A statewide analysis of uptake of highly effective contraception offered immediately postpartum in Massachusetts, 2017 – 2021

Our study aims to evaluate trends in Massachusetts in provision of highly effective contraception, including contraceptive implant, intrauterine device (IUD) and permanent contraception, in the immediate postpartum (iPP) period. Deliveries from 2017-2021 were extracted from a Massachusetts Acute Hos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contraception (Stoneham) 2024-12, p.110785, Article 110785
Hauptverfasser: Nandi, Preetha, Lekshmi, Devika, Charles, Alysa St, Werner, Erika, Evans, Megan L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 110785
container_title Contraception (Stoneham)
container_volume
creator Nandi, Preetha
Lekshmi, Devika
Charles, Alysa St
Werner, Erika
Evans, Megan L.
description Our study aims to evaluate trends in Massachusetts in provision of highly effective contraception, including contraceptive implant, intrauterine device (IUD) and permanent contraception, in the immediate postpartum (iPP) period. Deliveries from 2017-2021 were extracted from a Massachusetts Acute Hospital database, and the primary outcomes included permanent contraception, iPP implant, or iPP IUD provision during delivery admission. Covariates included race, ethnicity, insurance, and hospital type. Logistic regressions for iPP contraception procedures and comparing reversibility of methods were analyzed, as well as sub-analyses by delivery type. During the study period, 16,379 permanent contraception, 2,608 iPP implant, and 2,198 iPP IUD procedures were performed during delivery admissions in Massachusetts. In adjusted models, Hispanic patients or those with private insurance had higher odds of receiving any iPP method, whereas patients who delivered at a non-teaching hospital had lower odds of receiving any iPP method. Patients who identified as Hispanic, had public insurance, or delivered at a non-teaching hospital had lower odds of receiving a reversible compared to permanent method. These trends overall persisted when analyzed by delivery type. Many factors correlate with differential uptake of highly effective contraception during delivery admissions, suggesting policy and programming implications to meet the state’s unmet postpartum contraception need.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110785
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3147482279</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010782424004992</els_id><sourcerecordid>3147482279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e1186-1570c611061f2644e926d7704a69ece8b19774955ce4916c02f621eb0ae3783c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1uFDEQhS0URIYkV0CWssmCHqrcbru9jKLwIwWxgbXlcVczHvqPtnvQrOAO3JCT4NEki6yqFp9e1XuPsWuENQKqd7u1H4c0O09TCuOwFiDkGhF0Xb1gK6y1KaDC-oytABAKXQt5zl7HuAMAbSr9ip2XRgMKUCv2-5bH5BL9Cg1xN7juEEPkY8uXKbkfdNy24fu2O3BqW_Ip7Ik_O5-JlmZqeOh7akKWyuw0xjS5OS09DwP_7GJ0frtESim-5QJQ839__uZF4CV72bou0tXjvGDf3t9_vftYPHz58Onu9qEgxFoVWGnwKptU2AolJRmhGq1BOmXIU71Bo7U0VeVJGlQeRKsE0gYclboufXnBbk660zz-XCgm24foqevcQOMSbYlSy1oIbTL65hFdNtmSnebQu_lgn0LLwP0JoPzwPtBsow80-Gx_zhHZZgwWwR7Lsjv7LC17LMueyir_A_Dli8g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3147482279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A statewide analysis of uptake of highly effective contraception offered immediately postpartum in Massachusetts, 2017 – 2021</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Nandi, Preetha ; Lekshmi, Devika ; Charles, Alysa St ; Werner, Erika ; Evans, Megan L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nandi, Preetha ; Lekshmi, Devika ; Charles, Alysa St ; Werner, Erika ; Evans, Megan L.</creatorcontrib><description>Our study aims to evaluate trends in Massachusetts in provision of highly effective contraception, including contraceptive implant, intrauterine device (IUD) and permanent contraception, in the immediate postpartum (iPP) period. Deliveries from 2017-2021 were extracted from a Massachusetts Acute Hospital database, and the primary outcomes included permanent contraception, iPP implant, or iPP IUD provision during delivery admission. Covariates included race, ethnicity, insurance, and hospital type. Logistic regressions for iPP contraception procedures and comparing reversibility of methods were analyzed, as well as sub-analyses by delivery