004945</els_id><sourcerecordid>3148495040</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1523-18e4c9c4a22966e5f72bdd4a0048b86535c4eb45a9d6839623211e95c9148d6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtP3DAURq0KVIbHH-ii8pJNpn4mNuoGoQKVkNi0a8ux74w8SuxgJxT-fT0aYMnKD53v070HoW-UrCmh7Y_deueyWzPCxJpKSUj3Ba3qpWtUS-URWhGleKOFoCfotJQdIbTjXH5FJ1x3RCvCV2i6HZbg8Wij3cIIccYhYuuXYcaTnUP9KHiJHvI2hbjFzxCTzTPkYAcML3O2LuUpZajPEcY-2wg4vbxuIdZ0ilf4GheXpn02w3OAf-foeGOHAhdv5xn6e_vrz8198_B49_vm-qFxVDLeUAXCaScsY7ptQW461nsvLCFC9aqVXDoBvZBW-1Zx3TLOKAUtnaZC-Rb4Gbo89E45PS1QZjOG4mAY6oRpKYZXTmhJBKkoO6Aup1IybMyUw2jzq6HE7E2bndmbNnvT5mC6hr6_9S_9CP4j8q62Aj8PANQt6-bZFFd9OvAhg5uNT-Gz_v-kiZCj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3148495040</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fluid management in adult patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A scoping review</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jendoubi, Ali ; de Roux, Quentin ; Ribot, Solène ; Vanden Bulcke, Aurore ; Miard, Camille ; Tiquet, Bérénice ; Ghaleh, Bijan ; Tissier, Renaud ; Kohlhauer, Matthias ; Mongardon, Nicolas</creator><creatorcontrib>Jendoubi, Ali ; de Roux, Quentin ; Ribot, Solène ; Vanden Bulcke, Aurore ; Miard, Camille ; Tiquet, Bérénice ; Ghaleh, Bijan ; Tissier, Renaud ; Kohlhauer, Matthias ; Mongardon, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><description>The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a cardiocirculatory support has tremendously increased in critically ill patients. Although fluid therapy is an essential component of the hemodynamic management of VA-ECMO patients, the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy remains controversial. We performed a scoping review to map out the existing knowledge on fluid management in terms of fluid type, dosing and the impact of fluid balance on VA-ECMO patient outcomes.
A literature search within PubMed and EMBASE was conducted from database inception to April 2024. We included all studies involving critically ill adult patients, supported by VA-ECMO regardless of clinical indication (cardiogenic shock or extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation) with or without Renal Replacement Therapy and describing fluid resuscitation strategies or focusing on fluid type or reporting the impact of fluid balance on clinical outcomes and mortality. Details of study population, ECMO indications, fluid types, resuscitation strategies, fluid balance and outcome measures were extracted.
Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria, including 14 clinical studies and two experimental animal studies. We found a lack of studies comparing restrictive and liberal approaches. No study has compared the efficacy and safety of balanced and saline solutions. The place of albumin, as an alternative fluid, should be investigated. Despite their heterogeneity, studies found a negative impact of both early and cumulative fluid overload on survival and renal outcomes.
The available literature on the fluid management in VA-ECMO setting is scarce. More high-quality evidence is needed regarding optimal fluid dosing, type and resuscitation endpoints in order to standardize practice and improve outcomes.
