Orthodontic Trainees' Perceptions of Effective Feedback in the United Kingdom
ABSTRACT Introduction Feedback is an invaluable educational tool and is now widely used in education, despite some of the challenges and barriers to its implementation. Effective feedback in medical and dental education is a driver for improvement, by recognising good performance and identifying are...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of dental education 2025-02, Vol.29 (1), p.211-218 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 218 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 211 |
container_title | European journal of dental education |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Chawla, Rachna K. Ryan, Fiona S. Cunningham, Susan J. |
description | ABSTRACT
Introduction
Feedback is an invaluable educational tool and is now widely used in education, despite some of the challenges and barriers to its implementation. Effective feedback in medical and dental education is a driver for improvement, by recognising good performance and identifying areas where improvement is required. This, in turn, can translate into better patient care, as feedback can positively impact on clinical performance. To date, there is limited literature about feedback mechanisms in orthodontic training and trainees' perceptions of how effective the various methods are.
Methods
This was a national, cross‐sectional questionnaire investigating orthodontic trainees' perceptions of effective feedback relating to chairside clinical training. An electronic questionnaire was developed and an invitation to participate was disseminated via the British Orthodontic Society (BOS) to postgraduate orthodontic trainees in the United Kingdom (UK). The population included all trainees at ST1‐5 level who were BOS members, aged 25 years and above, including those appointed by Health Education England (HEE) and those who were non‐HEE appointed. The questionnaire was open for an 11‐week period between 10 February 2022 and 28 April 2022.
Results
The questionnaire was completed by 68 participants with a mean age of 30.7 years and the response rate was approximately 30%. Trainees agreed that effective feedback improved their clinical skills and performance (99%) and 82% felt comfortable requesting feedback from their supervisors. The main perceived barrier to obtaining high quality in‐depth feedback was perceived time pressures for educators (87%).
Conclusions
This study demonstrated positive findings regarding trainees' perceptions of feedback processes in UK clinical orthodontic training. Perceived barriers to effective feedback included time constraints and the perception that trainers were too busy to provide in‐depth feedback. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/eje.13063 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146856152</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3154884140</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2433-fc126bd39f6278fc780a88abaae96525b626fc7761513c212f12e86cc8ec02513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0E4lFY8APIEgtgEepH4jhLVJVnESzadeQ4Y-rSxsVOQPw9hgALJLwZ6-rM1eggdEjJOY1vCAs4p5wIvoF2qSAkIVlebMY_L0SSScl30F4IC0KIzDjZRjsxz4s8lbvo_sG3c1e7prUaT72yDUA4wY_gNaxb65qAncFjY0C39hXwJUBdKf2MbYPbOeBZY1uo8Z1tnmq32kdbRi0DHHzPAZpdjqej62TycHUzupgkmqWcJ0ZTJqqaF0awXBqdS6KkVJVSUIiMZZVgIqa5oBnlmlFmKAMptJagCYvZAJ32vWvvXjoIbbmyQcNyqRpwXSg5TYXM4jqL6PEfdOE638TrIpWlUqY0JZE66yntXQgeTLn2dqX8e0lJ-em4jI7LL8eRPfpu7KoV1L_kj9QIDHvgzS7h_f-mcnw77is_AMusg5M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3154884140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Orthodontic Trainees' Perceptions of Effective Feedback in the United Kingdom</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Chawla, Rachna K. ; Ryan, Fiona S. ; Cunningham, Susan J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chawla, Rachna K. ; Ryan, Fiona S. ; Cunningham, Susan J.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Introduction
Feedback is an invaluable educational tool and is now widely used in education, despite some of the challenges and barriers to its implementation. Effective feedback in medical and dental education is a driver for improvement, by recognising good performance and identifying areas where improvement is required. This, in turn, can translate into better patient care, as feedback can positively impact on clinical performance. To date, there is limited literature about feedback mechanisms in orthodontic training and trainees' perceptions of how effective the various methods are.
Methods
This was a national, cross‐sectional questionnaire investigating orthodontic trainees' perceptions of effective feedback relating to chairside clinical training. An electronic questionnaire was developed and an invitation to participate was disseminated via the British Orthodontic Society (BOS) to postgraduate orthodontic trainees in the United Kingdom (UK). The population included all trainees at ST1‐5 level who were BOS members, aged 25 years and above, including those appointed by Health Education England (HEE) and those who were non‐HEE appointed. The questionnaire was open for an 11‐week period between 10 February 2022 and 28 April 2022.