type. During the study period, 16,379 permanent contraception, 2,608 iPP implant, and 2,198 iPP IUD procedures were performed during delivery admissions in Massachusetts. In adjusted models, Hispanic patients or those with private insurance had higher odds of receiving any iPP method, whereas patients who delivered at a non-teaching hospital had lower odds of receiving any iPP method. Patients who identified as Hispanic, had public insurance, or delivered at a non-teaching hospital had lower odds of receiving a reversible compared to permanent method. These trends overall persisted when analyzed by delivery type. Many factors correlate with differential uptake of highly effective contraception during delivery admissions, suggesting policy and programming implications to meet the state’s unmet postpartum contraception need.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-7824</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-0518</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110785</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39701206</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Health disparity ; immediate postpartum ; permanent contraception ; postpartum contraception ; public health</subject><ispartof>Contraception (Stoneham), 2024-12, p.110785, Article 110785</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39701206$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nandi, Preetha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lekshmi, Devika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles, Alysa St</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Megan L.</creatorcontrib><title>A statewide analysis of uptake of highly effective contraception offered immediately postpartum in Massachusetts, 2017 – 2021</title><title>Contraception (Stoneham)</title><addtitle>Contraception</addtitle><description>Our study aims to evaluate trends in Massachusetts in provision of highly effective contraception, including contraceptive implant, intrauterine device (IUD) and permanent contraception, in the immediate postpartum (iPP) period. Deliveries from 2017-2021 were extracted from a Massachusetts Acute Hospital database, and the primary outcomes included permanent contraception, iPP implant, or iPP IUD provision during delivery admission. Covariates included race, ethnicity, insurance, and hospital type. Logistic regressions for iPP contraception procedures and comparing reversibility of methods were analyzed, as well as sub-analyses by delivery type. During the study period, 16,379 permanent contraception, 2,608 iPP implant, and 2,198 iPP IUD procedures were performed during delivery admissions in Massachusetts. In adjusted models, Hispanic patients or those with private insurance had higher odds of receiving any iPP method, whereas patients who delivered at a non-teaching hospital had lower odds of receiving any iPP method. Patients who identified as Hispanic, had public insurance, or delivered at a non-teaching hospital had lower odds of receiving a reversible compared to permanent method. These trends overall persisted when analyzed by delivery type. Many factors correlate with differential uptake of highly effective contraception during delivery admissions, suggesting policy and programming implications to meet the state’s unmet postpartum contraception need.</description><subject>Health disparity</subject><subject>immediate postpartum</subject><subject>permanent contraception</subject><subject>postpartum contraception</subject><subject>public health</subject><issn>0010-7824</issn><issn>1879-0518</issn><issn>1879-0518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkU1uFDEQhS0URIYkV0CWssmCHqrcbru9jKLwIwWxgbXlcVczHvqPtnvQrOAO3JCT4NEki6yqFp9e1XuPsWuENQKqd7u1H4c0O09TCuOwFiDkGhF0Xb1gK6y1KaDC-oytABAKXQt5zl7HuAMAbSr9ip2XRgMKUCv2-5bH5BL9Cg1xN7juEEPkY8uXKbkfdNy24fu2O3BqW_Ip7Ik_O5-JlmZqeOh7akKWyuw0xjS5OS09DwP_7GJ0frtESim-5QJQ839__uZF4CV72bou0tXjvGDf3t9_vftYPHz58Onu9qEgxFoVWGnwKptU2AolJRmhGq1BOmXIU71Bo7U0VeVJGlQeRKsE0gYclboufXnBbk660zz-XCgm24foqevcQOMSbYlSy1oIbTL65hFdNtmSnebQu_lgn0LLwP0JoPzwPtBsow80-Gx_zhHZZgwWwR7Lsjv7LC17LMueyir_A_Dli8g</recordid><startdate>20241217</startdate><enddate>20241217</enddate><creator>Nandi, Preetha</creator><creator>Lekshmi, Devika</creator><creator>Charles, Alysa St</creator><creator>Werner, Erika</creator><creator>Evans, Megan L.