Contribution of the main contaminating materials during pig slaughter to the microbial numbers on carcasses

During pig slaughter, contaminants such as intestinal and stomach contents, bile, tubular rail fat, and reddish foam from the respiratory tract frequently appear on carcasses, potentially compromising meat safety. This study examined the impact of these contaminants on the bacterial loads of pig car...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Letters in applied microbiology 2024-12, Vol.77 (12)
Hauptverfasser: Tholen, Janna, Upmann, Matthias
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page
container_title Letters in applied microbiology
container_volume 77
creator Tholen, Janna
Upmann, Matthias
description During pig slaughter, contaminants such as intestinal and stomach contents, bile, tubular rail fat, and reddish foam from the respiratory tract frequently appear on carcasses, potentially compromising meat safety. This study examined the impact of these contaminants on the bacterial loads of pig carcasses, using total bacterial counts and Enterobacteriaceae counts as hygiene indicators. Examination of the substances as such showed that intestinal and stomach contents were particularly conspicuous to undermine the carcase hygiene due to total bacterial counts of ∼6.0 log10 CFU g-1 (intestinal content) and 5.5 log10 CFU g-1 (stomach content). Tubular rail fat showed varying contamination levels, from low (3.1 log10 CFU g-1) to high (6.4 log10 CFU g-1). The reddish foam had moderate contamination (4.3 log10 CFU g-1). Enterobacteriaceae levels mirrored these results at a lower level. Subsequently, a comparative study analysing bacterial levels in contaminated and in noncontaminated pork rind regions was performed. Even small amounts of intestinal and stomach contents led to significant increases in total bacterial counts of up to 3 log10 CFU cm-² and in Enterobacteriaceae counts (up to 5 log10 CFU cm-²). Other contaminants did not significantly raise bacterial levels: their total viable counts around 3.5 log10 CFU cm-² were similar to those of uncontaminated carcass areas. Nevertheless, they should be removed before further processing.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/lambio/ovae125
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146846720</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3146846720</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1311-d6dec0f0dd4474e1ae982412afa1aff6ede54b8e2bc5bcb5773f8959fc65901f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1LxDAQxYMo7rp69Sg5eulu0iZNc5TFLxC8KHgrSTrZjbbNmrSC_71ZuoqnGea992N4CF1SsqREFqtWddr5lf9SQHN-hOaUiTwTJX87_rfP0FmM74SQiubyFM0KWXJBhJyjj7Xvh-D0ODjfY2_xsAXcKddjkwTVuV4Nrt-k0wDBqTbiZgz7w85tcGzVuNkmAQ9-CjoTvE423I-dhhBxghoVjIoR4jk6sYkAF4e5QK93ty_rh-zp-f5xffOUGVpQmjVlA4ZY0jSMCQZUgaxyRnNlFVXWltAAZ7qCXBuujeZCFLaSXFpTckmoLRboeuLugv8cIQ5156KBtlU9-DHWBWVlxUqRk2RdTtb0d4wBbL0LrlPhu6ak3hdcTwXXh4JT4OrAHnUHzZ_9t9HiB0kEfIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3146846720</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contribution of the main contaminating materials during pig slaughter to the microbial numbers on carcasses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Tholen, Janna ; Upmann, Matthias</creator><creatorcontrib>Tholen, Janna ; Upmann, Matthias</creatorcontrib><description>During pig slaughter, contaminants such as intestinal and stomach contents, bile, tubular rail fat, and reddish foam from the respiratory tract frequently appear on carcasses, potentially compromising meat safety. This study examined the impact of these contaminants on the bacterial loads of pig carcasses, using total bacterial counts and Enterobacteriaceae counts as hygiene indicators. Examination of the substances as such showed that intestinal and stomach contents were particularly conspicuous to undermine the carcase hygiene due to total bacterial counts of ∼6.0 log10 CFU g-1 (intestinal content) and 5.5 log10 CFU g-1 (stomach content). Tubular rail fat showed varying contamination levels, from low (3.1 log10 CFU g-1) to high (6.4 log10 CFU g-1). The reddish foam had moderate contamination (4.3 log10 CFU g-1). Enterobacteriaceae levels mirrored these results at a lower level. Subsequently, a comparative study analysing bacterial levels in contaminated and in noncontaminated pork rind regions was performed. Even small amounts of intestinal and stomach contents led to significant increases in total bacterial counts of up to 3 log10 CFU cm-² and in Enterobacteriaceae counts (up to 5 log10 CFU cm-²). Other contaminants did not significantly raise bacterial levels: their total viable counts around 3.5 log10 CFU cm-² were similar to those of uncontaminated carcass areas. Nevertheless, they should be removed before further processing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-765X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-765X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/lambio/ovae125</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39657079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Abattoirs ; Animals ; Bacteria - classification ; Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification ; Bacterial Load ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Enterobacteriaceae - isolation &amp; purification ; Food Contamination - analysis ; Food Microbiology ; Meat - microbiology ; Swine</subject><ispartof>Letters in applied microbiology, 2024-12, Vol.77 (12)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Applied Microbiology International.