Environmental impact of pediatric ENT surgery: A STROBE analysis

Increasing emissions of greenhouse gases contribute to climate change. The healthcare sector, and particularly the operating room, is a significant emitter of greenhouse gases. In head-and-neck surgery, pediatric procedures are very common, but few studies have assessed their ecological impact. Our...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases head and neck diseases, 2024-12
Hauptverfasser: Martin, M., Ayraud-Thevenot, S., Dufour, X., Lebreton, J.-P., Guihenneuc, J., Carsuzaa, F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases
container_volume
creator Martin, M.
Ayraud-Thevenot, S.
Dufour, X.
Lebreton, J.-P.
Guihenneuc, J.
Carsuzaa, F.
description Increasing emissions of greenhouse gases contribute to climate change. The healthcare sector, and particularly the operating room, is a significant emitter of greenhouse gases. In head-and-neck surgery, pediatric procedures are very common, but few studies have assessed their ecological impact. Our objective was to quantify the carbon footprint of common pediatric head-and-neck surgeries (tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, and transtympanic tube placement). An eco-epidemiological study was conducted in December 2022 in a tertiary hospital center. The carbon footprint of 10 pediatric head-and-neck surgeries (tonsillectomies, adenoidectomies, transtympanic tube placements) was calculated, as the sum of carbon dioxide (CO2eq) emissions generated by patient and medical staff transport, waste production, energy consumption in operating rooms, manufacturing and transport of disposable and reusable medical devices (MDs), medication production, and sterilization of reusable MDs. The carbon footprint of 1 pediatric head-and-neck surgery was 57.86kgCO2eq. Disposable MDs were the most polluting item with 30.82kgCO2eq (53.3%). Patient transport accounted for 27.4%, medication for 12.6% and reusable MDs for 2.9%. Pediatric head-and-neck surgeries generate a significant quantity of CO2, mostly due to the production and delivery of disposable MDs. These observations could serve as a starting point for ecological actions consistent with an environmentally sustainable and climate-resilient health system.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.anorl.2024.11.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146519477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1879729624001613</els_id><sourcerecordid>3146519477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1540-4b25fe4c2ddb0c030014cf53a221cfd10864086715909ecf3bd7bf27782694253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNtKw0AQhhdRbKl9AkH20pvEPSWbCIK1xAMUC1rBu2Wz2ciWnNxNCn17t7b10oFh5uKf-Wc-AC4xCjHC8c06lE1rq5AgwkKMQ4SiEzDGCU8DTtHn6bEnaTwCU-fWyAdNkhSl52BE05gSQtAY3GfNxti2qXXTywqaupOqh20JO10Y2VujYPa6gm6wX9pub-EMvq_elg8ZlI2sts64C3BWysrp6aFOwMdjtpo_B4vl08t8tggUjhgKWE6iUjNFiiJHClGEMFNlRCUhWJUFRknMfHIc-Qu1Kmle8LwknCckThmJ6ARc7_d2tv0etOtFbZzSVSUb3Q5OUMziCKeMcy-le6myrXNWl6KzppZ2KzASO3piLX7piR09gbHw9PzU1cFgyGtd_M0cWXnB3V6g_Zsbo61wyuhGeVBWq14UrfnX4AdC_X7x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3146519477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental impact of pediatric ENT surgery: A STROBE analysis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Martin, M. ; Ayraud-Thevenot, S. ; Dufour, X. ; Lebreton, J.-P. ; Guihenneuc, J. ; Carsuzaa, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin, M. ; Ayraud-Thevenot, S. ; Dufour, X. ; Lebreton, J.-P. ; Guihenneuc, J. ; Carsuzaa, F.</creatorcontrib><description>Increasing emissions of greenhouse gases contribute to climate change. The healthcare sector, and particularly the operating room, is a significant emitter of greenhouse gases. In head-and-neck surgery, pediatric procedures are very common, but few studies have assessed their ecological impact. Our objective was to quantify the carbon footprint of common pediatric head-and-neck surgeries (tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, and transtympanic tube placement). An eco-epidemiological study was conducted in December 2022 in a tertiary hospital center. The carbon footprint of 10 pediatric head-and-neck surgeries (tonsillectomies, adenoidectomies, transtympanic tube placements) was calculated, as the sum of carbon dioxide (CO2eq) emissions generated by patient and medical staff transport, waste production, energy consumption in operating rooms, manufacturing and transport of disposable and reusable medical devices (MDs), medication production, and sterilization of reusable MDs. The carbon footprint of 1 pediatric head-and-neck surgery was 57.86kgCO2eq. Disposable MDs were the most polluting item with 30.82kgCO2eq (53.3%). Patient transport accounted for 27.4%, medication for 12.6% and reusable MDs for 2.9%. Pediatric head-and-neck surgeries generate a significant quantity of CO2, mostly due to the production and delivery of disposable MDs. These observations could serve as a starting point for ecological actions consistent with an environmentally sustainable and climate-resilient health system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1879-7296</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-730X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-730X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2024.11.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39632220</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Climate ; Environment ; Greenhouse gases ; Pediatric ; Tonsillectomy</subject><ispartof>European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases, 2024-12</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1540-4b25fe4c2ddb0c030014cf53a221cfd10864086715909ecf3bd7bf27782694253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879729624001613$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39632220$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayraud-Thevenot, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dufour, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebreton, J.