Glucose Testing Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Devices for Neonatal Hypoglycemia
To evaluate the accuracy of various point-of-care device methodologies for measuring blood glucose concentrations in babies at risk of neonatal hypoglycemia. This systematic review and meta-analysis included studies from Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Web of Science up to May 20, 2024. Studies compa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of pediatrics 2025-03, Vol.278, p.114438, Article 114438 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 114438 |
container_title | The Journal of pediatrics |
container_volume | 278 |
creator | St Clair, Sophie L. Ulyatt, Caitlyn M. Corkin, Maria T. Lord, Libby G. Crowther, Caroline A. Harding, Jane E. Lin, Luling |
description | To evaluate the accuracy of various point-of-care device methodologies for measuring blood glucose concentrations in babies at risk of neonatal hypoglycemia.
This systematic review and meta-analysis included studies from Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Web of Science up to May 20, 2024. Studies comparing point-of-care testing methods for neonatal blood glucose to a standard laboratory method were included, excluding those on continuous glucose monitoring or conducted before 1990. Two researchers independently assessed inclusion and evaluated risk of bias using QUADAS-2. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using contingency tables, and diagnostic accuracy was analyzed using hierarchical random-effects modelling. Studies with insufficient data were summarized by estimation direction.
Seventy-one studies were included. The quantitative analysis (n = 31) evaluated glucose oxidase (GO) + photometry (n = 8), glucose-1-dehydrogenase (GDH) + photometry (n = 6), GO + electrochemistry (n = 13), GDH + electrochemistry (n = 12), and hexokinase (HK) + electrochemistry (n = 2). All methods showed high specificity (≥93%), with GO + electrochemistry, GDH + electrochemistry, and HK + electrochemistry showing superior sensitivity. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve confirmed HK + electrochemistry as the most accurate.
Certain point-of-care device methodologies demonstrate greater accuracy in measuring neonatal blood glucose concentrations. Of the methods evaluated, HK + electrochemistry proved to be the most reliable. However, the limited number of studies using this method suggests the need for further research to confirm these findings across diverse settings and populations.
PROSPERO on December 29, 2023 (CRD42023488539). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114438 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146847604</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022347624005419</els_id><sourcerecordid>3146847604</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2351-c418662a38d4390376b09860d33bad6650cb73e1c8e24873f13dc38cc30a67563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS1ERbeFX4CEfOSSxc54nQSJw2pLW6S2IChnyzueLF4l8dZOQPkH_dkkbOHIaaTR92b03mPstRRLKaR-t1_uD-TSMhe5WkqpFJTP2EKKqsh0CfCcLYTI8wxUoU_ZWUp7IUSlhHjBTqHSxUprWLDHq2bAkIjfU-p9t-O31P8ILr3na_5tTD21tvfIv9JPT7-47dwM2Gzd2WZMPvFQ8wtvd11IM7ZGHKLFcV5_Cb7rs1BnGxuJX0wHkBKvQ-R3FDrb24Zfj4ewa0ak1tuX7KS2TaJXT_Ocfb_8eL-5zm4-X33arG8yzGElM1Sy1Dq3UDoFlYBCb0VVauEAttZpvRK4LYAklpSrsoBagkMoEUHY2TOcs7fHu4cYHobJtGl9Qmoa21EYkgGpdDlFJtSEwhHFGFKKVJtD9K2No5HCzBWYvflTgZkrMMcKJtWbpwfDtiX3T_M38wn4cARosjnFGk1CTx2S85GwNy74_z74DRUUmEM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3146847604</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Glucose Testing Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Devices for Neonatal Hypoglycemia</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>St Clair, Sophie L. ; Ulyatt, Caitlyn M. ; Corkin, Maria T. ; Lord, Libby G. ; Crowther, Caroline A. ; Harding, Jane E. ; Lin, Luling</creator><creatorcontrib>St Clair, Sophie L. ; Ulyatt, Caitlyn M. ; Corkin, Maria T. ; Lord, Libby G. ; Crowther, Caroline A. ; Harding, Jane E. ; Lin, Luling</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the accuracy of various point-of-care device methodologies for measuring blood glucose concentrations in babies at risk of neonatal hypoglycemia.
