Can blood‐flow restriction resistance training enhance remote strength transfer? A systematic review with meta‐analysis
Objectives This systematic review with meta‐analysis aimed to examine the effect of blood flow restriction resistance training (BFR‐RT) on strength gains in untrained limbs (remote strength transfer [RST]). Literature Survey A search for studies was performed using six databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Sco...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PM & R 2024-12, Vol.16 (12), p.1395-1405 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1405 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 1395 |
| container_title | PM & R |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Rodríguez, Miguel Ángel Crespo, Irene Quintana‐Cepedal, Marcos Fernández‐del Valle, María Valle, Miguel Olmedillas, Hugo |
| description | Objectives
This systematic review with meta‐analysis aimed to examine the effect of blood flow restriction resistance training (BFR‐RT) on strength gains in untrained limbs (remote strength transfer [RST]).
Literature Survey
A search for studies was performed using six databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus, and ScienceDirect) up to February 2024.
Methodology
Studies that assessed the RST phenomenon following BFR‐RT and measured muscle strength were included. Meta‐analyses of standardized mean differences (SMDs) were performed using a random‐effects model to determine the effect of BFR‐RT on RST.
Synthesis
Eight studies were included in this systematic review, of which six were involved in the meta‐analyses. BFR‐RT was not found to enhance RST in comparison with RT (SMD 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.02 to 0.56; p = .07). These findings did not vary when the comparison was examined in upper limbs or measured using an isometric contraction.
Conclusions
BFR‐RT does not enhance RST in comparison with traditional RT at the same load according to the meta‐analyses. Therefore, the usage of BFR is not recommended for RST. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pmrj.13200 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146606882</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3146606882</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2180-682b238946eb6ca69bf512d165d25f9267804b666fe951681c4c24ba1b87386e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1KAzEQB_Agit8XH0D2KEJrJrs7zZ5Eip8oiuh5yaazGtnN1iS1FC8-gs_ok5i26tFThvDjP8yfsT3gfeBcHI1b99KHVHC-wjahSLMe5Jiu_s6ZFBtsy_sXzjEDietsIy0wh3wAm-x9qGxSNV03-vr4rJtumjjywRkdTGfns_FBWU1JcMpYY58Sss-LD0dtFyiJmOxTeJ4D62tyx8lJ4mc-UKuC0ZG9GZomUxNJS0HFNcqqZhaDd9harRpPuz_vNns8O30YXvSub88vhyfXPS1A8h5KUYlUFhlShVphUdU5iBFgPhJ5XQgcSJ5ViFhTkQNK0JkWWaWgkoNUIqXb7GCZO3bd6ySeV7bGa2oaZamb-DKFDJGjlCLSwyXVrvPeUV2OnWmVm5XAy3nZ5bzsclF2xPs_uZOqpdEf_W03AliCqWlo9k9UeXdzf7UM_Qb-QI3K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3146606882</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can blood‐flow restriction resistance training enhance remote strength transfer? A systematic review with meta‐analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Rodríguez, Miguel Ángel ; Crespo, Irene ; Quintana‐Cepedal, Marcos ; Fernández‐del Valle, María ; Valle, Miguel ; Olmedillas, Hugo</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Miguel Ángel ; Crespo, Irene ; Quintana‐Cepedal, Marcos ; Fernández‐del Valle, María ; Valle, Miguel ; Olmedillas, Hugo</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
This systematic review with meta‐analysis aimed to examine the effect of blood flow restriction resistance training (BFR‐RT) on strength gains in untrained limbs (remote strength transfer [RST]).
Literature Survey
A search for studies was performed using six databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus, and ScienceDirect) up to February 2024.
Methodology
Studies that assessed the RST phenomenon following BFR‐RT and measured muscle strength were included. Meta‐analyses of standardized mean differences (SMDs) were performed using a random‐effects model to determine the effect of BFR‐RT on RST.
Synthesis
Eight studies were included in this systematic review, of which six were involved in the meta‐analyses. BFR‐RT was not found to enhance RST in comparison with RT (SMD 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.02 to 0.56; p = .07). These findings did not vary when the comparison was examined in upper limbs or measured using an isometric contraction.
Conclusions
BFR‐RT does not enhance RST in comparison with traditional RT at the same load according to the meta‐analyses. Therefore, the usage of BFR is not recommended for RST.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1934-1482</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1934-1563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-1563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.13200</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39651571</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Humans ; Muscle Strength - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - blood supply ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Regional Blood Flow - physiology ; Resistance Training - methods ; Upper Extremity - physiology</subject><ispartof>PM & R, 2024-12, Vol.16 (12), p.1395-1405</ispartof><rights>2024 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2180-682b238946eb6ca69bf512d165d25f9267804b666fe951681c4c24ba1b87386e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9708-7015 ; 0000-0003-4625-2759 ; 0000-0002-0440-1157 ; 0000-0003-2341-2967 ; 0000-0003-2678-1506</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpmrj.13200$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpmrj.13200$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39651571$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crespo, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintana‐Cepedal, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández‐del Valle, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olmedillas, Hugo</creatorcontrib><title>Can blood‐flow restriction resistance training enhance remote strength transfer? A systematic review with meta‐analysis</title><title>PM & R</title><addtitle>PM R</addtitle><description>Objectives
This systematic review with meta‐analysis aimed to examine the effect of blood flow restriction resistance training (BFR‐RT) on strength gains in untrained limbs (remote strength transfer [RST]).
Literature Survey
A search for studies was performed using six databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus, and ScienceDirect) up to February 2024.
