Analysis of treatment methods and relapse factors of postoperative anastomotic stenosis in colorectal cancer

Anastomotic stenosis following surgical intervention for colorectal cancer is a frequently encountered complication. Nevertheless, the optimal approach to effectively manage anastomotic stenosis at varying distances from the anal margin remains uncertain. The primary objective of this research endea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2024-12
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Jiawei, Chen, Yongcheng, Su, Yuping, Deng, Jiaxin, Li, Juan, Lin, Dezheng, Liao, Sen, Bai, Xuhao, He, Bingfeng, Wang, Junhao, Zhong, Qinghua, Hu, Jiancong, Su, Mingli, Guo, Xuefeng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Anastomotic stenosis following surgical intervention for colorectal cancer is a frequently encountered complication. Nevertheless, the optimal approach to effectively manage anastomotic stenosis at varying distances from the anal margin remains uncertain. The primary objective of this research endeavor was to explore the risk factors associated with recurrent anastomotic stenosis subsequent to colorectal cancer surgery, as well as to evaluate potential strategies for its management. The present study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and treatment outcomes of 244 patients who underwent colorectal surgery and were subsequently diagnosed with anastomotic stenosis. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the location of anastomotic stenosis relative to the anal verge: the low anastomotic stenosis group (n = 107) and the high anastomotic stenosis group (n = 137). The severity of anastomotic stenosis was found to be significantly higher in the low anastomotic stenosis group compared to the high anastomotic stenosis group (71.0% vs 57.7%, P = 0.031). Furthermore, the high anastomotic stenosis group exhibited a greater inclination toward opting for endoscopic treatment when it came to the choice of treatment for anastomotic stenosis (62.8% vs 27.1%, P 
ISSN:0930-2794
1432-2218
1432-2218
DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-11458-7