Extracorporeal shock wave therapy shows comparative results with other modalities for the management of plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Plantar fasciitis (PF) is one of the most common causes of heel pain. With its treatment being mainly conservative, a lot of controversy surrounds the choice of the best conservative management for this entity. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of extracorporeal shoc...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Foot and ankle surgery 2024-11 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | Foot and ankle surgery |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Tung, Wei Shao Daher, Mohammad Covarrubias, Oscar Herber, Agustin Gianakos, Arianna L. |
| description | Plantar fasciitis (PF) is one of the most common causes of heel pain. With its treatment being mainly conservative, a lot of controversy surrounds the choice of the best conservative management for this entity. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) to other conservative treatment options for the management of plantar fasciitis PF.
PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (Pages 1–20) were searched systematically for randomized control trials (RCTs) published after 2013 comparing ESWT to other treatment modalities. ESWT was compared against six other treatment modalities and a placebo.
Fifteen studies involving 1123 patients were included in the meta-analysis. ESWT was found to perform significantly better than placebo (SMD: 7.53, CI: [5.84, 9.22]; p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fas.2024.11.005 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3131851048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S126877312400239X</els_id><sourcerecordid>3131851048</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1508-be413b20dd60d899a6b0b5e73b0ece42b60ca059f2b59a91d7247d8a991164d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwAGyQl2wSxvk3rKqq_EiV2MDamtgTri9JHDy-vb1vw6Pi6BaWrDzyfOdoZk6WvZZQSJDtu30xIhcllHUhZQHQPMkuZd1Crpq-fprqsu3zrqvkRfaCeQ8AnYLqeXZRqaYry66_zH7fPsSAxofVB8JJ8M6bn-KI9yTijgKup-3ryML4ecWA0aVOID5MkcXRxZ3wGydmb3Fy0RGL0YdNK2Zc8AfNtEThR7FOuEQMIk1sXAL5vbgWfOJIczI1yfPe0VHgYsVMEfMknk7s-GX2bMSJ6dXje5V9_3j77eZzfvf105eb67vcyAb6fKBaVkMJ1rZge6WwHWBoqKsGIEN1ObRgEBo1lkOjUEnblXVne1RKyra2dXWVvT37rsH_OhBHPTs2NKWxyR9YV7KSfSOh7hMqz6gJnjnQqNfgZgwnLUFvwei9TmvqLRgtpU7BJM2bR_vDMJP9p_ibRAI-nAFKS6ZTBJ3uRIsh6wKZqK13_7H_A5unolA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3131851048</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extracorporeal shock wave therapy shows comparative results with other modalities for the management of plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Tung, Wei Shao ; Daher, Mohammad ; Covarrubias, Oscar ; Herber, Agustin ; Gianakos, Arianna L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tung, Wei Shao ; Daher, Mohammad ; Covarrubias, Oscar ; Herber, Agustin ; Gianakos, Arianna L.</creatorcontrib><description>Plantar fasciitis (PF) is one of the most common causes of heel pain. With its treatment being mainly conservative, a lot of controversy surrounds the choice of the best conservative management for this entity. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) to other conservative treatment options for the management of plantar fasciitis PF.
PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (Pages 1–20) were searched systematically for randomized control trials (RCTs) published after 2013 comparing ESWT to other treatment modalities. ESWT was compared against six other treatment modalities and a placebo.
Fifteen studies involving 1123 patients were included in the meta-analysis. ESWT was found to perform significantly better than placebo (SMD: 7.53, CI: [5.84, 9.22]; p < 0.00001) for VAS pain score, and CSI for FFI (SMD: 1.07, CI: [0.08, 2.07], p = 0.03). PRP outperformed ESWT for post-intervention VAS scores (SMD: −1.05; CI: [−1.53, −0.57]; p < 0.0001) and FFI (SMD: −0.84; CI: [−1.38, −0.30]; p = 0.002), while custom orthotics improved FFI significantly over ESWT (SMD: −0.74; CI: [−1.19, −0.28; p = 0.001]. No other significant differences were found between ESWT and other treatment modalities for the three metrics included in this study.
ESWT has been proven to be a successful treatment for PF. However, PRP showed a statistically and clinically significant greater improvement in pain and FFI than ESWT. However, compared to ESWT, PRP is still a more technically challenging procedure.
Level 1 Meta-Analysis</description><identifier>ISSN: 1268-7731</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1460-9584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-9584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2024.11.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39572278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Corticosteroid injections ; Custom orthotics ; Extracorporeal shock wave therapy ; Pain ; Plantar fasciitis ; Platelet-rich plasma</subject><ispartof>Foot and ankle surgery, 2024-11</ispartof><rights>2024 European Foot and Ankle Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1508-be413b20dd60d899a6b0b5e73b0ece42b60ca059f2b59a91d7247d8a991164d43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6382-0944 ; 0000-0002-5525-3027 ; 0000-0002-9256-9952 ; 0000-0001-6294-3053</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2024.11.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39572278$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tung, Wei Shao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daher, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Covarrubias, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herber, Agustin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianakos, Arianna L.</creatorcontrib><title>Extracorporeal shock wave therapy shows comparative results with other modalities for the management of plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Foot and ankle surgery</title><addtitle>Foot Ankle Surg</addtitle><description>Plantar fasciitis (PF) is one of the most common causes of heel pain. With its treatment being mainly conservative, a lot of controversy surrounds the choice of the best conservative management for this entity. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) to other conservative treatment options for the management of plantar fasciitis PF.
PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (Pages 1–20) were searched systematically for randomized control trials (RCTs) published after 2013 comparing ESWT to other treatment modalities. ESWT was compared against six other treatment modalities and a placebo.
Fifteen studies involving 1123 patients were included in the meta-analysis. ESWT was found to perform significantly better than placebo (SMD: 7.53, CI: [5.84, 9.22]; p < 0.00001) for VAS pain score, and CSI for FFI (SMD: 1.07, CI: [0.08, 2.07], p = 0.03). PRP outperformed ESWT for post-intervention VAS scores (SMD: −1.05; CI: [−1.53, −0.57]; p < 0.0001) and FFI (SMD: −0.84; CI: [−1.38, −0.30]; p = 0.002), while custom orthotics improved FFI significantly over ESWT (SMD: −0.74; CI: [−1.19, −0.28; p = 0.001]. No other significant differences were found between ESWT and other treatment modalities for the three metrics included in this study.
ESWT has been proven to be a successful treatment for PF. However, PRP showed a statistically and clinically significant greater improvement in pain and FFI than ESWT. However, compared to ESWT, PRP is still a more technically challenging procedure.
Level 1 Meta-Analysis</description><subject>Corticosteroid injections</subject><subject>Custom orthotics</subject><subject>Extracorporeal shock wave therapy</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Plantar fasciitis</subject><subject>Platelet-rich plasma</subject><issn>1268-7731</issn><issn>1460-9584</issn><issn>1460-9584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwAGyQl2wSxvk3rKqq_EiV2MDamtgTri9JHDy-vb1vw6Pi6BaWrDzyfOdoZk6WvZZQSJDtu30xIhcllHUhZQHQPMkuZd1Crpq-fprqsu3zrqvkRfaCeQ8AnYLqeXZRqaYry66_zH7fPsSAxofVB8JJ8M6bn-KI9yTijgKup-3ryML4ecWA0aVOID5MkcXRxZ3wGydmb3Fy0RGL0YdNK2Zc8AfNtEThR7FOuEQMIk1sXAL5vbgWfOJIczI1yfPe0VHgYsVMEfMknk7s-GX2bMSJ6dXje5V9_3j77eZzfvf105eb67vcyAb6fKBaVkMJ1rZge6WwHWBoqKsGIEN1ObRgEBo1lkOjUEnblXVne1RKyra2dXWVvT37rsH_OhBHPTs2NKWxyR9YV7KSfSOh7hMqz6gJnjnQqNfgZgwnLUFvwei9TmvqLRgtpU7BJM2bR_vDMJP9p_ibRAI-nAFKS6ZTBJ3uRIsh6wKZqK13_7H_A5unolA</recordid><startdate>20241119</startdate><enddate>20241119</enddate><creator>Tung, Wei Shao</creator><creator>Daher, Mohammad</creator><creator>Covarrubias, Oscar</creator><creator>Herber, Agustin</creator><creator>Gianakos, Arianna L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6382-0944</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5525-3027</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9256-9952</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6294-3053</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241119</creationdate><title>Extracorporeal shock wave therapy shows comparative results with other modalities for the management of plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Tung, Wei Shao ; Daher, Mohammad ; Covarrubias, Oscar ; Herber, Agustin ; Gianakos, Arianna L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1508-be413b20dd60d899a6b0b5e73b0ece42b60ca059f2b59a91d7247d8a991164d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Corticosteroid injections</topic><topic>Custom orthotics</topic><topic>Extracorporeal shock wave therapy</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Plantar fasciitis</topic><topic>Platelet-rich plasma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tung, Wei Shao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daher, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Covarrubias, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herber, Agustin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianakos, Arianna L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Foot and ankle surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tung, Wei Shao</au><au>Daher, Mohammad</au><au>Covarrubias, Oscar</au><au>Herber, Agustin</au><au>Gianakos, Arianna L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extracorporeal shock wave therapy shows comparative results with other modalities for the management of plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Foot and ankle surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Foot Ankle Surg</addtitle><date>2024-11-19</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>1268-7731</issn><issn>1460-9584</issn><eissn>1460-9584</eissn><abstract>Plantar fasciitis (PF) is one of the most common causes of heel pain. With its treatment being mainly conservative, a lot of controversy surrounds the choice of the best conservative management for this entity. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) to other conservative treatment options for the management of plantar fasciitis PF.
PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (Pages 1–20) were searched systematically for randomized control trials (RCTs) published after 2013 comparing ESWT to other treatment modalities. ESWT was compared against six other treatment modalities and a placebo.
Fifteen studies involving 1123 patients were included in the meta-analysis. ESWT was found to perform significantly better than placebo (SMD: 7.53, CI: [5.84, 9.22]; p < 0.00001) for VAS pain score, and CSI for FFI (SMD: 1.07, CI: [0.08, 2.07], p = 0.03). PRP outperformed ESWT for post-intervention VAS scores (SMD: −1.05; CI: [−1.53, −0.57]; p < 0.0001) and FFI (SMD: −0.84; CI: [−1.38, −0.30]; p = 0.002), while custom orthotics improved FFI significantly over ESWT (SMD: −0.74; CI: [−1.19, −0.28; p = 0.001]. No other significant differences were found between ESWT and other treatment modalities for the three metrics included in this study.
ESWT has been proven to be a successful treatment for PF. However, PRP showed a statistically and clinically significant greater improvement in pain and FFI than ESWT. However, compared to ESWT, PRP is still a more technically challenging procedure.
Level 1 Meta-Analysis</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39572278</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fas.2024.11.005</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6382-0944</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5525-3027</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9256-9952</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6294-3053</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1268-7731 |
| ispartof | Foot and ankle surgery, 2024-11 |
| issn | 1268-7731 1460-9584 1460-9584 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3131851048 |
| source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Corticosteroid injections Custom orthotics Extracorporeal shock wave therapy Pain Plantar fasciitis Platelet-rich plasma |
| title | Extracorporeal shock wave therapy shows comparative results with other modalities for the management of plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T16%3A11%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extracorporeal%20shock%20wave%20therapy%20shows%20comparative%20results%20with%20other%20modalities%20for%20the%20management%20of%20plantar%20fasciitis:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Foot%20and%20ankle%20surgery&rft.au=Tung,%20Wei%20Shao&rft.date=2024-11-19&rft.issn=1268-7731&rft.eissn=1460-9584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fas.2024.11.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3131851048%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3131851048&rft_id=info:pmid/39572278&rft_els_id=S126877312400239X&rfr_iscdi=true |