Acceptable number of cholangioscopy-guided biopsies for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma can be challenging. Previous studies suggest that the sensitivity of taking three cholangioscopy-guided biopsies is approximately 70%. We hypothesized that obtaining four or more biopsies might improve the sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista española de enfermedades digestivas 2024-11
Hauptverfasser: Alonso Lárraga, Juan Octavio, Jiménez-Gutiérrez, José Miguel, Meneses-Mayo, Marcos, Hernández-Guerrero, Angélica, Serrano-Arévalo, Mónica Lizzette, Villegas-González, Lidia Faridi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Revista española de enfermedades digestivas
container_volume
creator Alonso Lárraga, Juan Octavio
Jiménez-Gutiérrez, José Miguel
Meneses-Mayo, Marcos
Hernández-Guerrero, Angélica
Serrano-Arévalo, Mónica Lizzette
Villegas-González, Lidia Faridi
description Diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma can be challenging. Previous studies suggest that the sensitivity of taking three cholangioscopy-guided biopsies is approximately 70%. We hypothesized that obtaining four or more biopsies might improve the sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. To determine the acceptable number of cholangioscopy-guided biopsies to improve sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. This retrospective study analyzed clinical records of adults with perihilar stenosis who underwent cholangioscopy-guided biopsies. Patients with gallbladder cancer or metastatic bile duct obstruction were excluded. Data were grouped based on the number of biopsies taken: Group A (1 to 3 biopsies), Group B (4 to 6 biopsies), and Group C (7 to 10 biopsies). Results from each group were compared against a composite standard, including clinical follow-up and/or biopsies performed by alternative methods. The group that underwent 4 to 6 biopsies had a sensitivity of 77.4%, while the group with 7 to 10 had a sensitivity of 70.8%. The group with 1 to 3 biopsies had a sensitivity of 34.5%. Statistically significant differences were observed between the groups, with comparisons showing improved sensitivity in the 4 to 6 biopsy group versus the 1 to 3 biopsy group (χ² = 14.42, P = 0.0001), and the 7 to 10 biopsy group versus the 1 to 3 biopsy group (χ² = 6.56, P = 0.010). Performing 4 to 6 cholangioscopy-guided biopsies significantly improves sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma compared to 1 to 3 biopsies. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.
doi_str_mv 10.17235/reed.2024.10719/2024
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3130211502</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3130211502</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1024-1caae3abd6d98c30c3fb7117ee0ad6e1294036816ec52727b1f39a2794d1ad683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtPwzAQhH0A0VL4CaAcuaR47SROjlXFS6rEBc6WH5vUKImD3Rz670lf4rQj7czu6CPkAegSBOP5c0C0S0ZZtgQqoHo-yCsyB-A0pUDLGbmN8YfSjBc5uyEzXuV5VRbZnMiVMTjslG4x6cdOY0h8nZitb1XfOB-NH_ZpMzqLNtHOD9FhTGofEutU0_vo-iYZMLita1X4zxkVjOt9p-7Ida3aiPfnuSDfry9f6_d08_n2sV5tUgNT1xSMUsiVtoWtSsOp4bUWAAKRKlsgsCqjvCihQJMzwYSGmleKiSqzMBlKviBPp7tD8L8jxp3sXDTYTnXQj1HyCQUDyCmbrPnJaoKPMWAth-A6FfYSqDzylAee8gBRHnke5ZR7PL8YdTftL6kLTP4HOO51sg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3130211502</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acceptable number of cholangioscopy-guided biopsies for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Alonso Lárraga, Juan Octavio ; Jiménez-Gutiérrez, José Miguel ; Meneses-Mayo, Marcos ; Hernández-Guerrero, Angélica ; Serrano-Arévalo, Mónica Lizzette ; Villegas-González, Lidia Faridi</creator><creatorcontrib>Alonso Lárraga, Juan Octavio ; Jiménez-Gutiérrez, José Miguel ; Meneses-Mayo, Marcos ; Hernández-Guerrero, Angélica ; Serrano-Arévalo, Mónica Lizzette ; Villegas-González, Lidia Faridi</creatorcontrib><description>Diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma can be challenging. Previous studies suggest that the sensitivity of taking three cholangioscopy-guided biopsies is approximately 70%. We hypothesized that obtaining four or more biopsies might improve the sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. To determine the acceptable number of cholangioscopy-guided biopsies to improve sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. This retrospective study analyzed clinical records of adults with perihilar stenosis who underwent cholangioscopy-guided biopsies. Patients with gallbladder cancer or metastatic bile duct obstruction were excluded. Data were grouped based on the number of biopsies taken: Group A (1 to 3 biopsies), Group B (4 to 6 biopsies), and Group C (7 to 10 biopsies). Results from each group were compared against a composite standard, including clinical follow-up and/or biopsies performed by alternative methods. The group that underwent 4 to 6 biopsies had a sensitivity of 77.4%, while the group with 7 to 10 had a sensitivity of 70.8%. The group with 1 to 3 biopsies had a sensitivity of 34.5%. Statistically significant differences were observed between the groups, with comparisons showing improved sensitivity in the 4 to 6 biopsy group versus the 1 to 3 biopsy group (χ² = 14.42, P = 0.0001), and the 7 to 10 biopsy group versus the 1 to 3 biopsy group (χ² = 6.56, P = 0.010). Performing 4 to 6 cholangioscopy-guided biopsies significantly improves sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma compared to 1 to 3 biopsies. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1130-0108</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10719/2024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39559864</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><ispartof>Revista española de enfermedades digestivas, 2024-11</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1024-1caae3abd6d98c30c3fb7117ee0ad6e1294036816ec52727b1f39a2794d1ad683</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2164-5145 ; 0000-0001-6887-4722 ; 0000-0005-8573-5835 ; 0000-0003-3001-1838 ; 0000-0003-3157-4480 ; 0000-0001-7381-6690</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39559864$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alonso Lárraga, Juan Octavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez-Gutiérrez, José Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meneses-Mayo, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Guerrero, Angélica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serrano-Arévalo, Mónica Lizzette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villegas-González, Lidia Faridi</creatorcontrib><title>Acceptable number of cholangioscopy-guided biopsies for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma</title><title>Revista española de enfermedades digestivas</title><addtitle>Rev Esp Enferm Dig</addtitle><description>Diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma can be challenging. Previous studies suggest that the sensitivity of taking three cholangioscopy-guided biopsies is approximately 70%. We hypothesized that obtaining four or more biopsies might improve the sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. To determine the acceptable number of cholangioscopy-guided biopsies to improve sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. This retrospective study analyzed clinical records of adults with perihilar stenosis who underwent cholangioscopy-guided biopsies. Patients with gallbladder cancer or metastatic bile duct obstruction were excluded. Data were grouped based on the number of biopsies taken: Group A (1 to 3 biopsies), Group B (4 to 6 biopsies), and Group C (7 to 10 biopsies). Results from each group were compared against a composite standard, including clinical follow-up and/or biopsies performed by alternative methods. The group that underwent 4 to 6 biopsies had a sensitivity of 77.4%, while the group with 7 to 10 had a sensitivity of 70.8%. The group with 1 to 3 biopsies had a sensitivity of 34.5%. Statistically significant differences were observed between the groups, with comparisons showing improved sensitivity in the 4 to 6 biopsy group versus the 1 to 3 biopsy group (χ² = 14.42, P = 0.0001), and the 7 to 10 biopsy group versus the 1 to 3 biopsy group (χ² = 6.56, P = 0.010). Performing 4 to 6 cholangioscopy-guided biopsies significantly improves sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma compared to 1 to 3 biopsies. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.</description><issn>1130-0108</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkEtPwzAQhH0A0VL4CaAcuaR47SROjlXFS6rEBc6WH5vUKImD3Rz670lf4rQj7czu6CPkAegSBOP5c0C0S0ZZtgQqoHo-yCsyB-A0pUDLGbmN8YfSjBc5uyEzXuV5VRbZnMiVMTjslG4x6cdOY0h8nZitb1XfOB-NH_ZpMzqLNtHOD9FhTGofEutU0_vo-iYZMLita1X4zxkVjOt9p-7Ida3aiPfnuSDfry9f6_d08_n2sV5tUgNT1xSMUsiVtoWtSsOp4bUWAAKRKlsgsCqjvCihQJMzwYSGmleKiSqzMBlKviBPp7tD8L8jxp3sXDTYTnXQj1HyCQUDyCmbrPnJaoKPMWAth-A6FfYSqDzylAee8gBRHnke5ZR7PL8YdTftL6kLTP4HOO51sg</recordid><startdate>20241119</startdate><enddate>20241119</enddate><creator>Alonso Lárraga, Juan Octavio</creator><creator>Jiménez-Gutiérrez, José Miguel</creator><creator>Meneses-Mayo, Marcos</creator><creator>Hernández-Guerrero, Angélica</creator><creator>Serrano-Arévalo, Mónica Lizzette</creator><creator>Villegas-González, Lidia Faridi</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2164-5145</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6887-4722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0005-8573-5835</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3001-1838</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3157-4480</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7381-6690</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241119</creationdate><title>Acceptable