Ambient air pollution exposure and adult asthma incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Ambient (outdoor) air pollutant exposures have emerged as a plausible risk factor for incident childhood asthma. However, the effect of ambient air pollutant exposures on risk of incident adult asthma is unclear. We aimed to investigate associations between specific ambient air pollutants and the ri...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet. Planetary health 2024-12, Vol.8 (12), p.e1065-e1078 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e1078 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e1065 |
container_title | The Lancet. Planetary health |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Lee, Spencer Tian, Derek He, Rose Cragg, Jacquelyn J Carlsten, Chris Giang, Amanda Gill, Prubjot K Johnson, Kate M Brigham, Emily |
description | Ambient (outdoor) air pollutant exposures have emerged as a plausible risk factor for incident childhood asthma. However, the effect of ambient air pollutant exposures on risk of incident adult asthma is unclear. We aimed to investigate associations between specific ambient air pollutants and the risk of incident adult asthma.
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science from inception to Nov 27, 2023. We included observational studies with the outcome of new-onset asthma during adulthood (onset at ≥18 years), and metric of exposure of ambient air pollutants (particulate matter [PM]2·5, nitrogen dioxide [NO2], ozone [O3], and sulphur dioxide [SO2]). Study data were extracted independently by two reviewers and study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. When four or more eligible studies were available for a given pollutant, we applied meta-analysis using inverse variance weighting in a random effects model to estimate pooled relative risk (RR), and used meta-regression to explore sources of heterogeneity. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023420139.
Our search identified 1891 references. After excluding 651 (34%) duplicates and ineligible studies, we included 25 studies in the systematic review. After excluding studies with overlapping populations or reporting effect estimates that could not be pooled, we performed meta-analysis for PM2·5 (nine studies), NO2 (nine studies), and O3 (four studies). Pooled random effects RRs for incident adult asthma per 5 μg/m3 increase in PM2·5 were 1·07 (95% CI 1·01 to 1·13) and per 10 μg/m3 in NO2 were 1·11 (1·03 to 1·20). We found no significant association between increasing O3 concentration and incident adult asthma (per 60-μg/m3 increase in O3, pooled RR 1·04 [0·79 to 1·36]). We found substantial heterogeneity across studies (I2=88% for all analyses). In exploratory meta-regression, average exposure level was a significant source of heterogeneity for the pooled NO2 estimate (95% CI –0·0077 to –0·0025 per μg/m3).
Exposure to increased ambient PM2·5 or NO2 might present an additional risk factor for incident adult asthma, although high heterogeneity among included studies warrants caution in interpretation. Evidence was inconsistent for O3 and insufficient for SO2. To increase confidence and population representation in pooled estimates, further primary investigations are necessary, ideally with |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00279-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146775338</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2542519624002791</els_id><sourcerecordid>3146775338</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e1591-2189373baf98c3ed9d7ea7618bedec3337fea0265262173f2b1f9f79c3d459143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkclOwzAQhi0EolXpI4B8LIeAl8SOuaCqYpMqcQDOxrEnwihLiR2gb0-6gDjNaOab0fzzI3RKyQUlVFw-sSxlSUaVmLH0nBAmVUIP0PivfPgvH6FpCO-EEJozITJ6jEZcCZkOrTF6ndeFhyZi4zu8aquqj75tMHyv2tB3gE3jsHF9NQAhvtUG-8Z6B42FK2xwWIcItYne4g4-PXxt-RqiSUxjqnXw4QQdlaYKMN3HCXq5vXle3CfLx7uHxXyZAM0UTRjNFZe8MKXKLQennAQjBc0LcGA557IEQ5jImGBU8pIVtFSlVJa7dJhP-QTNdntXXfvRQ4i69sFCVZkG2j5oTlMhZcZ5PqBne7QvanB61fnadGv9-5UBuN4BMBw8yOp0sH6j2fkObNSu9ZoSvbFCb63Qmz9rluqtFZryH4KKek0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3146775338</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ambient air pollution exposure and adult asthma incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Electronic Journals Library</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lee, Spencer ; Tian, Derek ; He, Rose ; Cragg, Jacquelyn J ; Carlsten, Chris ; Giang, Amanda ; Gill, Prubjot K ; Johnson, Kate M ; Brigham, Emily</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Spencer ; Tian, Derek ; He, Rose ; Cragg, Jacquelyn J ; Carlsten, Chris ; Giang, Amanda ; Gill, Prubjot K ; Johnson, Kate M ; Brigham, Emily</creatorcontrib><description>Ambient (outdoor) air pollutant exposures have emerged as a plausible risk factor for incident childhood asthma. However, the effect of ambient air pollutant exposures on risk of incident adult asthma is unclear. We aimed to investigate associations between specific ambient air pollutants and the risk of incident adult asthma.
