Can screening and decontamination procedures performed on an outpatient basis reduce colonization with Staphylococcus aureus and mitigate associated complications in patients undergoing elective hospital procedures? A controlled intervention study (STAUfrei)

Staphylococcus aureus colonization increases the risk of wound infection in surgical procedures. Prevention strategies to date have focused primarily on the hospital setting, although there are recommendations for pre-hospital decontamination at home, which can be performed by patients themselves. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of hospital infection 2024-12, Vol.157, p.19-28
Hauptverfasser: Bauer, A., Sturm, H., Martus, P., Brüggenjürgen, B., Eberhardt, H., Mayer, E., Schulz, R., Bernhold, J., Krause, T., Höllein, P., Liese, J., Wolf, S., Joos, S., Grünewald, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 28
container_issue
container_start_page 19
container_title The Journal of hospital infection
container_volume 157
creator Bauer, A.
Sturm, H.
Martus, P.
Brüggenjürgen, B.
Eberhardt, H.
Mayer, E.
Schulz, R.
Bernhold, J.
Krause, T.
Höllein, P.
Liese, J.
Wolf, S.
Joos, S.
Grünewald, M.
description Staphylococcus aureus colonization increases the risk of wound infection in surgical procedures. Prevention strategies to date have focused primarily on the hospital setting, although there are recommendations for pre-hospital decontamination at home, which can be performed by patients themselves. This study aimed to shift the process of screening and decontamination of S. aureus [meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and meticillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA)] out of the hospital setting. Between April 2019 and March 2022, 8054 (intervention group N=3390, control group 4664) patients (age >18 years) undergoing elective procedures in a hospital in Baden-Württemberg (Germany) were recruited for the study. The intervention consisted of 5 days of decontamination carried out by patients (or their caregivers) in their domestic environment. The analysis comprised a simple arm comparison of colonization rates at admission between study groups, as well as adjusted logistic regressions. After adjustment for relevant risk factors, the intervention reduced the risk of S. aureus colonization at admission by 14%; this difference was significant (odds ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.74–0.10; P=0.046). Re-admission was significantly less common in the intervention group. Signs of wound infection and recolonization after invasive procedures did not differ significantly between the study groups. Outpatient decontamination measures appear to be more effective compared with routine care. As the results from logistic regressions are based on MSSA, its consideration in clinical hygiene management should be discussed. Strict adherence during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was challenging, potentially underestimating the overall impact of the intervention.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.12.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146650786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195670124004018</els_id><sourcerecordid>3146650786</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1521-bd4d962fd459da5b61e0a129c1edec20386383518ac8d3034271b22b158a72153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU2P0zAUDCsQWwp_gAPycTmk2M5HGwkJVRVf0kocdvdsOfZr-6rEDrZTVH49L2RBnDg9y5qZN28my14LvhJc1O9Oq9MR3UpyWa6EXHEurrKFqAqZy6ZonmYLLpoqr9dcXGcvYjxxzum_ep5dF01dy5qLxZOrnXYsmgDg0B2YdpZZMN4l3aPTCb1jQ_AG7BggsgHC3oceLKN_IvoxDQQCl1irI0YWCGiAGd95hz9n_g9MR3aX9HC8dN54Y8bINMlNg9b1mPCgEzAdozdIL0v8fujQ_OZHhuRh3hLZ6CyEg5-8Qgcm4RnY0ccBk-7-cfqBbdl0RfBdR3roEoQzCUx-Yhrthd3c3W8f9gHw7cvs2V53EV49zmX28Onj_e5Lfvvt89fd9jY3opIib21pm1rubVk1VldtLYBrIRsjgBKTvNjUxaaoxEabjS14Ucq1aKVsRbXRa0m1LLObWZdsfh8hJtVjNNB12oEfoypEWdcVX5POMpMz1AQfY4C9GgL2OlyU4GrqXp3U1L2auldCKuqeSG8e9ceWKvpL-VM2Ad7PAKArzwhBRUOpUmQYKEplPf5P_xev8sfP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3146650786</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can screening and decontamination procedures performed on an outpatient basis reduce colonization with Staphylococcus aureus and mitigate associated complications in patients undergoing elective hospital procedures? A controlled intervention study (STAUfrei)</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Bauer, A. ; Sturm, H. ; Martus, P. ; Brüggenjürgen, B. ; Eberhardt, H. ; Mayer, E. ; Schulz, R. ; Bernhold, J. ; Krause, T. ; Höllein, P. ; Liese, J. ; Wolf, S. ; Joos, S. ; Grünewald, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bauer, A. ; Sturm, H. ; Martus, P. ; Brüggenjürgen, B. ; Eberhardt, H. ; Mayer, E. ; Schulz, R. ; Bernhold, J. ; Krause, T. ; Höllein, P. ; Liese, J. ; Wolf, S. ; Joos, S. ; Grünewald, M. ; STAUfrei Consortium</creatorcontrib><description>Staphylococcus aureus colonization increases the risk of wound infection in surgical procedures. Prevention strategies to date have focused primarily on the hospital setting, although there are recommendations for pre-hospital decontamination at home, which can be performed by patients themselves. This study aimed to shift the process of screening and decontamination of S. aureus [meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and meticillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA)] out of the hospital setting. Between April 2019 and March 2022, 8054 (intervention group N=3390, control group 4664) patients (age &gt;18 years) undergoing elective procedures in a hospital in Baden-Württemberg (Germany) were recruited for the study. The intervention consisted of 5 days of decontamination carried out by patients (or their caregivers) in their domestic environment. The analysis