[Display omitted]
•There is a significant amount of data to support the negative impact of fluid overload on survival and kidney outcomes in VA-ECMO patients.•There is no evidence on the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy in VA-ECMO patients in terms of volume and type.•There is no data comparing balanced versus unbalanced solutions in VA-ECMO setting. There is no evidence to support the use of albumin as a first line resuscitation fluid.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-9441</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1557-8615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-8615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.155007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39709803</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Critically ill patients ; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ; Fluid management</subject><ispartof>Journal of critical care, 2025-04, Vol.86, p.155007, Article 155007</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1523-18e4c9c4a22966e5f72bdd4a0048b86535c4eb45a9d6839623211e95c9148d6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.155007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3538,27906,27907,45977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39709803$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jendoubi, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Roux, Quentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribot, Solène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanden Bulcke, Aurore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miard, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiquet, Bérénice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghaleh, Bijan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tissier, Renaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohlhauer, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mongardon, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><title>Fluid management in adult patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A scoping review</title><title>Journal of critical care</title><addtitle>J Crit Care</addtitle><description>The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a cardiocirculatory support has tremendously increased in critically ill patients. Although fluid therapy is an essential component of the hemodynamic management of VA-ECMO patients, the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy remains controversial. We performed a scoping review to map out the existing knowledge on fluid management in terms of fluid type, dosing and the impact of fluid balance on VA-ECMO patient outcomes.
A literature search within PubMed and EMBASE was conducted from database inception to April 2024. We included all studies involving critically ill adult patients, supported by VA-ECMO regardless of clinical indication (cardiogenic shock or extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation) with or without Renal Replacement Therapy and describing fluid resuscitation strategies or focusing on fluid type or reporting the impact of fluid balance on clinical outcomes and mortality. Details of study population, ECMO indications, fluid types, resuscitation strategies, fluid balance and outcome measures were extracted.
Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria, including 14 clinical studies and two experimental animal studies. We found a lack of studies comparing restrictive and liberal approaches. No study has compared the efficacy and safety of balanced and saline solutions. The place of albumin, as an alternative fluid, should be investigated. Despite their heterogeneity, studies found a negative impact of both early and cumulative fluid overload on survival and renal outcomes.
The available literature on the fluid management in VA-ECMO setting is scarce. More high-quality evidence is needed regarding optimal fluid dosing, type and resuscitation endpoints in order to standardize practice and improve outcomes.
[Display omitted]
•There is a significant amount of data to support the negative impact of fluid overload on survival and kidney outcomes in VA-ECMO patients.•There is no evidence on the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy in VA-ECMO patients in terms of volume and type.•There is no data comparing balanced versus unbalanced solutions in VA-ECMO setting. There is no evidence to support the use of albumin as a first line resuscitation fluid.</description><subject>Critically ill patients</subject><subject>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation</subject><subject>Fluid management</subject><issn>0883-9441</issn><issn>1557-8615</issn><issn>1557-8615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtP3DAURq0KVIbHH-ii8pJNpn4mNuoGoQKVkNi0a8ux74w8SuxgJxT-fT0aYMnKD53v070HoW-UrCmh7Y_deueyWzPCxJpKSUj3Ba3qpWtUS-URWhGleKOFoCfotJQdIbTjXH5FJ1x3RCvCV2i6HZbg8Wij3cIIccYhYuuXYcaTnUP9KHiJHvI2hbjFzxCTzTPkYAcML3O2LuUpZajPEcY-2wg4vbxuIdZ0ilf4GheXpn02w3OAf-foeGOHAhdv5xn6e_vrz8198_B49_vm-qFxVDLeUAXCaScsY7ptQW461nsvLCFC9aqVXDoBvZBW-1Zx3TLOKAUtnaZC-Rb4Gbo89E45PS1QZjOG4mAY6oRpKYZXTmhJBKkoO6Aup1IybMyUw2jzq6HE7E2bndmbNnvT5mC6hr6_9S_9CP4j8q62Aj8PANQt6-bZFFd9OvAhg5uNT-Gz_v-kiZCj</recordid><startdate>202504</startdate><enddate>202504</enddate><creator>Jendoubi, Ali</creator><creator>de Roux, Quentin</creator><creator>Ribot, Solène</creator><creator>Vanden Bulcke, Aurore</creator><creator>Miard, Camille</creator><creator>Tiquet, Bérénice</creator><creator>Ghaleh, Bijan</creator><creator>Tissier, Renaud</creator><creator>Kohlhauer, Matthias</creator><creator>Mongardon, Nicolas</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202504</creationdate><title>Fluid