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241217</creationdate><title>A statewide analysis of uptake of highly effective contraception offered immediately postpartum in Massachusetts, 2017 – 2021</title><author>Nandi, Preetha ; Lekshmi, Devika ; Charles, Alysa St ; Werner, Erika ; Evans, Megan L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e1186-1570c611061f2644e926d7704a69ece8b19774955ce4916c02f621eb0ae3783c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Health disparity</topic><topic>immediate postpartum</topic><topic>permanent contraception</topic><topic>postpartum contraception</topic><topic>public health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nandi, Preetha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lekshmi, Devika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles, Alysa St</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Megan L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contraception (Stoneham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nandi, Preetha</au><au>Lekshmi, Devika</au><au>Charles, Alysa St</au><au>Werner, Erika</au><au>Evans, Megan L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A statewide analysis of uptake of highly effective contraception offered immediately postpartum in Massachusetts, 2017 – 2021</atitle><jtitle>Contraception (Stoneham)</jtitle><addtitle>Contraception</addtitle><date>2024-12-17</date><risdate>2024</risdate><spage>110785</spage><pages>110785-</pages><artnum>110785</artnum><issn>0010-7824</issn><issn>1879-0518</issn><eissn>1879-0518</eissn><abstract>Our study aims to evaluate trends in Massachusetts in provision of highly effective contraception, including contraceptive implant, intrauterine device (IUD) and permanent contraception, in the immediate postpartum (iPP) period. Deliveries from 2017-2021 were extracted from a Massachusetts Acute Hospital database, and the primary outcomes included permanent contraception, iPP implant, or iPP IUD provision during delivery admission. Covariates included race, ethnicity, insurance, and hospital type. Logistic regressions for iPP contraception procedures and comparing reversibility of methods were analyzed, as well as sub-analyses by delivery type. During the study period, 16,379 permanent contraception, 2,608 iPP implant, and 2,198 iPP IUD procedures were performed during delivery admissions in Massachusetts. In adjusted models, Hispanic patients or those with private insurance had higher odds of receiving any iPP method, whereas patients who delivered at a non-teaching hospital had lower odds of receiving any iPP method. Patients who identified as Hispanic, had public insurance, or delivered at a non-teaching hospital had lower odds of receiving a reversible compared to permanent method. These trends overall persisted when analyzed by delivery type. Many factors correlate with differential uptake of highly effective contraception during delivery admissions, suggesting policy and programming implications to meet the state’s unmet postpartum contraception need.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39701206</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110785</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-7824
ispartof Contraception (Stoneham), 2024-12, p.110785, Article 110785
issn 0010-7824
1879-0518
1879-0518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3147482279
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Health disparity
immediate postpartum
permanent contraception
postpartum contraception
public health
title A statewide analysis of uptake of highly effective contraception offered immediately postpartum in Massachusetts, 2017 – 2021
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T10%3A37%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20statewide%20analysis%20of%20uptake%20of%20highly%20effective%20contraception%20offered%20immediately%20postpartum%20in%20Massachusetts,%202017%20%E2%80%93%202021&rft.jtitle=Contraception%20(Stoneham)&rft.au=Nandi,%20Preetha&rft.date=2024-12-17&rft.spage=110785&rft.pages=110785-&rft.artnum=110785&rft.issn=0010-7824&rft.eissn=1879-0518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110785&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3147482279%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3147482279&rft_id=info:pmid/39701206&rft_els_id=S0010782424004992&rfr_iscdi=true