Phenotype‐to‐Genotype Description of Prenatal Suspected and Postnatal Discovered Upper Limb Anomalies: A Retrospective Cohort Study

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate phenotype and genotype characteristics of fetuses and children with upper limb anomalies. Method Retrospective cohort study of a prenatal and postnatal cohort with upper limb anomalies from January 2007 to December 2021 in a Fetal Medicine Unit. Prenatally on ultrasoun...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Prenatal diagnosis 2025-01, Vol.45 (1), p.3-14
Hauptverfasser: Arduç, Arda, Dijk, Sandra J. B., Cate, Feikje J., Doesburg, Margriet H. M., Linskens, Ingeborg H., Leeuwen, Elisabeth, Maarle, Merel C., Pajkrt, Eva
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title Prenatal diagnosis
container_volume 45
creator Arduç, Arda
Dijk, Sandra J. B.
Cate, Feikje J.
Doesburg, Margriet H. M.
Linskens, Ingeborg H.
Leeuwen, Elisabeth
Maarle, Merel C.
Pajkrt, Eva
description ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate phenotype and genotype characteristics of fetuses and children with upper limb anomalies. Method Retrospective cohort study of a prenatal and postnatal cohort with upper limb anomalies from January 2007 to December 2021 in a Fetal Medicine Unit. Prenatally on ultrasound suspected upper limb anomalies, such as transverse and longitudinal reduction defects, polydactyly, and syndactyly, and postnatally identified children referred to the Congenital Hand Team were evaluated separately. Results The prenatal group included 199 pregnancies: 64 transverse and 19 longitudinal reduction defects, 103 polydactylies, and 13 cases with syndactyly. The majority of cases with longitudinal reduction defects (n = 10, 52.6%), polydactyly (n = 62, 60.2%), and syndactyly (n = 10, 76.9%) were non‐isolated, as opposed to transverse reduction defects, which were generally isolated (n = 41, 64.1%). The postnatal cohort included 362 children with upper limb anomalies with 49 transverse and 22 longitudinal reduction defects, 226 polydactylies, and 65 syndactylies. Chromosomal or monogenic abnormalities were identified in 76/199 (38.2%) cases of the prenatal cohort and in 31/362 (8.6%) cases of the postnatal cohort. Conclusion Prenatal identification of minor defects of the digits is a challenge, with more postnatal than prenatal cases. The majority of cases with isolated anomalies in both groups had no underlying chromosomal or monogenic cause, nor were they associated with a syndrome, as compared to the non‐isolated cases. Conducting structural anomaly scans and genetic counseling are crucial to assess the risk of genetic abnormalities.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pd.6714
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3134332378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3153293096</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3264-840d6ce565abaf9306af714e7c2d65b98bf3c060c888d297067b216380dc80433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU-LEzEYxoMobl3FbyABDwrSNZnMJBkvUlpdhYLFdc8hk7xjs8xMxiRT6c2bVz-jn8Tsti4qeMm_95cnz5MXoceUnFFCipejPeOClnfQjJJazElRsLtoRmheM1nRE_QgxqsMyqIW99EJqzlldSlm6PtmC4NP-xF-fvuRfB7Oj3u8gmiCG5PzA_Yt3gQYdNIdvpjiCCaBxXqweONjOpyvXDR-ByEXLscRAl67vsGLwfe6cxBf4QX-CCn4m9tuB3jptz4kfJEmu3-I7rW6i_DoOJ-iy7dvPi3fzdcfzt8vF-u5YQUv57IklhuoeKUb3daMcN3m3CBMYXnV1LJpmSGcGCmlzVkJF01BOZPEGklKxk7R64PuODU9WANDCrpTY3C9DnvltVN_Vwa3VZ_9TlEqqBCsygrPjwrBf5kgJtXn4NB1egA_RcUoy-8UTMiMPv0HvfJTGHK-TFWsyP5rnqlnB8rkv4kB2ls3lKjr7qrRquvuZvLJn-Zvud_tzMCLA_DVdbD_n47arG7kfgF9IrDT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3153293096</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phenotype‐to‐Genotype Description of Prenatal Suspected and Postnatal Discovered Upper Limb Anomalies: A Retrospective Cohort Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Arduç, Arda ; Dijk, Sandra J. B. ; Cate, Feikje J. ; Doesburg, Margriet H. M. ; Linskens, Ingeborg H. ; Leeuwen, Elisabeth ; Maarle, Merel C. ; Pajkrt, Eva</creator><creatorcontrib>Arduç, Arda ; Dijk, Sandra J. B. ; Cate, Feikje J. ; Doesburg, Margriet H. M. ; Linskens, Ingeborg H. ; Leeuwen, Elisabeth ; Maarle, Merel C. ; Pajkrt, Eva</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate phenotype and genotype characteristics of fetuses and children with upper limb anomalies. Method Retrospective cohort study of a prenatal and postnatal cohort with upper limb anomalies from January 2007 to December 2021 in a Fetal Medicine Unit. Prenatally on ultrasound suspected upper limb anomalies, such as transverse and longitudinal reduction