Outcomes of Salvage Surgery for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit

Salvage esophagectomy is more complex and associated with higher postoperative morbidity and mortality than standard resection. This study aimed to investigate short-term outcomes and the influence of hospital volume on these outcomes of salvage surgery for esophageal cancer. The study enrolled all...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2024-12
Hauptverfasser: Visser, Maurits R, Voeten, Daan M, Gisbertz, Suzanne S, Ruurda, Jelle P, van Hillegersberg, Richard, van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Annals of surgical oncology
container_volume
creator Visser, Maurits R
Voeten, Daan M
Gisbertz, Suzanne S
Ruurda, Jelle P
van Hillegersberg, Richard
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I
description Salvage esophagectomy is more complex and associated with higher postoperative morbidity and mortality than standard resection. This study aimed to investigate short-term outcomes and the influence of hospital volume on these outcomes of salvage surgery for esophageal cancer. The study enrolled all patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer registered in the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) between 2012 and 2022. The patients were classified as salvage or non-salvage by registering surgeons. Salvage surgery is defined in the DUCA as surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Postoperative mortality (30-day/in-hospital) and morbidity were compared between the salvage and non-salvage patients using multilevel logistic regression analyses. Hospital variation in the use of salvage esophagectomy was investigated using funnel plots. The influence of hospital volume (≤ 40 to > 40 cases) and salvage volume (< 6 to ≥ 6 cases) on outcomes for salvage patients were investigated. Using backward elimination, relevant baseline characteristics influencing salvage outcomes were identified. Between 2012 and 2022, 7749 patients underwent esophagectomy, 251 (3%) of whom underwent salvage resection, varying from 0 to 8% between centers. Severe complications (43% vs 28%; odds ratio [OR], 1.81; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.40-2.34) and 30-day/in-hospital mortality (11% vs 3%; OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 2.38-5.61) were higher after salvage surgery than after non-salvage surgery. Salvage patients treated in high-volume centers had a lower risk of 30-day/in-hospital mortality than those treated in low-volume centers (9% vs 19%; OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.99), with no relation between salvage volume and outcome. Male sex, older age (> 75 years), and squamous cell carcinoma were associated with worse short-term outcomes of salvage surgery. Salvage surgery is associated with worse short-term outcomes than non-salvage esophagectomy. Outcomes after salvage surgery were favorable in high-volume esophagectomy centers.
doi_str_mv 10.1245/s10434-024-16490-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3140927930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3140927930</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p569-e65609b73b00499eb0de7868cdfcf04d4aad0b865c29e1a99672b97c8cd10a143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkLFOwzAYhC0EoqXwAgzII0vgd-w4MVtVSqlU0aFljpzYaYKSONgOqG-PJYrEdKfTdzccQrcEHkjMkkdHgFEWQcwiwpmAiJ2hKUlCxHhGzv_5Cbpy7gOApBSSSzShgscpp2KK_Hb0pem0w6bCO9l-yYPGu9EetD3iyli8dGaoQyhbvJC2bHrTySc8x2_SN6b_bpTGC1Mb6_HOjyp0rOmwrzV-DsM1fh8GbfFqHcp9Gdx8VI2_RheVbJ2-OekM7V-W-8VrtNmu1ov5JhoSLiLNEw6iSGkBwITQBSidZjwrVVVWwBSTUkGR8aSMhSZSCJ7GhUjLABCQhNEZuv-dHaz5HLXzede4Uret7LUZXU4JAxGngkJA707oWHRa5YNtOmmP-d9R9Ad3eGrc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3140927930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes of Salvage Surgery for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Visser, Maurits R ; Voeten, Daan M ; Gisbertz, Suzanne S ; Ruurda, Jelle P ; van Hillegersberg, Richard ; van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I</creator><creatorcontrib>Visser, Maurits R ; Voeten, Daan M ; Gisbertz, Suzanne S ; Ruurda, Jelle P ; van Hillegersberg, Richard ; van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I ; Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) Group</creatorcontrib><description>Salvage esophagectomy is more complex and associated with higher postoperative morbidity and mortality than standard resection. This study aimed to investigate short-term outcomes and the influence of hospital volume on these outcomes of salvage surgery for esophageal cancer. The study enrolled all patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer registered in the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) between 2012 and 2022. The patients were classified as salvage or non-salvage by registering surgeons. Salvage surgery is defined in the DUCA as surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Postoperative