Survival of the probiotic strain Lacticaseibacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei F19 in high-hopped beers

[Display omitted] •F19 exhibits significant proliferation in high-hopped beer formulations (IBU 40).•F19 populations are not affected by high-hopped, but pH indicates a low metabolism.•No differences in yeast populations with pure yeast cultures or treated with F19.•F19 strain’s resistance to high a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food research international 2024-11, Vol.196, p.115040, Article 115040
Hauptverfasser: Borges Martins da Silva, Lucas, Vieira Arruda, Katy, Yumi Suzuki, Juliana, Edgar Herkenhoff, Marcos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 115040
container_title Food research international
container_volume 196
creator Borges Martins da Silva, Lucas
Vieira Arruda, Katy
Yumi Suzuki, Juliana
Edgar Herkenhoff, Marcos
description [Display omitted] •F19 exhibits significant proliferation in high-hopped beer formulations (IBU 40).•F19 populations are not affected by high-hopped, but pH indicates a low metabolism.•No differences in yeast populations with pure yeast cultures or treated with F19.•F19 strain’s resistance to high amounts of iso-α-acids (IAAs) is notable.•F19 may be due to inherent probiotic characteristics and resistance mechanisms. This study aims to enhance understanding of probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) survival in high-hopped beer formulations and their interactions with different yeasts and highlights the fermentation processes, microbial metabolism, and production of distinctive beer flavors. For this, this research used Lacticaseibacillus paracasei F19 (F19), Saccharomycodes ludwigii, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains US-05 (US-05) and Kveik (Kveik) for brewing. Bacterial and yeast cultures were prepared, fermented in wort, and analyzed in different hop concentrations (International Bitterness Units − IBU 0, 20, 40). Methods included physicochemical analysis, yeast and bacterial counts, RT-qPCR for gene expression, statistical analysis, and sensory evaluation by sommeliers following BJCP guidelines. Physicochemical analysis showed efficient fermentation across all hop concentrations (IBU 0, 20, 40), with decreasing SG and pH over time due to lactic acid bacteria and yeast metabolism. Higher hop levels (IBU 20 and 40) resulted in less acidic beer, indicating hop interference with bacterial activity. Yeast populations remained stable regardless of hop content, with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomycodes ludwigii performing well. Probiotic strain F19 exhibited robust viability in all formulations. Sensory analysis favored higher hop content beers, suggesting consumer acceptance and potential health benefits of probiotic, high-hop beers. Higher hop content hindered sour beer production as only hop-free beers reached low pH levels. Probiotic strain F19 remained viable under high IBU formulations (20 and 40), with these being preferred by sommeliers using BJCP methodology. All yeast strains supported F19 survival. Further studies are needed on gastrointestinal resistance and clinical benefits.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115040
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3134332889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0963996924011104</els_id><sourcerecordid>3134332889</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-71f9b077c5a210a923aac3d960de53932b5a6779df173e854492356eefed58643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1P3DAQhq2qqCxLf0KRj70k2PFH4hOqEEuRVuIAnC3HnrBeZdfBTlbqv8dLtqi3nkYePe-M50HoByUlJVReb8suBBchlRWpeEmpIJx8QQva1KyoKRdf0YIoyQqlpDpHFyltCSFS1OobOmdKUs4bsUCvT1M8-IPpcejwuAE8xND6MHqL0xiN3-O1sfllEvjWWN_3U8KDieajg9PUpqH8p7GiCufQxr9uik0YBnC4BYjpEp11pk_w_VSX6GV193z7u1g_3j_c_loXtuJszB_vVEvq2gpTUWJUxYyxzClJHAimWNUKI-tauY7WDBrBeUaEBOjAiUZytkQ_57n5jrcJ0qh3Plnoe7OHMCXNKOOMVU2jMipm1MaQUoROD9HvTPyjKdFHx3qrT4710bGeHefc1WnF1O7Afab-Ss3AzQxAPvTgIepkPewtOB_BjtoF_58V7z_xkB4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3134332889</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survival of the probiotic strain Lacticaseibacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei F19 in high-hopped beers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Borges Martins da Silva, Lucas ; Vieira Arruda, Katy ; Yumi Suzuki, Juliana ; Edgar Herkenhoff, Marcos</creator><creatorcontrib>Borges Martins da Silva, Lucas ; Vieira Arruda, Katy ; Yumi Suzuki, Juliana ; Edgar Herkenhoff, Marcos</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] •F19 exhibits significant proliferation in high-hopped beer formulations (IBU 40).