Effects of different-valent vaccines against human papillomavirus (HPV) to prevent persistent HPV16/18 infections and CIN2+ in women: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
To evaluate the efficacy of 2-valent, 4-valent and 9-valent HPV vaccination in preventing persistent HPV infections and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) lesions among women with different infection statuses at baseline.OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the efficacy of 2-valent, 4-val...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of infectious diseases 2024-12, p.107363 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 107363 |
container_title | International journal of infectious diseases |
container_volume | |
creator | Wu, Haiyue Li, Lucia Fu, Kun Shen, YuFei Lu, Yingnan Liao, Zexi Liu, Yingzhen Zha, Wenting Wu, Lisha Zhang, Yu |
description | To evaluate the efficacy of 2-valent, 4-valent and 9-valent HPV vaccination in preventing persistent HPV infections and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) lesions among women with different infection statuses at baseline.OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the efficacy of 2-valent, 4-valent and 9-valent HPV vaccination in preventing persistent HPV infections and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) lesions among women with different infection statuses at baseline.PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception to March 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and post hoc analyses of RCTs reporting the risk of persistent HPV infections and CIN2+ among vaccinated women were included. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to summarize the intervention effects.METHODSPubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception to March 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and post hoc analyses of RCTs reporting the risk of persistent HPV infections and CIN2+ among vaccinated women were included. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to summarize the intervention effects.Eighteen RCTs and one post hoc analysis of RCTs were included. In the according-to-protocol (ATP) cohorts, the 4-valent vaccine was the most effective against HPV16/18-related persistent infections and CIN2+ (6-month persistent infections (6mPIs): OR 0.05, 95% CI [0.02, 0.15]; 12-month persistent infections (12mPIs): OR 0.02, 95% CI [0.00, 0.18]; CIN2+: OR 0.03 95% CI [0.01, 0.17]). For the total vaccination cohorts (TVCs), the 2-valent vaccine was most effective against HPV16/18-related 12mPIs and CIN2+ (12mPIs: OR 0.15, 95% CI [0.04, 0.63]; CIN2+: OR 0.52 95% CI [0.32, 0.87]), whereas the 4-valent vaccine was most effective against HPV16/18-related 6mPIs (OR 0.08, 95% CI [0.02, 0.28]).RESULTSEighteen RCTs and one post hoc analysis of RCTs were included. In the according-to-protocol (ATP) cohorts, the 4-valent vaccine was the most effective against HPV16/18-related persistent infections and CIN2+ (6-month persistent infections (6mPIs): OR 0.05, 95% CI [0.02, 0.15]; 12-month persistent infections (12mPIs): OR 0.02, 95% CI [0.00, 0.18]; CIN2+: OR 0.03 95% CI [0.01, 0.17]). For the total vaccination cohorts (TVCs), the 2-valent vaccine was most effective against HPV16/18-related 12mPIs and CIN2+ (12mPIs: |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijid.2024.107363 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3147977195</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3147977195</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_31479771953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVTrtOw0AQPCGQCI8foNoyCDn4bMd26FAUFBpEgWijlbOGDec74z07ynfxg5wRBS3VjGbnsUpd6XimY53f7ma84-0siZMsCEWap0dqosuijNK51sd_-Kk6E9nFcZzleTlRX6u6psoLuBq2HHhH1kcDmgAwYFWxJQF8Q7bi4b1v0EKLLRvjGhy46wWm6-fXa_AO2o6GMdZSJyx-pOEUvtMlsB1n2NlQZrewfHxKboIIe9eQvYN7kENINOi5glDDtP_xWfJ7131AQx4jtGgOoflCndRohC5_8VxNH1Yvy3XUdu6zJ_GbhqUiY9CS62WT6qxYFIVezNN_WL8BgdduAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3147977195</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of different-valent vaccines against human papillomavirus (HPV) to prevent persistent HPV16/18 infections and CIN2+ in women: A systematic review and network meta-analysis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Wu, Haiyue ; Li, Lucia ; Fu, Kun ; Shen, YuFei ; Lu, Yingnan ; Liao, Zexi ; Liu, Yingzhen ; Zha, Wenting ; Wu, Lisha ; Zhang, Yu</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Haiyue ; Li, Lucia ; Fu, Kun ; Shen, YuFei ; Lu, Yingnan ; Liao, Zexi ; Liu, Yingzhen ; Zha, Wenting ; Wu, Lisha ; Zhang, Yu</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the efficacy of 2-valent, 4-valent and 9-valent HPV vaccination in preventing persistent HPV infections and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) lesions among women with different infection statuses at baseline.OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the efficacy of 2-valent, 4-valent and 9-valent HPV vaccination in preventing persistent HPV infections and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) lesions among women with different infection statuses at baseline.PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception to March 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and post hoc analyses of RCTs reporting the risk of persistent HPV infections and CIN2+ among vaccinated women were included. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to summarize the intervention effects.METHODSPubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception to March 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and post hoc analyses of RCTs reporting the risk of persistent HPV infections and CIN2+ among vaccinated women were included. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to summarize the intervention effects.Eighteen RCTs and one post hoc analysis of RCTs were included. In the according-to-protocol (ATP) cohorts, the 4-valent vaccine was the most effective against HPV16/18-related persistent infections and CIN2+ (6-month persistent infections (6mPIs): OR 0.05, 95% CI [0.02, 0.15]; 12-month persistent infections (12mPIs): OR 0.02, 95% CI [0.00, 0.18]; CIN2+: OR 0.03 95% CI [0.01, 0.17]). For the total vaccination cohorts (TVCs), the 2-valent vaccine was most effective against HPV16/18-related 12mPIs and CIN2+ (12mPIs: OR 0.15, 95% CI [0.04, 0.63]; CIN2+: OR 0.52 95% CI [0.32, 0.87]), whereas the 4-valent vaccine was most effective against HPV16/18-related 6mPIs (OR 0.08, 95% CI [0.02, 0.28]).RESULTSEighteen RCTs and one post hoc analysis of RCTs were included. In the according-to-protocol (ATP) cohorts, the 4-valent vaccine was the most effective against HPV16/18-related persistent infections and CIN2+ (6-month persistent infections (6mPIs): OR 0.05, 95% CI [0.02, 0.15]; 12-month persistent infections (12mPIs): OR 0.02, 95% CI [0.00, 0.18]; CIN2+: OR 0.03 95% CI [0.01, 0.17]). For the total vaccination cohorts (TVCs), the 2-valent vaccine was most effective against HPV16/18-related 12mPIs and CIN2+ (12mPIs: OR 0.15, 95% CI [0.04, 0.63]; CIN2+: OR 0.52 95% CI [0.32, 0.87]), whereas the 4-valent vaccine was most effective against HPV16/18-related 6mPIs (OR 0.08, 95% CI [0.02, 0.28]).Vaccination against HPV can significantly reduce the risk of persistent HPV16/18-related infections and CIN2+, regardless of the HPV infection prevaccination. In addition to 4- and 9-valent vaccines, 2-valent vaccines could also provide satisfactory protection against persistent HPV16/18-related infections and CIN2+, especially over the long term, and may constitute an alternative for government-led vaccination programs in developing countries.CONCLUSIONSVaccination against HPV can significantly reduce the risk of persistent HPV16/18-related infections and CIN2+, regardless of the HPV infection prevaccination. In addition to 4- and 9-valent vaccines, 2-valent vaccines could also provide satisfactory protection against persistent HPV16/18-related infections and CIN2+, especially over the long term, and may constitute an alternative for government-led vaccination programs in developing countries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-3511</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3511</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2024.107363</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>International journal of infectious diseases, 2024-12, p.107363</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Haiyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, YuFei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Yingnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Zexi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yingzhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zha, Wenting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Lisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yu</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of different-valent vaccines against human papillomavirus (HPV) to prevent persistent HPV16/18 infections and CIN2+ in women: A systematic review and network meta-analysis</title><title>International journal of infectious diseases</title><description>To evaluate the efficacy of 2-valent, 4-valent and 9-valent HPV vaccination in preventing persistent HPV infections and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) lesions among women with different infection statuses at baseline.OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the efficacy of 2-valent, 4-valent and 9-valent HPV vaccination in preventing persistent HPV infections and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) lesions among women with different infection statuses at baseline.PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception to March 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and post hoc analyses of RCTs reporting the risk of persistent HPV infections and CIN2+ among vaccinated women were included. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to summarize the intervention effects.METHODSPubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception to March 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and post hoc analyses of RCTs reporting the risk of persistent HPV infections and CIN2+ among vaccinated women were included. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to summarize the intervention effects.Eighteen RCTs and one post hoc analysis of RCTs were included. In the according-to-protocol (ATP) cohorts, the 4-valent vaccine was the most effective against HPV16/18-related persistent infections and CIN2+ (6-month persistent infections (6mPIs): OR 0.05, 95% CI [0.02, 0.15]; 12-month persistent infections (12mPIs): OR 0.02, 95% CI [0.00, 0.18]; CIN2+: OR 0.03 95% CI [0.01, 0.17]). For the total vaccination cohorts (TVCs), the 2-valent vaccine was most effective against HPV16/18-related 12mPIs and CIN2+ (12mPIs: OR 0.15, 95% CI [0.04, 0.63]; CIN2+: OR 0.52 95% CI [0.32, 0.87]), whereas the 4-valent vaccine was most effective against HPV16/18-related 6mPIs (OR 0.08, 95% CI [0.02, 0.28]).RESULTSEighteen RCTs and one post hoc analysis of RCTs were included. In the according-to-protocol (ATP) cohorts, the 4-valent vaccine was the most effective against HPV16/18-related persistent infections and CIN2+ (6-month persistent infections (6mPIs): OR 0.05, 95% CI [0.02, 0.15]; 12-month persistent infections (12mPIs): OR 0.02, 95% CI [0.00, 0.18]; CIN2+: OR 0.03 95% CI [0.01, 0.17]). For the total vaccination cohorts (TVCs), the 2-valent vaccine was most effective against HPV16/18-related 12mPIs and CIN2+ (12mPIs: OR 0.15, 95% CI [0.04, 0.63]; CIN2+: OR 0.52 95% CI [0.32, 0.87]), whereas the 4-valent vaccine was most effective against HPV16/18-related 6mPIs (OR 0.08, 95% CI [0.02, 0.28]).Vaccination against HPV can significantly reduce the risk of persistent HPV16/18-related infections and CIN2+, regardless of the HPV infection prevaccination. In addition to 4- and 9-valent vaccines, 2-valent vaccines could also provide satisfactory protection against persistent HPV16/18-related infections and CIN2+, especially over the long term, and may constitute an alternative for government-led vaccination programs in developing countries.CONCLUSIONSVaccination against HPV can significantly reduce the risk of persistent HPV16/18-related infections and CIN2+, regardless of the HPV infection prevaccination. In addition to 4- and 9-valent vaccines, 2-valent vaccines could also provide satisfactory protection against persistent HPV16/18-related infections and CIN2+, especially over the long term, and may constitute an alternative for government-led vaccination programs in developing countries.</description><issn>1878-3511</issn><issn>1878-3511</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVTrtOw0AQPCGQCI8foNoyCDn4bMd26FAUFBpEgWijlbOGDec74z07ynfxg5wRBS3VjGbnsUpd6XimY53f7ma84-0siZMsCEWap0dqosuijNK51sd_-Kk6E9nFcZzleTlRX6u6psoLuBq2HHhH1kcDmgAwYFWxJQF8Q7bi4b1v0EKLLRvjGhy46wWm6-fXa_AO2o6GMdZSJyx-pOEUvtMlsB1n2NlQZrewfHxKboIIe9eQvYN7kENINOi5glDDtP_xWfJ7131AQx4jtGgOoflCndRohC5_8VxNH1Yvy3XUdu6zJ_GbhqUiY9CS62WT6qxYFIVezNN_WL8BgdduAA</recordid><startdate>20241219</startdate><enddate>20241219</enddate><creator>Wu, Haiyue</creator><creator>Li, Lucia</creator><creator>Fu, Kun</creator><creator>Shen, YuFei</creator><creator>Lu, Yingnan</creator><creator>Liao, Zexi</creator><creator>Liu, Yingzhen</creator><creator>Zha, Wenting</creator><creator>Wu, Lisha</creator><creator>Zhang, Yu</creator><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241219</creationdate><title>Effects of different-valent vaccines against human papillomavirus (HPV) to prevent persistent HPV16/18 infections and CIN2+ in women: A systematic review and network meta-analysis</title><author>Wu, Haiyue ; Li, Lucia ; Fu, Kun ; Shen, YuFei ; Lu, Yingnan ; Liao, Zexi ; Liu, Yingzhen ; Zha, Wenting ; Wu, Lisha ; Zhang, Yu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_31479771953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Haiyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, YuFei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Yingnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Zexi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yingzhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zha, Wenting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Lisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yu</creatorcontrib><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Haiyue</au><au>Li, Lucia</au><au>Fu, Kun</au><au>Shen, YuFei</au><au>Lu, Yingnan</au><au>Liao, Zexi</au><au>Liu, Yingzhen</au><au>Zha, Wenting</au><au>Wu, Lisha</au><au>Zhang, Yu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of different-valent vaccines against human papillomavirus (HPV) to prevent persistent HPV16/18 infections and CIN2+ in women: A systematic review and network meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>International journal of infectious diseases</jtitle><date>2024-12-19</date><risdate>2024</risdate><spage>107363</spage><pages>107363-</pages><issn>1878-3511</issn><eissn>1878-3511</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the efficacy of 2-valent, 4-valent and 9-valent HPV vaccination in preventing persistent HPV infections and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) lesions among women with different infection statuses at baseline.OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the efficacy of 2-valent, 4-valent and 9-valent HPV vaccination in preventing persistent HPV infections and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) lesions among women with different infection statuses at baseline.PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception to March 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and post hoc analyses of RCTs reporting the risk of persistent HPV infections and CIN2+ among vaccinated women were included. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to summarize the intervention effects.METHODSPubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception to March 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and post hoc analyses of RCTs reporting the risk of persistent HPV infections and CIN2+ among vaccinated women were included. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to summarize the intervention effects.Eighteen RCTs and one post hoc analysis of RCTs were included. In the according-to-protocol (ATP) cohorts, the 4-valent vaccine was the most effective against HPV16/18-related persistent infections and CIN2+ (6-month persistent infections (6mPIs): OR 0.05, 95% CI [0.02, 0.15]; 12-month persistent infections (12mPIs): OR 0.02, 95% CI [0.00, 0.18]; CIN2+: OR 0.03 95% CI [0.01, 0.17]). For the total vaccination cohorts (TVCs), the 2-valent vaccine was most effective against HPV16/18-related 12mPIs and CIN2+ (12mPIs: OR 0.15, 95% CI [0.04, 0.63]; CIN2+: OR 0.52 95% CI [0.32, 0.87]), whereas the 4-valent vaccine was most effective against HPV16/18-related 6mPIs (OR 0.08, 95% CI [0.02, 0.28]).RESULTSEighteen RCTs and one post hoc analysis of RCTs were included. In the according-to-protocol (ATP) cohorts, the 4-valent vaccine was the most effective against HPV16/18-related persistent infections and CIN2+ (6-month persistent infections (6mPIs): OR 0.05, 95% CI [0.02, 0.15]; 12-month persistent infections (12mPIs): OR 0.02, 95% CI [0.00, 0.18]; CIN2+: OR 0.03 95% CI [0.01, 0.17]). For the total vaccination cohorts (TVCs), the 2-valent vaccine was most effective against HPV16/18-related 12mPIs and CIN2+ (12mPIs: OR 0.15, 95% CI [0.04, 0.63]; CIN2+: OR 0.52 95% CI [0.32, 0.87]), whereas the 4-valent vaccine was most effective against HPV16/18-related 6mPIs (OR 0.08, 95% CI [0.02, 0.28]).Vaccination against HPV can significantly reduce the risk of persistent HPV16/18-related infections and CIN2+, regardless of the HPV infection prevaccination. In addition to 4- and 9-valent vaccines, 2-valent vaccines could also provide satisfactory protection against persistent HPV16/18-related infections and CIN2+, especially over the long term, and may constitute an alternative for government-led vaccination programs in developing countries.CONCLUSIONSVaccination against HPV can significantly reduce the risk of persistent HPV16/18-related infections and CIN2+, regardless of the HPV infection prevaccination. In addition to 4- and 9-valent vaccines, 2-valent vaccines could also provide satisfactory protection against persistent HPV16/18-related infections and CIN2+, especially over the long term, and may constitute an alternative for government-led vaccination programs in developing countries.</abstract><doi>10.1016/j.ijid.2024.107363</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1878-3511 |
ispartof | International journal of infectious diseases, 2024-12, p.107363 |
issn | 1878-3511 1878-3511 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3147977195 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
title | Effects of different-valent vaccines against human papillomavirus (HPV) to prevent persistent HPV16/18 infections and CIN2+ in women: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A58%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20different-valent%20vaccines%20against%20human%20papillomavirus%20(HPV)%20to%20prevent%20persistent%20HPV16/18%20infections%20and%20CIN2+%20in%20women:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20network%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Wu,%20Haiyue&rft.date=2024-12-19&rft.spage=107363&rft.pages=107363-&rft.issn=1878-3511&rft.eissn=1878-3511&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijid.2024.107363&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3147977195%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3147977195&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |