Comparison of musculoskeletal pain and upper extremity disability in smartphone addicts and smartphone non-addicts among university students: A cross-sectional study

The aim of this study was to compare musculoskeletal pain and upper extremity disability between 'smartphone addicts' and 'non-smartphone addicts' and to assess the impact of determinants of musculoskeletal pain and upper extremity disability in both groups. The study included 35...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bodywork and movement therapies 2024-10, Vol.40, p.279-285
1. Verfasser: Kurtaran, Mehmet
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 285
container_issue
container_start_page 279
container_title Journal of bodywork and movement therapies
container_volume 40
creator Kurtaran, Mehmet
description The aim of this study was to compare musculoskeletal pain and upper extremity disability between 'smartphone addicts' and 'non-smartphone addicts' and to assess the impact of determinants of musculoskeletal pain and upper extremity disability in both groups. The study included 352 university students aged 18–25 years who used smartphones for at least 1 h per day in the past year. The questionnaire consisted of demographic data, the Smartphone Addiction Scale-short version (SAS-SV), the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), and the Verbal Rating Scale. Participants were divided into two groups, 'smartphone addicts' and 'smartphone non-addicts', according to their SAS-SV scores (cut-off for males≥31, females≥33). Participants had a prevalence of smartphone addiction of 38.4%. There was a statistically significant difference between the 'addicted' and 'non-addicted' groups for SAS-SV (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.04.041
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3133417822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1360859224002298</els_id><sourcerecordid>3133417822</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-2fef363ec153b83a624c545c4d13850e1449a8881bcce8d52f30b6ba70e3d3573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcuO1TAMjRCIecAPsEBZsukljz5SxGZ0BQzSSGxgHaWJC7m0SYnT0dwP4j9J5w4jVkiWbNnnHNk-hLzibMcZb98edodhzjvBRL1jW_An5Jw3UlS9UPJpqWXLKtX04oxcIB4YY30t-ufkTPZNL5u-Oye_93FeTPIYA40jnVe06xTxJ0yQzUQX4wM1wdF1WSBRuMsJZp-P1Hk0g5-2siBwNikvP2IAapzzNuM96Z92iKF6HM0xfKdr8LeQcFPAvDoIGd_RK2pTRKwQbPYxlA222fEFeTaaCeHlQ74k3z5--Lq_rm6-fPq8v7qprGRdrsQIo2wl2PKEQUnTito2dWNrx6VqGPC67o1Sig_WgnKNGCUb2sF0DKSTTScvyZuT7pLirxUw69mjhWkyAeKKWnIpa94pIQpUnKD3CycY9ZJ8ufeoOdObPfqgN3v0Zo9mW_BCev2gvw4zuEfKXz8K4P0JAOXKWw9Jo_UQLDifyku0i_5_-n8AS3emNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3133417822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of musculoskeletal pain and upper extremity disability in smartphone addicts and smartphone non-addicts among university students: A cross-sectional study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kurtaran, Mehmet</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurtaran, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to compare musculoskeletal pain and upper extremity disability between 'smartphone addicts' and 'non-smartphone addicts' and to assess the impact of determinants of musculoskeletal pain and upper extremity disability in both groups. The study included 352 university students aged 18–25 years who used smartphones for at least 1 h per day in the past year. The questionnaire consisted of demographic data, the Smartphone Addiction Scale-short version (SAS-SV), the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), and the Verbal Rating Scale. Participants were divided into two groups, 'smartphone addicts' and 'smartphone non-addicts', according to their SAS-SV scores (cut-off for males≥31, females≥33). Participants had a prevalence of smartphone addiction of 38.4%. There was a statistically significant difference between the 'addicted' and 'non-addicted' groups for SAS-SV (p &lt; 0.001), Quick DASH (p &lt; 0.001) and daily smartphone use time (p = 0.007). The results of logistic regression analyses showed that female gender was a predictor of shoulder (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.16–0.85, p = 0.01) and wrist/hand (OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.19–0.98; p = 0.04) pain in smartphone addicts and low back pain (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.12–0.98, p = 0.04) in non-smartphone addicts. In both groups, the SAS-SV score was found to significantly predict the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain in all body regions. The study showed that among university students, smartphone addicts had more musculoskeletal complaints and upper extremity disability than smartphone non-addicts. The SAS-SV score was a predictor of the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and upper extremity disability in smartphone users among university students.