Perceptions of Contractual Risk Allocation in Construction Supply Chains

Common perceptions of contractual risk allocation are the basis of a harmonious, effective and efficient construction project. This paper explores the extent to which common perceptions of risk allocation exist along the construction supply chain. The results of a survey indicate that differing perc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice 2008-01, Vol.134 (1), p.95-105
Hauptverfasser: Loosemore, M, McCarthy, C. S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 105
container_issue 1
container_start_page 95
container_title Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice
container_volume 134
creator Loosemore, M
McCarthy, C. S
description Common perceptions of contractual risk allocation are the basis of a harmonious, effective and efficient construction project. This paper explores the extent to which common perceptions of risk allocation exist along the construction supply chain. The results of a survey indicate that differing perceptions are worryingly high in all relationships, but particularly further down the supply chain. The paper indicates the relationships in which this is most likely to occur and the types of risk it is most likely to affect. The results provide important lessons for project managers, negotiators and contract drafters. In particular, by providing a better understanding of where and how differences in risk perceptions are likely to emerge, they help those negotiating and drafting contracts focus their energies more effectively to help minimize the potential for unnecessary loss and dispute. Finally, our results indicate that the key to better managing perceptions of risk is fundamentally one of communication, consultation and involvement in contractual decision-making. The key point is that contractual allocations of risk have little meaning if they are separated from the social and behavioral context in which risk is experienced by those involved in a project.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:1(95)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_31442767</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>31442767</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a474t-928f88a8e1fadd4bd2f886860c1571121d5105653686569f3c2d4d04067e12763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwD1lV7SLg8SMPJBZVVChSJRCFtWUcR6SYONjJon-PTYElq3ndO5o5CM0AXwLO4Gq-3FarBWBOUlqSYk4wLhZA2TXMS744QhMoGU05Z3Ac8l_ZKTrzfocxJpziCVo_aqd0P7S284ltksp2g5NqGKVJnlr_niyNsUrGedJ2cewHN6rvejv2vdkn1ZtsO3-OThppvL74iVP0crt6rtbp5uHuvlpuUslyNqThgqYoZKGhkXXNXmsSyqzIsAKeAxCoeTg14zT0eFY2VJGa1ZjhLNdA8oxO0eywt3f2c9R-EB-tV9oY2Wk7ekGBsaDLg_DmIFTOeu90I3rXfki3F4BFBChEBCgiGRHJiAhQBIACRMmDvzz4ZVgvdnZ0Xfjrz_yv9wsll3Sx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>31442767</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceptions of Contractual Risk Allocation in Construction Supply Chains</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Loosemore, M ; McCarthy, C. S</creator><creatorcontrib>Loosemore, M ; McCarthy, C. S</creatorcontrib><description>Common perceptions of contractual risk allocation are the basis of a harmonious, effective and efficient construction project. This paper explores the extent to which common perceptions of risk allocation exist along the construction supply chain. The results of a survey indicate that differing perceptions are worryingly high in all relationships, but particularly further down the supply chain. The paper indicates the relationships in which this is most likely to occur and the types of risk it is most likely to affect. The results provide important lessons for project managers, negotiators and contract drafters. In particular, by providing a better understanding of where and how differences in risk perceptions are likely to emerge, they help those negotiating and drafting contracts focus their energies more effectively to help minimize the potential for unnecessary loss and dispute. Finally, our results indicate that the key to better managing perceptions of risk is fundamentally one of communication, consultation and involvement in contractual decision-making. The key point is that contractual allocations of risk have little meaning if they are separated from the social and behavioral context in which risk is experienced by those involved in a project.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-3928</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:1(95)</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>LEGAL AFFAIRS SECTION</subject><ispartof>Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, 2008-01, Vol.134 (1), p.95-105</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a474t-928f88a8e1fadd4bd2f886860c1571121d5105653686569f3c2d4d04067e12763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a474t-928f88a8e1fadd4bd2f886860c1571121d5105653686569f3c2d4d04067e12763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:1(95)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:1(95)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,75936,75944</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loosemore, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, C. S</creatorcontrib><title>Perceptions of Contractual Risk Allocation in Construction Supply