Sources of variation in preschoolers’ relational reasoning: The interaction between language use and working memory

•We examined language- and working memory-related sources of variation on Turkish-learning preschoolers’ relational reasoning.•Children using more relational language and background-focused scene descriptions performed worse in the relational reasoning task.•Children with less frequent relational la...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental child psychology 2024-12, Vol.252, p.106149, Article 106149
Hauptverfasser: Esmer, Şeref Can, Turan, Eylül, Karadöller, Dilay Z., Göksun, Tilbe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 106149
container_title Journal of experimental child psychology
container_volume 252
creator Esmer, Şeref Can
Turan, Eylül
Karadöller, Dilay Z.
Göksun, Tilbe
description •We examined language- and working memory-related sources of variation on Turkish-learning preschoolers’ relational reasoning.•Children using more relational language and background-focused scene descriptions performed worse in the relational reasoning task.•Children with less frequent relational language use and focal object descriptions of the scenes benefited more from working memory.•The ways children strengthen their relational reasoning skills may depend on interactive effects of different cognitive mechanisms. Previous research has suggested the importance of relational language and working memory in children’s relational reasoning. The tendency to use language (e.g., using more relational than object-focused language, prioritizing focal objects over background in linguistic descriptions) could reflect children’s biases toward the relational versus object-based solutions in a relational match-to-sample (RMTS) task. In the lack of any apparent object match as a foil option, object-focused children might rely on other cognitive mechanisms (i.e., working memory) to choose a relational match in the RMTS task. The current study examined the interactive roles of language- and working memory-related sources of variation in Turkish-learning preschoolers’ relational reasoning. We collected data from 4- and 5-year-olds (N = 41) via Zoom in the RMTS task, a scene description task, and a backward word span task. Generalized binomial mixed effects models revealed that children who used more relational language and background-focused scene descriptions performed worse in the relational reasoning task. Furthermore, children with less frequent relational language use and focal object descriptions of the scenes benefited more from working memory to succeed in the relational reasoning task. These results suggest additional working memory demands for object-focused children to choose relational matches in the RMTS task, highlighting the importance of examining the interactive effects of different cognitive mechanisms on relational reasoning.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106149
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3147973316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022096524002893</els_id><sourcerecordid>3147973316</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e1098-25031fb3a413b08daac30841f8986227d3bc3988aa115d7bbd48f6719d56e07b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kUtOwzAQhi0EouVxARbISzYpduw4DmKDEC8JiQWwthx70rokcbETEDuuwfU4CS6F1by-Gc3Mj9ARJTNKqDhdzpZgVrOc5DwlBOXVFppSUomM8KLcRlNC8jxLcTFBezEuCaFUcLaLJqwqiSBcTtH46MdgIGLf4DcdnB6c77Hr8SpANAvvWwjx-_MLB2h_a7pNro6-d_38DD8tIMEDBG1-G2sY3gF63Op-Puo54DEC1r3F7z68pA7cQefDxwHaaXQb4fDP7qPn66uny9vs_uHm7vLiPoN0hszygjDa1ExzymoirdaGEclpIysp8ry0rDasklJrSgtb1rXlshElrWwhgJQ120cnm7mr4F9HiIPqXDTQpvXAj1ExysuqZIyKhB7_oWPdgVWr4DodPtT_qxJwvgEgLfzmIKhoHPQGrAtgBmW9U5SotTJqqdbKqLUyaqMM-wEFFIMB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3147973316</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sources of variation in preschoolers’ relational reasoning: The interaction between language use and working memory</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Esmer, Şeref Can ; Turan, Eylül ; Karadöller, Dilay Z. ; Göksun, Tilbe</creator><creatorcontrib>Esmer, Şeref Can ; Turan, Eylül ; Karadöller, Dilay Z. ; Göksun, Tilbe</creatorcontrib><description>•We examined language- and working memory-related sources of variation on Turkish-learning preschoolers’ relational reasoning.•Children using more relational language and background-focused scene descriptions performed worse in the relational reasoning task.•Children with less frequent relational language use and focal object descriptions of the scenes benefited more from working memory.