THE OPTIMAL DURATION OF pH-MONITORING: TESTING THE VALIDITY OF LYON 2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR WIRELESS pH MEASUREMENT

The Lyon 2.0 consensus recommends 96-hr wireless pH studies for GERD diagnosis; however, the optimal length of pH-measurement has not been established. Further it is uncertain if, and under what circumstances, shorter recording times are sufficient for a conclusive diagnosis. Data from 944 patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology 2024-12
Hauptverfasser: Rusu, Radu I, Fox, Mark R, Sweis, Rami, Zeki, Sebastian, Dunn, Jason M, Anggiansah, Angela, Jafari, Jafar, Learoyd, Annastazia, Wong, Terry
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology
container_volume
creator Rusu, Radu I
Fox, Mark R
Sweis, Rami
Zeki, Sebastian
Dunn, Jason M
Anggiansah, Angela
Jafari, Jafar
Learoyd, Annastazia
Wong, Terry
description The Lyon 2.0 consensus recommends 96-hr wireless pH studies for GERD diagnosis; however, the optimal length of pH-measurement has not been established. Further it is uncertain if, and under what circumstances, shorter recording times are sufficient for a conclusive diagnosis. Data from 944 patients with 4-day recordings was reviewed. Patients were classified at 24, 48, and 72-hrs against the 96-hr reference standard. Acid exposure time (AET) 6% conclusively positive for GERD. Esophagitis was an independent marker of disease. The effect of utilizing average day, worst-day, and dominant-pattern analysis (≥2 negative or positive days) was compared. Groups defined by AET thresholds from 1% to 7% at 24- and 48-hr were followed to assess when short recording periods were sufficient for conclusive diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy improved with study duration (p < 0.00001). The proportion of patients with inconclusive results (AET 4-6%) reduced from 113/944 at 24-hr to 40/113 at 96-hr (35% of subgroup; p = 0.02), with similar results for dominant pattern analysis. Diagnostic sensitivity for 24, 48 and 72-hr pH-monitoring for AET 6% threshold increased with study duration from 62.5% to 76.6% and 88.2%, respectively, when compared to the 96-hour reference standard. The results of this analysis validate the recommendation that prolonged reflux studies of at least 72-hr duration provide optimal AET measurements for GERD diagnosis. Prolonging studies can also resolve inconclusive results based on 24- and 48-hr studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.11.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3147129684</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3147129684</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p563-574d643b6c0a340dee3d3e4879b241a94bf1912f8429afee7537159ca31319043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpN0M1PwjAYx_HGaATRP8CL6dHLZt-2Um8LFGiyrWYrGk7LXjqFgMxNDv73DsXE0_M7fPI9PADcYuRihP2HjVu-vrkEEeZi7CIkzsAQe4w4nGN2_m8PwFXXbRAiggl-CQZU-IIRRIegMwsJ9ZNRURDC6TIJjNIx1DPYLJxIx8roRMXzR2hkavoBj_w5CNVUmdWRhaueExfBRE50FMl4-lNI4Uwn8EUlMpRp2sdgJIN0mchemGtwUefbzt6c7giYmTSThRPquZoEodN4PnU8ziqf0cIvUU4ZqqylFbVszEVBGM4FK2osMKnHjIi8tpZ7lGNPlDnFFAvE6Ajc_2abdv9xsN1ntlt3pd1u83e7P3QZxYxjIvzxkd6d6KHY2Spr2vUub7-yvz_Rb9C-YAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3147129684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE OPTIMAL DURATION OF pH-MONITORING: TESTING THE VALIDITY OF LYON 2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR WIRELESS pH MEASUREMENT</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Rusu, Radu I ; Fox, Mark R ; Sweis, Rami ; Zeki, Sebastian ; Dunn, Jason M ; Anggiansah, Angela ; Jafari, Jafar ; Learoyd, Annastazia ; Wong, Terry</creator><creatorcontrib>Rusu, Radu I ; Fox, Mark R ; Sweis, Rami ; Zeki, Sebastian ; Dunn, Jason M ; Anggiansah, Angela ; Jafari, Jafar ; Learoyd, Annastazia ; Wong, Terry</creatorcontrib><description>The Lyon 2.0 consensus recommends 96-hr wireless pH studies for GERD diagnosis; however, the optimal length of pH-measurement has not been established. Further it is uncertain if, and under what circumstances, shorter recording times are sufficient for a conclusive diagnosis. Data from 944 patients with 4-day recordings was reviewed. Patients were classified at 24, 48, and 72-hrs against the 96-hr reference standard. Acid exposure time (AET) &lt;4% was conclusively negative and AET &gt;6% conclusively positive for GERD. Esophagitis was an independent marker of disease. The effect of utilizing average day, worst-day, and dominant-pattern analysis (≥2 negative or positive days) was compared. Groups