Chains</title><title>Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice</title><description>Common perceptions of contractual risk allocation are the basis of a harmonious, effective and efficient construction project. This paper explores the extent to which common perceptions of risk allocation exist along the construction supply chain. The results of a survey indicate that differing perceptions are worryingly high in all relationships, but particularly further down the supply chain. The paper indicates the relationships in which this is most likely to occur and the types of risk it is most likely to affect. The results provide important lessons for project managers, negotiators and contract drafters. In particular, by providing a better understanding of where and how differences in risk perceptions are likely to emerge, they help those negotiating and drafting contracts focus their energies more effectively to help minimize the potential for unnecessary loss and dispute. Finally, our results indicate that the key to better managing perceptions of risk is fundamentally one of communication, consultation and involvement in contractual decision-making. The key point is that contractual allocations of risk have little meaning if they are separated from the social and behavioral context in which risk is experienced by those involved in a project.</description><subject>LEGAL AFFAIRS SECTION</subject><issn>1052-3928</issn><issn>1943-5541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwD1lV7SLg8SMPJBZVVChSJRCFtWUcR6SYONjJon-PTYElq3ndO5o5CM0AXwLO4Gq-3FarBWBOUlqSYk4wLhZA2TXMS744QhMoGU05Z3Ac8l_ZKTrzfocxJpziCVo_aqd0P7S284ltksp2g5NqGKVJnlr_niyNsUrGedJ2cewHN6rvejv2vdkn1ZtsO3-OThppvL74iVP0crt6rtbp5uHuvlpuUslyNqThgqYoZKGhkXXNXmsSyqzIsAKeAxCoeTg14zT0eFY2VJGa1ZjhLNdA8oxO0eywt3f2c9R-EB-tV9oY2Wk7ekGBsaDLg_DmIFTOeu90I3rXfki3F4BFBChEBCgiGRHJiAhQBIACRMmDvzz4ZVgvdnZ0Xfjrz_yv9wsll3Sx</recordid><startdate>200801</startdate><enddate>200801</enddate><creator>Loosemore, M</creator><creator>McCarthy, C. S</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200801</creationdate><title>Perceptions of Contractual Risk Allocation in Construction Supply Chains</title><author>Loosemore, M ; McCarthy, C. S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a474t-928f88a8e1fadd4bd2f886860c1571121d5105653686569f3c2d4d04067e12763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>LEGAL AFFAIRS SECTION</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loosemore, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, C. S</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loosemore, M</au><au>McCarthy, C. S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceptions of Contractual Risk Allocation in Construction Supply Chains</atitle><jtitle>Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice</jtitle><date>2008-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>95-105</pages><issn>1052-3928</issn><eissn>1943-5541</eissn><abstract>Common perceptions of contractual risk allocation are the basis of a harmonious, effective and efficient construction project. This paper explores the extent to which common perceptions of risk allocation exist along the construction supply chain. The results of a survey indicate that differing perceptions are worryingly high in all relationships, but particularly further down the supply chain. The paper indicates the relationships in which this is most likely to occur and the types of risk it is most likely to affect. The results provide important lessons for project managers, negotiators and contract drafters. In particular, by providing a better understanding of where and how differences in risk perceptions are likely to emerge, they help those negotiating and drafting contracts focus their energies more effectively to help minimize the potential for unnecessary loss and dispute. Finally, our results indicate that the key to better managing perceptions of risk is fundamentally one of communication, consultation and involvement in contractual decision-making. The key point is that contractual allocations of risk have little meaning if they are separated from the social and behavioral context in which risk is experienced by those involved in a project.</abstract><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:1(95)</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1052-3928
ispartof Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, 2008-01, Vol.134 (1), p.95-105
issn 1052-3928
1943-5541
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_31442767
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects LEGAL AFFAIRS SECTION
title Perceptions of Contractual Risk Allocation in Construction Supply Chains
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T00%3A57%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceptions%20of%20Contractual%20Risk%20Allocation%20in%20Construction%20Supply%20Chains&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20professional%20issues%20in%20engineering%20education%20and%20practice&rft.au=Loosemore,%20M&rft.date=2008-01&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=95-105&rft.issn=1052-3928&rft.eissn=1943-5541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:1(95)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E31442767%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=31442767&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true