Don't think of a pink elephant: Individual differences in visualisation predict involuntary imagery and its neural correlates

There are substantial differences in the capacity of people to have imagined visual experiences, ranging from a lifelong inability (Congenital Aphantasia) to people who report having imagined experiences that are as vivid as actually seeing (Hyper-Phantasia). While Congenital Aphantasia has typicall...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cortex 2025-02, Vol.183, p.53-65
Hauptverfasser: Arnold, Derek H., Hutchinson, Mary, Bouyer, Loren N., Schwarzkopf, D. Samuel, Pellicano, Elizabeth, Saurels, Blake W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 65
container_issue
container_start_page 53
container_title Cortex
container_volume 183
creator Arnold, Derek H.
Hutchinson, Mary
Bouyer, Loren N.
Schwarzkopf, D. Samuel
Pellicano, Elizabeth
Saurels, Blake W.
description There are substantial differences in the capacity of people to have imagined visual experiences, ranging from a lifelong inability (Congenital Aphantasia) to people who report having imagined experiences that are as vivid as actually seeing (Hyper-Phantasia). While Congenital Aphantasia has typically been framed as a cognitive deficit, it is possible that a weak or absent ability to have imagined visual sensations is balanced by a heightened resistance to intrusive thoughts – which are experienced as an imagined sensation. Here, we report on a direct test of that proposition. We asked people to either imagine, or to try not to imagine having a range of audio and visual experiences while we recorded their brain activity with electroencephalography (EEG). Ratings describing the subjective vividness of different people's voluntary visualisations predicted if they would also report having involuntary visualisations – such as an imagined experience of seeing a pink elephant when they were asked not to. Both the prevalence of different people's involuntary visualisations and the typical vividness of their visualisations could be predicted by neural correlates of disinhibition, working memory, and neural feedback. Our data suggest that the propensity of people to have involuntary visual experiences can scale with the subjective intensity of their typical experiences of visualisation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.10.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3140893320</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010945224003083</els_id><sourcerecordid>3140893320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-3c9ddc5992b22ad0dccbdf7820654bdd5d3344d1e0976fe43b4efb1822e3cb673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlOHDEQhi2UCIblDSLkW3LpibdezCESIiRBQuICZ8ttVwdPeuzGdo_CgXePOwM55lSlv_7aPoQ-ULKmhDafN2sTYobfa0aYKNKaMHKAVlS2vOooYe_QihBKKilqdoSOU9qQ4ujq-hAdcdnQRjb1Cr18Df5jxvnR-V84DFjjaclghOlR-3yBb7x1O2dnPWLrhgEieAMJO493LhXVJZ1d8HiKYJ3JpbAL4-yzjs_YbfVPKFF7i11O2MMcy5xyd4RRZ0in6P2gxwRnr_EEPXy7vr_6Ud3efb-5urytDOvaXHEjrTW1lKxnTFtijent0HaMNLXora0t50JYCkS2zQCC9wKGnnaMATd90_IT9Gk_d4rhaYaU1dYlA-OoPYQ5KU4F6STnjBSr2FtNDClFGNQUyx_xWVGiFvBqo_bg1QJ-UcnftvPXDXO_Bfuv6Y10MXzZG6D8uXMQVTJuYWldBJOVDe7_G_4AwCiZag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3140893320</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Don't think of a pink elephant: Individual differences in visualisation predict involuntary imagery and its neural correlates</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Arnold, Derek H. ; Hutchinson, Mary ; Bouyer, Loren N. ; Schwarzkopf, D. Samuel ; Pellicano, Elizabeth ; Saurels, Blake W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Derek H. ; Hutchinson, Mary ; Bouyer, Loren N. ; Schwarzkopf, D. Samuel ; Pellicano, Elizabeth ; Saurels, Blake W.</creatorcontrib><description>There are substantial differences in the capacity of people to have imagined visual experiences, ranging from a lifelong inability (Congenital Aphantasia) to people who report having imagined experiences that are as vivid as actually seeing (Hyper-Phantasia). While Congenital Aphantasia has typically been framed as a cognitive deficit, it is possible that a weak or absent ability to have imagined visual sensations is balanced by a heightened resistance to intrusive thoughts – which are experienced as an imagined sensation. Here, we report on a direct test of that proposition. We asked people to either imagine, or to try not to imagine having a range of audio and visual experiences while we recorded their brain activity with electroencephalography (EEG). Ratings describing the subjective vividness of different people's voluntary visualisations predicted if they would also report having involuntary visualisations – such as an imagined experience of seeing a pink elephant when they were asked not to. Both the prevalence of different people's involuntary visualisations and the typical vividness of their visualisations could be predicted by neural correlates of disinhibition, working memory, and neural feedback. Our data suggest that the propensity of people to have involuntary visual experiences can scale with the subjective intensity of their typical experiences of visualisation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-9452</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1973-8102</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1973-8102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.10.