defined by AET thresholds from 1% to 7% at 24- and 48-hr were followed to assess when short recording periods were sufficient for conclusive diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy improved with study duration (p &lt; 0.00001). The proportion of patients with inconclusive results (AET 4-6%) reduced from 113/944 at 24-hr to 40/113 at 96-hr (35% of subgroup; p = 0.02), with similar results for dominant pattern analysis. Diagnostic sensitivity for 24, 48 and 72-hr pH-monitoring for AET 6% threshold increased with study duration from 62.5% to 76.6% and 88.2%, respectively, when compared to the 96-hour reference standard. The results of this analysis validate the recommendation that prolonged reflux studies of at least 72-hr duration provide optimal AET measurements for GERD diagnosis. Prolonging studies can also resolve inconclusive results based on 24- and 48-hr studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1542-7714</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-7714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.11.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39694203</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024-12</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39694203$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rusu, Radu I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Mark R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweis, Rami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeki, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Jason M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anggiansah, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jafari, Jafar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Learoyd, Annastazia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Terry</creatorcontrib><title>THE OPTIMAL DURATION OF pH-MONITORING: TESTING THE VALIDITY OF LYON 2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR WIRELESS pH MEASUREMENT</title><title>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology</title><addtitle>Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><description>The Lyon 2.0 consensus recommends 96-hr wireless pH studies for GERD diagnosis; however, the optimal length of pH-measurement has not been established. Further it is uncertain if, and under what circumstances, shorter recording times are sufficient for a conclusive diagnosis. Data from 944 patients with 4-day recordings was reviewed. Patients were classified at 24, 48, and 72-hrs against the 96-hr reference standard. Acid exposure time (AET) &lt;4% was conclusively negative and AET &gt;6% conclusively positive for GERD. Esophagitis was an independent marker of disease. The effect of utilizing average day, worst-day, and dominant-pattern analysis (≥2 negative or positive days) was compared. Groups defined by AET thresholds from 1% to 7% at 24- and 48-hr were followed to assess when short recording periods were sufficient for conclusive diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy improved with study duration (p &lt; 0.00001). The proportion of patients with inconclusive results (AET 4-6%) reduced from 113/944 at 24-hr to 40/113 at 96-hr (35% of subgroup; p = 0.02), with similar results for dominant pattern analysis. Diagnostic sensitivity for 24, 48 and 72-hr pH-monitoring for AET 6% threshold increased with study duration from 62.5% to 76.6% and 88.2%, respectively, when compared to the 96-hour reference standard. The results of this analysis validate the recommendation that prolonged reflux studies of at least 72-hr duration provide optimal AET measurements for GERD diagnosis. Prolonging studies can also resolve inconclusive results based on 24- and 48-hr studies.</description><issn>1542-7714</issn><issn>1542-7714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpN0M1PwjAYx_HGaATRP8CL6dHLZt-2Um8LFGiyrWYrGk7LXjqFgMxNDv73DsXE0_M7fPI9PADcYuRihP2HjVu-vrkEEeZi7CIkzsAQe4w4nGN2_m8PwFXXbRAiggl-CQZU-IIRRIegMwsJ9ZNRURDC6TIJjNIx1DPYLJxIx8roRMXzR2hkavoBj_w5CNVUmdWRhaueExfBRE50FMl4-lNI4Uwn8EUlMpRp2sdgJIN0mchemGtwUefbzt6c7giYmTSThRPquZoEodN4PnU8ziqf0cIvUU4ZqqylFbVszEVBGM4FK2osMKnHjIi8tpZ7lGNPlDnFFAvE6Ajc_2abdv9xsN1ntlt3pd1u83e7P3QZxYxjIvzxkd6d6KHY2Spr2vUub7-yvz_Rb9C-YAQ</recordid><startdate>20241216</startdate><enddate>20241216</enddate><creator>Rusu, Radu I</creator><creator>Fox, Mark R</creator><creator>Sweis, Rami</creator><creator>Zeki, Sebastian</creator><creator>Dunn, Jason