Inferring Word Class and Meaning From Spoken and Written Texts: A Comparison of Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder

The aim of the study was to determine the ability of children with developmental language disorder (DLD) to infer word class and meaning from text and to document variations by word class (noun, verb, adjective) and modality (listening, reading). We also asked whether the children could integrate gl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of speech, language, and hearing research language, and hearing research, 2024-12, Vol.67 (12), p.4783-4798
Hauptverfasser: McGregor, Karla K, Pomper, Ron, Eden, Nichole, Appenzeller, Margo, Arbisi-Kelm, Timothy, Polese, Elaina, Reed, Deborah K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4798
container_issue 12
container_start_page 4783
container_title Journal of speech, language, and hearing research
container_volume 67
creator McGregor, Karla K
Pomper, Ron
Eden, Nichole
Appenzeller, Margo
Arbisi-Kelm, Timothy
Polese, Elaina
Reed, Deborah K
description The aim of the study was to determine the ability of children with developmental language disorder (DLD) to infer word class and meaning from text and to document variations by word class (noun, verb, adjective) and modality (listening, reading). We also asked whether the children could integrate global cues across the entire passage as well as local cues from the immediate sentence frame to support inferences. Fourth graders with DLD ( = 28) and typical language development (TLD; = 41) read and listened to expository texts and guessed the noun, verb, and adjective removed from each. Adults ( = 20) completed the task to establish a baseline of correct responses. We used latent semantic analysis (LSA) to determine the semantic fit of the responses to the texts and to determine whether global cues were more difficult for children with DLD than local cues. The DLD group was 24% less accurate than the TLD group. In both diagnostic groups, accuracy varied by word class (nouns > adjectives > verbs) but not modality (reading = listening). Word class errors were rare, and errors of semantic fit were frequent. LSA cosines were higher for correct responses relative to the passage as a whole than the immediate sentence frame, suggesting that both groups mined the more extensive information in the global cues to support inferences. Compared to the TLD group, the DLD group tended to make "worse" errors: repeating words from the sentence frame or coming up with no response at all. Accuracy in the DLD group, but not the TLD group, was related to vocabulary knowledge. When the two groups were collapsed, scores on verbal short-term/working memory and sustained attention also predicted performance, but weaknesses in these aspects of executive function on the part of individuals with DLD did not fully explain the difference between the performance of the DLD and TLD groups. Whether listening or reading, fourth graders with DLD are less able to infer word meaning from texts than their age-mates. The problem reflects, in part, deficits in executive function and lexical semantic knowledge.
doi_str_mv 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00743
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3132846985</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3132846985</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c185t-729cb9e0372ca395d00557035c7168a07ed512585d8de05727119d1cee2b527a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUclOxDAMjRCI_QuQUI5cClmaScoNdVg1CIlFc4wyjWcotElJWgSfwF8TGBZf_PTsZ8t-CO1RckhJnh8xwnJ9dTe5uM0YzwiROV9Bm1QIlRWUsNWEScGynCu1gbZifCIpaD5aRxu8EKpgkmyij0s3hxBqt8BTHywuGxMjNs7iazDuiz4LvsV3nX8G981PQ933Cd_DWx-P8QkufduZUEfvsJ_j8rFubEj1ad0_LgUJ-KHHY3iFxnctuN40eGLcYjALwOOkDBbCDlqbmybC7k_eRg9np_flRTa5Ob8sTyZZRZXoM8mKalYA4ZJVJt1hCRFCEi4qSUfKEAlWUCaUsMoCEZJJSgtLKwA2E0wavo0OlnO74F8GiL1u61hB0xgHfoiaU85UPiqUSK182VoFH2OAue5C3ZrwrinRXx7ofw804_rbg6Ta_1kwzFqwf5rfp_NP622C1A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3132846985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inferring Word Class and Meaning From Spoken and Written Texts: A Comparison of Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder</title><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>McGregor, Karla K ; Pomper, Ron ; Eden, Nichole ; Appenzeller, Margo ; Arbisi-Kelm, Timothy ; Polese, Elaina ; Reed, Deborah K</creator><creatorcontrib>McGregor, Karla K ; Pomper, Ron ; Eden, Nichole ; Appenzeller, Margo ; Arbisi-Kelm, Timothy ; Polese, Elaina ; Reed, Deborah K</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the study was to determine the ability of children with developmental language disorder (DLD) to infer word class and meaning from text and to document variations by word class (noun, verb, adjective) and modality (listening, reading). We also asked whether the children could integrate global cues across the entire passage as well as local cues from the immediate sentence frame to support inferences. Fourth graders with DLD ( = 28) and typical language development (TLD; = 41) read and listened to expository texts and guessed the noun, verb, and adjective removed from each. Adults ( = 20) completed the task to establish a baseline of correct responses. We used latent semantic analysis (LSA) to determine the semantic fit of the responses to the texts and to determine whether global cues were more difficult for children with DLD than local cues. The DLD group was 24% less accurate than the TLD group. In both diagnostic groups, accuracy varied by word class (nouns &gt; adjectives &gt; verbs) but not modality (reading = listening). Word class errors were rare, and errors of semantic fit were frequent. LSA