defects, polydactyly, and syndactyly, and postnatally identified children referred to the Congenital Hand Team were evaluated separately. Results The prenatal group included 199 pregnancies: 64 transverse and 19 longitudinal reduction defects, 103 polydactylies, and 13 cases with syndactyly. The majority of cases with longitudinal reduction defects (n = 10, 52.6%), polydactyly (n = 62, 60.2%), and syndactyly (n = 10, 76.9%) were non‐isolated, as opposed to transverse reduction defects, which were generally isolated (n = 41, 64.1%). The postnatal cohort included 362 children with upper limb anomalies with 49 transverse and 22 longitudinal reduction defects, 226 polydactylies, and 65 syndactylies. Chromosomal or monogenic abnormalities were identified in 76/199 (38.2%) cases of the prenatal cohort and in 31/362 (8.6%) cases of the postnatal cohort. Conclusion Prenatal identification of minor defects of the digits is a challenge, with more postnatal than prenatal cases. The majority of cases with isolated anomalies in both groups had no underlying chromosomal or monogenic cause, nor were they associated with a syndrome, as compared to the non‐isolated cases. Conducting structural anomaly scans and genetic counseling are crucial to assess the risk of genetic abnormalities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-3851</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pd.6714</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39613947</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abnormalities ; Adult ; Anomalies ; Children ; Cohort analysis ; Cohort Studies ; Defects ; Female ; Fetuses ; Genetic abnormalities ; Genetic counseling ; Genetic screening ; Genotype ; Genotypes ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Original ; Phenotype ; Phenotypes ; Polydactyly ; Polydactyly - diagnosis ; Polydactyly - diagnostic imaging ; Polydactyly - epidemiology ; Polydactyly - genetics ; Postpartum period ; Pregnancy ; prenatal ultrasound ; reduction defect ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk assessment ; Syndactyly ; Syndactyly - diagnosis ; Syndactyly - epidemiology ; Syndactyly - genetics ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal ; Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - diagnosis ; Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - diagnostic imaging ; Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - genetics ; upper limb anomalies</subject><ispartof>Prenatal diagnosis, 2025-01, Vol.45 (1), p.3-14</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3264-840d6ce565abaf9306af714e7c2d65b98bf3c060c888d297067b216380dc80433</cites><orcidid>0009-0007-7157-6014</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpd.6714$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpd.6714$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39613947$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arduç, Arda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dijk, Sandra J. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cate, Feikje J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doesburg, Margriet H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linskens, Ingeborg H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leeuwen, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maarle, Merel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pajkrt, Eva</creatorcontrib><title>Phenotype‐to‐Genotype Description of Prenatal Suspected and Postnatal Discovered Upper Limb Anomalies: A Retrospective Cohort Study</title><title>Prenatal diagnosis</title><addtitle>Prenat Diagn</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate phenotype and genotype characteristics of fetuses and children with upper limb anomalies. Method Retrospective cohort study of a prenatal and postnatal cohort with upper limb anomalies from January 2007 to December 2021 in a Fetal Medicine Unit. Prenatally on ultrasound suspected upper limb anomalies, such as transverse and longitudinal reduction defects, polydactyly, and syndactyly, and postnatally identified children referred to the Congenital Hand Team were evaluated separately. Results The prenatal group included 199 pregnancies: 64 transverse and 19 longitudinal reduction defects, 103 polydactylies, and 13 cases with syndactyly. The majority of cases with longitudinal reduction defects (n = 10, 52.6%), polydactyly (n = 62, 60.2%), and syndactyly (n = 10, 76.9%) were non‐isolated, as opposed to transverse reduction defects, which were generally isolated (n = 41, 64.1%). The postnatal cohort included 362 children with upper limb anomalies with 49 transverse and 22 longitudinal reduction defects, 226 polydactylies, and 65 syndactylies. Chromosomal or monogenic abnormalities were identified in 76/199 (38.2%) cases of the prenatal cohort and in 31/362 (8.6%) cases of the postnatal cohort. Conclusion Prenatal identification of minor defects of the digits is a challenge, with more postnatal than prenatal cases. The majority of cases with isolated anomalies in both groups had no underlying chromosomal or monogenic cause, nor were they associated with a syndrome, as compared to the non‐isolated cases. Conducting structural anomaly scans and genetic counseling are crucial to assess the risk of genetic abnormalities.