Results
The questionnaire was completed by 68 participants with a mean age of 30.7 years and the response rate was approximately 30%. Trainees agreed that effective feedback improved their clinical skills and performance (99%) and 82% felt comfortable requesting feedback from their supervisors. The main perceived barrier to obtaining high quality in‐depth feedback was perceived time pressures for educators (87%).
Conclusions
This study demonstrated positive findings regarding trainees' perceptions of feedback processes in UK clinical orthodontic training. Perceived barriers to effective feedback included time constraints and the perception that trainers were too busy to provide in‐depth feedback.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1396-5883</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1600-0579</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0579</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/eje.13063</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39679748</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Clinical Competence ; clinical feedback ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Depth perception ; Education ; Education, Dental, Graduate ; Feedback ; feedback perceptions ; Female ; Formative Feedback ; Humans ; Male ; orthodontic training ; Orthodontics ; Orthodontics - education ; Perceptions ; Questionnaires ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Temporal perception ; Training ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>European journal of dental education, 2025-02, Vol.29 (1), p.211-218</ispartof><rights>2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2025 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2433-fc126bd39f6278fc780a88abaae96525b626fc7761513c212f12e86cc8ec02513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Feje.13063$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Feje.13063$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39679748$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chawla, Rachna K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Fiona S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, Susan J.</creatorcontrib><title>Orthodontic Trainees' Perceptions of Effective Feedback in the United Kingdom</title><title>European journal of dental education</title><addtitle>Eur J Dent Educ</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Introduction
Feedback is an invaluable educational tool and is now widely used in education, despite some of the challenges and barriers to its implementation. Effective feedback in medical and dental education is a driver for improvement, by recognising good performance and identifying areas where improvement is required. This, in turn, can translate into better patient care, as feedback can positively impact on clinical performance. To date, there is limited literature about feedback mechanisms in orthodontic training and trainees' perceptions of how effective the various methods are.
Methods
This was a national, cross‐sectional questionnaire investigating orthodontic trainees' perceptions of effective feedback relating to chairside clinical training. An electronic questionnaire was developed and an invitation to participate was disseminated via the British Orthodontic Society (BOS) to postgraduate orthodontic trainees in the United Kingdom (UK). The population included all trainees at ST1‐5 level who were BOS members, aged 25 years and above, including those appointed by Health Education England (HEE) and those who were non‐HEE appointed. The questionnaire was open for an 11‐week period between 10 February 2022 and 28 April 2022.
Results
The questionnaire was completed by 68 participants with a mean age of 30.7 years and the response rate was approximately 30%. Trainees agreed that effective feedback improved their clinical skills and performance (99%) and 82% felt comfortable requesting feedback from their supervisors. The main perceived barrier to obtaining high quality in‐depth feedback was perceived time pressures for educators (87%).