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1311-d6dec0f0dd4474e1ae982412afa1aff6ede54b8e2bc5bcb5773f8959fc65901f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39657079$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tholen, Janna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Upmann, Matthias</creatorcontrib><title>Contribution of the main contaminating materials during pig slaughter to the microbial numbers on carcasses</title><title>Letters in applied microbiology</title><addtitle>Lett Appl Microbiol</addtitle><description>During pig slaughter, contaminants such as intestinal and stomach contents, bile, tubular rail fat, and reddish foam from the respiratory tract frequently appear on carcasses, potentially compromising meat safety. This study examined the impact of these contaminants on the bacterial loads of pig carcasses, using total bacterial counts and Enterobacteriaceae counts as hygiene indicators. Examination of the substances as such showed that intestinal and stomach contents were particularly conspicuous to undermine the carcase hygiene due to total bacterial counts of ∼6.0 log10 CFU g-1 (intestinal content) and 5.5 log10 CFU g-1 (stomach content). Tubular rail fat showed varying contamination levels, from low (3.1 log10 CFU g-1) to high (6.4 log10 CFU g-1). The reddish foam had moderate contamination (4.3 log10 CFU g-1). Enterobacteriaceae levels mirrored these results at a lower level. Subsequently, a comparative study analysing bacterial levels in contaminated and in noncontaminated pork rind regions was performed. Even small amounts of intestinal and stomach contents led to significant increases in total bacterial counts of up to 3 log10 CFU cm-² and in Enterobacteriaceae counts (up to 5 log10 CFU cm-²). Other contaminants did not significantly raise bacterial levels: their total viable counts around 3.5 log10 CFU cm-² were similar to those of uncontaminated carcass areas. Nevertheless, they should be removed before further processing.</description><subject>Abattoirs</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria - classification</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Bacterial Load</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Food Contamination - analysis</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>Meat - microbiology</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>1472-765X</issn><issn>1472-765X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1LxDAQxYMo7rp69Sg5eulu0iZNc5TFLxC8KHgrSTrZjbbNmrSC_71ZuoqnGea992N4CF1SsqREFqtWddr5lf9SQHN-hOaUiTwTJX87_rfP0FmM74SQiubyFM0KWXJBhJyjj7Xvh-D0ODjfY2_xsAXcKddjkwTVuV4Nrt-k0wDBqTbiZgz7w85tcGzVuNkmAQ9-CjoTvE423I-dhhBxghoVjIoR4jk6sYkAF4e5QK93ty_rh-zp-f5xffOUGVpQmjVlA4ZY0jSMCQZUgaxyRnNlFVXWltAAZ7qCXBuujeZCFLaSXFpTckmoLRboeuLugv8cIQ5156KBtlU9-DHWBWVlxUqRk2RdTtb0d4wBbL0LrlPhu6ak3hdcTwXXh4JT4OrAHnUHzZ_9t9HiB0kEfIQ</recordid><startdate>20241202</startdate><enddate>20241202</enddate><creator>Tholen, Janna</creator><creator>Upmann, Matthias</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241202</creationdate><title>Contribution of the main contaminating materials during pig slaughter to the microbial numbers on carcasses</title><author>Tholen, Janna ; Upmann, Matthias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1311-d6dec0f0dd4474e1ae982412afa1aff6ede54b8e2bc5bcb5773f8959fc65901f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Abattoirs</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria - classification</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Bacterial Load</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Food Contamination - analysis</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>Meat - microbiology</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tholen, Janna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Upmann, Matthias</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Letters in applied microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tholen, Janna</au><au>Upmann, Matthias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contribution of the main contaminating materials during pig slaughter to the microbial numbers on carcasses</atitle><jtitle>Letters in applied microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Lett Appl Microbiol</addtitle><date>2024-12-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>12</issue><issn>1472-765X</issn><eissn>1472-765X</eissn><abstract>During pig slaughter, contaminants such as intestinal and stomach contents, bile, tubular rail fat, and reddish foam from the respiratory tract frequently appear on carcasses, potentially compromising meat safety. This study examined the impact of these contaminants on the bacterial loads of pig carcasses, using total bacterial counts and Enterobacteriaceae counts as hygiene indicators. Examination of the substances as such showed that intestinal and stomach contents were particularly conspicuous to undermine the carcase hygiene due to total bacterial counts of ∼6.0 log10 CFU g-1 (intestinal content) and 5.5 log10 CFU g-1 (stomach content). Tubular rail fat showed varying contamination levels, from low (3.1 log10 CFU g-1) to high (6.4 log10 CFU g-1). The reddish foam had moderate contamination (4.3 log10 CFU g-1). Enterobacteriaceae levels mirrored these results at a lower level. Subsequently, a comparative study analysing bacterial levels in contaminated and in noncontaminated pork rind regions was performed. Even small amounts of intestinal and stomach contents led to significant increases in total bacterial counts of up to 3 log10 CFU cm-² and in Enterobacteriaceae counts (up to 5 log10 CFU cm-²). Other contaminants did not significantly raise bacterial levels: their total viable counts around 3.5 log10 CFU cm-² were similar to those of uncontaminated carcass areas. Nevertheless, they should be removed before further processing.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>39657079</pmid><doi>10.1093/lambio/ovae125</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1472-765X
ispartof Letters in applied microbiology, 2024-12, Vol.77 (12)
issn 1472-765X
1472-765X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146846720
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Abattoirs
Animals
Bacteria - classification
Bacteria - isolation & purification
Bacterial Load
Colony Count, Microbial
Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification
Food Contamination - analysis
Food Microbiology
Meat - microbiology
Swine
title Contribution of the main contaminating materials during pig slaughter to the microbial numbers on carcasses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A39%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contribution%20of%20the%20main%20contaminating%20materials%20during%20pig%20slaughter%20to%20the%20microbial%20numbers%20on%20carcasses&rft.jtitle=Letters%20in%20applied%20microbiology&rft.au=Tholen,%20Janna&rft.date=2024-12-02&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=12&rft.issn=1472-765X&rft.eissn=1472-765X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/lambio/ovae125&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3146846720%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3146846720&rft_id=info:pmid/39657079&rfr_iscdi=true