•F19 populations are not affected by high-hopped, but pH indicates a low metabolism.•No differences in yeast populations with pure yeast cultures or treated with F19.•F19 strain’s resistance to high amounts of iso-α-acids (IAAs) is notable.•F19 may be due to inherent probiotic characteristics and resistance mechanisms. This study aims to enhance understanding of probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) survival in high-hopped beer formulations and their interactions with different yeasts and highlights the fermentation processes, microbial metabolism, and production of distinctive beer flavors. For this, this research used Lacticaseibacillus paracasei F19 (F19), Saccharomycodes ludwigii, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains US-05 (US-05) and Kveik (Kveik) for brewing. Bacterial and yeast cultures were prepared, fermented in wort, and analyzed in different hop concentrations (International Bitterness Units − IBU 0, 20, 40). Methods included physicochemical analysis, yeast and bacterial counts, RT-qPCR for gene expression, statistical analysis, and sensory evaluation by sommeliers following BJCP guidelines. Physicochemical analysis showed efficient fermentation across all hop concentrations (IBU 0, 20, 40), with decreasing SG and pH over time due to lactic acid bacteria and yeast metabolism. Higher hop levels (IBU 20 and 40) resulted in less acidic beer, indicating hop interference with bacterial activity. Yeast populations remained stable regardless of hop content, with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomycodes ludwigii performing well. Probiotic strain F19 exhibited robust viability in all formulations. Sensory analysis favored higher hop content beers, suggesting consumer acceptance and potential health benefits of probiotic, high-hop beers. Higher hop content hindered sour beer production as only hop-free beers reached low pH levels. Probiotic strain F19 remained viable under high IBU formulations (20 and 40), with these being preferred by sommeliers using BJCP methodology. All yeast strains supported F19 survival. Further studies are needed on gastrointestinal resistance and clinical benefits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-9969</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1873-7145</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7145</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115040</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39614485</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Beer - analysis ; Beer - microbiology ; Craft beer ; Female ; Fermentation ; Food Microbiology ; Hop ; Humans ; Humulus - chemistry ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Lacticaseibacillus paracasei - metabolism ; Lacticaseibacillus paracasei - physiology ; Male ; Microbial Viability ; PMA-qPCR ; Probiotics ; Probiotics - metabolism ; RT-qPCR ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae - metabolism ; Taste</subject><ispartof>Food research international, 2024-11, Vol.196, p.115040, Article 115040</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-71f9b077c5a210a923aac3d960de53932b5a6779df173e854492356eefed58643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39614485$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borges Martins da Silva, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieira Arruda, Katy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yumi Suzuki, Juliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edgar Herkenhoff, Marcos</creatorcontrib><title>Survival of the probiotic strain Lacticaseibacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei F19 in high-hopped beers</title><title>Food research international</title><addtitle>Food Res Int</addtitle><description>[Display omitted] •F19 exhibits significant proliferation in high-hopped beer formulations (IBU 40).•F19 populations are not affected by high-hopped, but pH indicates a low metabolism.•No differences in yeast populations with pure yeast cultures or treated with F19.•F19 strain’s resistance to high amounts of iso-α-acids (IAAs) is notable.