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science from inception to Nov 27, 2023. We included observational studies with the outcome of new-onset asthma during adulthood (onset at ≥18 years), and metric of exposure of ambient air pollutants (particulate matter [PM]2·5, nitrogen dioxide [NO2], ozone [O3], and sulphur dioxide [SO2]). Study data were extracted independently by two reviewers and study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. When four or more eligible studies were available for a given pollutant, we applied meta-analysis using inverse variance weighting in a random effects model to estimate pooled relative risk (RR), and used meta-regression to explore sources of heterogeneity. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023420139.
Our search identified 1891 references. After excluding 651 (34%) duplicates and ineligible studies, we included 25 studies in the systematic review. After excluding studies with overlapping populations or reporting effect estimates that could not be pooled, we performed meta-analysis for PM2·5 (nine studies), NO2 (nine studies), and O3 (four studies). Pooled random effects RRs for incident adult asthma per 5 μg/m3 increase in PM2·5 were 1·07 (95% CI 1·01 to 1·13) and per 10 μg/m3 in NO2 were 1·11 (1·03 to 1·20). We found no significant association between increasing O3 concentration and incident adult asthma (per 60-μg/m3 increase in O3, pooled RR 1·04 [0·79 to 1·36]). We found substantial heterogeneity across studies (I2=88% for all analyses). In exploratory meta-regression, average exposure level was a significant source of heterogeneity for the pooled NO2 estimate (95% CI –0·0077 to –0·0025 per μg/m3).
Exposure to increased ambient PM2·5 or NO2 might present an additional risk factor for incident adult asthma, although high heterogeneity among included studies warrants caution in interpretation. Evidence was inconsistent for O3 and insufficient for SO2. To increase confidence and population representation in pooled estimates, further primary investigations are necessary, ideally with aligned methodology and reporting.
None.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2542-5196</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2542-5196</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00279-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39674196</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Air Pollutants - adverse effects ; Air Pollutants - analysis ; Air Pollution - adverse effects ; Air Pollution - analysis ; Asthma - chemically induced ; Asthma - epidemiology ; Asthma - etiology ; Environmental Exposure - adverse effects ; Humans ; Incidence ; Nitrogen Dioxide - adverse effects ; Nitrogen Dioxide - analysis ; Ozone - adverse effects ; Ozone - analysis ; Particulate Matter - adverse effects ; Particulate Matter - analysis ; Sulfur Dioxide - adverse effects ; Sulfur Dioxide - analysis</subject><ispartof>The Lancet. Planetary health, 2024-12, Vol.8 (12), p.e1065-e1078</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39674196$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Spencer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Rose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cragg, Jacquelyn J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlsten, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giang, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, Prubjot K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kate M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brigham, Emily</creatorcontrib><title>Ambient air pollution exposure and adult asthma incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>The Lancet. Planetary health</title><addtitle>Lancet Planet Health</addtitle><description>Ambient (outdoor) air pollutant exposures have emerged as a plausible risk factor for incident childhood asthma. However, the effect of ambient air pollutant exposures on risk of incident adult asthma is unclear. We aimed to investigate associations between specific ambient air pollutants and the risk of incident adult asthma.
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science from inception to Nov 27, 2023. We included observational studies with the outcome of new-onset asthma during adulthood (onset at ≥18 years), and metric of exposure of ambient air pollutants (particulate matter [PM]2·5, nitrogen dioxide [NO2], ozone [O3], and sulphur dioxide [SO2]). Study data were extracted independently by two reviewers and study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. When four or more eligible studies were available for a given pollutant, we applied meta-analysis using inverse variance weighting in a random effects model to estimate pooled relative risk (RR), and used meta-regression to explore sources of heterogeneity. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023420139.