comprised a simple arm comparison of colonization rates at admission between study groups, as well as adjusted logistic regressions. After adjustment for relevant risk factors, the intervention reduced the risk of S. aureus colonization at admission by 14%; this difference was significant (odds ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.74–0.10; P=0.046). Re-admission was significantly less common in the intervention group. Signs of wound infection and recolonization after invasive procedures did not differ significantly between the study groups. Outpatient decontamination measures appear to be more effective compared with routine care. As the results from logistic regressions are based on MSSA, its consideration in clinical hygiene management should be discussed. Strict adherence during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was challenging, potentially underestimating the overall impact of the intervention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.12.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39662601</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Decontamination ; Outpatient care ; Postoperative wound infections ; Prevention ; Staphylococcus aureus</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hospital infection, 2024-12, Vol.157, p.19-28</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1521-bd4d962fd459da5b61e0a129c1edec20386383518ac8d3034271b22b158a72153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124004018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39662601$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bauer, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturm, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martus, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brüggenjürgen, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eberhardt, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernhold, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Höllein, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liese, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joos, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grünewald, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STAUfrei Consortium</creatorcontrib><title>Can screening and decontamination procedures performed on an outpatient basis reduce colonization with Staphylococcus aureus and mitigate associated complications in patients undergoing elective hospital procedures? A controlled intervention study (STAUfrei)</title><title>The Journal of hospital infection</title><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><description>Staphylococcus aureus colonization increases the risk of wound infection in surgical procedures. Prevention strategies to date have focused primarily on the hospital setting, although there are recommendations for pre-hospital decontamination at home, which can be performed by patients themselves. This study aimed to shift the process of screening and decontamination of S. aureus [meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and meticillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA)] out of the hospital setting. Between April 2019 and March 2022, 8054 (intervention group N=3390, control group 4664) patients (age &gt;18 years) undergoing elective procedures in a hospital in Baden-Württemberg (Germany) were recruited for the study. The intervention consisted of 5 days of decontamination carried out by patients (or their caregivers) in their domestic environment. The analysis comprised a simple arm comparison of colonization rates at admission between study groups, as well as adjusted logistic regressions. After adjustment for relevant risk factors, the intervention reduced the risk of S. aureus colonization at admission by 14%; this difference was significant (odds ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.74–0.10; P=0.046). Re-admission was significantly less common in the intervention group. Signs of wound infection and recolonization after invasive procedures did not differ significantly between the study groups. Outpatient decontamination measures appear to be more effective compared with routine care. As the results from logistic regressions are based on MSSA, its consideration in clinical hygiene management should be discussed. Strict adherence during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was challenging, potentially underestimating the overall impact of the intervention.</description><subject>Decontamination</subject><subject>Outpatient care</subject><subject>Postoperative wound infections</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UU2P0zAUDCsQWwp_gAPycTmk2M5HGwkJVRVf0kocdvdsOfZr-6rEDrZTVH49L2RBnDg9y5qZN28my14LvhJc1O9Oq9MR3UpyWa6EXHEurrKFqAqZy6ZonmYLLpoqr9dcXGcvYjxxzum_ep5dF01dy5qLxZOrnXYsmgDg0B2YdpZZMN4l3aPTCb1jQ_AG7BggsgHC3oceLKN_IvoxDQQCl1irI0YWCGiAGd95hz9n_g9MR3aX9HC8dN54Y8bINMlNg9b1mPCgEzAdozdIL0v8fujQ_OZHhuRh3hLZ6CyEg5-8Qgcm4RnY0ccBk-7-cfqBbdl0RfBdR3roEoQzCUx-Yhrthd3c3W8f9gHw7cvs2V53EV49zmX28Onj_e5Lfvvt89fd9jY3opIib21pm1rubVk1VldtLYBrIRsjgBKTvNjUxaaoxEabjS14Ucq1aKVsRbXRa0m1LLObWZdsfh8hJtVjNNB12oEfoypEWdcVX5POMpMz1AQfY4C9GgL2OlyU4GrqXp3U1L2auldCKuqeSG8e9ceWKvpL-VM2Ad7PAKArzwhBRUOpUmQYKEplPf5P_xev8sfP</recordid><startdate>20241209</startdate><enddate>20241209</enddate><creator>Bauer, A.</creator><creator>Sturm, H.</creator><creator>Martus, P.</creator><creator>Brüggenjürgen, B.</creator><creator>Eberhardt, H.</creator><creator>Mayer, E.</creator><creator>Schulz, R.</creator><creator>Bernhold, J.</creator><creator>Krause, T.</creator><creator>Höllein, P.</creator><creator>Liese, J.</creator><creator>Wolf, S.</creator><creator>Joos, S.