cosines were higher for correct responses relative to the passage as a whole than the immediate sentence frame, suggesting that both groups mined the more extensive information in the global cues to support inferences. Compared to the TLD group, the DLD group tended to make "worse" errors: repeating words from the sentence frame or coming up with no response at all. Accuracy in the DLD group, but not the TLD group, was related to vocabulary knowledge. When the two groups were collapsed, scores on verbal short-term/working memory and sustained attention also predicted performance, but weaknesses in these aspects of executive function on the part of individuals with DLD did not fully explain the difference between the performance of the DLD and TLD groups. Whether listening or reading, fourth graders with DLD are less able to infer word meaning from texts than their age-mates. The problem reflects, in part, deficits in executive function and lexical semantic knowledge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-4388</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1558-9102</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00743</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39589270</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Child ; Child Language ; Cues ; Female ; Humans ; Language Development Disorders - psychology ; Language Tests ; Male ; Reading ; Semantics ; Speech Perception</subject><ispartof>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 2024-12, Vol.67 (12), p.4783-4798</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c185t-729cb9e0372ca395d00557035c7168a07ed512585d8de05727119d1cee2b527a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0612-0057 ; 0000-0001-5595-4192</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39589270$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGregor, Karla K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomper, Ron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eden, Nichole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appenzeller, Margo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arbisi-Kelm, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polese, Elaina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Deborah K</creatorcontrib><title>Inferring Word Class and Meaning From Spoken and Written Texts: A Comparison of Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder</title><title>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</title><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><description>The aim of the study was to determine the ability of children with developmental language disorder (DLD) to infer word class and meaning from text and to document variations by word class (noun, verb, adjective) and modality (listening, reading). We also asked whether the children could integrate global cues across the entire passage as well as local cues from the immediate sentence frame to support inferences. Fourth graders with DLD ( = 28) and typical language development (TLD; = 41) read and listened to expository texts and guessed the noun, verb, and adjective removed from each. Adults ( = 20) completed the task to establish a baseline of correct responses. We used latent semantic analysis (LSA) to determine the semantic fit of the responses to the texts and to determine whether global cues were more difficult for children with DLD than local cues. The DLD group was 24% less accurate than the TLD group. In both diagnostic groups, accuracy varied by word class (nouns &gt; adjectives &gt; verbs) but not modality (reading = listening). Word class errors were rare, and errors of semantic fit were frequent. LSA cosines were higher for correct responses relative to the passage as a whole than the immediate sentence frame, suggesting that both groups mined the more extensive information in the global cues to support inferences. Compared to the TLD group, the DLD group tended to make "worse" errors: repeating words from the sentence frame or coming up with no response at all. Accuracy in the DLD group, but not the TLD group, was related to vocabulary knowledge. When the two groups were collapsed, scores on verbal short-term/working memory and sustained attention also predicted performance, but weaknesses in these aspects of executive function on the part of individuals with DLD did not fully explain the difference between the performance of the DLD and TLD groups. Whether listening or reading, fourth graders with DLD are less able to infer word meaning from texts than their age-mates. The problem reflects, in part, deficits in executive function and lexical semantic knowledge.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Language</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language Development Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Language Tests</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><issn>1092-4388</issn><issn>1558-9102</issn><issn>1558-9102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUclOxDAMjRCI_QuQUI5cClmaScoNdVg1CIlFc4wyjWcotElJWgSfwF8TGBZf_PTsZ8t-CO1RckhJnh8xwnJ9dTe5uM0YzwiROV9Bm1QIlRWUsNWEScGynCu1gbZifCIpaD5aRxu8EKpgkmyij0s3hxBqt8BTHywuGxMjNs7iazDuiz4LvsV3nX8G981PQ933Cd_DWx-P8QkufduZUEfvsJ_j8rFubEj1ad0_LgUJ-KHHY3iFxnctuN40eGLcYjALwOOkDBbCDlqbmybC7k_eRg9np_flRTa5Ob8sTyZZRZXoM8mKalYA4ZJVJt1hCRFCEi4qSUfKEAlWUCaUsMoCEZJJSgtLKwA2E0wavo0OlnO74F8GiL1u61hB0xgHfoiaU85UPiqUSK182VoFH2OAue5C3ZrwrinRXx7ofw804_rbg6Ta_1kwzFqwf5rfp_NP622C1A</recordid><startdate>20241209</startdate><enddate>20241209</enddate><creator>McGregor, Karla K</creator><creator>Pomper, Ron</creator><creator>Eden, Nichole</creator><creator>Appenzeller, Margo</creator><creator>Arbisi-Kelm, Timothy</creator><creator>Polese, Elaina</creator><creator>Reed, Deborah