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1360-8592</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-9283</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-9283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.04.041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39593597</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Addiction ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Behavior, Addictive - epidemiology ; Chronic pain ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Disability ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Musculoskeletal pain ; Musculoskeletal Pain - epidemiology ; Prevalence ; Sex Factors ; Smartphone ; Students - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Universities ; Upper Extremity - physiopathology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, 2024-10, Vol.40, p.279-285</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-2fef363ec153b83a624c545c4d13850e1449a8881bcce8d52f30b6ba70e3d3573</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8257-4400</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224002298$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39593597$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurtaran, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of musculoskeletal pain and upper extremity disability in smartphone addicts and smartphone non-addicts among university students: A cross-sectional study</title><title>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies</title><addtitle>J Bodyw Mov Ther</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to compare musculoskeletal pain and upper extremity disability between 'smartphone addicts' and 'non-smartphone addicts' and to assess the impact of determinants of musculoskeletal pain and upper extremity disability in both groups. The study included 352 university students aged 18–25 years who used smartphones for at least 1 h per day in the past year. The questionnaire consisted of demographic data, the Smartphone Addiction Scale-short version (SAS-SV), the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), and the Verbal Rating Scale. Participants were divided into two groups, 'smartphone addicts' and 'smartphone non-addicts', according to their SAS-SV scores (cut-off for males≥31, females≥33). Participants had a prevalence of smartphone addiction of 38.4%. There was a statistically significant difference between the 'addicted' and 'non-addicted' groups for SAS-SV (p &lt; 0.001), Quick DASH (p &lt; 0.001) and daily smartphone use time (p = 0.007). The results of logistic regression analyses showed that female gender was a predictor of shoulder (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.16–0.85, p = 0.01) and wrist/hand (OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.19–0.98; p = 0.04) pain in smartphone addicts and low back pain (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.12–0.98, p = 0.04) in non-smartphone addicts. In both groups, the SAS-SV score was found to significantly predict the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain in all body regions. The study showed that among university students, smartphone addicts had more musculoskeletal complaints and upper extremity disability than smartphone non-addicts. The SAS-SV score was a predictor of the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and upper extremity disability in smartphone users among university students.</description><subject>Addiction</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavior, Addictive - epidemiology</subject><subject>Chronic pain</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal pain</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Pain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Smartphone</subject><subject>Students - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Upper Extremity - physiopathology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1360-8592</issn><issn>1532-9283</issn><issn>1532-9283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcuO1TAMjRCIecAPsEBZsukljz5SxGZ0BQzSSGxgHaWJC7m0SYnT0dwP4j9J5w4jVkiWbNnnHNk-hLzibMcZb98edodhzjvBRL1jW_An5Jw3UlS9UPJpqWXLKtX04oxcIB4YY30t-ufkTPZNL5u-Oye_93FeTPIYA40jnVe06xTxJ0yQzUQX4wM1wdF1WSBRuMsJZp-P1Hk0g5-2siBwNikvP2IAapzzNuM96Z92iKF6HM0xfKdr8LeQcFPAvDoIGd_RK2pTRKwQbPYxlA222fEFeTaaCeHlQ74k3z5--Lq_rm6-fPq8v7qprGRdrsQIo2wl2PKEQUnTito2dWNrx6VqGPC67o1Sig_WgnKNGCUb2sF0DKSTTScvyZuT7pLirxUw69mjhWkyAeKKWnIpa94pIQpUnKD3CycY9ZJ8ufeoOdObPfqgN3v0Zo9mW_BCev2gvw4zuEfKXz8K4P0JAOXKWw9Jo_UQLDifyku0i_5_-n8AS3emNg</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Kurtaran, Mehmet</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8257-4400</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Comparison of musculoskeletal pain and upper extremity disability in smartphone addicts and smartphone non-addicts among university students: A cross-sectional study</title><author>Kurtaran, Mehmet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-2fef363ec153b83a624c545c4d13850e1449a8881bcce8d52f30b6ba70e3d3573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Addiction</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavior, Addictive - epidemiology</topic><topic>Chronic pain</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal pain</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Pain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Smartphone</topic><topic>Students - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Upper Extremity - physiopathology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurtaran, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurtaran, Mehmet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of musculoskeletal pain and upper extremity disability in smartphone addicts and smartphone non-addicts among university students: A cross-sectional study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies</jtitle><addtitle>J Bodyw Mov Ther</addtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>40</volume><spage>279</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>279-285</pages><issn>1360-8592</issn><issn>1532-9283</issn><eissn>1532-9283</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to compare musculoskeletal pain and upper extremity disability between 'smartphone addicts' and 'non-smartphone addicts' and to assess the impact of determinants of musculoskeletal pain and upper extremity disability in both groups. The study included 352 university students aged 18–25 years who used smartphones for at least 1 h per day in the past year. The questionnaire consisted of demographic data, the Smartphone Addiction Scale-short version (SAS-SV), the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), and the Verbal Rating Scale. Participants were divided into two groups, 'smartphone addicts' and 'smartphone non-addicts', according to their SAS-SV scores (cut-off for males≥31, females≥33). Participants had a prevalence of smartphone addiction of 38.4%. There was a statistically significant difference between the 'addicted' and 'non-addicted' groups for SAS-SV (p &lt; 0.001), Quick DASH (p &lt; 0.001) and daily smartphone use time (p = 0.007). The results of logistic regression analyses showed that female gender was a predictor of shoulder (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.16–0.85, p = 0.01) and wrist/hand (OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.19–0.98; p = 0.04) pain in smartphone addicts and low back pain (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.12–0.98, p = 0.04) in non-smartphone addicts. In both groups, the SAS-SV score was found to significantly predict the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain in all body regions. The study showed that among university students, smartphone addicts had more musculoskeletal complaints and upper extremity disability than smartphone non-addicts. The SAS-SV score was a predictor of the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and upper extremity disability in smartphone users among university students.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39593597</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.04.041</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8257-4400</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1360-8592
ispartof Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, 2024-10, Vol.40, p.279-285
issn 1360-8592
1532-9283
1532-9283
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3133417822
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Addiction
Adolescent
Adult
Behavior, Addictive - epidemiology
Chronic pain
Cross-Sectional Studies
Disability
Disability Evaluation
Female
Humans
Male
Musculoskeletal pain
Musculoskeletal Pain - epidemiology
Prevalence
Sex Factors
Smartphone
Students - statistics & numerical data
Surveys and Questionnaires
Universities
Upper Extremity - physiopathology
Young Adult
title Comparison of musculoskeletal pain and upper extremity disability in smartphone addicts and smartphone non-addicts among university students: A cross-sectional study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T17%3A25%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20musculoskeletal%20pain%20and%20upper%20extremity%20disability%20in%20smartphone%20addicts%20and%20smartphone%20non-addicts%20among%20university%20students:%20A%20cross-sectional%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bodywork%20and%20movement%20therapies&rft.au=Kurtaran,%20Mehmet&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=40&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=279-285&rft.issn=1360-8592&rft.eissn=1532-9283&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.04.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3133417822%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3133417822&rft_id=info:pmid/39593597&rft_els_id=S1360859224002298&rfr_iscdi=true