Methodology
Studies that assessed the RST phenomenon following BFR‐RT and measured muscle strength were included. Meta‐analyses of standardized mean differences (SMDs) were performed using a random‐effects model to determine the effect of BFR‐RT on RST.
Synthesis
Eight studies were included in this systematic review, of which six were involved in the meta‐analyses. BFR‐RT was not found to enhance RST in comparison with RT (SMD 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.02 to 0.56; p = .07). These findings did not vary when the comparison was examined in upper limbs or measured using an isometric contraction.
Conclusions
BFR‐RT does not enhance RST in comparison with traditional RT at the same load according to the meta‐analyses. Therefore, the usage of BFR is not recommended for RST.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Muscle Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - blood supply</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Regional Blood Flow - physiology</subject><subject>Resistance Training - methods</subject><subject>Upper Extremity - physiology</subject><issn>1934-1482</issn><issn>1934-1563</issn><issn>1934-1563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90M1KAzEQB_Agit8XH0D2KEJrJrs7zZ5Eip8oiuh5yaazGtnN1iS1FC8-gs_ok5i26tFThvDjP8yfsT3gfeBcHI1b99KHVHC-wjahSLMe5Jiu_s6ZFBtsy_sXzjEDietsIy0wh3wAm-x9qGxSNV03-vr4rJtumjjywRkdTGfns_FBWU1JcMpYY58Sss-LD0dtFyiJmOxTeJ4D62tyx8lJ4mc-UKuC0ZG9GZomUxNJS0HFNcqqZhaDd9harRpPuz_vNns8O30YXvSub88vhyfXPS1A8h5KUYlUFhlShVphUdU5iBFgPhJ5XQgcSJ5ViFhTkQNK0JkWWaWgkoNUIqXb7GCZO3bd6ySeV7bGa2oaZamb-DKFDJGjlCLSwyXVrvPeUV2OnWmVm5XAy3nZ5bzsclF2xPs_uZOqpdEf_W03AliCqWlo9k9UeXdzf7UM_Qb-QI3K</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Rodríguez, Miguel Ángel</creator><creator>Crespo, Irene</creator><creator>Quintana‐Cepedal, Marcos</creator><creator>Fernández‐del Valle, María</creator><creator>Valle, Miguel</creator><creator>Olmedillas, Hugo</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9708-7015</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4625-2759</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0440-1157</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2341-2967</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2678-1506</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Can blood‐flow restriction resistance training enhance remote strength transfer? A systematic review with meta‐analysis</title><author>Rodríguez, Miguel Ángel ; Crespo, Irene ; Quintana‐Cepedal, Marcos ; Fernández‐del Valle, María ; Valle, Miguel ; Olmedillas, Hugo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2180-682b238946eb6ca69bf512d165d25f9267804b666fe951681c4c24ba1b87386e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Muscle Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - blood supply</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Regional Blood Flow - physiology</topic><topic>Resistance Training - methods</topic><topic>Upper Extremity - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crespo, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintana‐Cepedal, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández‐del Valle, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olmedillas, Hugo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>PM & R</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodríguez, Miguel Ángel</au><au>Crespo, Irene</au><au>Quintana‐Cepedal, Marcos</au><au>Fernández‐del Valle, María</au><au>Valle, Miguel</au><au>Olmedillas, Hugo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can blood‐flow restriction resistance training enhance remote strength transfer? A systematic review with meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>PM & R</jtitle><addtitle>PM R</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1395</spage><epage>1405</epage><pages>1395-1405</pages><issn>1934-1482</issn><issn>1934-1563</issn><eissn>1934-1563</eissn><abstract>Objectives
This systematic review with meta‐analysis aimed to examine the effect of blood flow restriction resistance training (BFR‐RT) on strength gains in untrained limbs (remote strength transfer [RST]).
Literature Survey
A search for studies was performed using six databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus, and ScienceDirect) up to February 2024.
Methodology
Studies that assessed the RST phenomenon following BFR‐RT and measured muscle strength were included. Meta‐analyses of standardized mean differences (SMDs) were performed using a random‐effects model to determine the effect of BFR‐RT on RST.
Synthesis
Eight studies were included in this systematic review, of which six were involved in the meta‐analyses. BFR‐RT was not found to enhance RST in comparison with RT (SMD 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.02 to 0.56; p = .07). These findings did not vary when the comparison was examined in upper limbs or measured using an isometric contraction.
Conclusions
BFR‐RT does not enhance RST in comparison with traditional RT at the same load according to the meta‐analyses. Therefore, the usage of BFR is not recommended for RST.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>39651571</pmid><doi>10.1002/pmrj.13200</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9708-7015</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4625-2759</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0440-1157</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2341-2967</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2678-1506</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1934-1482 |
| ispartof | PM & R, 2024-12, Vol.16 (12), p.1395-1405 |
| issn | 1934-1482 1934-1563 1934-1563 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146606882 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Humans Muscle Strength - physiology Muscle, Skeletal - blood supply Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Regional Blood Flow - physiology Resistance Training - methods Upper Extremity - physiology |
| title | Can blood‐flow restriction resistance training enhance remote strength transfer? A systematic review with meta‐analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A59%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20blood%E2%80%90flow%20restriction%20resistance%20training%20enhance%20remote%20strength%20transfer?%20A%20systematic%20review%20with%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=PM%20&%20R&rft.au=Rodr%C3%ADguez,%20Miguel%20%C3%81ngel&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1395&rft.epage=1405&rft.pages=1395-1405&rft.issn=1934-1482&rft.eissn=1934-1563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pmrj.13200&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3146606882%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3146606882&rft_id=info:pmid/39651571&rfr_iscdi=true |