•F19 may be due to inherent probiotic characteristics and resistance mechanisms. This study aims to enhance understanding of probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) survival in high-hopped beer formulations and their interactions with different yeasts and highlights the fermentation processes, microbial metabolism, and production of distinctive beer flavors. For this, this research used Lacticaseibacillus paracasei F19 (F19), Saccharomycodes ludwigii, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains US-05 (US-05) and Kveik (Kveik) for brewing. Bacterial and yeast cultures were prepared, fermented in wort, and analyzed in different hop concentrations (International Bitterness Units − IBU 0, 20, 40). Methods included physicochemical analysis, yeast and bacterial counts, RT-qPCR for gene expression, statistical analysis, and sensory evaluation by sommeliers following BJCP guidelines. Physicochemical analysis showed efficient fermentation across all hop concentrations (IBU 0, 20, 40), with decreasing SG and pH over time due to lactic acid bacteria and yeast metabolism. Higher hop levels (IBU 20 and 40) resulted in less acidic beer, indicating hop interference with bacterial activity. Yeast populations remained stable regardless of hop content, with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomycodes ludwigii performing well. Probiotic strain F19 exhibited robust viability in all formulations. Sensory analysis favored higher hop content beers, suggesting consumer acceptance and potential health benefits of probiotic, high-hop beers. Higher hop content hindered sour beer production as only hop-free beers reached low pH levels. Probiotic strain F19 remained viable under high IBU formulations (20 and 40), with these being preferred by sommeliers using BJCP methodology. All yeast strains supported F19 survival. Further studies are needed on gastrointestinal resistance and clinical benefits.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Beer - analysis</subject><subject>Beer - microbiology</subject><subject>Craft beer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>Hop</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humulus - chemistry</subject><subject>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</subject><subject>Lacticaseibacillus paracasei - metabolism</subject><subject>Lacticaseibacillus paracasei - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microbial Viability</subject><subject>PMA-qPCR</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Probiotics - metabolism</subject><subject>RT-qPCR</subject><subject>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - metabolism</subject><subject>Taste</subject><issn>0963-9969</issn><issn>1873-7145</issn><issn>1873-7145</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1P3DAQhq2qqCxLf0KRj70k2PFH4hOqEEuRVuIAnC3HnrBeZdfBTlbqv8dLtqi3nkYePe-M50HoByUlJVReb8suBBchlRWpeEmpIJx8QQva1KyoKRdf0YIoyQqlpDpHFyltCSFS1OobOmdKUs4bsUCvT1M8-IPpcejwuAE8xND6MHqL0xiN3-O1sfllEvjWWN_3U8KDieajg9PUpqH8p7GiCufQxr9uik0YBnC4BYjpEp11pk_w_VSX6GV193z7u1g_3j_c_loXtuJszB_vVEvq2gpTUWJUxYyxzClJHAimWNUKI-tauY7WDBrBeUaEBOjAiUZytkQ_57n5jrcJ0qh3Plnoe7OHMCXNKOOMVU2jMipm1MaQUoROD9HvTPyjKdFHx3qrT4710bGeHefc1WnF1O7Afab-Ss3AzQxAPvTgIepkPewtOB_BjtoF_58V7z_xkB4</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Borges Martins da Silva, Lucas</creator><creator>Vieira Arruda, Katy</creator><creator>Yumi Suzuki, Juliana</creator><creator>Edgar Herkenhoff, Marcos</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Survival of the probiotic strain Lacticaseibacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei F19 in high-hopped beers</title><author>Borges Martins da Silva, Lucas ; Vieira Arruda, Katy ; Yumi Suzuki, Juliana ; Edgar Herkenhoff, Marcos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-71f9b077c5a210a923aac3d960de53932b5a6779df173e854492356eefed58643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Beer - analysis</topic><topic>Beer - microbiology</topic><topic>Craft beer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>Hop</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humulus - chemistry</topic><topic>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</topic><topic>Lacticaseibacillus paracasei - metabolism</topic><topic>Lacticaseibacillus paracasei - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microbial Viability</topic><topic>PMA-qPCR</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Probiotics - metabolism</topic><topic>RT-qPCR</topic><topic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - metabolism</topic><topic>Taste</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borges Martins da Silva, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieira Arruda, Katy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yumi Suzuki, Juliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edgar