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guihenneuc, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carsuzaa, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental impact of pediatric ENT surgery: A STROBE analysis</title><title>European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases</title><addtitle>Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis</addtitle><description>Increasing emissions of greenhouse gases contribute to climate change. The healthcare sector, and particularly the operating room, is a significant emitter of greenhouse gases. In head-and-neck surgery, pediatric procedures are very common, but few studies have assessed their ecological impact. Our objective was to quantify the carbon footprint of common pediatric head-and-neck surgeries (tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, and transtympanic tube placement). An eco-epidemiological study was conducted in December 2022 in a tertiary hospital center. The carbon footprint of 10 pediatric head-and-neck surgeries (tonsillectomies, adenoidectomies, transtympanic tube placements) was calculated, as the sum of carbon dioxide (CO2eq) emissions generated by patient and medical staff transport, waste production, energy consumption in operating rooms, manufacturing and transport of disposable and reusable medical devices (MDs), medication production, and sterilization of reusable MDs. The carbon footprint of 1 pediatric head-and-neck surgery was 57.86kgCO2eq. Disposable MDs were the most polluting item with 30.82kgCO2eq (53.3%). Patient transport accounted for 27.4%, medication for 12.6% and reusable MDs for 2.9%. Pediatric head-and-neck surgeries generate a significant quantity of CO2, mostly due to the production and delivery of disposable MDs. These observations could serve as a starting point for ecological actions consistent with an environmentally sustainable and climate-resilient health system.</description><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Pediatric</subject><subject>Tonsillectomy</subject><issn>1879-7296</issn><issn>1879-730X</issn><issn>1879-730X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kNtKw0AQhhdRbKl9AkH20pvEPSWbCIK1xAMUC1rBu2Wz2ciWnNxNCn17t7b10oFh5uKf-Wc-AC4xCjHC8c06lE1rq5AgwkKMQ4SiEzDGCU8DTtHn6bEnaTwCU-fWyAdNkhSl52BE05gSQtAY3GfNxti2qXXTywqaupOqh20JO10Y2VujYPa6gm6wX9pub-EMvq_elg8ZlI2sts64C3BWysrp6aFOwMdjtpo_B4vl08t8tggUjhgKWE6iUjNFiiJHClGEMFNlRCUhWJUFRknMfHIc-Qu1Kmle8LwknCckThmJ6ARc7_d2tv0etOtFbZzSVSUb3Q5OUMziCKeMcy-le6myrXNWl6KzppZ2KzASO3piLX7piR09gbHw9PzU1cFgyGtd_M0cWXnB3V6g_Zsbo61wyuhGeVBWq14UrfnX4AdC_X7x</recordid><startdate>20241203</startdate><enddate>20241203</enddate><creator>Martin, M.</creator><creator>Ayraud-Thevenot, S.</creator><creator>Dufour, X.</creator><creator>Lebreton, J.-P.</creator><creator>Guihenneuc, J.</creator><creator>Carsuzaa, F.</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241203</creationdate><title>Environmental impact of pediatric ENT surgery: A STROBE analysis</title><author>Martin, M. ; Ayraud-Thevenot, S. ; Dufour, X. ; Lebreton, J.-P. ; Guihenneuc, J. ; Carsuzaa, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1540-4b25fe4c2ddb0c030014cf53a221cfd10864086715909ecf3bd7bf27782694253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Pediatric</topic><topic>Tonsillectomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayraud-Thevenot, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dufour, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebreton, J.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guihenneuc, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carsuzaa, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin, M.</au><au>Ayraud-Thevenot, S.</au><au>Dufour, X.</au><au>Lebreton, J.-P.</au><au>Guihenneuc, J.</au><au>Carsuzaa, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental impact of pediatric ENT surgery: A STROBE analysis</atitle><jtitle>European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis</addtitle><date>2024-12-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>1879-7296</issn><issn>1879-730X</issn><eissn>1879-730X</eissn><abstract>Increasing emissions of greenhouse gases contribute to climate change. The healthcare sector, and particularly the operating room, is a significant emitter of greenhouse gases. In head-and-neck surgery, pediatric procedures are very common, but few studies have assessed their ecological impact. Our objective was to quantify the carbon footprint of common pediatric head-and-neck surgeries (tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, and transtympanic tube placement). An eco-epidemiological study was conducted in December 2022 in a tertiary hospital center. The carbon footprint of 10 pediatric head-and-neck surgeries (tonsillectomies, adenoidectomies, transtympanic tube placements) was calculated, as the sum of carbon dioxide (CO2eq) emissions generated by patient and medical staff transport, waste production, energy consumption in operating rooms, manufacturing and transport of disposable and reusable medical devices (MDs), medication production, and sterilization of reusable MDs. The carbon footprint of 1 pediatric head-and-neck surgery was 57.86kgCO2eq. Disposable MDs were the most polluting item with 30.82kgCO2eq (53.3%). Patient transport accounted for 27.4%, medication for 12.6% and reusable MDs for 2.9%. Pediatric head-and-neck surgeries generate a significant quantity of CO2, mostly due to the production and delivery of disposable MDs. These observations could serve as a starting point for ecological actions consistent with an environmentally sustainable and climate-resilient health system.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>39632220</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.anorl.2024.11.005</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1879-7296
ispartof European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases, 2024-12
issn 1879-7296
1879-730X
1879-730X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146519477
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Climate
Environment
Greenhouse gases
Pediatric
Tonsillectomy
title Environmental impact of pediatric ENT surgery: A STROBE analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T23%3A32%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20impact%20of%20pediatric%20ENT%20surgery:%20A%20STROBE%20analysis&rft.jtitle=European%20annals%20of%20otorhinolaryngology,%20head%20and%20neck%20diseases&rft.au=Martin,%20M.&rft.date=2024-12-03&rft.issn=1879-7296&rft.eissn=1879-730X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anorl.2024.11.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3146519477%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3146519477&rft_id=info:pmid/39632220&rft_els_id=S1879729624001613&rfr_iscdi=true