Comparative Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Profiles Across Various NSAID Forms and Doses: Implications for Efficacy and Adverse Effects

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used for pain disorders and exert pharmacological effects by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX). Although previous studies have evaluated the COX inhibitory activity and selectivity of NSAIDs, none has compared COX inhibitory concentrations wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pain and therapy 2024-12
Hauptverfasser: Shirakawa, Kenshu, Takeno, Masafumi, Kuma, Hidekazu, Terahara, Takaaki, Yamaguchi, Shigeki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Pain and therapy
container_volume
creator Shirakawa, Kenshu
Takeno, Masafumi
Kuma, Hidekazu
Terahara, Takaaki
Yamaguchi, Shigeki
description Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used for pain disorders and exert pharmacological effects by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX). Although previous studies have evaluated the COX inhibitory activity and selectivity of NSAIDs, none has compared COX inhibitory concentrations with the plasma concentrations of clinical doses or investigated the efficacy and adverse effects of different dosage forms. Therefore, in this study we evaluated the COX inhibitory activities and inhibition rates of clinical doses of the various NSAID formulations, especially diclofenac sodium. Human blood and the drug (diclofenac sodium, celecoxib, ibuprofen, flurbiprofen, or etodolac) were mixed and incubated, and the supernatant was collected and quantified the COX inhibitory activity of each drug by ELISA. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the inhibition rates at maximum plasma drug concentration (C ) of clinical doses of marketed formulations. For diclofenac sodium, we also calculated the concentrations at which COX inhibition rates were 50% and 80% (IC and IC ). COX-2 inhibition rate at C of clinical doses exceeded 50% except celecoxib 100 mg. For diclofenac sodium, the C at the clinical doses of the oral and suppository formulations showed almost complete inhibition of COX-2 and an inhibition rate exceeding IC for COX-1. The C at repeated doses of the transdermal formulation showed an inhibition rate above IC for COX-2 but below IC for COX-1. This result explains why gastrointestinal disorders frequently occur with oral and suppository formulations of diclofenac sodium despite its relatively high COX-2 selectivity. Although the plasma drug concentration of the transdermal formulation is lower than oral and suppository formulations, it has an inhibition rate above IC for COX-2, which is required for analgesic efficacy, and has a lower COX-1 inhibition rate than these formulations. The findings explain why the transdermal formulation exerts an analgesic effect despite having a lower C than other diclofenac sodium formulations.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40122-024-00687-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146925812</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3146925812</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-8711f7b0e220952b1e5178ff1cf51d558bd30f03141766fc9788beb2733764743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UctOGzEUtRAVIMoPsEBedjPFj_HYwy4KoY2EaKUCYmd5PNftoJlx6ptE5DP6B_0WvozJJLC6r3OOdO4h5Jyzr5wxfYk540JkTOQZY4XRmTggJ4KXMisUfzrc90ZIfUzOEJ8ZG_BGlbk6IseyLIwxjJ2Qf9PYLVxyy2YNdLZ27WpoY09joNONb2N82fyG3iG8_p_3f5qqGa8_UwxNC0gnPkVE-uhSE1dI735N5tf0JqYOqetreh0R8IrOu0Xb-FEYaYiJzkIYZr8ZQZN6DQlhuwS_xM_kU3Atwtm-npKHm9n99Ht2--PbfDq5zTw3-TIzmvOgKwZCsFKJioPi2oTAfVC8VspUtWSBSZ5zXRTBl9qYCiqhpdRFrnN5Sr7sdBcp_l0BLm3XoIe2dT0MXuzALEqhDBcDVOygo9sEwS5S07m0sZzZbRp2l4Yd0rBjGnZLutjrr6oO6g_K--_lG43nhro</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3146925812</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Profiles Across Various NSAID Forms and Doses: Implications for Efficacy and Adverse Effects</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Shirakawa, Kenshu ; Takeno, Masafumi ; Kuma, Hidekazu ; Terahara, Takaaki ; Yamaguchi, Shigeki</creator><creatorcontrib>Shirakawa, Kenshu ; Takeno, Masafumi ; Kuma, Hidekazu ; Terahara, Takaaki ; Yamaguchi, Shigeki</creatorcontrib><description>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used for pain disorders and exert pharmacological effects by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX). Although previous studies have evaluated the COX inhibitory activity and selectivity of NSAIDs, none has compared COX inhibitory concentrations with the plasma concentrations of clinical doses or investigated the efficacy and adverse effects of different dosage forms. Therefore, in this study we evaluated the COX inhibitory activities and inhibition rates of clinical doses of the various NSAID formulations, especially diclofenac sodium. Human blood and the drug (diclofenac sodium, celecoxib, ibuprofen, flurbiprofen, or etodolac) were mixed and incubated, and the supernatant was collected and quantified the COX inhibitory activity of each drug by ELISA. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the inhibition rates at maximum plasma drug concentration (C ) of clinical doses of marketed formulations. For diclofenac sodium, we also calculated the concentrations at which COX inhibition rates were 50% and 80% (IC and IC ). COX-2 inhibition rate at C of clinical doses exceeded 50% except celecoxib 100 mg. For diclofenac sodium, the C at the clinical doses of the oral and suppository formulations showed almost complete inhibition of COX-2 and an inhibition rate exceeding IC for COX-1. The C at repeated doses of the transdermal formulation showed an inhibition rate above IC for COX-2 but below IC for COX-1. This result explains why gastrointestinal disorders frequently occur with oral and suppository formulations of diclofenac sodium despite its relatively high COX-2 selectivity. Although the plasma drug concentration of the transdermal formulation is lower than oral and suppository formulations, it has an inhibition rate above IC for COX-2, which is required for analgesic efficacy, and has a lower COX-1 inhibition rate than these formulations. The findings explain why the transdermal formulation exerts an analgesic effect despite having a lower C than other diclofenac sodium formulations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2193-8237</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2193-651X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00687-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39688800</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Zealand</publisher><ispartof>Pain and therapy, 2024-12</ispartof><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-8711f7b0e220952b1e5178ff1cf51d558bd30f03141766fc9788beb2733764743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,861,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39688800$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shirakawa, Kenshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeno, Masafumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuma, Hidekazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terahara, Takaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Shigeki</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Profiles Across Various NSAID Forms and Doses: Implications for Efficacy and Adverse Effects</title><title>Pain and therapy</title><addtitle>Pain Ther</addtitle><description>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used for pain disorders and exert pharmacological effects by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX). Although previous studies have evaluated the COX inhibitory activity and selectivity of NSAIDs, none has compared COX inhibitory concentrations with the plasma concentrations of clinical doses or investigated the efficacy and adverse effects of different dosage forms. Therefore, in this study we evaluated the COX inhibitory activities and inhibition rates of clinical doses of the various NSAID formulations, especially diclofenac sodium. Human blood and the drug (diclofenac sodium, celecoxib, ibuprofen, flurbiprofen, or etodolac) were mixed and incubated, and the supernatant was collected and quantified the COX inhibitory activity of each drug by ELISA. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the inhibition rates at maximum plasma drug concentration (C ) of clinical doses of marketed formulations. For diclofenac sodium, we also calculated the concentrations at which COX inhibition rates were 50% and 80% (IC and IC ). COX-2 inhibition rate at C of clinical doses exceeded 50% except celecoxib 100 mg. For diclofenac sodium, the C at the clinical doses of the oral and suppository formulations showed almost complete inhibition of COX-2 and an inhibition rate exceeding IC for COX-1. The C at repeated doses of the transdermal formulation showed an inhibition rate above IC for COX-2 but below IC for COX-1. This result explains why gastrointestinal disorders frequently occur with oral and suppository formulations of diclofenac sodium despite its relatively high COX-2 selectivity. Although the plasma drug concentration of the transdermal formulation is lower than oral and suppository formulations, it has an inhibition rate above IC for COX-2, which is required for analgesic efficacy, and has a lower COX-1 inhibition rate than these formulations. The findings explain why the transdermal formulation exerts an analgesic effect despite having a lower C than other diclofenac sodium formulations.</description><issn>2193-8237</issn><issn>2193-651X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UctOGzEUtRAVIMoPsEBedjPFj_HYwy4KoY2EaKUCYmd5PNftoJlx6ptE5DP6B_0WvozJJLC6r3OOdO4h5Jyzr5wxfYk540JkTOQZY4XRmTggJ4KXMisUfzrc90ZIfUzOEJ8ZG_BGlbk6IseyLIwxjJ2Qf9PYLVxyy2YNdLZ27WpoY09joNONb2N82fyG3iG8_p_3f5qqGa8_UwxNC0gnPkVE-uhSE1dI735N5tf0JqYOqetreh0R8IrOu0Xb-FEYaYiJzkIYZr8ZQZN6DQlhuwS_xM_kU3Atwtm-npKHm9n99Ht2--PbfDq5zTw3-TIzmvOgKwZCsFKJioPi2oTAfVC8VspUtWSBSZ5zXRTBl9qYCiqhpdRFrnN5Sr7sdBcp_l0BLm3XoIe2dT0MXuzALEqhDBcDVOygo9sEwS5S07m0sZzZbRp2l4Yd0rBjGnZLutjrr6oO6g_K--_lG43nhro</recordid><startdate>20241217</startdate><enddate>20241217</enddate><creator>Shirakawa, Kenshu</creator><creator>Takeno, Masafumi</creator><creator>Kuma, Hidekazu</creator><creator>Terahara, Takaaki</creator><creator>Yamaguchi, Shigeki</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241217</creationdate><title>Comparative Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Profiles Across Various NSAID Forms and Doses: Implications for Efficacy and Adverse Effects</title><author>Shirakawa, Kenshu ; Takeno, Masafumi ; Kuma, Hidekazu ; Terahara, Takaaki ; Yamaguchi, Shigeki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-8711f7b0e220952b1e5178ff1cf51d558bd30f03141766fc9788beb2733764743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shirakawa, Kenshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeno, Masafumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuma, Hidekazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terahara, Takaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Shigeki</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pain and therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shirakawa, Kenshu</au><au>Takeno, Masafumi</au><au>Kuma, Hidekazu</au><au>Terahara, Takaaki</au><au>Yamaguchi, Shigeki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Profiles Across Various NSAID Forms and Doses: Implications for Efficacy and Adverse Effects</atitle><jtitle>Pain and therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Pain Ther</addtitle><date>2024-12-17</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>2193-8237</issn><eissn>2193-651X</eissn><abstract>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used for pain disorders and exert pharmacological effects by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX). Although previous studies have evaluated the COX inhibitory activity and selectivity of NSAIDs, none has compared COX inhibitory concentrations with the plasma concentrations of clinical doses or investigated the efficacy and adverse effects of different dosage forms. Therefore, in this study we evaluated the COX inhibitory activities and inhibition rates of clinical doses of the various NSAID formulations, especially diclofenac sodium. Human blood and the drug (diclofenac sodium, celecoxib, ibuprofen, flurbiprofen, or etodolac) were mixed and incubated, and the supernatant was collected and quantified the COX inhibitory activity of each drug by ELISA. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the inhibition rates at maximum plasma drug concentration (C ) of clinical doses of marketed formulations. For diclofenac sodium, we also calculated the concentrations at which COX inhibition rates were 50% and 80% (IC and IC ). COX-2 inhibition rate at C of clinical doses exceeded 50% except celecoxib 100 mg. For diclofenac sodium, the C at the clinical doses of the oral and suppository formulations showed almost complete inhibition of COX-2 and an inhibition rate exceeding IC for COX-1. The C at repeated doses of the transdermal formulation showed an inhibition rate above IC for COX-2 but below IC for COX-1. This result explains why gastrointestinal disorders frequently occur with oral and suppository formulations of diclofenac sodium despite its relatively high COX-2 selectivity. Although the plasma drug concentration of the transdermal formulation is lower than oral and suppository formulations, it has an inhibition rate above IC for COX-2, which is required for analgesic efficacy, and has a lower COX-1 inhibition rate than these formulations. The findings explain why the transdermal formulation exerts an analgesic effect despite having a lower C than other diclofenac sodium formulations.</abstract><cop>New Zealand</cop><pmid>39688800</pmid><doi>10.1007/s40122-024-00687-2</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2193-8237
ispartof Pain and therapy, 2024-12
issn 2193-8237
2193-651X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146925812
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; PubMed Central
title Comparative Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Profiles Across Various NSAID Forms and Doses: Implications for Efficacy and Adverse Effects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T14%3A47%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Evaluation%20of%20Cyclooxygenase%C2%A0Inhibition%20Profiles%20Across%20Various%20NSAID%20Forms%20and%20Doses:%20Implications%20for%20Efficacy%20and%20Adverse%20Effects&rft.jtitle=Pain%20and%20therapy&rft.au=Shirakawa,%20Kenshu&rft.date=2024-12-17&rft.issn=2193-8237&rft.eissn=2193-651X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40122-024-00687-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3146925812%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3146925812&rft_id=info:pmid/39688800&rfr_iscdi=true