Implementation of Electronic Triggers to Identify Diagnostic Errors in Emergency Departments

IMPORTANCE: Missed diagnosis can lead to preventable patient harm. OBJECTIVE: To develop and implement a portfolio of electronic triggers (e-triggers) and examine their performance for identifying missed opportunities in diagnosis (MODs) in emergency departments (EDs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPA...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA internal medicine 2024-12
Hauptverfasser: Vaghani, Viralkumar, Gupta, Ashish, Mir, Usman, Wei, Li, Murphy, Daniel R, Mushtaq, Umair, Sittig, Dean F, Zimolzak, Andrew J, Singh, Hardeep
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:IMPORTANCE: Missed diagnosis can lead to preventable patient harm. OBJECTIVE: To develop and implement a portfolio of electronic triggers (e-triggers) and examine their performance for identifying missed opportunities in diagnosis (MODs) in emergency departments (EDs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this retrospective medical record review study of ED visits at 1321 Veterans Affairs health care sites, rules-based e-triggers were developed and implemented using a national electronic health record repository. These e-triggers targeted 6 high-risk presentations for MODs in treat-and-release ED visits. A high-risk stroke e-trigger was applied to treat-and-release ED visits from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. A symptom-disease dyad e-trigger was applied to visits from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019. High-risk abdominal pain, unexpected ED return, unexpected hospital return, and test result e-triggers were applied to visits from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019. At least 100 randomly selected flagged records were reviewed by physician reviewers for each e-trigger. Data were analyzed between January 2024 and April 2024. EXPOSURES: Treat-and-release ED visits involving high-risk stroke, symptom-disease dyads, high-risk abdominal pain, unexpected ED return, unexpected hospital return, and abnormal test results not followed up after initial ED visit. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Trained physician reviewers evaluated the presence/absence of MODs at ED visits and recorded data on patient and clinician characteristics, types of diagnostic process breakdowns, and potential harm from MODs. RESULTS: The high-risk stroke e-trigger was applied to 8 792 672 treat-and-release ED visits (4 967 283 unique patients); the symptom-disease dyad e-trigger was applied to 3 692 454 visits (2 070 979 patients); and high-risk abdominal pain, unexpected ED return, unexpected hospital return, and test result e-triggers were applied to 1 845 905 visits (1 032 969 patients), overall identifying 203, 1981, 170, 116 785, 14 879, and 2090 trigger-positive records, respectively. Review of 625 randomly selected patient records (mean [SD] age, 62.5 [15.2] years; 553 [88.5%] male) showed the following MOD counts and positive predictive values (PPVs) within each category: 47 MODs (PPV, 47.0%) for stroke, 31 MODs (PPV, 25.8%) for abdominal pain, 11 MODs (PPV, 11.0%) for ED returns, 23 MODs (PPV, 23.0%) for hospital returns, 18 MODs (PPV, 18.0%) for symptom-disease dyads, an
ISSN:2168-6106
2168-6114
2168-6114
DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.6214