Gender issues in myopia: a changing paradigm in generations

Myopia is becoming an important cause of visual impairment. Determining risk profiles will help to develop targeted prevention strategies. This study aims to explore the difference in myopia development between genders in two cohorts representing different generations, and to assess whether hypothet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of epidemiology 2024-12, Vol.39 (12), p.1315-1324
Hauptverfasser: Enthoven, Clair A., Haarman, Annechien E. G., Swierkowska-Janc, Joanna, Tideman, J. Willem L., Polling, Jan Roelof, Raat, Hein, Verhoeven, Virginie J.M., Labrecque, Jeremy, Klaver, Caroline C. W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1324
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1315
container_title European journal of epidemiology
container_volume 39
creator Enthoven, Clair A.
Haarman, Annechien E. G.
Swierkowska-Janc, Joanna
Tideman, J. Willem L.
Polling, Jan Roelof
Raat, Hein
Verhoeven, Virginie J.M.
Labrecque, Jeremy
Klaver, Caroline C. W.
description Myopia is becoming an important cause of visual impairment. Determining risk profiles will help to develop targeted prevention strategies. This study aims to explore the difference in myopia development between genders in two cohorts representing different generations, and to assess whether hypothetical interventions targeting education or lifestyle factors would reduce a gender gap. This study included two Dutch population-based cohorts; 11,109 adults aged ≥ 45 years from the Rotterdam Study I-III born between 1887 and 1960, and 7229 children from the birth cohort Generation R study born between 2002 and 2006 at age 9–13 years. Sequential G-estimation was used to estimate changes in gender-specific myopia prevalence, incidence and spherical equivalent if hypothetical interventions such as education and lifestyle changes would have been implemented. Myopia prevalence was 32.3% in men and 29.3% in women in the generation born between 1887 and 1960 (0.23 dioptre difference in spherical equivalent; p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10654-024-01163-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146629267</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3149646797</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-7c09d57a34984ce60efdc5646cd1fa4b8287a469f4203260448c68c9d4ffd2243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwBxhQJBaWwPkjdgwTqqAgVWKB2XIdJ6RqnGI3Q_vrcUgBiYHhdMM9997pQegcwzUGEDcBA89YCiQWxpymuwM0xpmgqSA5O0RjoJKmREoYoZMQlgCQg8yO0YhKzjFIOUZ3M-sK65M6hM6GpHZJs23Xtb5NdGLetatqVyVr7XVRV00_rqyzXm_q1oVTdFTqVbBn-z5Bb48Pr9OndP4ye57ez1NDMr5JhQFZZEJTJnNmLAdbFibjjJsCl5otcpILzbgsGQFKODCWG54bWbCyLAhhdIKuhty1bz_ilxvV1MHY1Uo723ZBUcw4J5JwEdHLP-iy7byL3_WUjEeF7CkyUMa3IXhbqrWvG-23CoPq1apBrYpq1ZdatYtLF_vobtHY4mfl22UE6ACEOHKV9b-3_4n9BLaPgqc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3149646797</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender issues in myopia: a changing paradigm in generations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Enthoven, Clair A. ; Haarman, Annechien E. G. ; Swierkowska-Janc, Joanna ; Tideman, J. Willem L. ; Polling, Jan Roelof ; Raat, Hein ; Verhoeven, Virginie J.M. ; Labrecque, Jeremy ; Klaver, Caroline C. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Enthoven, Clair A. ; Haarman, Annechien E. G. ; Swierkowska-Janc, Joanna ; Tideman, J. Willem L. ; Polling, Jan Roelof ; Raat, Hein ; Verhoeven, Virginie J.M. ; Labrecque, Jeremy ; Klaver, Caroline C. W.</creatorcontrib><description>Myopia is becoming an important cause of visual impairment. Determining risk profiles will help to develop targeted prevention strategies. This study aims to explore the difference in myopia development between genders in two cohorts representing different generations, and to assess whether hypothetical interventions targeting education or lifestyle factors would reduce a gender gap. This study included two Dutch population-based cohorts; 11,109 adults aged ≥ 45 years from the Rotterdam Study I-III born between 1887 and 1960, and 7229 children from the birth cohort Generation R study born between 2002 and 2006 at age 9–13 years. Sequential G-estimation was used to estimate changes in gender-specific myopia prevalence, incidence and spherical equivalent if hypothetical interventions such as education and lifestyle changes would have been implemented. Myopia prevalence was 32.3% in men and 29.3% in women in the generation born between 1887 and 1960 (0.23 dioptre difference in spherical equivalent; p  &lt; 0.001); while this prevalence was 20.2% in boys and 24.7% in girls born between 2002 and 2006 at age 13 (0.15 dioptre difference in spherical equivalent; p  = 0.02). In the older generation, hypothetically intervening to lower education reduced the difference between genders by -52.4% (-108.0%; -13.2%) for spherical equivalent and − 53.0% (-112.0%; -11.6%) for myopia. In children, hypothetically intervening on reducing reading time (-50.0%, 95%CI=-267.5%; 33.8% for spherical equivalent) and number of books read/week (-76.8%, 95% CI=-349.9%; 20.2% for spherical equivalent) was most prominent, but not statistically significant. The results show that men had a higher prevalence of myopia in our study of older generations; while girls had a higher prevalence in the young generation. Our hypothetical interventions suggest that these generation-specific gender preponderances were largely due to education and, possibly, lifestyle factors in youth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0393-2990</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1573-7284</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7284</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10654-024-01163-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39661099</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age ; Age determination ; Aged ; Cardiology ; Child ; Children ; Cohort Studies ; Education ; Educational Status ; Epidemiology ; Equivalence ; Essay ; Female ; Gender ; Gender aspects ; Gender differences ; Girls ; Humans ; Incidence ; Infectious Diseases ; Intervention ; Life Style ; Lifestyles ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Men ; Middle Aged ; Myopia ; Myopia - epidemiology ; Netherlands - epidemiology ; Oncology ; Population