Conclusions
This study demonstrated positive findings regarding trainees' perceptions of feedback processes in UK clinical orthodontic training. Perceived barriers to effective feedback included time constraints and the perception that trainers were too busy to provide in‐depth feedback.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>clinical feedback</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Depth perception</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education, Dental, Graduate</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>feedback perceptions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Formative Feedback</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>orthodontic training</subject><subject>Orthodontics</subject><subject>Orthodontics - education</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Temporal perception</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1396-5883</issn><issn>1600-0579</issn><issn>1600-0579</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0E4lFY8APIEgtgEepH4jhLVJVnESzadeQ4Y-rSxsVOQPw9hgALJLwZ6-rM1eggdEjJOY1vCAs4p5wIvoF2qSAkIVlebMY_L0SSScl30F4IC0KIzDjZRjsxz4s8lbvo_sG3c1e7prUaT72yDUA4wY_gNaxb65qAncFjY0C39hXwJUBdKf2MbYPbOeBZY1uo8Z1tnmq32kdbRi0DHHzPAZpdjqej62TycHUzupgkmqWcJ0ZTJqqaF0awXBqdS6KkVJVSUIiMZZVgIqa5oBnlmlFmKAMptJagCYvZAJ32vWvvXjoIbbmyQcNyqRpwXSg5TYXM4jqL6PEfdOE638TrIpWlUqY0JZE66yntXQgeTLn2dqX8e0lJ-em4jI7LL8eRPfpu7KoV1L_kj9QIDHvgzS7h_f-mcnw77is_AMusg5M</recordid><startdate>202502</startdate><enddate>202502</enddate><creator>Chawla, Rachna K.</creator><creator>Ryan, Fiona S.</creator><creator>Cunningham, Susan J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202502</creationdate><title>Orthodontic Trainees' Perceptions of Effective Feedback in the United Kingdom</title><author>Chawla, Rachna K. ; Ryan, Fiona S. ; Cunningham, Susan J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2433-fc126bd39f6278fc780a88abaae96525b626fc7761513c212f12e86cc8ec02513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>clinical feedback</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Depth perception</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education, Dental, Graduate</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>feedback perceptions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Formative Feedback</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>orthodontic training</topic><topic>Orthodontics</topic><topic>Orthodontics - education</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Temporal perception</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chawla, Rachna K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Fiona S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, Susan J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of dental education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chawla, Rachna K.</au><au>Ryan, Fiona S.</au><au>Cunningham, Susan J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Orthodontic Trainees' Perceptions of Effective Feedback in the United Kingdom</atitle><jtitle>European journal of dental education</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Dent Educ</addtitle><date>2025-02</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>211</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>211-218</pages><issn>1396-5883</issn><issn>1600-0579</issn><eissn>1600-0579</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
Introduction
Feedback is an invaluable educational tool and is now widely used in education, despite some of the challenges and barriers to its implementation. Effective feedback in medical and dental education is a driver for improvement, by recognising good performance and identifying areas where improvement is required. This, in turn, can translate into better patient care, as feedback can positively impact on clinical performance. To date, there is limited literature about feedback mechanisms in orthodontic training and trainees' perceptions of how effective the various methods are.
Methods
This was a national, cross‐sectional questionnaire investigating orthodontic trainees' perceptions of effective feedback relating to chairside clinical training. An electronic questionnaire was developed and an invitation to participate was disseminated via the British Orthodontic Society (BOS) to postgraduate orthodontic trainees in the United Kingdom (UK). The population included all trainees at ST1‐5 level who were BOS members, aged 25 years and above, including those appointed by Health Education England (HEE) and those who were non‐HEE appointed. The questionnaire was open for an 11‐week period between 10 February 2022 and 28 April 2022.
Results
The questionnaire was completed by 68 participants with a mean age of 30.7 years and the response rate was approximately 30%. Trainees agreed that effective feedback improved their clinical skills and performance (99%) and 82% felt comfortable requesting feedback from their supervisors. The main perceived barrier to obtaining high quality in‐depth feedback was perceived time pressures for educators (87%).
Conclusions
This study demonstrated positive findings regarding trainees' perceptions of feedback processes in UK clinical orthodontic training. Perceived barriers to effective feedback included time constraints and the perception that trainers were too busy to provide in‐depth feedback.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>39679748</pmid><doi>10.1111/eje.13063</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1396-5883 |
ispartof | European journal of dental education, 2025-02, Vol.29 (1), p.211-218 |
issn | 1396-5883 1600-0579 1600-0579 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146856152 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Clinical Competence clinical feedback Cross-Sectional Studies Depth perception Education Education, Dental, Graduate Feedback feedback perceptions Female Formative Feedback Humans Male orthodontic training Orthodontics Orthodontics - education Perceptions Questionnaires Surveys and Questionnaires Temporal perception Training United Kingdom |
title | Orthodontic Trainees' Perceptions of Effective Feedback in the United Kingdom |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T03%3A42%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Orthodontic%20Trainees'%20Perceptions%20of%20Effective%20Feedback%20in%20the%20United%20Kingdom&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20dental%20education&rft.au=Chawla,%20Rachna%20K.&rft.date=2025-02&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=211&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=211-218&rft.issn=1396-5883&rft.eissn=1600-0579&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/eje.13063&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3154884140%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3154884140&rft_id=info:pmid/39679748&rfr_iscdi=true |