mortality (30-day/in-hospital) and morbidity were compared between the salvage and non-salvage patients using multilevel logistic regression analyses. Hospital variation in the use of salvage esophagectomy was investigated using funnel plots. The influence of hospital volume (≤ 40 to &gt; 40 cases) and salvage volume (&lt; 6 to ≥ 6 cases) on outcomes for salvage patients were investigated. Using backward elimination, relevant baseline characteristics influencing salvage outcomes were identified. Between 2012 and 2022, 7749 patients underwent esophagectomy, 251 (3%) of whom underwent salvage resection, varying from 0 to 8% between centers. Severe complications (43% vs 28%; odds ratio [OR], 1.81; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.40-2.34) and 30-day/in-hospital mortality (11% vs 3%; OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 2.38-5.61) were higher after salvage surgery than after non-salvage surgery. Salvage patients treated in high-volume centers had a lower risk of 30-day/in-hospital mortality than those treated in low-volume centers (9% vs 19%; OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.99), with no relation between salvage volume and outcome. Male sex, older age (&gt; 75 years), and squamous cell carcinoma were associated with worse short-term outcomes of salvage surgery. Salvage surgery is associated with worse short-term outcomes than non-salvage esophagectomy. Outcomes after salvage surgery were favorable in high-volume esophagectomy centers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16490-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39627639</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2024-12</ispartof><rights>2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-8689-3134</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39627639$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Visser, Maurits R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voeten, Daan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gisbertz, Suzanne S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruurda, Jelle P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hillegersberg, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) Group</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes of Salvage Surgery for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Salvage esophagectomy is more complex and associated with higher postoperative morbidity and mortality than standard resection. This study aimed to investigate short-term outcomes and the influence of hospital volume on these outcomes of salvage surgery for esophageal cancer. The study enrolled all patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer registered in the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) between 2012 and 2022. The patients were classified as salvage or non-salvage by registering surgeons. Salvage surgery is defined in the DUCA as surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Postoperative mortality (30-day/in-hospital) and morbidity were compared between the salvage and non-salvage patients using multilevel logistic regression analyses. Hospital variation in the use of salvage esophagectomy was investigated using funnel plots. The influence of hospital volume (≤ 40 to &gt; 40 cases) and salvage volume (&lt; 6 to ≥ 6 cases) on outcomes for salvage patients were investigated. Using backward elimination, relevant baseline characteristics influencing salvage outcomes were identified. Between 2012 and 2022, 7749 patients underwent esophagectomy, 251 (3%) of whom underwent salvage resection, varying from 0 to 8% between centers. Severe complications (43% vs 28%; odds ratio [OR], 1.81; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.40-2.34) and 30-day/in-hospital mortality (11% vs 3%; OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 2.38-5.61) were higher after salvage surgery than after non-salvage surgery. Salvage patients treated in high-volume centers had a lower risk of 30-day/in-hospital mortality than those treated in low-volume centers (9% vs 19%; OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.99), with no relation between salvage volume and outcome. Male sex, older age (&gt; 75 years), and squamous cell carcinoma were associated with worse short-term outcomes of salvage surgery. Salvage surgery is associated with worse short-term outcomes than non-salvage esophagectomy. Outcomes after salvage surgery were favorable in high-volume esophagectomy centers.</description><issn>1534-4681</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkLFOwzAYhC0EoqXwAgzII0vgd-w4MVtVSqlU0aFljpzYaYKSONgOqG-PJYrEdKfTdzccQrcEHkjMkkdHgFEWQcwiwpmAiJ2hKUlCxHhGzv_5Cbpy7gOApBSSSzShgscpp2KK_Hb0pem0w6bCO9l-yYPGu9EetD3iyli8dGaoQyhbvJC2bHrTySc8x2_SN6b_bpTGC1Mb6_HOjyp0rOmwrzV-DsM1fh8GbfFqHcp9Gdx8VI2_RheVbJ2-OekM7V-W-8VrtNmu1ov5JhoSLiLNEw6iSGkBwITQBSidZjwrVVVWwBSTUkGR8aSMhSZSCJ7GhUjLABCQhNEZuv-dHaz5HLXzede4Uret7LUZXU4JAxGngkJA707oWHRa5YNtOmmP-d9R9Ad3eGrc</recordid><startdate>20241203</startdate><enddate>20241203</enddate><creator>Visser, Maurits R</creator><creator>Voeten, Daan M</creator><creator>Gisbertz, Suzanne S</creator><creator>Ruurda, Jelle P</creator><creator>van Hillegersberg, Richard</creator><creator>van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8689-3134</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241203</creationdate><title>Outcomes of Salvage Surgery for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit</title><author>Visser, Maurits R ; Voeten, Daan M ; Gisbertz, Suzanne S ; Ruurda, Jelle P ; van Hillegersberg, Richard ; van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p569-e65609b73b00499eb0de7868cdfcf04d4aad0b865c29e1a99672b97c8cd10a143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Visser, Maurits R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voeten, Daan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gisbertz, Suzanne S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruurda, Jelle P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hillegersberg, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) Group</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Visser, Maurits R</au><au>Voeten, Daan M</au><au>Gisbertz, Suzanne S</au><au>Ruurda, Jelle P</au><au>van Hillegersberg, Richard</au><au>van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I</au><aucorp>Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes of Salvage Surgery for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2024-12-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>1534-4681</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Salvage esophagectomy is more complex and associated with higher postoperative morbidity and mortality than standard resection. This study aimed to investigate short-term outcomes and the influence of hospital volume on these outcomes of salvage surgery for esophageal cancer. The study enrolled all patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer registered in the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) between 2012 and 2022. The patients were classified as salvage or non-salvage by registering surgeons. Salvage surgery is defined in the DUCA as surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Postoperative mortality (30-day/in-hospital) and morbidity were compared between the salvage and non-salvage patients using multilevel logistic regression analyses. Hospital variation in the use of salvage esophagectomy was investigated using funnel plots. The influence of hospital volume (≤ 40 to &gt; 40 cases) and salvage volume (&lt; 6 to ≥ 6 cases) on outcomes for salvage patients were investigated. Using backward elimination, relevant baseline characteristics influencing salvage outcomes were identified. Between 2012 and 2022, 7749 patients underwent esophagectomy, 251 (3%) of whom underwent salvage resection, varying from 0 to 8% between centers. Severe complications (43% vs 28%; odds ratio [OR], 1.81; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.40-2.34) and 30-day/in-hospital mortality (11% vs 3%; OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 2.38-5.61) were higher after salvage surgery than after non-salvage surgery. Salvage patients treated in high-volume centers had a lower risk of 30-day/in-hospital mortality than those treated in low-volume centers (9% vs 19%; OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.99), with no relation between salvage volume and outcome. Male sex, older age (&gt; 75 years), and squamous cell carcinoma were associated with worse short-term outcomes of salvage surgery. Salvage surgery is associated with worse short-term outcomes than non-salvage esophagectomy. Outcomes after salvage surgery were favorable in high-volume esophagectomy centers.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>39627639</pmid><doi>10.1245/s10434-024-16490-4</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8689-3134</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1534-4681
ispartof Annals of surgical oncology, 2024-12
issn 1534-4681
1534-4681
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3140927930
source SpringerNature Journals
title Outcomes of Salvage Surgery for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T19%3A57%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20of%20Salvage%20Surgery%20for%20Esophageal%20Carcinoma:%20A%20Nationwide%20Cohort%20Study%20from%20the%20Dutch%20Upper%20GI%20Cancer%20Audit&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Visser,%20Maurits%20R&rft.aucorp=Dutch%20Upper%20Gastrointestinal%20Cancer%20Audit%20(DUCA)%20Group&rft.date=2024-12-03&rft.issn=1534-4681&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-024-16490-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3140927930%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3140927930&rft_id=info:pmid/39627639&rfr_iscdi=true