</creator><creator>Grünewald, M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241209</creationdate><title>Can screening and decontamination procedures performed on an outpatient basis reduce colonization with Staphylococcus aureus and mitigate associated complications in patients undergoing elective hospital procedures? A controlled intervention study (STAUfrei)</title><author>Bauer, A. ; Sturm, H. ; Martus, P. ; Brüggenjürgen, B. ; Eberhardt, H. ; Mayer, E. ; Schulz, R. ; Bernhold, J. ; Krause, T. ; Höllein, P. ; Liese, J. ; Wolf, S. ; Joos, S. ; Grünewald, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1521-bd4d962fd459da5b61e0a129c1edec20386383518ac8d3034271b22b158a72153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Decontamination</topic><topic>Outpatient care</topic><topic>Postoperative wound infections</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bauer, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturm, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martus, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brüggenjürgen, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eberhardt, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernhold, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Höllein, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liese, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joos, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grünewald, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STAUfrei Consortium</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bauer, A.</au><au>Sturm, H.</au><au>Martus, P.</au><au>Brüggenjürgen, B.</au><au>Eberhardt, H.</au><au>Mayer, E.</au><au>Schulz, R.</au><au>Bernhold, J.</au><au>Krause, T.</au><au>Höllein, P.</au><au>Liese, J.</au><au>Wolf, S.</au><au>Joos, S.</au><au>Grünewald, M.</au><aucorp>STAUfrei Consortium</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can screening and decontamination procedures performed on an outpatient basis reduce colonization with Staphylococcus aureus and mitigate associated complications in patients undergoing elective hospital procedures? A controlled intervention study (STAUfrei)</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><date>2024-12-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>157</volume><spage>19</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>19-28</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>Staphylococcus aureus colonization increases the risk of wound infection in surgical procedures. Prevention strategies to date have focused primarily on the hospital setting, although there are recommendations for pre-hospital decontamination at home, which can be performed by patients themselves. This study aimed to shift the process of screening and decontamination of S. aureus [meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and meticillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA)] out of the hospital setting. Between April 2019 and March 2022, 8054 (intervention group N=3390, control group 4664) patients (age &gt;18 years) undergoing elective procedures in a hospital in Baden-Württemberg (Germany) were recruited for the study. The intervention consisted of 5 days of decontamination carried out by patients (or their caregivers) in their domestic environment. The analysis comprised a simple arm comparison of colonization rates at admission between study groups, as well as adjusted logistic regressions. After adjustment for relevant risk factors, the intervention reduced the risk of S. aureus colonization at admission by 14%; this difference was significant (odds ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.74–0.10; P=0.046). Re-admission was significantly less common in the intervention group. Signs of wound infection and recolonization after invasive procedures did not differ significantly between the study groups. Outpatient decontamination measures appear to be more effective compared with routine care. As the results from logistic regressions are based on MSSA, its consideration in clinical hygiene management should be discussed. Strict adherence during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was challenging, potentially underestimating the overall impact of the intervention.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39662601</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhin.2024.12.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6701
ispartof The Journal of hospital infection, 2024-12, Vol.157, p.19-28
issn 0195-6701
1532-2939
1532-2939
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146650786
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Decontamination
Outpatient care
Postoperative wound infections
Prevention
Staphylococcus aureus
title Can screening and decontamination procedures performed on an outpatient basis reduce colonization with Staphylococcus aureus and mitigate associated complications in patients undergoing elective hospital procedures? A controlled intervention study (STAUfrei)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T00%3A24%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20screening%20and%20decontamination%20procedures%20performed%20on%20an%20outpatient%20basis%20reduce%20colonization%20with%20Staphylococcus%20aureus%20and%20mitigate%20associated%20complications%20in%20patients%20undergoing%20elective%20hospital%20procedures?%20A%20controlled%20intervention%20study%20(STAUfrei)&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hospital%20infection&rft.au=Bauer,%20A.&rft.aucorp=STAUfrei%20Consortium&rft.date=2024-12-09&rft.volume=157&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=19-28&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhin.2024.12.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3146650786%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3146650786&rft_id=info:pmid/39662601&rft_els_id=S0195670124004018&rfr_iscdi=true