PSA Density and Lesion Volume: Key Factors in Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsies for PI‐RADS 3 Lesions

ABSTRACT Introduction The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to guide prostate biopsies has improved cancer detection rates, particularly for high‐grade tumors. However, despite guidelines recommending biopsies for lesions with a Prostate Imaging‐Reporting and Data System (PI‐RA...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Prostate 2025-03, Vol.85 (4), p.385-390
Hauptverfasser: Ayranci, Ali, Caglar, Ufuk, Yazili, Huseyin Burak, Erdal, Feyzi Sinan, Erbin, Akif, Sarilar, Omer, Ozgor, Faruk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 390
container_issue 4
container_start_page 385
container_title The Prostate
container_volume 85
creator Ayranci, Ali
Caglar, Ufuk
Yazili, Huseyin Burak
Erdal, Feyzi Sinan
Erbin, Akif
Sarilar, Omer
Ozgor, Faruk
description ABSTRACT Introduction The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to guide prostate biopsies has improved cancer detection rates, particularly for high‐grade tumors. However, despite guidelines recommending biopsies for lesions with a Prostate Imaging‐Reporting and Data System (PI‐RADS) score ≥ 3, the clinical significance of PI‐RADS 3 lesions remains uncertain. This uncertainty, coupled with the cost and potential complications of biopsies, underscores the need for more accurate risk stratification strategies to avoid unnecessary procedures. Prostate‐specific antigen density (PSAD) and index lesion volume are emerging as potential contributors to improve risk assessment. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone an MRI‐guided transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate biopsy at a tertiary care institution. Patients with PI‐RADS 3 lesions were included, and data on demographics, prostate‐specific antigens (PSA), PSAD, lesion diameter, and pathology results were collected. The relationships between PSAD, lesion volume, and pathology outcomes were statistically analyzed. Results Of the 213 patients included, 40 were diagnosed with prostate cancer. PSAD and PSAD x lesion diameter were significantly higher in the patients diagnosed with prostate cancer than those with benign lesions. Among the prostate cancer patients, clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) had a higher mean PSAD value than clinically insignificant prostate cancer (cisPCa). ROC analysis found PSAD x lesion diameter to have the highest discriminatory power for detecting csPCa. Discussion MRI‐guided biopsies offer targeted sampling but the clinical significance of PI‐RADS 3 lesions remains uncertain. Index lesion volume and PSAD are promising adjunctive markers for risk assessment. Combining these factors could facilitate the avoidance of unnecessary biopsies and improve the detection of csPCa. Conclusion Incorporating PSAD and index lesion volume into biopsy decision‐making may enhance risk stratification, particularly for PI‐RADS 3 lesions. Further research is needed to validate these findings and enhance the risk assessment strategies used in making decisions regarding prostate biopsy.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pros.24840
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146847892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3160820088</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2460-e0984e88c819531c75504bdce63f0644881abbc7855c26333dd2b9196206def23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1OGzEUhmELFZWQdtMLqCx1g5CGHv-Mx8Mu_EeNREQK29GM5wwymthhnAFlxyVwjb2SOiTtggUrbx59On4J-cbgiAHwn4vOhyMutYQdMmCQZwmATD-RAfAMEslEtkf2Q3gAiBz4Z7IncpXJHPSAmOlsRM_QBbtc0dLVdILBekfvfNvP8Zj-whW9KM3Sd4FaR0dP3tbW3dNb59BgCGW3oifWL4LFQBvf0en4z8vrzehsRsV2K3whu03ZBvy6fYfk9uL89-lVMrm-HJ-OJonhUkGCkGuJWhvN8lQwk6UpyKo2qEQDSkqtWVlVJtNpargSQtQ1r3KWKw6qxoaLITnY7MYgjz2GZTG3wWDblg59HwrBpNIy0_ma_nhHH3zfuXhdVAo0B9A6qsONMrFw6LApFp2dxy8XDIp1-mKdvnhLH_H37WRfzbH-T_-1joBtwLNtcfXBVDG9uZ5tRv8CinqMkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3160820088</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PSA Density and Lesion Volume: Key Factors in Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsies for PI‐RADS 3 Lesions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ayranci, Ali ; Caglar, Ufuk ; Yazili, Huseyin Burak ; Erdal, Feyzi Sinan ; Erbin, Akif ; Sarilar, Omer ; Ozgor, Faruk</creator><creatorcontrib>Ayranci, Ali ; Caglar, Ufuk ; Yazili, Huseyin Burak ; Erdal, Feyzi Sinan ; Erbin, Akif ; Sarilar, Omer ; Ozgor, Faruk</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Introduction The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to guide prostate biopsies has improved cancer detection rates, particularly for high‐grade tumors. However, despite guidelines recommending biopsies for lesions with a Prostate Imaging‐Reporting and Data System (PI‐RADS) score ≥ 3, the clinical significance of PI‐RADS 3 lesions remains uncertain. This uncertainty, coupled with the cost and potential complications of biopsies, underscores the need for more accurate risk stratification strategies to avoid unnecessary procedures. Prostate‐specific antigen density (PSAD) and index lesion volume are emerging as potential contributors to improve risk assessment. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone an MRI‐guided transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate biopsy at a tertiary care institution. Patients with PI‐RADS 3 lesions were included, and data on demographics, prostate‐specific antigens (PSA), PSAD, lesion diameter, and pathology results were collected. The relationships between PSAD, lesion volume, and pathology outcomes were statistically analyzed. Results Of the 213 patients included, 40 were diagnosed with prostate cancer. PSAD and PSAD x lesion diameter were significantly higher in the patients diagnosed with prostate cancer than those with benign lesions. Among the prostate cancer patients, clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) had a higher mean PSAD value than clinically insignificant prostate cancer (cisPCa). ROC analysis found PSAD x lesion diameter to have the highest discriminatory power for detecting csPCa. Discussion MRI‐guided biopsies offer targeted sampling but the clinical significance of PI‐RADS 3 lesions remains uncertain. Index lesion volume and PSAD are promising adjunctive markers for risk assessment. Combining these factors could facilitate the avoidance of unnecessary biopsies and improve the detection of csPCa. Conclusion Incorporating PSAD and index lesion volume into biopsy decision‐making may enhance risk stratification, particularly for PI‐RADS 3 lesions. Further research is needed to validate these findings and enhance the risk assessment strategies used in making decisions regarding prostate biopsy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-4137</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0045</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0045</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pros.24840</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39674908</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biopsy ; Clinical significance ; Decision making ; Humans ; Image-Guided Biopsy - methods ; Lesions ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging ; Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Pathology ; Prostate - diagnostic imaging ; Prostate - pathology ; prostate biopsy ; Prostate cancer ; prostate imaging reporting and data system ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood ; prostate‐specific antigen density ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; prostatic neoplasms/diagnosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk assessment ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Unnecessary Procedures</subject><ispartof>The Prostate, 2025-03, Vol.85 (4), p.385-390</ispartof><rights>2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2025 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2460-e0984e88c819531c75504bdce63f0644881abbc7855c26333dd2b9196206def23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3747-0869 ; 0000-0002-3248-7664 ; 0000-0003-0666-7861 ; 0000-0002-4832-9396 ; 0000-0001-7147-8288</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpros.24840$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpros.24840$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39674908$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ayranci, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caglar, Ufuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazili, Huseyin Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdal, Feyzi Sinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erbin, Akif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarilar, Omer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozgor, Faruk</creatorcontrib><title>PSA Density and Lesion Volume: Key Factors in Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsies for PI‐RADS 3 Lesions</title><title>The Prostate</title><addtitle>Prostate</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Introduction The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to guide prostate biopsies has improved cancer detection rates, particularly for high‐grade tumors. However, despite guidelines recommending biopsies for lesions with a Prostate Imaging‐Reporting and Data System (PI‐RADS) score ≥ 3, the clinical significance of PI‐RADS 3 lesions remains uncertain. This uncertainty, coupled with the cost and potential complications of biopsies, underscores the need for more accurate risk stratification strategies to avoid unnecessary procedures. Prostate‐specific antigen density (PSAD) and index lesion volume are emerging as potential contributors to improve risk assessment. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone an MRI‐guided transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate biopsy at a tertiary care institution. Patients with PI‐RADS 3 lesions were included, and data on demographics, prostate‐specific antigens (PSA), PSAD, lesion diameter, and pathology results were collected. The relationships between PSAD, lesion volume, and pathology outcomes were statistically analyzed. Results Of the 213 patients included, 40 were diagnosed with prostate cancer. PSAD and PSAD x lesion diameter were significantly higher in the patients diagnosed with prostate cancer than those with benign lesions. Among the prostate cancer patients, clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) had a higher mean PSAD value than clinically insignificant prostate cancer (cisPCa). ROC analysis found PSAD x lesion diameter to have the highest discriminatory power for detecting csPCa. Discussion MRI‐guided biopsies offer targeted sampling but the clinical significance of PI‐RADS 3 lesions remains uncertain. Index lesion volume and PSAD are promising adjunctive markers for risk assessment. Combining these factors could facilitate the avoidance of unnecessary biopsies and improve the detection of csPCa. Conclusion Incorporating PSAD and index lesion volume into biopsy decision‐making may enhance risk stratification, particularly for PI‐RADS 3 lesions. Further research is needed to validate these findings and enhance the risk assessment strategies used in making decisions regarding prostate biopsy.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Clinical significance</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image-Guided Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>prostate biopsy</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>prostate imaging reporting and data system</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</subject><subject>prostate‐specific antigen density</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>prostatic neoplasms/diagnosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Unnecessary Procedures</subject><issn>0270-4137</issn><issn>1097-0045</issn><issn>1097-0045</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90M1OGzEUhmELFZWQdtMLqCx1g5CGHv-Mx8Mu_EeNREQK29GM5wwymthhnAFlxyVwjb2SOiTtggUrbx59On4J-cbgiAHwn4vOhyMutYQdMmCQZwmATD-RAfAMEslEtkf2Q3gAiBz4Z7IncpXJHPSAmOlsRM_QBbtc0dLVdILBekfvfNvP8Zj-whW9KM3Sd4FaR0dP3tbW3dNb59BgCGW3oifWL4LFQBvf0en4z8vrzehsRsV2K3whu03ZBvy6fYfk9uL89-lVMrm-HJ-OJonhUkGCkGuJWhvN8lQwk6UpyKo2qEQDSkqtWVlVJtNpargSQtQ1r3KWKw6qxoaLITnY7MYgjz2GZTG3wWDblg59HwrBpNIy0_ma_nhHH3zfuXhdVAo0B9A6qsONMrFw6LApFp2dxy8XDIp1-mKdvnhLH_H37WRfzbH-T_-1joBtwLNtcfXBVDG9uZ5tRv8CinqMkw</recordid><startdate>202503</startdate><enddate>202503</enddate><creator>Ayranci, Ali</creator><creator>Caglar, Ufuk</creator><creator>Yazili, Huseyin Burak</creator><creator>Erdal, Feyzi Sinan</creator><creator>Erbin, Akif</creator><creator>Sarilar, Omer</creator><creator>Ozgor, Faruk</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3747-0869</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3248-7664</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0666-7861</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4832-9396</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7147-8288</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202503</creationdate><title>PSA Density and Lesion Volume: Key Factors in Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsies for PI‐RADS 3 Lesions</title><author>Ayranci, Ali ; Caglar, Ufuk ; Yazili, Huseyin Burak ; Erdal, Feyzi Sinan ; Erbin, Akif ; Sarilar, Omer ; Ozgor, Faruk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2460-e0984e88c819531c75504bdce63f0644881abbc7855c26333dd2b9196206def23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Clinical significance</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image-Guided Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>prostate biopsy</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>prostate imaging reporting and data system</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</topic><topic>prostate‐specific antigen density</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>prostatic neoplasms/diagnosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Unnecessary Procedures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ayranci, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caglar, Ufuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazili, Huseyin Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdal, Feyzi Sinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erbin, Akif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarilar, Omer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozgor, Faruk</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Prostate</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ayranci, Ali</au><au>Caglar, Ufuk</au><au>Yazili, Huseyin