Our search identified 1891 references. After excluding 651 (34%) duplicates and ineligible studies, we included 25 studies in the systematic review. After excluding studies with overlapping populations or reporting effect estimates that could not be pooled, we performed meta-analysis for PM2·5 (nine studies), NO2 (nine studies), and O3 (four studies). Pooled random effects RRs for incident adult asthma per 5 μg/m3 increase in PM2·5 were 1·07 (95% CI 1·01 to 1·13) and per 10 μg/m3 in NO2 were 1·11 (1·03 to 1·20). We found no significant association between increasing O3 concentration and incident adult asthma (per 60-μg/m3 increase in O3, pooled RR 1·04 [0·79 to 1·36]). We found substantial heterogeneity across studies (I2=88% for all analyses). In exploratory meta-regression, average exposure level was a significant source of heterogeneity for the pooled NO2 estimate (95% CI –0·0077 to –0·0025 per μg/m3).
Exposure to increased ambient PM2·5 or NO2 might present an additional risk factor for incident adult asthma, although high heterogeneity among included studies warrants caution in interpretation. Evidence was inconsistent for O3 and insufficient for SO2. To increase confidence and population representation in pooled estimates, further primary investigations are necessary, ideally with aligned methodology and reporting.
None.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Air Pollutants - adverse effects</subject><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Air Pollution - adverse effects</subject><subject>Air Pollution - analysis</subject><subject>Asthma - chemically induced</subject><subject>Asthma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Asthma - etiology</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Nitrogen Dioxide - adverse effects</subject><subject>Nitrogen Dioxide - analysis</subject><subject>Ozone - adverse effects</subject><subject>Ozone - analysis</subject><subject>Particulate Matter - adverse effects</subject><subject>Particulate Matter - analysis</subject><subject>Sulfur Dioxide - adverse effects</subject><subject>Sulfur Dioxide - analysis</subject><issn>2542-5196</issn><issn>2542-5196</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkclOwzAQhi0EolXpI4B8LIeAl8SOuaCqYpMqcQDOxrEnwihLiR2gb0-6gDjNaOab0fzzI3RKyQUlVFw-sSxlSUaVmLH0nBAmVUIP0PivfPgvH6FpCO-EEJozITJ6jEZcCZkOrTF6ndeFhyZi4zu8aquqj75tMHyv2tB3gE3jsHF9NQAhvtUG-8Z6B42FK2xwWIcItYne4g4-PXxt-RqiSUxjqnXw4QQdlaYKMN3HCXq5vXle3CfLx7uHxXyZAM0UTRjNFZe8MKXKLQennAQjBc0LcGA557IEQ5jImGBU8pIVtFSlVJa7dJhP-QTNdntXXfvRQ4i69sFCVZkG2j5oTlMhZcZ5PqBne7QvanB61fnadGv9-5UBuN4BMBw8yOp0sH6j2fkObNSu9ZoSvbFCb63Qmz9rluqtFZryH4KKek0</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Lee, Spencer</creator><creator>Tian, Derek</creator><creator>He, Rose</creator><creator>Cragg, Jacquelyn J</creator><creator>Carlsten, Chris</creator><creator>Giang, Amanda</creator><creator>Gill, Prubjot K</creator><creator>Johnson, Kate M</creator><creator>Brigham, Emily</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Ambient air pollution exposure and adult asthma incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Lee, Spencer ; Tian, Derek ; He, Rose ; Cragg, Jacquelyn J ; Carlsten, Chris ; Giang, Amanda ; Gill, Prubjot K ; Johnson, Kate M ; Brigham, Emily</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e1591-2189373baf98c3ed9d7ea7618bedec3337fea0265262173f2b1f9f79c3d459143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Air Pollutants - adverse effects</topic><topic>Air Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Air Pollution - adverse effects</topic><topic>Air Pollution - analysis</topic><topic>Asthma - chemically induced</topic><topic>Asthma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Asthma - etiology</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Nitrogen Dioxide - adverse effects</topic><topic>Nitrogen Dioxide - analysis</topic><topic>Ozone - adverse effects</topic><topic>Ozone - analysis</topic><topic>Particulate Matter - adverse effects</topic><topic>Particulate Matter - analysis</topic><topic>Sulfur Dioxide - adverse effects</topic><topic>Sulfur Dioxide - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Spencer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Rose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cragg, Jacquelyn J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlsten, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giang, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, Prubjot K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kate M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brigham, Emily</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet. Planetary health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Spencer</au><au>Tian, Derek</au><au>He, Rose</au><au>Cragg, Jacquelyn J</au><au>Carlsten, Chris</au><au>Giang, Amanda</au><au>Gill, Prubjot K</au><au>Johnson, Kate M</au><au>Brigham, Emily</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ambient air pollution exposure and adult asthma incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet. Planetary health</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Planet Health</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e1065</spage><epage>e1078</epage><pages>e1065-e1078</pages><issn>2542-5196</issn><eissn>2542-5196</eissn><abstract>Ambient (outdoor) air pollutant exposures have emerged as a plausible risk factor for incident childhood asthma. However, the effect of ambient air pollutant exposures on risk of incident adult asthma is unclear. We aimed to investigate associations between specific ambient air pollutants and the risk of incident adult asthma.