K</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0612-0057</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5595-4192</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241209</creationdate><title>Inferring Word Class and Meaning From Spoken and Written Texts: A Comparison of Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder</title><author>McGregor, Karla K ; Pomper, Ron ; Eden, Nichole ; Appenzeller, Margo ; Arbisi-Kelm, Timothy ; Polese, Elaina ; Reed, Deborah K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c185t-729cb9e0372ca395d00557035c7168a07ed512585d8de05727119d1cee2b527a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Language</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language Development Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Language Tests</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGregor, Karla K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomper, Ron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eden, Nichole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appenzeller, Margo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arbisi-Kelm, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polese, Elaina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Deborah K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGregor, Karla K</au><au>Pomper, Ron</au><au>Eden, Nichole</au><au>Appenzeller, Margo</au><au>Arbisi-Kelm, Timothy</au><au>Polese, Elaina</au><au>Reed, Deborah K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inferring Word Class and Meaning From Spoken and Written Texts: A Comparison of Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder</atitle><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><date>2024-12-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4783</spage><epage>4798</epage><pages>4783-4798</pages><issn>1092-4388</issn><issn>1558-9102</issn><eissn>1558-9102</eissn><abstract>The aim of the study was to determine the ability of children with developmental language disorder (DLD) to infer word class and meaning from text and to document variations by word class (noun, verb, adjective) and modality (listening, reading). We also asked whether the children could integrate global cues across the entire passage as well as local cues from the immediate sentence frame to support inferences. Fourth graders with DLD ( = 28) and typical language development (TLD; = 41) read and listened to expository texts and guessed the noun, verb, and adjective removed from each. Adults ( = 20) completed the task to establish a baseline of correct responses. We used latent semantic analysis (LSA) to determine the semantic fit of the responses to the texts and to determine whether global cues were more difficult for children with DLD than local cues. The DLD group was 24% less accurate than the TLD group. In both diagnostic groups, accuracy varied by word class (nouns &gt; adjectives &gt; verbs) but not modality (reading = listening). Word class errors were rare, and errors of semantic fit were frequent. LSA cosines were higher for correct responses relative to the passage as a whole than the immediate sentence frame, suggesting that both groups mined the more extensive information in the global cues to support inferences. Compared to the TLD group, the DLD group tended to make "worse" errors: repeating words from the sentence frame or coming up with no response at all. Accuracy in the DLD group, but not the TLD group, was related to vocabulary knowledge. When the two groups were collapsed, scores on verbal short-term/working memory and sustained attention also predicted performance, but weaknesses in these aspects of executive function on the part of individuals with DLD did not fully explain the difference between the performance of the DLD and TLD groups. Whether listening or reading, fourth graders with DLD are less able to infer word meaning from texts than their age-mates. The problem reflects, in part, deficits in executive function and lexical semantic knowledge.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>39589270</pmid><doi>10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00743</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0612-0057</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5595-4192</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-4388
ispartof Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 2024-12, Vol.67 (12), p.4783-4798
issn 1092-4388
1558-9102
1558-9102
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3132846985
source Education Source (EBSCOhost); MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Child
Child Language
Cues
Female
Humans
Language Development Disorders - psychology
Language Tests
Male
Reading
Semantics
Speech Perception
title Inferring Word Class and Meaning From Spoken and Written Texts: A Comparison of Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T22%3A48%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inferring%20Word%20Class%20and%20Meaning%20From%20Spoken%20and%20Written%20Texts:%20A%20Comparison%20of%20Children%20With%20and%20Without%20Developmental%20Language%20Disorder&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20speech,%20language,%20and%20hearing%20research&rft.au=McGregor,%20Karla%20K&rft.date=2024-12-09&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4783&rft.epage=4798&rft.pages=4783-4798&rft.issn=1092-4388&rft.eissn=1558-9102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00743&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3132846985%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3132846985&rft_id=info:pmid/39589270&rfr_iscdi=true