M</creator><creator>Anggiansah, Angela</creator><creator>Jafari, Jafar</creator><creator>Learoyd, Annastazia</creator><creator>Wong, Terry</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241216</creationdate><title>THE OPTIMAL DURATION OF pH-MONITORING: TESTING THE VALIDITY OF LYON 2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR WIRELESS pH MEASUREMENT</title><author>Rusu, Radu I ; Fox, Mark R ; Sweis, Rami ; Zeki, Sebastian ; Dunn, Jason M ; Anggiansah, Angela ; Jafari, Jafar ; Learoyd, Annastazia ; Wong, Terry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p563-574d643b6c0a340dee3d3e4879b241a94bf1912f8429afee7537159ca31319043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rusu, Radu I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Mark R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweis, Rami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeki, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Jason M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anggiansah, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jafari, Jafar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Learoyd, Annastazia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Terry</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rusu, Radu I</au><au>Fox, Mark R</au><au>Sweis, Rami</au><au>Zeki, Sebastian</au><au>Dunn, Jason M</au><au>Anggiansah, Angela</au><au>Jafari, Jafar</au><au>Learoyd, Annastazia</au><au>Wong, Terry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE OPTIMAL DURATION OF pH-MONITORING: TESTING THE VALIDITY OF LYON 2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR WIRELESS pH MEASUREMENT</atitle><jtitle>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><date>2024-12-16</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>1542-7714</issn><eissn>1542-7714</eissn><abstract>The Lyon 2.0 consensus recommends 96-hr wireless pH studies for GERD diagnosis; however, the optimal length of pH-measurement has not been established. Further it is uncertain if, and under what circumstances, shorter recording times are sufficient for a conclusive diagnosis. Data from 944 patients with 4-day recordings was reviewed. Patients were classified at 24, 48, and 72-hrs against the 96-hr reference standard. Acid exposure time (AET) &lt;4% was conclusively negative and AET &gt;6% conclusively positive for GERD. Esophagitis was an independent marker of disease. The effect of utilizing average day, worst-day, and dominant-pattern analysis (≥2 negative or positive days) was compared. Groups defined by AET thresholds from 1% to 7% at 24- and 48-hr were followed to assess when short recording periods were sufficient for conclusive diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy improved with study duration (p &lt; 0.00001). The proportion of patients with inconclusive results (AET 4-6%) reduced from 113/944 at 24-hr to 40/113 at 96-hr (35% of subgroup; p = 0.02), with similar results for dominant pattern analysis. Diagnostic sensitivity for 24, 48 and 72-hr pH-monitoring for AET 6% threshold increased with study duration from 62.5% to 76.6% and 88.2%, respectively, when compared to the 96-hour reference standard. The results of this analysis validate the recommendation that prolonged reflux studies of at least 72-hr duration provide optimal AET measurements for GERD diagnosis. Prolonging studies can also resolve inconclusive results based on 24- and 48-hr studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>39694203</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cgh.2024.11.009</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1542-7714
ispartof Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024-12
issn 1542-7714
1542-7714
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3147129684
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
title THE OPTIMAL DURATION OF pH-MONITORING: TESTING THE VALIDITY OF LYON 2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR WIRELESS pH MEASUREMENT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A37%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20OPTIMAL%20DURATION%20OF%20pH-MONITORING:%20TESTING%20THE%20VALIDITY%20OF%20LYON%202.0%20RECOMMENDATIONS%20FOR%20WIRELESS%20pH%20MEASUREMENT&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20gastroenterology%20and%20hepatology&rft.au=Rusu,%20Radu%20I&rft.date=2024-12-16&rft.issn=1542-7714&rft.eissn=1542-7714&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cgh.2024.11.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3147129684%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3147129684&rft_id=info:pmid/39694203&rfr_iscdi=true