Herkenhoff, Marcos</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Food research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borges Martins da Silva, Lucas</au><au>Vieira Arruda, Katy</au><au>Yumi Suzuki, Juliana</au><au>Edgar Herkenhoff, Marcos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survival of the probiotic strain Lacticaseibacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei F19 in high-hopped beers</atitle><jtitle>Food research international</jtitle><addtitle>Food Res Int</addtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>196</volume><spage>115040</spage><pages>115040-</pages><artnum>115040</artnum><issn>0963-9969</issn><issn>1873-7145</issn><eissn>1873-7145</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] •F19 exhibits significant proliferation in high-hopped beer formulations (IBU 40).•F19 populations are not affected by high-hopped, but pH indicates a low metabolism.•No differences in yeast populations with pure yeast cultures or treated with F19.•F19 strain’s resistance to high amounts of iso-α-acids (IAAs) is notable.•F19 may be due to inherent probiotic characteristics and resistance mechanisms. This study aims to enhance understanding of probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) survival in high-hopped beer formulations and their interactions with different yeasts and highlights the fermentation processes, microbial metabolism, and production of distinctive beer flavors. For this, this research used Lacticaseibacillus paracasei F19 (F19), Saccharomycodes ludwigii, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains US-05 (US-05) and Kveik (Kveik) for brewing. Bacterial and yeast cultures were prepared, fermented in wort, and analyzed in different hop concentrations (International Bitterness Units − IBU 0, 20, 40). Methods included physicochemical analysis, yeast and bacterial counts, RT-qPCR for gene expression, statistical analysis, and sensory evaluation by sommeliers following BJCP guidelines. Physicochemical analysis showed efficient fermentation across all hop concentrations (IBU 0, 20, 40), with decreasing SG and pH over time due to lactic acid bacteria and yeast metabolism. Higher hop levels (IBU 20 and 40) resulted in less acidic beer, indicating hop interference with bacterial activity. Yeast populations remained stable regardless of hop content, with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomycodes ludwigii performing well. Probiotic strain F19 exhibited robust viability in all formulations. Sensory analysis favored higher hop content beers, suggesting consumer acceptance and potential health benefits of probiotic, high-hop beers. Higher hop content hindered sour beer production as only hop-free beers reached low pH levels. Probiotic strain F19 remained viable under high IBU formulations (20 and 40), with these being preferred by sommeliers using BJCP methodology. All yeast strains supported F19 survival. Further studies are needed on gastrointestinal resistance and clinical benefits.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39614485</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115040</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0963-9969
ispartof Food research international, 2024-11, Vol.196, p.115040, Article 115040
issn 0963-9969
1873-7145
1873-7145
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3134332889
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Beer - analysis
Beer - microbiology
Craft beer
Female
Fermentation
Food Microbiology
Hop
Humans
Humulus - chemistry
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
Lacticaseibacillus paracasei - metabolism
Lacticaseibacillus paracasei - physiology
Male
Microbial Viability
PMA-qPCR
Probiotics
Probiotics - metabolism
RT-qPCR
Saccharomyces cerevisiae - metabolism
Taste
title Survival of the probiotic strain Lacticaseibacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei F19 in high-hopped beers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A33%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survival%20of%20the%20probiotic%20strain%20Lacticaseibacillus%20paracasei%20subsp.%20paracasei%20F19%20in%20high-hopped%20beers&rft.jtitle=Food%20research%20international&rft.au=Borges%20Martins%20da%20Silva,%20Lucas&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=196&rft.spage=115040&rft.pages=115040-&rft.artnum=115040&rft.issn=0963-9969&rft.eissn=1873-7145&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3134332889%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3134332889&rft_id=info:pmid/39614485&rft_els_id=S0963996924011104&rfr_iscdi=true