•The ways children strengthen their relational reasoning skills may depend on interactive effects of different cognitive mechanisms. Previous research has suggested the importance of relational language and working memory in children’s relational reasoning. The tendency to use language (e.g., using more relational than object-focused language, prioritizing focal objects over background in linguistic descriptions) could reflect children’s biases toward the relational versus object-based solutions in a relational match-to-sample (RMTS) task. In the lack of any apparent object match as a foil option, object-focused children might rely on other cognitive mechanisms (i.e., working memory) to choose a relational match in the RMTS task. The current study examined the interactive roles of language- and working memory-related sources of variation in Turkish-learning preschoolers’ relational reasoning. We collected data from 4- and 5-year-olds (N = 41) via Zoom in the RMTS task, a scene description task, and a backward word span task. Generalized binomial mixed effects models revealed that children who used more relational language and background-focused scene descriptions performed worse in the relational reasoning task. Furthermore, children with less frequent relational language use and focal object descriptions of the scenes benefited more from working memory to succeed in the relational reasoning task. These results suggest additional working memory demands for object-focused children to choose relational matches in the RMTS task, highlighting the importance of examining the interactive effects of different cognitive mechanisms on relational reasoning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0965</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1096-0457</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106149</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39706048</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cognitive development ; Relational language ; Relational reasoning ; Working memory</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental child psychology, 2024-12, Vol.252, p.106149, Article 106149</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106149$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39706048$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Esmer, Şeref Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turan, Eylül</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karadöller, Dilay Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Göksun, Tilbe</creatorcontrib><title>Sources of variation in preschoolers’ relational reasoning: The interaction between language use and working memory</title><title>Journal of experimental child psychology</title><addtitle>J Exp Child Psychol</addtitle><description>•We examined language- and working memory-related sources of variation on Turkish-learning preschoolers’ relational reasoning.•Children using more relational language and background-focused scene descriptions performed worse in the relational reasoning task.•Children with less frequent relational language use and focal object descriptions of the scenes benefited more from working memory.•The ways children strengthen their relational reasoning skills may depend on interactive effects of different cognitive mechanisms. Previous research has suggested the importance of relational language and working memory in children’s relational reasoning. The tendency to use language (e.g., using more relational than object-focused language, prioritizing focal objects over background in linguistic descriptions) could reflect children’s biases toward the relational versus object-based solutions in a relational match-to-sample (RMTS) task. In the lack of any apparent object match as a foil option, object-focused children might rely on other cognitive mechanisms (i.e., working memory) to choose a relational match in the RMTS task. The current study examined the interactive roles of language- and working memory-related sources of variation in Turkish-learning preschoolers’ relational reasoning. We collected data from 4- and 5-year-olds (N = 41) via Zoom in the RMTS task, a scene description task, and a backward word span task. Generalized binomial mixed effects models revealed that children who used more relational language and background-focused scene descriptions performed worse in the relational reasoning task. Furthermore, children with less frequent relational language use and focal object descriptions of the scenes benefited more from working memory to succeed in the relational reasoning task. These results suggest additional working memory demands for object-focused children to choose relational matches in the RMTS task, highlighting the importance of examining the interactive effects of different cognitive mechanisms on relational reasoning.</description><subject>Cognitive development</subject><subject>Relational language</subject><subject>Relational reasoning</subject><subject>Working memory</subject><issn>0022-0965</issn><issn>1096-0457</issn><issn>1096-0457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kUtOwzAQhi0EouVxARbISzYpduw4DmKDEC8JiQWwthx70rokcbETEDuuwfU4CS6F1by-Gc3Mj9ARJTNKqDhdzpZgVrOc5DwlBOXVFppSUomM8KLcRlNC8jxLcTFBezEuCaFUcLaLJqwqiSBcTtH46MdgIGLf4DcdnB6c77Hr8SpANAvvWwjx-_MLB2h_a7pNro6-d_38DD8tIMEDBG1-G2sY3gF63Op-Puo54DEC1r3F7z68pA7cQefDxwHaaXQb4fDP7qPn66uny9vs_uHm7vLiPoN0hszygjDa1ExzymoirdaGEclpIysp8ry0rDasklJrSgtb1rXlshElrWwhgJQ120cnm7mr4F9HiIPqXDTQpvXAj1ExysuqZIyKhB7_oWPdgVWr4DodPtT_qxJwvgEgLfzmIKhoHPQGrAtgBmW9U5SotTJqqdbKqLUyaqMM-wEFFIMB</recordid><startdate>20241219</startdate><enddate>20241219</enddate><creator>Esmer, Şeref Can</creator><creator>Turan, Eylül</creator><creator>Karadöller, Dilay Z.