Burak</au><au>Erdal, Feyzi Sinan</au><au>Erbin, Akif</au><au>Sarilar, Omer</au><au>Ozgor, Faruk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PSA Density and Lesion Volume: Key Factors in Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsies for PI‐RADS 3 Lesions</atitle><jtitle>The Prostate</jtitle><addtitle>Prostate</addtitle><date>2025-03</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>385</spage><epage>390</epage><pages>385-390</pages><issn>0270-4137</issn><issn>1097-0045</issn><eissn>1097-0045</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Introduction The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to guide prostate biopsies has improved cancer detection rates, particularly for high‐grade tumors. However, despite guidelines recommending biopsies for lesions with a Prostate Imaging‐Reporting and Data System (PI‐RADS) score ≥ 3, the clinical significance of PI‐RADS 3 lesions remains uncertain. This uncertainty, coupled with the cost and potential complications of biopsies, underscores the need for more accurate risk stratification strategies to avoid unnecessary procedures. Prostate‐specific antigen density (PSAD) and index lesion volume are emerging as potential contributors to improve risk assessment. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone an MRI‐guided transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate biopsy at a tertiary care institution. Patients with PI‐RADS 3 lesions were included, and data on demographics, prostate‐specific antigens (PSA), PSAD, lesion diameter, and pathology results were collected. The relationships between PSAD, lesion volume, and pathology outcomes were statistically analyzed. Results Of the 213 patients included, 40 were diagnosed with prostate cancer. PSAD and PSAD x lesion diameter were significantly higher in the patients diagnosed with prostate cancer than those with benign lesions. Among the prostate cancer patients, clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) had a higher mean PSAD value than clinically insignificant prostate cancer (cisPCa). ROC analysis found PSAD x lesion diameter to have the highest discriminatory power for detecting csPCa. Discussion MRI‐guided biopsies offer targeted sampling but the clinical significance of PI‐RADS 3 lesions remains uncertain. Index lesion volume and PSAD are promising adjunctive markers for risk assessment. Combining these factors could facilitate the avoidance of unnecessary biopsies and improve the detection of csPCa. Conclusion Incorporating PSAD and index lesion volume into biopsy decision‐making may enhance risk stratification, particularly for PI‐RADS 3 lesions. Further research is needed to validate these findings and enhance the risk assessment strategies used in making decisions regarding prostate biopsy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>39674908</pmid><doi>10.1002/pros.24840</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3747-0869</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3248-7664</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0666-7861</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4832-9396</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7147-8288</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0270-4137
ispartof The Prostate, 2025-03, Vol.85 (4), p.385-390
issn 0270-4137
1097-0045
1097-0045
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146847892
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aged
Biopsy
Clinical significance
Decision making
Humans
Image-Guided Biopsy - methods
Lesions
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Middle Aged
multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Pathology
Prostate - diagnostic imaging
Prostate - pathology
prostate biopsy
Prostate cancer
prostate imaging reporting and data system
Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood
prostate‐specific antigen density
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
prostatic neoplasms/diagnosis
Retrospective Studies
Risk assessment
Risk Assessment - methods
Unnecessary Procedures
title PSA Density and Lesion Volume: Key Factors in Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsies for PI‐RADS 3 Lesions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T19%3A36%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PSA%20Density%20and%20Lesion%20Volume:%20Key%20Factors%20in%20Avoiding%20Unnecessary%20Biopsies%20for%20PI%E2%80%90RADS%203%20Lesions&rft.jtitle=The%20Prostate&rft.au=Ayranci,%20Ali&rft.date=2025-03&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=390&rft.pages=385-390&rft.issn=0270-4137&rft.eissn=1097-0045&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pros.24840&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3160820088%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3160820088&rft_id=info:pmid/39674908&rfr_iscdi=true