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science from inception to Nov 27, 2023. We included observational studies with the outcome of new-onset asthma during adulthood (onset at ≥18 years), and metric of exposure of ambient air pollutants (particulate matter [PM]2·5, nitrogen dioxide [NO2], ozone [O3], and sulphur dioxide [SO2]). Study data were extracted independently by two reviewers and study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. When four or more eligible studies were available for a given pollutant, we applied meta-analysis using inverse variance weighting in a random effects model to estimate pooled relative risk (RR), and used meta-regression to explore sources of heterogeneity. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023420139.
Our search identified 1891 references. After excluding 651 (34%) duplicates and ineligible studies, we included 25 studies in the systematic review. After excluding studies with overlapping populations or reporting effect estimates that could not be pooled, we performed meta-analysis for PM2·5 (nine studies), NO2 (nine studies), and O3 (four studies). Pooled random effects RRs for incident adult asthma per 5 μg/m3 increase in PM2·5 were 1·07 (95% CI 1·01 to 1·13) and per 10 μg/m3 in NO2 were 1·11 (1·03 to 1·20). We found no significant association between increasing O3 concentration and incident adult asthma (per 60-μg/m3 increase in O3, pooled RR 1·04 [0·79 to 1·36]). We found substantial heterogeneity across studies (I2=88% for all analyses). In exploratory meta-regression, average exposure level was a significant source of heterogeneity for the pooled NO2 estimate (95% CI –0·0077 to –0·0025 per μg/m3).
Exposure to increased ambient PM2·5 or NO2 might present an additional risk factor for incident adult asthma, although high heterogeneity among included studies warrants caution in interpretation. Evidence was inconsistent for O3 and insufficient for SO2. To increase confidence and population representation in pooled estimates, further primary investigations are necessary, ideally with aligned methodology and reporting.
None.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39674196</pmid><doi>10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00279-1</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2542-5196 |
ispartof | The Lancet. Planetary health, 2024-12, Vol.8 (12), p.e1065-e1078 |
issn | 2542-5196 2542-5196 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146775338 |
source | Electronic Journals Library; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Air Pollutants - adverse effects Air Pollutants - analysis Air Pollution - adverse effects Air Pollution - analysis Asthma - chemically induced Asthma - epidemiology Asthma - etiology Environmental Exposure - adverse effects Humans Incidence Nitrogen Dioxide - adverse effects Nitrogen Dioxide - analysis Ozone - adverse effects Ozone - analysis Particulate Matter - adverse effects Particulate Matter - analysis Sulfur Dioxide - adverse effects Sulfur Dioxide - analysis |
title | Ambient air pollution exposure and adult asthma incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A01%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ambient%20air%20pollution%20exposure%20and%20adult%20asthma%20incidence:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet.%20Planetary%20health&rft.au=Lee,%20Spencer&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e1065&rft.epage=e1078&rft.pages=e1065-e1078&rft.issn=2542-5196&rft.eissn=2542-5196&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00279-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3146775338%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3146775338&rft_id=info:pmid/39674196&rft_els_id=S2542519624002791&rfr_iscdi=true |