</creator><creator>Göksun, Tilbe</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241219</creationdate><title>Sources of variation in preschoolers’ relational reasoning: The interaction between language use and working memory</title><author>Esmer, Şeref Can ; Turan, Eylül ; Karadöller, Dilay Z. ; Göksun, Tilbe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e1098-25031fb3a413b08daac30841f8986227d3bc3988aa115d7bbd48f6719d56e07b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cognitive development</topic><topic>Relational language</topic><topic>Relational reasoning</topic><topic>Working memory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Esmer, Şeref Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turan, Eylül</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karadöller, Dilay Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Göksun, Tilbe</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental child psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Esmer, Şeref Can</au><au>Turan, Eylül</au><au>Karadöller, Dilay Z.</au><au>Göksun, Tilbe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sources of variation in preschoolers’ relational reasoning: The interaction between language use and working memory</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental child psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Child Psychol</addtitle><date>2024-12-19</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>252</volume><spage>106149</spage><pages>106149-</pages><artnum>106149</artnum><issn>0022-0965</issn><issn>1096-0457</issn><eissn>1096-0457</eissn><abstract>•We examined language- and working memory-related sources of variation on Turkish-learning preschoolers’ relational reasoning.•Children using more relational language and background-focused scene descriptions performed worse in the relational reasoning task.•Children with less frequent relational language use and focal object descriptions of the scenes benefited more from working memory.•The ways children strengthen their relational reasoning skills may depend on interactive effects of different cognitive mechanisms. Previous research has suggested the importance of relational language and working memory in children’s relational reasoning. The tendency to use language (e.g., using more relational than object-focused language, prioritizing focal objects over background in linguistic descriptions) could reflect children’s biases toward the relational versus object-based solutions in a relational match-to-sample (RMTS) task. In the lack of any apparent object match as a foil option, object-focused children might rely on other cognitive mechanisms (i.e., working memory) to choose a relational match in the RMTS task. The current study examined the interactive roles of language- and working memory-related sources of variation in Turkish-learning preschoolers’ relational reasoning. We collected data from 4- and 5-year-olds (N = 41) via Zoom in the RMTS task, a scene description task, and a backward word span task. Generalized binomial mixed effects models revealed that children who used more relational language and background-focused scene descriptions performed worse in the relational reasoning task. Furthermore, children with less frequent relational language use and focal object descriptions of the scenes benefited more from working memory to succeed in the relational reasoning task. These results suggest additional working memory demands for object-focused children to choose relational matches in the RMTS task, highlighting the importance of examining the interactive effects of different cognitive mechanisms on relational reasoning.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39706048</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106149</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0965
ispartof Journal of experimental child psychology, 2024-12, Vol.252, p.106149, Article 106149
issn 0022-0965
1096-0457
1096-0457
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3147973316
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Cognitive development
Relational language
Relational reasoning
Working memory
title Sources of variation in preschoolers’ relational reasoning: The interaction between language use and working memory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A54%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sources%20of%20variation%20in%20preschoolers%E2%80%99%20relational%20reasoning:%20The%20interaction%20between%20language%20use%20and%20working%20memory&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20child%20psychology&rft.au=Esmer,%20%C5%9Eeref%20Can&rft.date=2024-12-19&rft.volume=252&rft.spage=106149&rft.pages=106149-&rft.artnum=106149&rft.issn=0022-0965&rft.eissn=1096-0457&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106149&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3147973316%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3147973316&rft_id=info:pmid/39706048&rft_els_id=S0022096524002893&rfr_iscdi=true