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39616965</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aphantasia ; Electroencephalography ; Intrusive thoughts ; Visual imagery</subject><ispartof>Cortex, 2025-02, Vol.183, p.53-65</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-3c9ddc5992b22ad0dccbdf7820654bdd5d3344d1e0976fe43b4efb1822e3cb673</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1027-6222 ; 0000-0002-7246-8003 ; 0000-0001-8202-7546 ; 0000-0003-3686-1622 ; 0000-0002-2200-0306</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2024.10.020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39616965$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Derek H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchinson, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouyer, Loren N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarzkopf, D. Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellicano, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saurels, Blake W.</creatorcontrib><title>Don't think of a pink elephant: Individual differences in visualisation predict involuntary imagery and its neural correlates</title><title>Cortex</title><addtitle>Cortex</addtitle><description>There are substantial differences in the capacity of people to have imagined visual experiences, ranging from a lifelong inability (Congenital Aphantasia) to people who report having imagined experiences that are as vivid as actually seeing (Hyper-Phantasia). While Congenital Aphantasia has typically been framed as a cognitive deficit, it is possible that a weak or absent ability to have imagined visual sensations is balanced by a heightened resistance to intrusive thoughts – which are experienced as an imagined sensation. Here, we report on a direct test of that proposition. We asked people to either imagine, or to try not to imagine having a range of audio and visual experiences while we recorded their brain activity with electroencephalography (EEG). Ratings describing the subjective vividness of different people's voluntary visualisations predicted if they would also report having involuntary visualisations – such as an imagined experience of seeing a pink elephant when they were asked not to. Both the prevalence of different people's involuntary visualisations and the typical vividness of their visualisations could be predicted by neural correlates of disinhibition, working memory, and neural feedback. Our data suggest that the propensity of people to have involuntary visual experiences can scale with the subjective intensity of their typical experiences of visualisation.</description><subject>Aphantasia</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Intrusive thoughts</subject><subject>Visual imagery</subject><issn>0010-9452</issn><issn>1973-8102</issn><issn>1973-8102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMlOHDEQhi2UCIblDSLkW3LpibdezCESIiRBQuICZ8ttVwdPeuzGdo_CgXePOwM55lSlv_7aPoQ-ULKmhDafN2sTYobfa0aYKNKaMHKAVlS2vOooYe_QihBKKilqdoSOU9qQ4ujq-hAdcdnQRjb1Cr18Df5jxvnR-V84DFjjaclghOlR-3yBb7x1O2dnPWLrhgEieAMJO493LhXVJZ1d8HiKYJ3JpbAL4-yzjs_YbfVPKFF7i11O2MMcy5xyd4RRZ0in6P2gxwRnr_EEPXy7vr_6Ud3efb-5urytDOvaXHEjrTW1lKxnTFtijent0HaMNLXora0t50JYCkS2zQCC9wKGnnaMATd90_IT9Gk_d4rhaYaU1dYlA-OoPYQ5KU4F6STnjBSr2FtNDClFGNQUyx_xWVGiFvBqo_bg1QJ-UcnftvPXDXO_Bfuv6Y10MXzZG6D8uXMQVTJuYWldBJOVDe7_G_4AwCiZag</recordid><startdate>20250201</startdate><enddate>20250201</enddate><creator>Arnold, Derek H.</creator><creator>Hutchinson, Mary</creator><creator>Bouyer, Loren N.