Machine Learning Algorithms for Neurosurgical Preoperative Planning: A Comprehensive Scoping Review
Preoperative neurosurgical planning is a keen step to avoiding surgical complications, reducing morbidity, and improving patient safety. The incursion of machine learning (ML) in this domain has recently gained attention, given the notable advantages in processing large data sets and potentially gen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World neurosurgery 2024-11 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | World neurosurgery |
container_volume | |
creator | Bocanegra-Becerra, Jhon E Neves Ferreira, Julia Sader Simoni, Gabriel Hong, Anthony Rios-Garcia, Wagner Eraghi, Mohammad Mirahmadi Castilla-Encinas, Adriam M Colan, Jhair Alejandro Rojas-Apaza, Rolando Franco Pariasca Trevejo, Emanuel Eduardo Bertani, Raphael Lopez-Gonzalez, Miguel Angel |
description | Preoperative neurosurgical planning is a keen step to avoiding surgical complications, reducing morbidity, and improving patient safety. The incursion of machine learning (ML) in this domain has recently gained attention, given the notable advantages in processing large data sets and potentially generating efficient and accurate algorithms in patient care. Herein, we evaluated the evolving applications of ML algorithms in the preoperative planning of brain and spine surgery.BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESPreoperative neurosurgical planning is a keen step to avoiding surgical complications, reducing morbidity, and improving patient safety. The incursion of machine learning (ML) in this domain has recently gained attention, given the notable advantages in processing large data sets and potentially generating efficient and accurate algorithms in patient care. Herein, we evaluated the evolving applications of ML algorithms in the preoperative planning of brain and spine surgery.In accordance with the Arksey and O'Malley framework, a scoping review was conducted using three databases (Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science). Articles that described the use of ML for preoperative planning in brain and spine surgery were included. Relevant data were collected regarding the neurosurgical field of application, patient baseline features, disease description, type of ML technology, study's aim, preoperative ML algorithm description, and advantages and limitations of ML algorithms.METHODSIn accordance with the Arksey and O'Malley framework, a scoping review was conducted using three databases (Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science). Articles that described the use of ML for preoperative planning in brain and spine surgery were included. Relevant data were collected regarding the neurosurgical field of application, patient baseline features, disease description, type of ML technology, study's aim, preoperative ML algorithm description, and advantages and limitations of ML algorithms.Our search strategy yielded 7,407 articles, of which 8 studies (5 retrospective, 2 prospective, and 1 experimental study) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Clinical information from 518 patients (62.7% female; mean age: 44.8 years) was used for generating ML algorithms, including convolutional neural network (14.3%), logistic regression (14.3%), random forest (14.3%), and other algorithms. Neurosurgical fields of applications included functional neurosurgery (37.5%), tumor surgery (37.5%), and spine sur |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.11.048 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3132140448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3132140448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p778-d80d95511b20f464d4127f1cfc399c6e54d923cedd657c33ebe9be7b489590213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNjj1PwzAYhC0EElXpH2DyyNLg13Zim62q-JIKVNC9Spw3qas0DnbT_n0SwcAtd9LpHh0ht8ASYJDd75Nzi33CGZcJQMKkviAT0ErPtcrM5b98TWYx7tkgAVIrMSH2Lbc71yJdYR5a19Z00dQ-uOPuEGnlA33HPvjYh9rZvKHrgL7DkB_dCem6ydtx8kAXdOkPXcAdtnFsvqzvRtYnnhyeb8hVlTcRZ38-JZunx83yZb76eH5dLlbzTg3_Ss1Kk6YABWeVzGQpgasKbGWFMTbDVJaGC4tlmaXKCoEFmgJVIbVJDeMgpuTuF9sF_91jPG4PLlpshpfo-7gVIDhIJqUWP_0XXAI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3132140448</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Machine Learning Algorithms for Neurosurgical Preoperative Planning: A Comprehensive Scoping Review</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Bocanegra-Becerra, Jhon E ; Neves Ferreira, Julia Sader ; Simoni, Gabriel ; Hong, Anthony ; Rios-Garcia, Wagner ; Eraghi, Mohammad Mirahmadi ; Castilla-Encinas, Adriam M ; Colan, Jhair Alejandro ; Rojas-Apaza, Rolando ; Franco Pariasca Trevejo, Emanuel Eduardo ; Bertani, Raphael ; Lopez-Gonzalez, Miguel Angel</creator><creatorcontrib>Bocanegra-Becerra, Jhon E ; Neves Ferreira, Julia Sader ; Simoni, Gabriel ; Hong, Anthony ; Rios-Garcia, Wagner ; Eraghi, Mohammad Mirahmadi ; Castilla-Encinas, Adriam M ; Colan, Jhair Alejandro ; Rojas-Apaza, Rolando ; Franco Pariasca Trevejo, Emanuel Eduardo ; Bertani, Raphael ; Lopez-Gonzalez, Miguel Angel</creatorcontrib><description>Preoperative neurosurgical planning is a keen step to avoiding surgical complications, reducing morbidity, and improving patient safety. The incursion of machine learning (ML) in this domain has recently gained attention, given the notable advantages in processing large data sets and potentially generating efficient and accurate algorithms in patient care. Herein, we evaluated the evolving applications of ML algorithms in the preoperative planning of brain and spine surgery.BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESPreoperative neurosurgical planning is a keen step to avoiding surgical complications, reducing morbidity, and improving patient safety. The incursion of machine learning (ML) in this domain has recently gained attention, given the notable advantages in processing large data sets and potentially generating efficient and accurate algorithms in patient care. Herein, we evaluated the evolving applications of ML algorithms in the preoperative planning of brain and spine surgery.In accordance with the Arksey and O'Malley framework, a scoping review was conducted using three databases (Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science). Articles that described the use of ML for preoperative planning in brain and spine surgery were included. Relevant data were collected regarding the neurosurgical field of application, patient baseline features, disease description, type of ML technology, study's aim, preoperative ML algorithm description, and advantages and limitations of ML algorithms.METHODSIn accordance with the Arksey and O'Malley framework, a scoping review was conducted using three databases (Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science). Articles that described the use of ML for preoperative planning in brain and spine surgery were included. Relevant data were collected regarding the neurosurgical field of application, patient baseline features, disease description, type of ML technology, study's aim, preoperative ML algorithm description, and advantages and limitations of ML algorithms.Our search strategy yielded 7,407 articles, of which 8 studies (5 retrospective, 2 prospective, and 1 experimental study) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Clinical information from 518 patients (62.7% female; mean age: 44.8 years) was used for generating ML algorithms, including convolutional neural network (14.3%), logistic regression (14.3%), random forest (14.3%), and other algorithms. Neurosurgical fields of applications included functional neurosurgery (37.5%), tumor surgery (37.5%), and spine surgery (25%). The main advantages of ML included automated processing of clinical and imaging information, selection of an individualized patient surgical approach and data-driven support for treatment decision-making. All studies reported technical limitations, such as long processing time, algorithmic bias, limited generalizability, and the need for database updating and maintenance.RESULTSOur search strategy yielded 7,407 articles, of which 8 studies (5 retrospective, 2 prospective, and 1 experimental study) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Clinical information from 518 patients (62.7% female; mean age: 44.8 years) was used for generating ML algorithms, including convolutional neural network (14.3%), logistic regression (14.3%), random forest (14.3%), and other algorithms. Neurosurgical fields of applications included functional neurosurgery (37.5%), tumor surgery (37.5%), and spine surgery (25%). The main advantages of ML included automated processing of clinical and imaging information, selection of an individualized patient surgical approach and data-driven support for treatment decision-making. All studies reported technical limitations, such as long processing time, algorithmic bias, limited generalizability, and the need for database updating and maintenance.ML algorithms for preoperative neurosurgical planning are being developed for efficient, automated, and safe treatment decision-making. Enhancing the robustness, transparency, and understanding of ML applications will be crucial for their successful integration into neurosurgical practice.CONCLUSIONML algorithms for preoperative neurosurgical planning are being developed for efficient, automated, and safe treatment decision-making. Enhancing the robustness, transparency, and understanding of ML applications will be crucial for their successful integration into neurosurgical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.11.048</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>World neurosurgery, 2024-11</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bocanegra-Becerra, Jhon E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves Ferreira, Julia Sader</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simoni, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rios-Garcia, Wagner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eraghi, Mohammad Mirahmadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castilla-Encinas, Adriam M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colan, Jhair Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rojas-Apaza, Rolando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco Pariasca Trevejo, Emanuel Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertani, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez-Gonzalez, Miguel Angel</creatorcontrib><title>Machine Learning Algorithms for Neurosurgical Preoperative Planning: A Comprehensive Scoping Review</title><title>World neurosurgery</title><description>Preoperative neurosurgical planning is a keen step to avoiding surgical complications, reducing morbidity, and improving patient safety. The incursion of machine learning (ML) in this domain has recently gained attention, given the notable advantages in processing large data sets and potentially generating efficient and accurate algorithms in patient care. Herein, we evaluated the evolving applications of ML algorithms in the preoperative planning of brain and spine surgery.BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESPreoperative neurosurgical planning is a keen step to avoiding surgical complications, reducing morbidity, and improving patient safety. The incursion of machine learning (ML) in this domain has recently gained attention, given the notable advantages in processing large data sets and potentially generating efficient and accurate algorithms in patient care. Herein, we evaluated the evolving applications of ML algorithms in the preoperative planning of brain and spine surgery.In accordance with the Arksey and O'Malley framework, a scoping review was conducted using three databases (Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science). Articles that described the use of ML for preoperative planning in brain and spine surgery were included. Relevant data were collected regarding the neurosurgical field of application, patient baseline features, disease description, type of ML technology, study's aim, preoperative ML algorithm description, and advantages and limitations of ML algorithms.METHODSIn accordance with the Arksey and O'Malley framework, a scoping review was conducted using three databases (Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science). Articles that described the use of ML for preoperative planning in brain and spine surgery were included. Relevant data were collected regarding the neurosurgical field of application, patient baseline features, disease description, type of ML technology, study's aim, preoperative ML algorithm description, and advantages and limitations of ML algorithms.Our search strategy yielded 7,407 articles, of which 8 studies (5 retrospective, 2 prospective, and 1 experimental study) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Clinical information from 518 patients (62.7% female; mean age: 44.8 years) was used for generating ML algorithms, including convolutional neural network (14.3%), logistic regression (14.3%), random forest (14.3%), and other algorithms. Neurosurgical fields of applications included functional neurosurgery (37.5%), tumor surgery (37.5%), and spine surgery (25%). The main advantages of ML included automated processing of clinical and imaging information, selection of an individualized patient surgical approach and data-driven support for treatment decision-making. All studies reported technical limitations, such as long processing time, algorithmic bias, limited generalizability, and the need for database updating and maintenance.RESULTSOur search strategy yielded 7,407 articles, of which 8 studies (5 retrospective, 2 prospective, and 1 experimental study) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Clinical information from 518 patients (62.7% female; mean age: 44.8 years) was used for generating ML algorithms, including convolutional neural network (14.3%), logistic regression (14.3%), random forest (14.3%), and other algorithms. Neurosurgical fields of applications included functional neurosurgery (37.5%), tumor surgery (37.5%), and spine surgery (25%). The main advantages of ML included automated processing of clinical and imaging information, selection of an individualized patient surgical approach and data-driven support for treatment decision-making. All studies reported technical limitations, such as long processing time, algorithmic bias, limited generalizability, and the need for database updating and maintenance.ML algorithms for preoperative neurosurgical planning are being developed for efficient, automated, and safe treatment decision-making. Enhancing the robustness, transparency, and understanding of ML applications will be crucial for their successful integration into neurosurgical practice.CONCLUSIONML algorithms for preoperative neurosurgical planning are being developed for efficient, automated, and safe treatment decision-making. Enhancing the robustness, transparency, and understanding of ML applications will be crucial for their successful integration into neurosurgical practice.</description><issn>1878-8769</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNjj1PwzAYhC0EElXpH2DyyNLg13Zim62q-JIKVNC9Spw3qas0DnbT_n0SwcAtd9LpHh0ht8ASYJDd75Nzi33CGZcJQMKkviAT0ErPtcrM5b98TWYx7tkgAVIrMSH2Lbc71yJdYR5a19Z00dQ-uOPuEGnlA33HPvjYh9rZvKHrgL7DkB_dCem6ydtx8kAXdOkPXcAdtnFsvqzvRtYnnhyeb8hVlTcRZ38-JZunx83yZb76eH5dLlbzTg3_Ss1Kk6YABWeVzGQpgasKbGWFMTbDVJaGC4tlmaXKCoEFmgJVIbVJDeMgpuTuF9sF_91jPG4PLlpshpfo-7gVIDhIJqUWP_0XXAI</recordid><startdate>20241120</startdate><enddate>20241120</enddate><creator>Bocanegra-Becerra, Jhon E</creator><creator>Neves Ferreira, Julia Sader</creator><creator>Simoni, Gabriel</creator><creator>Hong, Anthony</creator><creator>Rios-Garcia, Wagner</creator><creator>Eraghi, Mohammad Mirahmadi</creator><creator>Castilla-Encinas, Adriam M</creator><creator>Colan, Jhair Alejandro</creator><creator>Rojas-Apaza, Rolando</creator><creator>Franco Pariasca Trevejo, Emanuel Eduardo</creator><creator>Bertani, Raphael</creator><creator>Lopez-Gonzalez, Miguel Angel</creator><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241120</creationdate><title>Machine Learning Algorithms for Neurosurgical Preoperative Planning: A Comprehensive Scoping Review</title><author>Bocanegra-Becerra, Jhon E ; Neves Ferreira, Julia Sader ; Simoni, Gabriel ; Hong, Anthony ; Rios-Garcia, Wagner ; Eraghi, Mohammad Mirahmadi ; Castilla-Encinas, Adriam M ; Colan, Jhair Alejandro ; Rojas-Apaza, Rolando ; Franco Pariasca Trevejo, Emanuel Eduardo ; Bertani, Raphael ; Lopez-Gonzalez, Miguel Angel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p778-d80d95511b20f464d4127f1cfc399c6e54d923cedd657c33ebe9be7b489590213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bocanegra-Becerra, Jhon E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves Ferreira, Julia Sader</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simoni, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rios-Garcia, Wagner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eraghi, Mohammad Mirahmadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castilla-Encinas, Adriam M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colan, Jhair Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rojas-Apaza, Rolando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco Pariasca Trevejo, Emanuel Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertani, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez-Gonzalez, Miguel Angel</creatorcontrib><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bocanegra-Becerra, Jhon E</au><au>Neves Ferreira, Julia Sader</au><au>Simoni, Gabriel</au><au>Hong, Anthony</au><au>Rios-Garcia, Wagner</au><au>Eraghi, Mohammad Mirahmadi</au><au>Castilla-Encinas, Adriam M</au><au>Colan, Jhair Alejandro</au><au>Rojas-Apaza, Rolando</au><au>Franco Pariasca Trevejo, Emanuel Eduardo</au><au>Bertani, Raphael</au><au>Lopez-Gonzalez, Miguel Angel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Machine Learning Algorithms for Neurosurgical Preoperative Planning: A Comprehensive Scoping Review</atitle><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle><date>2024-11-20</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>1878-8769</issn><eissn>1878-8769</eissn><abstract>Preoperative neurosurgical planning is a keen step to avoiding surgical complications, reducing morbidity, and improving patient safety. The incursion of machine learning (ML) in this domain has recently gained attention, given the notable advantages in processing large data sets and potentially generating efficient and accurate algorithms in patient care. Herein, we evaluated the evolving applications of ML algorithms in the preoperative planning of brain and spine surgery.BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESPreoperative neurosurgical planning is a keen step to avoiding surgical complications, reducing morbidity, and improving patient safety. The incursion of machine learning (ML) in this domain has recently gained attention, given the notable advantages in processing large data sets and potentially generating efficient and accurate algorithms in patient care. Herein, we evaluated the evolving applications of ML algorithms in the preoperative planning of brain and spine surgery.In accordance with the Arksey and O'Malley framework, a scoping review was conducted using three databases (Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science). Articles that described the use of ML for preoperative planning in brain and spine surgery were included. Relevant data were collected regarding the neurosurgical field of application, patient baseline features, disease description, type of ML technology, study's aim, preoperative ML algorithm description, and advantages and limitations of ML algorithms.METHODSIn accordance with the Arksey and O'Malley framework, a scoping review was conducted using three databases (Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science). Articles that described the use of ML for preoperative planning in brain and spine surgery were included. Relevant data were collected regarding the neurosurgical field of application, patient baseline features, disease description, type of ML technology, study's aim, preoperative ML algorithm description, and advantages and limitations of ML algorithms.Our search strategy yielded 7,407 articles, of which 8 studies (5 retrospective, 2 prospective, and 1 experimental study) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Clinical information from 518 patients (62.7% female; mean age: 44.8 years) was used for generating ML algorithms, including convolutional neural network (14.3%), logistic regression (14.3%), random forest (14.3%), and other algorithms. Neurosurgical fields of applications included functional neurosurgery (37.5%), tumor surgery (37.5%), and spine surgery (25%). The main advantages of ML included automated processing of clinical and imaging information, selection of an individualized patient surgical approach and data-driven support for treatment decision-making. All studies reported technical limitations, such as long processing time, algorithmic bias, limited generalizability, and the need for database updating and maintenance.RESULTSOur search strategy yielded 7,407 articles, of which 8 studies (5 retrospective, 2 prospective, and 1 experimental study) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Clinical information from 518 patients (62.7% female; mean age: 44.8 years) was used for generating ML algorithms, including convolutional neural network (14.3%), logistic regression (14.3%), random forest (14.3%), and other algorithms. Neurosurgical fields of applications included functional neurosurgery (37.5%), tumor surgery (37.5%), and spine surgery (25%). The main advantages of ML included automated processing of clinical and imaging information, selection of an individualized patient surgical approach and data-driven support for treatment decision-making. All studies reported technical limitations, such as long processing time, algorithmic bias, limited generalizability, and the need for database updating and maintenance.ML algorithms for preoperative neurosurgical planning are being developed for efficient, automated, and safe treatment decision-making. Enhancing the robustness, transparency, and understanding of ML applications will be crucial for their successful integration into neurosurgical practice.CONCLUSIONML algorithms for preoperative neurosurgical planning are being developed for efficient, automated, and safe treatment decision-making. Enhancing the robustness, transparency, and understanding of ML applications will be crucial for their successful integration into neurosurgical practice.</abstract><doi>10.1016/j.wneu.2024.11.048</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1878-8769 |
ispartof | World neurosurgery, 2024-11 |
issn | 1878-8769 1878-8769 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3132140448 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
title | Machine Learning Algorithms for Neurosurgical Preoperative Planning: A Comprehensive Scoping Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T03%3A37%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Machine%20Learning%20Algorithms%20for%20Neurosurgical%20Preoperative%20Planning:%20A%20Comprehensive%20Scoping%20Review&rft.jtitle=World%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Bocanegra-Becerra,%20Jhon%20E&rft.date=2024-11-20&rft.issn=1878-8769&rft.eissn=1878-8769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.11.048&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3132140448%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3132140448&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |