Extremely dense breasts: A comprehensive review of increased cancer risk and supplementary screening methods

•About 10% of women have extremely dense breasts, doubling their breast cancer risk compared to those with non-dense breasts.•Mammography sensitivity drops with density. Tomosynthesis offers no improvement for extremely dense breasts; ultrasound boosts sensitivity but cuts specificity.•MRI improves...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of radiology 2025-01, Vol.182, p.111837, Article 111837
Hauptverfasser: Nissan, Noam, Ochoa Albiztegui, Rosa Elena, Fruchtman-Brot, Hila, Gluskin, Jill, Arita, Yuki, Amir, Tali, Reiner, Jeffrey S., Feigin, Kimberly, Mango, Victoria L, Jochelson, Maxine S., Sung, Janice S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 111837
container_title European journal of radiology
container_volume 182
creator Nissan, Noam
Ochoa Albiztegui, Rosa Elena
Fruchtman-Brot, Hila
Gluskin, Jill
Arita, Yuki
Amir, Tali
Reiner, Jeffrey S.
Feigin, Kimberly
Mango, Victoria L
Jochelson, Maxine S.
Sung, Janice S.
description •About 10% of women have extremely dense breasts, doubling their breast cancer risk compared to those with non-dense breasts.•Mammography sensitivity drops with density. Tomosynthesis offers no improvement for extremely dense breasts; ultrasound boosts sensitivity but cuts specificity.•MRI improves cancer detection in women with extremely dense breasts, but high costs and limited availability may restrict its use.•Contrast-enhanced mammography matches MRI performance at lower costs, making it a viable option for extremely dense breast screening. Women with extremely dense breasts account for approximately 10% of the screening population and face an increased lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. At the same time, the sensitivity of mammography, the first-line screening modality, is significantly reduced in this breast density group, owing to the masking effect of the abundant fibroglandular tissue. Consequently, this population has garnered increasing scientific attention due to the unique diagnostic challenge they present. Several research initiatives have attempted to address this diagnostic challenge by incorporating supplemental imaging modalities such as ultrasound, MRI, and contrast-enhanced mammography. Each of these modalities offers different benefits as well as limitations, both clinically and practically, including considerations of availability and costs. The purpose of this article is to critically review the background, latest scientific evidence, and future directions for the use of the various supplemental screening techniques for women with extremely dense breasts.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111837
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3132140941</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X24005539</els_id><sourcerecordid>3132140941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1544-850cf0b948c61a27d3486ec1347220d51f05d9e78bad49ac57af4af12c91bf6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlKBDEQhoMoOi5PIEiOXnpMpdOTbsGDDG4geFHwFtJJRTP2ZtLj8vZmHPXoqaD4_lo-Qg6BTYHB7GQxxUXQdsoZF1MAKHO5QSZQSp5JyeUmmTDJWcZE-bhDdmNcMMYKUfFtspNXRUK4mJDm4mMM2GLzSS12EWkdUMcxntJzavp2CPic2v4NacA3j--0d9R3ZgWhpUZ3BgMNPr5Q3Vkal8PQpGndqMMnjQnDzndPtMXxubdxn2w53UQ8-Kl75OHy4n5-nd3eXd3Mz28zA4UQWVkw41hdidLMQHNpc1HO0EAu0s3MFuBYYSuUZa2tqLQppHZCO-CmgtrNXL5Hjtdzh9C_LjGOqvXRYNPoDvtlVDnkHASrBCQ0X6Mm9DEGdGoIvk3XK2BqpVkt1LdmtdKs1ppT6uhnwbJu0f5lfr0m4GwNYHozeQsqGo9JlvUBzahs7_9d8AX88ZDG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3132140941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extremely dense breasts: A comprehensive review of increased cancer risk and supplementary screening methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Nissan, Noam ; Ochoa Albiztegui, Rosa Elena ; Fruchtman-Brot, Hila ; Gluskin, Jill ; Arita, Yuki ; Amir, Tali ; Reiner, Jeffrey S. ; Feigin, Kimberly ; Mango, Victoria L ; Jochelson, Maxine S. ; Sung, Janice S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nissan, Noam ; Ochoa Albiztegui, Rosa Elena ; Fruchtman-Brot, Hila ; Gluskin, Jill ; Arita, Yuki ; Amir, Tali ; Reiner, Jeffrey S. ; Feigin, Kimberly ; Mango, Victoria L ; Jochelson, Maxine S. ; Sung, Janice S.</creatorcontrib><description>•About 10% of women have extremely dense breasts, doubling their breast cancer risk compared to those with non-dense breasts.•Mammography sensitivity drops with density. Tomosynthesis offers no improvement for extremely dense breasts; ultrasound boosts sensitivity but cuts specificity.•MRI improves cancer detection in women with extremely dense breasts, but high costs and limited availability may restrict its use.•Contrast-enhanced mammography matches MRI performance at lower costs, making it a viable option for extremely dense breast screening. Women with extremely dense breasts account for approximately 10% of the screening population and face an increased lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. At the same time, the sensitivity of mammography, the first-line screening modality, is significantly reduced in this breast density group, owing to the masking effect of the abundant fibroglandular tissue. Consequently, this population has garnered increasing scientific attention due to the unique diagnostic challenge they present. Several research initiatives have attempted to address this diagnostic challenge by incorporating supplemental imaging modalities such as ultrasound, MRI, and contrast-enhanced mammography. Each of these modalities offers different benefits as well as limitations, both clinically and practically, including considerations of availability and costs. The purpose of this article is to critically review the background, latest scientific evidence, and future directions for the use of the various supplemental screening techniques for women with extremely dense breasts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111837</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39577224</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Breast Density ; Breast neoplasm ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Cancer screening ; Contrast-enhanced mammography ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Mammography - methods ; Mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging ; Mass Screening - methods ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2025-01, Vol.182, p.111837, Article 111837</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1544-850cf0b948c61a27d3486ec1347220d51f05d9e78bad49ac57af4af12c91bf6f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111837$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39577224$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nissan, Noam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochoa Albiztegui, Rosa Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fruchtman-Brot, Hila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gluskin, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arita, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amir, Tali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiner, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feigin, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mango, Victoria L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jochelson, Maxine S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Janice S.</creatorcontrib><title>Extremely dense breasts: A comprehensive review of increased cancer risk and supplementary screening methods</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>•About 10% of women have extremely dense breasts, doubling their breast cancer risk compared to those with non-dense breasts.•Mammography sensitivity drops with density. Tomosynthesis offers no improvement for extremely dense breasts; ultrasound boosts sensitivity but cuts specificity.•MRI improves cancer detection in women with extremely dense breasts, but high costs and limited availability may restrict its use.•Contrast-enhanced mammography matches MRI performance at lower costs, making it a viable option for extremely dense breast screening. Women with extremely dense breasts account for approximately 10% of the screening population and face an increased lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. At the same time, the sensitivity of mammography, the first-line screening modality, is significantly reduced in this breast density group, owing to the masking effect of the abundant fibroglandular tissue. Consequently, this population has garnered increasing scientific attention due to the unique diagnostic challenge they present. Several research initiatives have attempted to address this diagnostic challenge by incorporating supplemental imaging modalities such as ultrasound, MRI, and contrast-enhanced mammography. Each of these modalities offers different benefits as well as limitations, both clinically and practically, including considerations of availability and costs. The purpose of this article is to critically review the background, latest scientific evidence, and future directions for the use of the various supplemental screening techniques for women with extremely dense breasts.</description><subject>Breast Density</subject><subject>Breast neoplasm</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Contrast-enhanced mammography</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>Mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMlKBDEQhoMoOi5PIEiOXnpMpdOTbsGDDG4geFHwFtJJRTP2ZtLj8vZmHPXoqaD4_lo-Qg6BTYHB7GQxxUXQdsoZF1MAKHO5QSZQSp5JyeUmmTDJWcZE-bhDdmNcMMYKUfFtspNXRUK4mJDm4mMM2GLzSS12EWkdUMcxntJzavp2CPic2v4NacA3j--0d9R3ZgWhpUZ3BgMNPr5Q3Vkal8PQpGndqMMnjQnDzndPtMXxubdxn2w53UQ8-Kl75OHy4n5-nd3eXd3Mz28zA4UQWVkw41hdidLMQHNpc1HO0EAu0s3MFuBYYSuUZa2tqLQppHZCO-CmgtrNXL5Hjtdzh9C_LjGOqvXRYNPoDvtlVDnkHASrBCQ0X6Mm9DEGdGoIvk3XK2BqpVkt1LdmtdKs1ppT6uhnwbJu0f5lfr0m4GwNYHozeQsqGo9JlvUBzahs7_9d8AX88ZDG</recordid><startdate>202501</startdate><enddate>202501</enddate><creator>Nissan, Noam</creator><creator>Ochoa Albiztegui, Rosa Elena</creator><creator>Fruchtman-Brot, Hila</creator><creator>Gluskin, Jill</creator><creator>Arita, Yuki</creator><creator>Amir, Tali</creator><creator>Reiner, Jeffrey S.</creator><creator>Feigin, Kimberly</creator><creator>Mango, Victoria L</creator><creator>Jochelson, Maxine S.</creator><creator>Sung, Janice S.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202501</creationdate><title>Extremely dense breasts: A comprehensive review of increased cancer risk and supplementary screening methods</title><author>Nissan, Noam ; Ochoa Albiztegui, Rosa Elena ; Fruchtman-Brot, Hila ; Gluskin, Jill ; Arita, Yuki ; Amir, Tali ; Reiner, Jeffrey S. ; Feigin, Kimberly ; Mango, Victoria L ; Jochelson, Maxine S. ; Sung, Janice S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1544-850cf0b948c61a27d3486ec1347220d51f05d9e78bad49ac57af4af12c91bf6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Breast Density</topic><topic>Breast neoplasm</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Contrast-enhanced mammography</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>Mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nissan, Noam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochoa Albiztegui, Rosa Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fruchtman-Brot, Hila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gluskin, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arita, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amir, Tali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiner, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feigin, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mango, Victoria L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jochelson, Maxine S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Janice S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nissan, Noam</au><au>Ochoa Albiztegui, Rosa Elena</au><au>Fruchtman-Brot, Hila</au><au>Gluskin, Jill</au><au>Arita, Yuki</au><au>Amir, Tali</au><au>Reiner, Jeffrey S.</au><au>Feigin, Kimberly</au><au>Mango, Victoria L</au><au>Jochelson, Maxine S.</au><au>Sung, Janice S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extremely dense breasts: A comprehensive review of increased cancer risk and supplementary screening methods</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2025-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>182</volume><spage>111837</spage><pages>111837-</pages><artnum>111837</artnum><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>•About 10% of women have extremely dense breasts, doubling their breast cancer risk compared to those with non-dense breasts.•Mammography sensitivity drops with density. Tomosynthesis offers no improvement for extremely dense breasts; ultrasound boosts sensitivity but cuts specificity.•MRI improves cancer detection in women with extremely dense breasts, but high costs and limited availability may restrict its use.•Contrast-enhanced mammography matches MRI performance at lower costs, making it a viable option for extremely dense breast screening. Women with extremely dense breasts account for approximately 10% of the screening population and face an increased lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. At the same time, the sensitivity of mammography, the first-line screening modality, is significantly reduced in this breast density group, owing to the masking effect of the abundant fibroglandular tissue. Consequently, this population has garnered increasing scientific attention due to the unique diagnostic challenge they present. Several research initiatives have attempted to address this diagnostic challenge by incorporating supplemental imaging modalities such as ultrasound, MRI, and contrast-enhanced mammography. Each of these modalities offers different benefits as well as limitations, both clinically and practically, including considerations of availability and costs. The purpose of this article is to critically review the background, latest scientific evidence, and future directions for the use of the various supplemental screening techniques for women with extremely dense breasts.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>39577224</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111837</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0720-048X
ispartof European journal of radiology, 2025-01, Vol.182, p.111837, Article 111837
issn 0720-048X
1872-7727
1872-7727
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3132140941
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Breast Density
Breast neoplasm
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Cancer screening
Contrast-enhanced mammography
Early Detection of Cancer - methods
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Mammography - methods
Mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging
Mass Screening - methods
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Sensitivity and Specificity
Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods
title Extremely dense breasts: A comprehensive review of increased cancer risk and supplementary screening methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T19%3A44%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extremely%20dense%20breasts:%20A%20comprehensive%20review%20of%20increased%20cancer%20risk%20and%20supplementary%20screening%20methods&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Nissan,%20Noam&rft.date=2025-01&rft.volume=182&rft.spage=111837&rft.pages=111837-&rft.artnum=111837&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111837&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3132140941%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3132140941&rft_id=info:pmid/39577224&rft_els_id=S0720048X24005539&rfr_iscdi=true