</creator><creator>Schwarzkopf, D. Samuel</creator><creator>Pellicano, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Saurels, Blake W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1027-6222</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7246-8003</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8202-7546</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3686-1622</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2200-0306</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250201</creationdate><title>Don't think of a pink elephant: Individual differences in visualisation predict involuntary imagery and its neural correlates</title><author>Arnold, Derek H. ; Hutchinson, Mary ; Bouyer, Loren N. ; Schwarzkopf, D. Samuel ; Pellicano, Elizabeth ; Saurels, Blake W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-3c9ddc5992b22ad0dccbdf7820654bdd5d3344d1e0976fe43b4efb1822e3cb673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Aphantasia</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Intrusive thoughts</topic><topic>Visual imagery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Derek H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchinson, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouyer, Loren N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarzkopf, D. Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellicano, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saurels, Blake W.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cortex</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arnold, Derek H.</au><au>Hutchinson, Mary</au><au>Bouyer, Loren N.</au><au>Schwarzkopf, D. Samuel</au><au>Pellicano, Elizabeth</au><au>Saurels, Blake W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Don't think of a pink elephant: Individual differences in visualisation predict involuntary imagery and its neural correlates</atitle><jtitle>Cortex</jtitle><addtitle>Cortex</addtitle><date>2025-02-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>183</volume><spage>53</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>53-65</pages><issn>0010-9452</issn><issn>1973-8102</issn><eissn>1973-8102</eissn><abstract>There are substantial differences in the capacity of people to have imagined visual experiences, ranging from a lifelong inability (Congenital Aphantasia) to people who report having imagined experiences that are as vivid as actually seeing (Hyper-Phantasia). While Congenital Aphantasia has typically been framed as a cognitive deficit, it is possible that a weak or absent ability to have imagined visual sensations is balanced by a heightened resistance to intrusive thoughts – which are experienced as an imagined sensation. Here, we report on a direct test of that proposition. We asked people to either imagine, or to try not to imagine having a range of audio and visual experiences while we recorded their brain activity with electroencephalography (EEG). Ratings describing the subjective vividness of different people's voluntary visualisations predicted if they would also report having involuntary visualisations – such as an imagined experience of seeing a pink elephant when they were asked not to. Both the prevalence of different people's involuntary visualisations and the typical vividness of their visualisations could be predicted by neural correlates of disinhibition, working memory, and neural feedback. Our data suggest that the propensity of people to have involuntary visual experiences can scale with the subjective intensity of their typical experiences of visualisation.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39616965</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cortex.2024.10.020</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1027-6222</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7246-8003</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8202-7546</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3686-1622</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2200-0306</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-9452
ispartof Cortex, 2025-02, Vol.183, p.53-65
issn 0010-9452
1973-8102
1973-8102
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3140893320
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aphantasia
Electroencephalography
Intrusive thoughts
Visual imagery
title Don't think of a pink elephant: Individual differences in visualisation predict involuntary imagery and its neural correlates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T12%3A31%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Don't%20think%20of%20a%20pink%20elephant:%20Individual%20differences%20in%20visualisation%20predict%20involuntary%20imagery%20and%20its%20neural%20correlates&rft.jtitle=Cortex&rft.au=Arnold,%20Derek%20H.&rft.date=2025-02-01&rft.volume=183&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=53-65&rft.issn=0010-9452&rft.eissn=1973-8102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cortex.2024.10.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3140893320%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3140893320&rft_id=info:pmid/39616965&rft_els_id=S0010945224003083&rfr_iscdi=true