This systematic review and meta-analysis included studies from Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Web of Science up to May 20, 2024. Studies comparing point-of-care testing methods for neonatal blood glucose to a standard laboratory method were included, excluding those on continuous glucose monitoring or conducted before 1990. Two researchers independently assessed inclusion and evaluated risk of bias using QUADAS-2. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using contingency tables, and diagnostic accuracy was analyzed using hierarchical random-effects modelling. Studies with insufficient data were summarized by estimation direction.
Seventy-one studies were included. The quantitative analysis (n = 31) evaluated glucose oxidase (GO) + photometry (n = 8), glucose-1-dehydrogenase (GDH) + photometry (n = 6), GO + electrochemistry (n = 13), GDH + electrochemistry (n = 12), and hexokinase (HK) + electrochemistry (n = 2). All methods showed high specificity (≥93%), with GO + electrochemistry, GDH + electrochemistry, and HK + electrochemistry showing superior sensitivity. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve confirmed HK + electrochemistry as the most accurate.
Certain point-of-care device methodologies demonstrate greater accuracy in measuring neonatal blood glucose concentrations. Of the methods evaluated, HK + electrochemistry proved to be the most reliable. However, the limited number of studies using this method suggests the need for further research to confirm these findings across diverse settings and populations.
PROSPERO on December 29, 2023 (CRD42023488539).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3476</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-6833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114438</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39675663</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>diagnostic techniques and procedures ; glycemia ; newborn</subject><ispartof>The Journal of pediatrics, 2025-03, Vol.278, p.114438, Article 114438</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2351-c418662a38d4390376b09860d33bad6650cb73e1c8e24873f13dc38cc30a67563</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8448-1504</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347624005419$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39675663$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>St Clair, Sophie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulyatt, Caitlyn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corkin, Maria T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lord, Libby G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowther, Caroline A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harding, Jane E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Luling</creatorcontrib><title>Glucose Testing Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Devices for Neonatal Hypoglycemia</title><title>The Journal of pediatrics</title><addtitle>J Pediatr</addtitle><description>To evaluate the accuracy of various point-of-care device methodologies for measuring blood glucose concentrations in babies at risk of neonatal hypoglycemia.
This systematic review and meta-analysis included studies from Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Web of Science up to May 20, 2024. Studies comparing point-of-care testing methods for neonatal blood glucose to a standard laboratory method were included, excluding those on continuous glucose monitoring or conducted before 1990. Two researchers independently assessed inclusion and evaluated risk of bias using QUADAS-2. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using contingency tables, and diagnostic accuracy was analyzed using hierarchical random-effects modelling. Studies with insufficient data were summarized by estimation direction.
Seventy-one studies were included. The quantitative analysis (n = 31) evaluated glucose oxidase (GO) + photometry (n = 8), glucose-1-dehydrogenase (GDH) + photometry (n = 6), GO + electrochemistry (n = 13), GDH + electrochemistry (n = 12), and hexokinase (HK) + electrochemistry (n = 2). All methods showed high specificity (≥93%), with GO + electrochemistry, GDH + electrochemistry, and HK + electrochemistry showing superior sensitivity. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve confirmed HK + electrochemistry as the most accurate.
Certain point-of-care device methodologies demonstrate greater accuracy in measuring neonatal blood glucose concentrations. Of the methods evaluated, HK + electrochemistry proved to be the most reliable. However, the limited number of studies using this method suggests the need for further research to confirm these findings across diverse settings and populations.
PROSPERO on December 29, 2023 (CRD42023488539).</description><subject>diagnostic techniques and procedures</subject><subject>glycemia</subject><subject>newborn</subject><issn>0022-3476</issn><issn>1097-6833</issn><issn>1097-6833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS1ERbeFX4CEfOSSxc54nQSJw2pLW6S2IChnyzueLF4l8dZOQPkH_dkkbOHIaaTR92b03mPstRRLKaR-t1_uD-TSMhe5WkqpFJTP2EKKqsh0CfCcLYTI8wxUoU_ZWUp7IUSlhHjBTqHSxUprWLDHq2bAkIjfU-p9t-O31P8ILr3na_5tTD21tvfIv9JPT7-47dwM2Gzd2WZMPvFQ8wtvd11IM7ZGHKLFcV5_Cb7rs1BnGxuJX0wHkBKvQ-R3FDrb24Zfj4ewa0ak1tuX7KS2TaJXT_Ocfb_8eL-5zm4-X33arG8yzGElM1Sy1Dq3UDoFlYBCb0VVauEAttZpvRK4LYAklpSrsoBagkMoEUHY2TOcs7fHu4cYHobJtGl9Qmoa21EYkgGpdDlFJtSEwhHFGFKKVJtD9K2No5HCzBWYvflTgZkrMMcKJtWbpwfDtiX3T_M38wn4cARosjnFGk1CTx2S85GwNy74_z74DRUUmEM</recordid><startdate>202503</startdate><enddate>202503</enddate><creator>St Clair, Sophie L.</creator><creator>Ulyatt, Caitlyn M.</creator><creator>Corkin, Maria T.</creator><creator>Lord, Libby G.</creator><creator>Crowther, Caroline A.</creator><creator>Harding, Jane E.</creator><creator>Lin, Luling</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8448-1504</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202503</creationdate><title>Glucose Testing Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Devices for Neonatal Hypoglycemia</title><author>St Clair, Sophie L. ; Ulyatt, Caitlyn M. ; Corkin, Maria T. ; Lord, Libby G. ; Crowther, Caroline A. ; Harding, Jane E. ; Lin, Luling</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2351-c418662a38d4390376b09860d33bad6650cb73e1c8e24873f13dc38cc30a67563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>diagnostic techniques and procedures</topic><topic>glycemia</topic><topic>newborn</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>St Clair, Sophie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulyatt, Caitlyn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corkin, Maria T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lord, Libby G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowther, Caroline A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harding, Jane E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Luling</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of pediatrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>St Clair, Sophie L.</au><au>Ulyatt, Caitlyn M.</au><au>Corkin, Maria T.</au><au>Lord, Libby G.</au><au>Crowther, Caroline A.</au><au>Harding, Jane E.</au><au>Lin, Luling</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Glucose Testing Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Devices for Neonatal Hypoglycemia</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of pediatrics</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr</addtitle><date>2025-03</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>278</volume><spage>114438</spage><pages>114438-</pages><artnum>114438</artnum><issn>0022-3476</issn><issn>1097-6833</issn><eissn>1097-6833</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the accuracy of various point-of-care device methodologies for measuring blood glucose concentrations in babies at risk of neonatal hypoglycemia.
This systematic review and meta-analysis included studies from Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Web of Science up to May 20, 2024. Studies comparing point-of-care testing methods for neonatal blood glucose to a standard laboratory method were included, excluding those on continuous glucose monitoring or conducted before 1990. Two researchers independently assessed inclusion and evaluated risk of bias using QUADAS-2. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using contingency tables, and diagnostic accuracy was analyzed using hierarchical random-effects modelling. Studies with insufficient data were summarized by estimation direction.
Seventy-one studies were included. The quantitative analysis (n = 31) evaluated glucose oxidase (GO) + photometry (n = 8), glucose-1-dehydrogenase (GDH) + photometry (n = 6), GO + electrochemistry (n = 13), GDH + electrochemistry (n = 12), and hexokinase (HK) + electrochemistry (n = 2). All methods showed high specificity (≥93%), with GO + electrochemistry, GDH + electrochemistry, and HK + electrochemistry showing superior sensitivity. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve confirmed HK + electrochemistry as the most accurate.
Certain point-of-care device methodologies demonstrate greater accuracy in measuring neonatal blood glucose concentrations. Of the methods evaluated, HK + electrochemistry proved to be the most reliable. However, the limited number of studies using this method suggests the need for further research to confirm these findings across diverse settings and populations.
PROSPERO on December 29, 2023 (CRD42023488539).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39675663</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114438</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8448-1504</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3476 |
ispartof | The Journal of pediatrics, 2025-03, Vol.278, p.114438, Article 114438 |
issn | 0022-3476 1097-6833 1097-6833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146847604 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | diagnostic techniques and procedures glycemia newborn |
title | Glucose Testing Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Devices for Neonatal Hypoglycemia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T21%3A15%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Glucose%20Testing%20Methods:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20Diagnostic%20Accuracy%20of%20Point-of-Care%20Devices%20for%20Neonatal%20Hypoglycemia&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20pediatrics&rft.au=St%20Clair,%20Sophie%20L.&rft.date=2025-03&rft.volume=278&rft.spage=114438&rft.pages=114438-&rft.artnum=114438&rft.issn=0022-3476&rft.eissn=1097-6833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114438&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3146847604%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3146847604&rft_id=info:pmid/39675663&rft_els_id=S0022347624005419&rfr_iscdi=true |