</description><subject>Abnormalities</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetuses</subject><subject>Genetic abnormalities</subject><subject>Genetic counseling</subject><subject>Genetic screening</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Polydactyly</subject><subject>Polydactyly - diagnosis</subject><subject>Polydactyly - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Polydactyly - epidemiology</subject><subject>Polydactyly - genetics</subject><subject>Postpartum period</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>prenatal ultrasound</subject><subject>reduction defect</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Syndactyly</subject><subject>Syndactyly - diagnosis</subject><subject>Syndactyly - epidemiology</subject><subject>Syndactyly - genetics</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><subject>Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - diagnosis</subject><subject>Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - genetics</subject><subject>upper limb anomalies</subject><issn>0197-3851</issn><issn>1097-0223</issn><issn>1097-0223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU-LEzEYxoMobl3FbyABDwrSNZnMJBkvUlpdhYLFdc8hk7xjs8xMxiRT6c2bVz-jn8Tsti4qeMm_95cnz5MXoceUnFFCipejPeOClnfQjJJazElRsLtoRmheM1nRE_QgxqsMyqIW99EJqzlldSlm6PtmC4NP-xF-fvuRfB7Oj3u8gmiCG5PzA_Yt3gQYdNIdvpjiCCaBxXqweONjOpyvXDR-ByEXLscRAl67vsGLwfe6cxBf4QX-CCn4m9tuB3jptz4kfJEmu3-I7rW6i_DoOJ-iy7dvPi3fzdcfzt8vF-u5YQUv57IklhuoeKUb3daMcN3m3CBMYXnV1LJpmSGcGCmlzVkJF01BOZPEGklKxk7R64PuODU9WANDCrpTY3C9DnvltVN_Vwa3VZ_9TlEqqBCsygrPjwrBf5kgJtXn4NB1egA_RcUoy-8UTMiMPv0HvfJTGHK-TFWsyP5rnqlnB8rkv4kB2ls3lKjr7qrRquvuZvLJn-Zvud_tzMCLA_DVdbD_n47arG7kfgF9IrDT</recordid><startdate>202501</startdate><enddate>202501</enddate><creator>Arduç, Arda</creator><creator>Dijk, Sandra J. B.</creator><creator>Cate, Feikje J.</creator><creator>Doesburg, Margriet H. M.</creator><creator>Linskens, Ingeborg H.</creator><creator>Leeuwen, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Maarle, Merel C.</creator><creator>Pajkrt, Eva</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7157-6014</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202501</creationdate><title>Phenotype‐to‐Genotype Description of Prenatal Suspected and Postnatal Discovered Upper Limb Anomalies: A Retrospective Cohort Study</title><author>Arduç, Arda ; Dijk, Sandra J. B. ; Cate, Feikje J. ; Doesburg, Margriet H. M. ; Linskens, Ingeborg H. ; Leeuwen, Elisabeth ; Maarle, Merel C. ; Pajkrt, Eva</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3264-840d6ce565abaf9306af714e7c2d65b98bf3c060c888d297067b216380dc80433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetuses</topic><topic>Genetic abnormalities</topic><topic>Genetic counseling</topic><topic>Genetic screening</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Polydactyly</topic><topic>Polydactyly - diagnosis</topic><topic>Polydactyly - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Polydactyly - epidemiology</topic><topic>Polydactyly - genetics</topic><topic>Postpartum period</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>prenatal ultrasound</topic><topic>reduction defect</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Syndactyly</topic><topic>Syndactyly - diagnosis</topic><topic>Syndactyly - epidemiology</topic><topic>Syndactyly - genetics</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</topic><topic>Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - diagnosis</topic><topic>Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - genetics</topic><topic>upper limb anomalies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arduç, Arda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dijk, Sandra J. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cate, Feikje J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doesburg, Margriet H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linskens, Ingeborg H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leeuwen, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maarle, Merel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pajkrt, Eva</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arduç, Arda</au><au>Dijk, Sandra J. B.</au><au>Cate, Feikje J.</au><au>Doesburg, Margriet H. M.</au><au>Linskens, Ingeborg H.</au><au>Leeuwen, Elisabeth</au><au>Maarle, Merel C.</au><au>Pajkrt, Eva</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phenotype‐to‐Genotype Description of Prenatal Suspected and Postnatal Discovered Upper Limb Anomalies: A Retrospective Cohort Study</atitle><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle><addtitle>Prenat Diagn</addtitle><date>2025-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>3-14</pages><issn>0197-3851</issn><issn>1097-0223</issn><eissn>1097-0223</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate phenotype and genotype characteristics of fetuses and children with upper limb anomalies. Method Retrospective cohort study of a prenatal and postnatal cohort with upper limb anomalies from January 2007 to December 2021 in a Fetal Medicine Unit. Prenatally on ultrasound suspected upper limb anomalies, such as transverse and longitudinal reduction defects, polydactyly, and syndactyly, and postnatally identified children referred to the Congenital Hand Team were evaluated separately. Results The prenatal group included 199 pregnancies: 64 transverse and 19 longitudinal reduction defects, 103 polydactylies, and 13 cases with syndactyly. The majority of cases with longitudinal reduction defects (n = 10, 52.6%), polydactyly (n = 62, 60.2%), and syndactyly (n = 10, 76.9%) were non‐isolated, as opposed to transverse reduction defects, which were generally isolated (n = 41, 64.1%). The postnatal cohort included 362 children with upper limb anomalies with 49 transverse and 22 longitudinal reduction defects, 226 polydactylies, and 65 syndactylies. Chromosomal or monogenic abnormalities were identified in 76/199 (38.2%) cases of the prenatal cohort and in 31/362 (8.6%) cases of the postnatal cohort. Conclusion Prenatal identification of minor defects of the digits is a challenge, with more postnatal than prenatal cases. The majority of cases with isolated anomalies in both groups had no underlying chromosomal or monogenic cause, nor were they associated with a syndrome, as compared to the non‐isolated cases. Conducting structural anomaly scans and genetic counseling are crucial to assess the risk of genetic abnormalities.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>39613947</pmid><doi>10.1002/pd.6714</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7157-6014</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-3851
ispartof Prenatal diagnosis, 2025-01, Vol.45 (1), p.3-14
issn 0197-3851
1097-0223
1097-0223
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3134332378
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Abnormalities
Adult
Anomalies
Children
Cohort analysis
Cohort Studies
Defects
Female
Fetuses
Genetic abnormalities
Genetic counseling
Genetic screening
Genotype
Genotypes
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Male
Original
Phenotype
Phenotypes
Polydactyly
Polydactyly - diagnosis
Polydactyly - diagnostic imaging
Polydactyly - epidemiology
Polydactyly - genetics
Postpartum period
Pregnancy
prenatal ultrasound
reduction defect
Retrospective Studies
Risk assessment
Syndactyly
Syndactyly - diagnosis
Syndactyly - epidemiology
Syndactyly - genetics
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - diagnosis
Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - diagnostic imaging
Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - genetics
upper limb anomalies
title Phenotype‐to‐Genotype Description of Prenatal Suspected and Postnatal Discovered Upper Limb Anomalies: A Retrospective Cohort Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A13%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phenotype%E2%80%90to%E2%80%90Genotype%20Description%20of%20Prenatal%20Suspected%20and%20Postnatal%20Discovered%20Upper%20Limb%20Anomalies:%20A%20Retrospective%20Cohort%20Study&rft.jtitle=Prenatal%20diagnosis&rft.au=Ardu%C3%A7,%20Arda&rft.date=2025-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=3-14&rft.issn=0197-3851&rft.eissn=1097-0223&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pd.6714&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3153293096%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3153293096&rft_id=info:pmid/39613947&rfr_iscdi=true