management in adult patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A scoping review</title><author>Jendoubi, Ali ; de Roux, Quentin ; Ribot, Solène ; Vanden Bulcke, Aurore ; Miard, Camille ; Tiquet, Bérénice ; Ghaleh, Bijan ; Tissier, Renaud ; Kohlhauer, Matthias ; Mongardon, Nicolas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1523-18e4c9c4a22966e5f72bdd4a0048b86535c4eb45a9d6839623211e95c9148d6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Critically ill patients</topic><topic>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation</topic><topic>Fluid management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jendoubi, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Roux, Quentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribot, Solène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanden Bulcke, Aurore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miard, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiquet, Bérénice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghaleh, Bijan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tissier, Renaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohlhauer, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mongardon, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of critical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jendoubi, Ali</au><au>de Roux, Quentin</au><au>Ribot, Solène</au><au>Vanden Bulcke, Aurore</au><au>Miard, Camille</au><au>Tiquet, Bérénice</au><au>Ghaleh, Bijan</au><au>Tissier, Renaud</au><au>Kohlhauer, Matthias</au><au>Mongardon, Nicolas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fluid management in adult patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A scoping review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of critical care</jtitle><addtitle>J Crit Care</addtitle><date>2025-04</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>86</volume><spage>155007</spage><pages>155007-</pages><artnum>155007</artnum><issn>0883-9441</issn><issn>1557-8615</issn><eissn>1557-8615</eissn><abstract>The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a cardiocirculatory support has tremendously increased in critically ill patients. Although fluid therapy is an essential component of the hemodynamic management of VA-ECMO patients, the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy remains controversial. We performed a scoping review to map out the existing knowledge on fluid management in terms of fluid type, dosing and the impact of fluid balance on VA-ECMO patient outcomes.
A literature search within PubMed and EMBASE was conducted from database inception to April 2024. We included all studies involving critically ill adult patients, supported by VA-ECMO regardless of clinical indication (cardiogenic shock or extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation) with or without Renal Replacement Therapy and describing fluid resuscitation strategies or focusing on fluid type or reporting the impact of fluid balance on clinical outcomes and mortality. Details of study population, ECMO indications, fluid types, resuscitation strategies, fluid balance and outcome measures were extracted.
Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria, including 14 clinical studies and two experimental animal studies. We found a lack of studies comparing restrictive and liberal approaches. No study has compared the efficacy and safety of balanced and saline solutions. The place of albumin, as an alternative fluid, should be investigated. Despite their heterogeneity, studies found a negative impact of both early and cumulative fluid overload on survival and renal outcomes.
The available literature on the fluid management in VA-ECMO setting is scarce. More high-quality evidence is needed regarding optimal fluid dosing, type and resuscitation endpoints in order to standardize practice and improve outcomes.
[Display omitted]
•There is a significant amount of data to support the negative impact of fluid overload on survival and kidney outcomes in VA-ECMO patients.•There is no evidence on the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy in VA-ECMO patients in terms of volume and type.•There is no data comparing balanced versus unbalanced solutions in VA-ECMO setting. There is no evidence to support the use of albumin as a first line resuscitation fluid.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39709803</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.155007</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-9441 |
ispartof | Journal of critical care, 2025-04, Vol.86, p.155007, Article 155007 |
issn | 0883-9441 1557-8615 1557-8615 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3148495040 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Critically ill patients Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Fluid management |
title | Fluid management in adult patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A scoping review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T10%3A50%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fluid%20management%20in%20adult%20patients%20undergoing%20venoarterial%20extracorporeal%20membrane%20oxygenation:%20A%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20critical%20care&rft.au=Jendoubi,%20Ali&rft.date=2025-04&rft.volume=86&rft.spage=155007&rft.pages=155007-&rft.artnum=155007&rft.issn=0883-9441&rft.eissn=1557-8615&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.155007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3148495040%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3148495040&rft_id=info:pmid/39709803&rft_els_id=S0883944124004945&rfr_iscdi=true |