studies ; Prevalence ; Public Health ; Risk Factors ; Sex Distribution ; Sex Factors ; Statistical analysis ; Visual aspects ; Youth</subject><ispartof>European journal of epidemiology, 2024-12, Vol.39 (12), p.1315-1324</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2024 Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. Springer Nature B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Dec 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-7c09d57a34984ce60efdc5646cd1fa4b8287a469f4203260448c68c9d4ffd2243</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0812-8765 ; 0000-0002-2355-5258 ; 0000-0002-1028-2158 ; 0000-0002-6281-6908 ; 0000-0002-6000-7445 ; 0000-0002-1452-5700 ; 0000-0002-3042-8783 ; 0000-0001-7359-7862 ; 0000-0001-7688-5667</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10654-024-01163-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10654-024-01163-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39661099$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Enthoven, Clair A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haarman, Annechien E. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swierkowska-Janc, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tideman, J. Willem L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polling, Jan Roelof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raat, Hein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoeven, Virginie J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labrecque, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klaver, Caroline C. W.</creatorcontrib><title>Gender issues in myopia: a changing paradigm in generations</title><title>European journal of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Epidemiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Myopia is becoming an important cause of visual impairment. Determining risk profiles will help to develop targeted prevention strategies. This study aims to explore the difference in myopia development between genders in two cohorts representing different generations, and to assess whether hypothetical interventions targeting education or lifestyle factors would reduce a gender gap. This study included two Dutch population-based cohorts; 11,109 adults aged ≥ 45 years from the Rotterdam Study I-III born between 1887 and 1960, and 7229 children from the birth cohort Generation R study born between 2002 and 2006 at age 9–13 years. Sequential G-estimation was used to estimate changes in gender-specific myopia prevalence, incidence and spherical equivalent if hypothetical interventions such as education and lifestyle changes would have been implemented. Myopia prevalence was 32.3% in men and 29.3% in women in the generation born between 1887 and 1960 (0.23 dioptre difference in spherical equivalent; p  &lt; 0.001); while this prevalence was 20.2% in boys and 24.7% in girls born between 2002 and 2006 at age 13 (0.15 dioptre difference in spherical equivalent; p  = 0.02). In the older generation, hypothetically intervening to lower education reduced the difference between genders by -52.4% (-108.0%; -13.2%) for spherical equivalent and − 53.0% (-112.0%; -11.6%) for myopia. In children, hypothetically intervening on reducing reading time (-50.0%, 95%CI=-267.5%; 33.8% for spherical equivalent) and number of books read/week (-76.8%, 95% CI=-349.9%; 20.2% for spherical equivalent) was most prominent, but not statistically significant. The results show that men had a higher prevalence of myopia in our study of older generations; while girls had a higher prevalence in the young generation. Our hypothetical interventions suggest that these generation-specific gender preponderances were largely due to education and, possibly, lifestyle factors in youth.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age determination</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Essay</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender aspects</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Girls</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Infectious Diseases</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Life Style</subject><subject>Lifestyles</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myopia</subject><subject>Myopia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Netherlands - epidemiology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sex Distribution</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Visual aspects</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>0393-2990</issn><issn>1573-7284</issn><issn>1573-7284</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwBxhQJBaWwPkjdgwTqqAgVWKB2XIdJ6RqnGI3Q_vrcUgBiYHhdMM9997pQegcwzUGEDcBA89YCiQWxpymuwM0xpmgqSA5O0RjoJKmREoYoZMQlgCQg8yO0YhKzjFIOUZ3M-sK65M6hM6GpHZJs23Xtb5NdGLetatqVyVr7XVRV00_rqyzXm_q1oVTdFTqVbBn-z5Bb48Pr9OndP4ye57ez1NDMr5JhQFZZEJTJnNmLAdbFibjjJsCl5otcpILzbgsGQFKODCWG54bWbCyLAhhdIKuhty1bz_ilxvV1MHY1Uo723ZBUcw4J5JwEdHLP-iy7byL3_WUjEeF7CkyUMa3IXhbqrWvG-23CoPq1apBrYpq1ZdatYtLF_vobtHY4mfl22UE6ACEOHKV9b-3_4n9BLaPgqc</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Enthoven, Clair A.</creator><creator>Haarman, Annechien E. G.</creator><creator>Swierkowska-Janc, Joanna</creator><creator>Tideman, J. Willem L.</creator><creator>Polling, Jan Roelof</creator><creator>Raat, Hein</creator><creator>Verhoeven, Virginie J.M.</creator><creator>Labrecque, Jeremy</creator><creator>Klaver, Caroline C. W.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0812-8765</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2355-5258</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1028-2158</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6281-6908</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6000-7445</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1452-5700</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3042-8783</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7359-7862</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7688-5667</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Gender issues in myopia: a changing paradigm in generations</title><author>Enthoven, Clair A. ; Haarman, Annechien E. G. ; Swierkowska-Janc, Joanna ; Tideman, J. Willem L. ; Polling, Jan Roelof ; Raat, Hein ; Verhoeven, Virginie J.M. ; Labrecque, Jeremy ; Klaver, Caroline C. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-7c09d57a34984ce60efdc5646cd1fa4b8287a469f4203260448c68c9d4ffd2243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age determination</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Essay</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender aspects</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Girls</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Infectious Diseases</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Life Style</topic><topic>Lifestyles</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myopia</topic><topic>Myopia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Netherlands - epidemiology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sex Distribution</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Visual aspects</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Enthoven, Clair A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haarman, Annechien E. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swierkowska-Janc, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tideman, J. Willem L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polling, Jan Roelof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raat, Hein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoeven, Virginie J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labrecque, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klaver, Caroline C. W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Enthoven, Clair A.</au><au>Haarman, Annechien E. G.</au><au>Swierkowska-Janc, Joanna</au><au>Tideman, J. Willem L.</au><au>Polling, Jan Roelof</au><au>Raat, Hein</au><au>Verhoeven, Virginie J.M.</au><au>Labrecque, Jeremy</au><au>Klaver, Caroline C. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gender issues in myopia: a changing paradigm in generations</atitle><jtitle>European journal of epidemiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Epidemiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1315</spage><epage>1324</epage><pages>1315-1324</pages><issn>0393-2990</issn><issn>1573-7284</issn><eissn>1573-7284</eissn><abstract>Myopia is becoming an important cause of visual impairment. Determining risk profiles will help to develop targeted prevention strategies. This study aims to explore the difference in myopia development between genders in two cohorts representing different generations, and to assess whether hypothetical interventions targeting education or lifestyle factors would reduce a gender gap. This study included two Dutch population-based cohorts; 11,109 adults aged ≥ 45 years from the Rotterdam Study I-III born between 1887 and 1960, and 7229 children from the birth cohort Generation R study born between 2002 and 2006 at age 9–13 years. Sequential G-estimation was used to estimate changes in gender-specific myopia prevalence, incidence and spherical equivalent if hypothetical interventions such as education and lifestyle changes would have been implemented. Myopia prevalence was 32.3% in men and 29.3% in women in the generation born between 1887 and 1960 (0.23 dioptre difference in spherical equivalent; p  &lt; 0.001); while this prevalence was 20.2% in boys and 24.7% in girls born between 2002 and 2006 at age 13 (0.15 dioptre difference in spherical equivalent; p  = 0.02). In the older generation, hypothetically intervening to lower education reduced the difference between genders by -52.4% (-108.0%; -13.2%) for spherical equivalent and − 53.0% (-112.0%; -11.6%) for myopia. In children, hypothetically intervening on reducing reading time (-50.0%, 95%CI=-267.5%; 33.8% for spherical equivalent) and number of books read/week (-76.8%, 95% CI=-349.9%; 20.2% for spherical equivalent) was most prominent, but not statistically significant. The results show that men had a higher prevalence of myopia in our study of older generations; while girls had a higher prevalence in the young generation. Our hypothetical interventions suggest that these generation-specific gender preponderances were largely due to education and, possibly, lifestyle factors in youth.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>39661099</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10654-024-01163-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0812-8765</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2355-5258</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1028-2158</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6281-6908</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6000-7445</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1452-5700</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3042-8783</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7359-7862</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7688-5667</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0393-2990
ispartof European journal of epidemiology, 2024-12, Vol.39 (12), p.1315-1324
issn 0393-2990
1573-7284
1573-7284
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146629267
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Age
Age determination
Aged
Cardiology
Child
Children
Cohort Studies
Education
Educational Status
Epidemiology
Equivalence
Essay
Female
Gender
Gender aspects
Gender differences
Girls
Humans
Incidence
Infectious Diseases
Intervention
Life Style
Lifestyles
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Men
Middle Aged
Myopia
Myopia - epidemiology
Netherlands - epidemiology
Oncology
Population studies
Prevalence
Public Health
Risk Factors
Sex Distribution
Sex Factors
Statistical analysis
Visual aspects
Youth
title Gender issues in myopia: a changing paradigm in generations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T04%3A27%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender%20issues%20in%20myopia:%20a%20changing%20paradigm%20in%20generations&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=Enthoven,%20Clair%20A.&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1315&rft.epage=1324&rft.pages=1315-1324&rft.issn=0393-2990&rft.eissn=1573-7284&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10654-024-01163-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3149646797%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3149646797&rft_id=info:pmid/39661099&rfr_iscdi=true