number of cholangioscopy-guided biopsies for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma</title><author>Alonso Lárraga, Juan Octavio ; Jiménez-Gutiérrez, José Miguel ; Meneses-Mayo, Marcos ; Hernández-Guerrero, Angélica ; Serrano-Arévalo, Mónica Lizzette ; Villegas-González, Lidia Faridi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1024-1caae3abd6d98c30c3fb7117ee0ad6e1294036816ec52727b1f39a2794d1ad683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alonso Lárraga, Juan Octavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez-Gutiérrez, José Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meneses-Mayo, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Guerrero, Angélica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serrano-Arévalo, Mónica Lizzette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villegas-González, Lidia Faridi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revista española de enfermedades digestivas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alonso Lárraga, Juan Octavio</au><au>Jiménez-Gutiérrez, José Miguel</au><au>Meneses-Mayo, Marcos</au><au>Hernández-Guerrero, Angélica</au><au>Serrano-Arévalo, Mónica Lizzette</au><au>Villegas-González, Lidia Faridi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acceptable number of cholangioscopy-guided biopsies for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma</atitle><jtitle>Revista española de enfermedades digestivas</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Esp Enferm Dig</addtitle><date>2024-11-19</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>1130-0108</issn><abstract>Diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma can be challenging. Previous studies suggest that the sensitivity of taking three cholangioscopy-guided biopsies is approximately 70%. We hypothesized that obtaining four or more biopsies might improve the sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. To determine the acceptable number of cholangioscopy-guided biopsies to improve sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. This retrospective study analyzed clinical records of adults with perihilar stenosis who underwent cholangioscopy-guided biopsies. Patients with gallbladder cancer or metastatic bile duct obstruction were excluded. Data were grouped based on the number of biopsies taken: Group A (1 to 3 biopsies), Group B (4 to 6 biopsies), and Group C (7 to 10 biopsies). Results from each group were compared against a composite standard, including clinical follow-up and/or biopsies performed by alternative methods. The group that underwent 4 to 6 biopsies had a sensitivity of 77.4%, while the group with 7 to 10 had a sensitivity of 70.8%. The group with 1 to 3 biopsies had a sensitivity of 34.5%. Statistically significant differences were observed between the groups, with comparisons showing improved sensitivity in the 4 to 6 biopsy group versus the 1 to 3 biopsy group (χ² = 14.42, P = 0.0001), and the 7 to 10 biopsy group versus the 1 to 3 biopsy group (χ² = 6.56, P = 0.010). Performing 4 to 6 cholangioscopy-guided biopsies significantly improves sensitivity for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma compared to 1 to 3 biopsies. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>39559864</pmid><doi>10.17235/reed.2024.10719/2024</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2164-5145</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6887-4722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0005-8573-5835</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3001-1838</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3157-4480</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7381-6690</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1130-0108
ispartof Revista española de enfermedades digestivas, 2024-11
issn 1130-0108
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3130211502
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Acceptable number of cholangioscopy-guided biopsies for diagnosing perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A20%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acceptable%20number%20of%20cholangioscopy-guided%20biopsies%20for%20diagnosing%20perihilar%20cholangiocarcinoma&rft.jtitle=Revista%20espa%C3%B1ola%20de%20enfermedades%20digestivas&rft.au=Alonso%20L%C3%A1rraga,%20Juan%20Octavio&rft.date=2024-11-19&rft.issn=1130-0108&rft_id=info:doi/10.17235/reed.2024.10719/2024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3130211502%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3130211502&rft_id=info:pmid/39559864&rfr_iscdi=true