Clinical outcomes of endovascular interventions for cerebral venous thrombosis in Japan: a nationwide retrospective study
IntroductionCerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare but serious disease. Despite anticoagulation being the cornerstone therapy, some patients experience worsening disease, necessitating alternative treatment. Endovascular treatment is an anticipated option with an uncertain clinical relevance. Th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Stroke and vascular neurology 2024-11, p.svn-2024-003639 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | svn-2024-003639 |
container_title | Stroke and vascular neurology |
container_volume | |
creator | Senda, Atsushi Suginaka, Hiroshi Morishita, Koji Fushimi, Kiyohide |
description | IntroductionCerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare but serious disease. Despite anticoagulation being the cornerstone therapy, some patients experience worsening disease, necessitating alternative treatment. Endovascular treatment is an anticipated option with an uncertain clinical relevance. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effects and efficacy of endovascular therapy and identify patient populations that may benefit from treatment.Patients and methodsThis retrospective study examined patient data from April 2014 to March 2022 that were extracted from a nationwide Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores and post-hospitalisation complications of cerebral infarction and intracranial haemorrhage. Severity was adjusted using a generalised linear mixed model, and propensity-score matching was employed to compare outcomes between treatment groups.ResultsThe study included 2901 patients; 240 patients in the endovascular treatment group were matched with 240 patients in the standard treatment group. After adjusting for background factors, endovascular treatment did not improve in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 1.45; 95% CI 0.74 to 2.16) or the mRS score (adjusted OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.23). No subpopulations that could benefit from endovascular treatment were identified. Post-hospitalisation cerebral infarction and intracranial haemorrhage did not increase with endovascular treatment (0.8% in the endovascular treatment group vs 1.2% in the standard treatment group).ConclusionEndovascular treatment showed no significant benefit for patients with CVT, indicating that treatment guidelines need to be refined. Our findings can guide clinical decisions and suggest the necessity of further research on potential benefits in specific subpopulations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/svn-2024-003639 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3131851338</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_fb287b8fecb4498392b707044ec52b24</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3131851338</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b283t-82b920cdccbb51407ad739cad79abd791ce40bb008b1a4f3bc07ee905929860b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2PFCEQxTtG427WPXszHE1MuwV0N-DNTPxYs4kXPROgq5VJN4xAj5n_XsZe5-alIJXfe5Wq1zQvKbyllA93-RhaBqxrAfjA1ZPmmkGvWjmo4enlL-VVc5vzHgCoFEKBet5ccdULRgVcN6fd7IN3ZiZxLS4umEmcCIYxHk1262wS8aFgOmIoPoZMppiIw4Q2VU3txjWT8jPFxcbsc4XJF3Mw4R0xJJiz5LcfkSQsKeYDuuKPSHJZx9OL5tlk5oy3j-9N8_3jh2-7z-3D10_3u_cPrWWSl1Yyqxi40Tlre9qBMKPgytWqjK2FOuzAWgBpqekmbh0IRFWXZ0oOYPlNc7_5jtHs9SH5xaSTjsbrv42YfmiTincz6qmOFFZO6GzXKckVswIEdB26nlnWVa_Xm9chxV8r5qIXnx3OswlYD6E55VT2lHNZ0bsNdXXxnHC6jKagz_HpGp8-x6e3-Kri1aP5ahccL_y_sCrwZgPsstf7uKZQ7_Zfuz8M1qYd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3131851338</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical outcomes of endovascular interventions for cerebral venous thrombosis in Japan: a nationwide retrospective study</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><source>DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Senda, Atsushi ; Suginaka, Hiroshi ; Morishita, Koji ; Fushimi, Kiyohide</creator><creatorcontrib>Senda, Atsushi ; Suginaka, Hiroshi ; Morishita, Koji ; Fushimi, Kiyohide</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionCerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare but serious disease. Despite anticoagulation being the cornerstone therapy, some patients experience worsening disease, necessitating alternative treatment. Endovascular treatment is an anticipated option with an uncertain clinical relevance. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effects and efficacy of endovascular therapy and identify patient populations that may benefit from treatment.Patients and methodsThis retrospective study examined patient data from April 2014 to March 2022 that were extracted from a nationwide Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores and post-hospitalisation complications of cerebral infarction and intracranial haemorrhage. Severity was adjusted using a generalised linear mixed model, and propensity-score matching was employed to compare outcomes between treatment groups.ResultsThe study included 2901 patients; 240 patients in the endovascular treatment group were matched with 240 patients in the standard treatment group. After adjusting for background factors, endovascular treatment did not improve in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 1.45; 95% CI 0.74 to 2.16) or the mRS score (adjusted OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.23). No subpopulations that could benefit from endovascular treatment were identified. Post-hospitalisation cerebral infarction and intracranial haemorrhage did not increase with endovascular treatment (0.8% in the endovascular treatment group vs 1.2% in the standard treatment group).ConclusionEndovascular treatment showed no significant benefit for patients with CVT, indicating that treatment guidelines need to be refined. Our findings can guide clinical decisions and suggest the necessity of further research on potential benefits in specific subpopulations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2059-8688</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2059-8696</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2059-8696</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/svn-2024-003639</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39572170</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Intervention ; Original research ; Stroke ; Thrombectomy ; Thromboembolism ; Thrombolytic Therapy</subject><ispartof>Stroke and vascular neurology, 2024-11, p.svn-2024-003639</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b283t-82b920cdccbb51407ad739cad79abd791ce40bb008b1a4f3bc07ee905929860b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0128-6800</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://svn.bmj.com/content/early/2024/11/20/svn-2024-003639.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://svn.bmj.com/content/early/2024/11/20/svn-2024-003639.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27923,27924,55349,77431,77457</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39572170$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Senda, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suginaka, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morishita, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fushimi, Kiyohide</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical outcomes of endovascular interventions for cerebral venous thrombosis in Japan: a nationwide retrospective study</title><title>Stroke and vascular neurology</title><addtitle>Stroke Vasc Neurol</addtitle><addtitle>Stroke Vasc Neurol</addtitle><description>IntroductionCerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare but serious disease. Despite anticoagulation being the cornerstone therapy, some patients experience worsening disease, necessitating alternative treatment. Endovascular treatment is an anticipated option with an uncertain clinical relevance. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effects and efficacy of endovascular therapy and identify patient populations that may benefit from treatment.Patients and methodsThis retrospective study examined patient data from April 2014 to March 2022 that were extracted from a nationwide Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores and post-hospitalisation complications of cerebral infarction and intracranial haemorrhage. Severity was adjusted using a generalised linear mixed model, and propensity-score matching was employed to compare outcomes between treatment groups.ResultsThe study included 2901 patients; 240 patients in the endovascular treatment group were matched with 240 patients in the standard treatment group. After adjusting for background factors, endovascular treatment did not improve in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 1.45; 95% CI 0.74 to 2.16) or the mRS score (adjusted OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.23). No subpopulations that could benefit from endovascular treatment were identified. Post-hospitalisation cerebral infarction and intracranial haemorrhage did not increase with endovascular treatment (0.8% in the endovascular treatment group vs 1.2% in the standard treatment group).ConclusionEndovascular treatment showed no significant benefit for patients with CVT, indicating that treatment guidelines need to be refined. Our findings can guide clinical decisions and suggest the necessity of further research on potential benefits in specific subpopulations.</description><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Original research</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Thrombectomy</subject><subject>Thromboembolism</subject><subject>Thrombolytic Therapy</subject><issn>2059-8688</issn><issn>2059-8696</issn><issn>2059-8696</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc2PFCEQxTtG427WPXszHE1MuwV0N-DNTPxYs4kXPROgq5VJN4xAj5n_XsZe5-alIJXfe5Wq1zQvKbyllA93-RhaBqxrAfjA1ZPmmkGvWjmo4enlL-VVc5vzHgCoFEKBet5ccdULRgVcN6fd7IN3ZiZxLS4umEmcCIYxHk1262wS8aFgOmIoPoZMppiIw4Q2VU3txjWT8jPFxcbsc4XJF3Mw4R0xJJiz5LcfkSQsKeYDuuKPSHJZx9OL5tlk5oy3j-9N8_3jh2-7z-3D10_3u_cPrWWSl1Yyqxi40Tlre9qBMKPgytWqjK2FOuzAWgBpqekmbh0IRFWXZ0oOYPlNc7_5jtHs9SH5xaSTjsbrv42YfmiTincz6qmOFFZO6GzXKckVswIEdB26nlnWVa_Xm9chxV8r5qIXnx3OswlYD6E55VT2lHNZ0bsNdXXxnHC6jKagz_HpGp8-x6e3-Kri1aP5ahccL_y_sCrwZgPsstf7uKZQ7_Zfuz8M1qYd</recordid><startdate>20241120</startdate><enddate>20241120</enddate><creator>Senda, Atsushi</creator><creator>Suginaka, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Morishita, Koji</creator><creator>Fushimi, Kiyohide</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0128-6800</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241120</creationdate><title>Clinical outcomes of endovascular interventions for cerebral venous thrombosis in Japan: a nationwide retrospective study</title><author>Senda, Atsushi ; Suginaka, Hiroshi ; Morishita, Koji ; Fushimi, Kiyohide</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b283t-82b920cdccbb51407ad739cad79abd791ce40bb008b1a4f3bc07ee905929860b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Original research</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Thrombectomy</topic><topic>Thromboembolism</topic><topic>Thrombolytic Therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Senda, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suginaka, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morishita, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fushimi, Kiyohide</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Stroke and vascular neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Senda, Atsushi</au><au>Suginaka, Hiroshi</au><au>Morishita, Koji</au><au>Fushimi, Kiyohide</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical outcomes of endovascular interventions for cerebral venous thrombosis in Japan: a nationwide retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>Stroke and vascular neurology</jtitle><stitle>Stroke Vasc Neurol</stitle><addtitle>Stroke Vasc Neurol</addtitle><date>2024-11-20</date><risdate>2024</risdate><spage>svn-2024-003639</spage><pages>svn-2024-003639-</pages><issn>2059-8688</issn><issn>2059-8696</issn><eissn>2059-8696</eissn><abstract>IntroductionCerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare but serious disease. Despite anticoagulation being the cornerstone therapy, some patients experience worsening disease, necessitating alternative treatment. Endovascular treatment is an anticipated option with an uncertain clinical relevance. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effects and efficacy of endovascular therapy and identify patient populations that may benefit from treatment.Patients and methodsThis retrospective study examined patient data from April 2014 to March 2022 that were extracted from a nationwide Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores and post-hospitalisation complications of cerebral infarction and intracranial haemorrhage. Severity was adjusted using a generalised linear mixed model, and propensity-score matching was employed to compare outcomes between treatment groups.ResultsThe study included 2901 patients; 240 patients in the endovascular treatment group were matched with 240 patients in the standard treatment group. After adjusting for background factors, endovascular treatment did not improve in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 1.45; 95% CI 0.74 to 2.16) or the mRS score (adjusted OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.23). No subpopulations that could benefit from endovascular treatment were identified. Post-hospitalisation cerebral infarction and intracranial haemorrhage did not increase with endovascular treatment (0.8% in the endovascular treatment group vs 1.2% in the standard treatment group).ConclusionEndovascular treatment showed no significant benefit for patients with CVT, indicating that treatment guidelines need to be refined. Our findings can guide clinical decisions and suggest the necessity of further research on potential benefits in specific subpopulations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>39572170</pmid><doi>10.1136/svn-2024-003639</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0128-6800</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2059-8688 |
ispartof | Stroke and vascular neurology, 2024-11, p.svn-2024-003639 |
issn | 2059-8688 2059-8696 2059-8696 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3131851338 |
source | BMJ Open Access Journals; Open Access: PubMed Central; Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ); DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals |
subjects | Intervention Original research Stroke Thrombectomy Thromboembolism Thrombolytic Therapy |
title | Clinical outcomes of endovascular interventions for cerebral venous thrombosis in Japan: a nationwide retrospective study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T15%3A04%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20outcomes%20of%20endovascular%20interventions%20for%20cerebral%20venous%20thrombosis%20in%20Japan:%20a%20nationwide%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Stroke%20and%20vascular%20neurology&rft.au=Senda,%20Atsushi&rft.date=2024-11-20&rft.spage=svn-2024-003639&rft.pages=svn-2024-003639-&rft.issn=2059-8688&rft.eissn=2059-8696&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/svn-2024-003639&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3131851338%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3131851338&rft_id=info:pmid/39572170&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_fb287b8fecb4498392b707044ec52b24&rfr_iscdi=true |