Postcolonial technoscience revisited

What does a postcolonial inquiry into technoscience do? And what is it for? I develop these questions by reconsidering one powerful idea: that science and technology studies (STS) is postcolonial when it elucidates the hybridity, heterogeneity, and indeterminacy of global technoscientific formations...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social studies of science 2024-12, p.3063127241303778
1. Verfasser: Hu, Cameron
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 3063127241303778
container_title Social studies of science
container_volume
creator Hu, Cameron
description What does a postcolonial inquiry into technoscience do? And what is it for? I develop these questions by reconsidering one powerful idea: that science and technology studies (STS) is postcolonial when it elucidates the hybridity, heterogeneity, and indeterminacy of global technoscientific formations, and does so to falsify colonial fantasies of hegemony expressed in imperious conceptual generalities and sovereign universalisms. Revisiting Warwick Anderson's expositions of postcolonial STS-initiated in this journal two decades ago-I reflect on the form and force of this critical operation. Despite an animating aversion to universalisms, the pursuit of hybridity and heterogeneity may ultimately universalize a liberal metaphysics of agency. This paradox suggests limits to the critical operation that pits hybridity and indeterminacy against hegemony in a postcolonial spirit.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/03063127241303778
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146917175</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3146917175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p565-7f0bdc3d526d2cd320d3814a75a44267de3646dc0851a4cd63b004b489112d613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNj81KxDAURoMozjj6AG5kFi7cVO_NTW7apQz-wYAuZl_SJIORthmbVvDtHXAEV9-3OBw4Qlwi3CIacwcETCiNVEhAxpRHYo6KoSDW1fG_PxNnOX8AgDGaT8WMKi5Zk56L67eUR5fa1EfbLsfg3vuUXQy9C8shfMUcx-DPxcnWtjlcHHYhNo8Pm9VzsX59elndr4udZl2YLTTekdeSvXSeJHgqUVmjrVKSjQ_Eir2DUqNVzjM1AKpRZYUoPSMtxM2vdjekzynkse5idqFtbR_SlGva91Ro0Og9enVAp6YLvt4NsbPDd_0XRj9zPE4X</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3146917175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postcolonial technoscience revisited</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Hu, Cameron</creator><creatorcontrib>Hu, Cameron</creatorcontrib><description>What does a postcolonial inquiry into technoscience do? And what is it for? I develop these questions by reconsidering one powerful idea: that science and technology studies (STS) is postcolonial when it elucidates the hybridity, heterogeneity, and indeterminacy of global technoscientific formations, and does so to falsify colonial fantasies of hegemony expressed in imperious conceptual generalities and sovereign universalisms. Revisiting Warwick Anderson's expositions of postcolonial STS-initiated in this journal two decades ago-I reflect on the form and force of this critical operation. Despite an animating aversion to universalisms, the pursuit of hybridity and heterogeneity may ultimately universalize a liberal metaphysics of agency. This paradox suggests limits to the critical operation that pits hybridity and indeterminacy against hegemony in a postcolonial spirit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1460-3659</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3659</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/03063127241303778</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39686535</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Social studies of science, 2024-12, p.3063127241303778</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-3039-8550</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39686535$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hu, Cameron</creatorcontrib><title>Postcolonial technoscience revisited</title><title>Social studies of science</title><addtitle>Soc Stud Sci</addtitle><description>What does a postcolonial inquiry into technoscience do? And what is it for? I develop these questions by reconsidering one powerful idea: that science and technology studies (STS) is postcolonial when it elucidates the hybridity, heterogeneity, and indeterminacy of global technoscientific formations, and does so to falsify colonial fantasies of hegemony expressed in imperious conceptual generalities and sovereign universalisms. Revisiting Warwick Anderson's expositions of postcolonial STS-initiated in this journal two decades ago-I reflect on the form and force of this critical operation. Despite an animating aversion to universalisms, the pursuit of hybridity and heterogeneity may ultimately universalize a liberal metaphysics of agency. This paradox suggests limits to the critical operation that pits hybridity and indeterminacy against hegemony in a postcolonial spirit.</description><issn>1460-3659</issn><issn>1460-3659</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNj81KxDAURoMozjj6AG5kFi7cVO_NTW7apQz-wYAuZl_SJIORthmbVvDtHXAEV9-3OBw4Qlwi3CIacwcETCiNVEhAxpRHYo6KoSDW1fG_PxNnOX8AgDGaT8WMKi5Zk56L67eUR5fa1EfbLsfg3vuUXQy9C8shfMUcx-DPxcnWtjlcHHYhNo8Pm9VzsX59elndr4udZl2YLTTekdeSvXSeJHgqUVmjrVKSjQ_Eir2DUqNVzjM1AKpRZYUoPSMtxM2vdjekzynkse5idqFtbR_SlGva91Ro0Og9enVAp6YLvt4NsbPDd_0XRj9zPE4X</recordid><startdate>20241216</startdate><enddate>20241216</enddate><creator>Hu, Cameron</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3039-8550</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241216</creationdate><title>Postcolonial technoscience revisited</title><author>Hu, Cameron</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p565-7f0bdc3d526d2cd320d3814a75a44267de3646dc0851a4cd63b004b489112d613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hu, Cameron</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social studies of science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hu, Cameron</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postcolonial technoscience revisited</atitle><jtitle>Social studies of science</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Stud Sci</addtitle><date>2024-12-16</date><risdate>2024</risdate><spage>3063127241303778</spage><pages>3063127241303778-</pages><issn>1460-3659</issn><eissn>1460-3659</eissn><abstract>What does a postcolonial inquiry into technoscience do? And what is it for? I develop these questions by reconsidering one powerful idea: that science and technology studies (STS) is postcolonial when it elucidates the hybridity, heterogeneity, and indeterminacy of global technoscientific formations, and does so to falsify colonial fantasies of hegemony expressed in imperious conceptual generalities and sovereign universalisms. Revisiting Warwick Anderson's expositions of postcolonial STS-initiated in this journal two decades ago-I reflect on the form and force of this critical operation. Despite an animating aversion to universalisms, the pursuit of hybridity and heterogeneity may ultimately universalize a liberal metaphysics of agency. This paradox suggests limits to the critical operation that pits hybridity and indeterminacy against hegemony in a postcolonial spirit.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>39686535</pmid><doi>10.1177/03063127241303778</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3039-8550</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1460-3659
ispartof Social studies of science, 2024-12, p.3063127241303778
issn 1460-3659
1460-3659
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146917175
source Access via SAGE
title Postcolonial technoscience revisited
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A17%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postcolonial%20technoscience%20revisited&rft.jtitle=Social%20studies%20of%20science&rft.au=Hu,%20Cameron&rft.date=2024-12-16&rft.spage=3063127241303778&rft.pages=3063127241303778-&rft.issn=1460-3659&rft.eissn=1460-3659&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/03063127241303778&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3146917175%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3146917175&rft_id=info:pmid/39686535&rfr_iscdi=true