Extremely dense breasts: A comprehensive review of increased cancer risk and supplementary screening methods
•About 10% of women have extremely dense breasts, doubling their breast cancer risk compared to those with non-dense breasts.•Mammography sensitivity drops with density. Tomosynthesis offers no improvement for extremely dense breasts; ultrasound boosts sensitivity but cuts specificity.•MRI improves...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of radiology 2025-01, Vol.182, p.111837, Article 111837 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 111837 |
container_title | European journal of radiology |
container_volume | 182 |
creator | Nissan, Noam Ochoa Albiztegui, Rosa Elena Fruchtman-Brot, Hila Gluskin, Jill Arita, Yuki Amir, Tali Reiner, Jeffrey S. Feigin, Kimberly Mango, Victoria L Jochelson, Maxine S. Sung, Janice S. |
description | •About 10% of women have extremely dense breasts, doubling their breast cancer risk compared to those with non-dense breasts.•Mammography sensitivity drops with density. Tomosynthesis offers no improvement for extremely dense breasts; ultrasound boosts sensitivity but cuts specificity.•MRI improves cancer detection in women with extremely dense breasts, but high costs and limited availability may restrict its use.•Contrast-enhanced mammography matches MRI performance at lower costs, making it a viable option for extremely dense breast screening.
Women with extremely dense breasts account for approximately 10% of the screening population and face an increased lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. At the same time, the sensitivity of mammography, the first-line screening modality, is significantly reduced in this breast density group, owing to the masking effect of the abundant fibroglandular tissue. Consequently, this population has garnered increasing scientific attention due to the unique diagnostic challenge they present. Several research initiatives have attempted to address this diagnostic challenge by incorporating supplemental imaging modalities such as ultrasound, MRI, and contrast-enhanced mammography. Each of these modalities offers different benefits as well as limitations, both clinically and practically, including considerations of availability and costs. The purpose of this article is to critically review the background, latest scientific evidence, and future directions for the use of the various supplemental screening techniques for women with extremely dense breasts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111837 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3132140941</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X24005539</els_id><sourcerecordid>3132140941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1544-850cf0b948c61a27d3486ec1347220d51f05d9e78bad49ac57af4af12c91bf6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlKBDEQhoMoOi5PIEiOXnpMpdOTbsGDDG4geFHwFtJJRTP2ZtLj8vZmHPXoqaD4_lo-Qg6BTYHB7GQxxUXQdsoZF1MAKHO5QSZQSp5JyeUmmTDJWcZE-bhDdmNcMMYKUfFtspNXRUK4mJDm4mMM2GLzSS12EWkdUMcxntJzavp2CPic2v4NacA3j--0d9R3ZgWhpUZ3BgMNPr5Q3Vkal8PQpGndqMMnjQnDzndPtMXxubdxn2w53UQ8-Kl75OHy4n5-nd3eXd3Mz28zA4UQWVkw41hdidLMQHNpc1HO0EAu0s3MFuBYYSuUZa2tqLQppHZCO-CmgtrNXL5Hjtdzh9C_LjGOqvXRYNPoDvtlVDnkHASrBCQ0X6Mm9DEGdGoIvk3XK2BqpVkt1LdmtdKs1ppT6uhnwbJu0f5lfr0m4GwNYHozeQsqGo9JlvUBzahs7_9d8AX88ZDG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3132140941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extremely dense breasts: A comprehensive review of increased cancer risk and supplementary screening methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Nissan, Noam ; Ochoa Albiztegui, Rosa Elena ; Fruchtman-Brot, Hila ; Gluskin, Jill ; Arita, Yuki ; Amir, Tali ; Reiner, Jeffrey S. ; Feigin, Kimberly ; Mango, Victoria L ; Jochelson, Maxine S. ; Sung, Janice S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nissan, Noam ; Ochoa Albiztegui, Rosa Elena ; Fruchtman-Brot, Hila ; Gluskin, Jill ; Arita, Yuki ; Amir, Tali ; Reiner, Jeffrey S. ; Feigin, Kimberly ; Mango, Victoria L ; Jochelson, Maxine S. ; Sung, Janice S.</creatorcontrib><description>•About 10% of women have extremely dense breasts, doubling their breast cancer risk compared to those with non-dense breasts.•Mammography sensitivity drops with density. Tomosynthesis offers no improvement for extremely dense breasts; ultrasound boosts sensitivity but cuts specificity.•MRI improves cancer detection in women with extremely dense breasts, but high costs and limited availability may restrict its use.•Contrast-enhanced mammography matches MRI performance at lower costs, making it a viable option for extremely dense breast screening.
Women with extremely dense breasts account for approximately 10% of the screening population and face an increased lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. At the same time, the sensitivity of mammography, the first-line screening modality, is significantly reduced in this breast density group, owing to the masking effect of the abundant fibroglandular tissue. Consequently, this population has garnered increasing scientific attention due to the unique diagnostic challenge they present. Several research initiatives have attempted to address this diagnostic challenge by incorporating supplemental imaging modalities such as ultrasound, MRI, and contrast-enhanced mammography. Each of these modalities offers different benefits as well as limitations, both clinically and practically, including considerations of availability and costs. The purpose of this article is to critically review the background, latest scientific evidence, and future directions for the use of the various supplemental screening techniques for women with extremely dense breasts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111837</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39577224</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Breast Density ; Breast neoplasm ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Cancer screening ; Contrast-enhanced mammography ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Mammography - methods ; Mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging ; Mass Screening - methods ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2025-01, Vol.182, p.111837, Article 111837</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1544-850cf0b948c61a27d3486ec1347220d51f05d9e78bad49ac57af4af12c91bf6f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111837$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39577224$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nissan, Noam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochoa Albiztegui, Rosa Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fruchtman-Brot, Hila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gluskin, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arita, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amir, Tali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiner, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feigin, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mango, Victoria L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jochelson, Maxine S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Janice S.</creatorcontrib><title>Extremely dense breasts: A comprehensive review of increased cancer risk and supplementary screening methods</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>•About 10% of women have extremely dense breasts, doubling their breast cancer risk compared to those with non-dense breasts.•Mammography sensitivity drops with density. Tomosynthesis offers no improvement for extremely dense breasts; ultrasound boosts sensitivity but cuts specificity.•MRI improves cancer detection in women with extremely dense breasts, but high costs and limited availability may restrict its use.•Contrast-enhanced mammography matches MRI performance at lower costs, making it a viable option for extremely dense breast screening.
Women with extremely dense breasts account for approximately 10% of the screening population and face an increased lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. At the same time, the sensitivity of mammography, the first-line screening modality, is significantly reduced in this breast density group, owing to the masking effect of the abundant fibroglandular tissue. Consequently, this population has garnered increasing scientific attention due to the unique diagnostic challenge they present. Several research initiatives have attempted to address this diagnostic challenge by incorporating supplemental imaging modalities such as ultrasound, MRI, and contrast-enhanced mammography. Each of these modalities offers different benefits as well as limitations, both clinically and practically, including considerations of availability and costs. The purpose of this article is to critically review the background, latest scientific evidence, and future directions for the use of the various supplemental screening techniques for women with extremely dense breasts.</description><subject>Breast Density</subject><subject>Breast neoplasm</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Contrast-enhanced mammography</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>Mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMlKBDEQhoMoOi5PIEiOXnpMpdOTbsGDDG4geFHwFtJJRTP2ZtLj8vZmHPXoqaD4_lo-Qg6BTYHB7GQxxUXQdsoZF1MAKHO5QSZQSp5JyeUmmTDJWcZE-bhDdmNcMMYKUfFtspNXRUK4mJDm4mMM2GLzSS12EWkdUMcxntJzavp2CPic2v4NacA3j--0d9R3ZgWhpUZ3BgMNPr5Q3Vkal8PQpGndqMMnjQnDzndPtMXxubdxn2w53UQ8-Kl75OHy4n5-nd3eXd3Mz28zA4UQWVkw41hdidLMQHNpc1HO0EAu0s3MFuBYYSuUZa2tqLQppHZCO-CmgtrNXL5Hjtdzh9C_LjGOqvXRYNPoDvtlVDnkHASrBCQ0X6Mm9DEGdGoIvk3XK2BqpVkt1LdmtdKs1ppT6uhnwbJu0f5lfr0m4GwNYHozeQsqGo9JlvUBzahs7_9d8AX88ZDG</recordid><startdate>202501</startdate><enddate>202501</enddate><creator>Nissan, Noam</creator><creator>Ochoa Albiztegui, Rosa Elena</creator><creator>Fruchtman-Brot, Hila</creator><creator>Gluskin, Jill</creator><creator>Arita, Yuki</creator><creator>Amir, Tali</creator><creator>Reiner, Jeffrey S.</creator><creator>Feigin, Kimberly</creator><creator>Mango, Victoria L</creator><creator>Jochelson, Maxine S.</creator><creator>Sung, Janice S.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202501</creationdate><title>Extremely dense breasts: A comprehensive review of increased cancer risk and supplementary screening methods</title><author>Nissan, Noam ; Ochoa Albiztegui, Rosa Elena ; Fruchtman-Brot, Hila ; Gluskin, Jill ; Arita, Yuki ; Amir, Tali ; Reiner, Jeffrey S. ; Feigin, Kimberly ; Mango, Victoria L ; Jochelson, Maxine S. ; Sung, Janice S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1544-850cf0b948c61a27d3486ec1347220d51f05d9e78bad49ac57af4af12c91bf6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Breast Density</topic><topic>Breast neoplasm</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Contrast-enhanced mammography</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>Mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nissan, Noam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochoa Albiztegui, Rosa Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fruchtman-Brot, Hila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gluskin, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arita, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amir, Tali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiner, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feigin, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mango, Victoria L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jochelson, Maxine S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Janice S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nissan, Noam</au><au>Ochoa Albiztegui, Rosa Elena</au><au>Fruchtman-Brot, Hila</au><au>Gluskin, Jill</au><au>Arita, Yuki</au><au>Amir, Tali</au><au>Reiner, Jeffrey S.</au><au>Feigin, Kimberly</au><au>Mango, Victoria L</au><au>Jochelson, Maxine S.</au><au>Sung, Janice S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extremely dense breasts: A comprehensive review of increased cancer risk and supplementary screening methods</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2025-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>182</volume><spage>111837</spage><pages>111837-</pages><artnum>111837</artnum><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>•About 10% of women have extremely dense breasts, doubling their breast cancer risk compared to those with non-dense breasts.•Mammography sensitivity drops with density. Tomosynthesis offers no improvement for extremely dense breasts; ultrasound boosts sensitivity but cuts specificity.•MRI improves cancer detection in women with extremely dense breasts, but high costs and limited availability may restrict its use.•Contrast-enhanced mammography matches MRI performance at lower costs, making it a viable option for extremely dense breast screening.
Women with extremely dense breasts account for approximately 10% of the screening population and face an increased lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. At the same time, the sensitivity of mammography, the first-line screening modality, is significantly reduced in this breast density group, owing to the masking effect of the abundant fibroglandular tissue. Consequently, this population has garnered increasing scientific attention due to the unique diagnostic challenge they present. Several research initiatives have attempted to address this diagnostic challenge by incorporating supplemental imaging modalities such as ultrasound, MRI, and contrast-enhanced mammography. Each of these modalities offers different benefits as well as limitations, both clinically and practically, including considerations of availability and costs. The purpose of this article is to critically review the background, latest scientific evidence, and future directions for the use of the various supplemental screening techniques for women with extremely dense breasts.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>39577224</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111837</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0720-048X |
ispartof | European journal of radiology, 2025-01, Vol.182, p.111837, Article 111837 |
issn | 0720-048X 1872-7727 1872-7727 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3132140941 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Breast Density Breast neoplasm Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Cancer screening Contrast-enhanced mammography Early Detection of Cancer - methods Female Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Mammography - methods Mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging Mass Screening - methods Risk Assessment Risk Factors Sensitivity and Specificity Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods |
title | Extremely dense breasts: A comprehensive review of increased cancer risk and supplementary screening methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T19%3A44%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extremely%20dense%20breasts:%20A%20comprehensive%20review%20of%20increased%20cancer%20risk%20and%20supplementary%20screening%20methods&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Nissan,%20Noam&rft.date=2025-01&rft.volume=182&rft.spage=111837&rft.pages=111837-&rft.artnum=111837&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111837&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3132140941%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3132140941&rft_id=info:pmid/39577224&rft_els_id=S0720048X24005539&rfr_iscdi=true |