The Pittsburgh Study: A Tiered Model to Support Parents during Early Childhood
To test the feasibility of implementing The Pittsburgh Study's (TPS) Early Childhood Collaborative, a population-level, community-partnered initiative to promote relational health by offering accessible preventive parenting program options for families with young children. TPS partnered with he...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of pediatrics 2025-02, Vol.277, p.114396, Article 114396 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 114396 |
| container_title | The Journal of pediatrics |
| container_volume | 277 |
| creator | Krug, Chelsea Weaver Mendelsohn, Alan L. Wuerth, Jordan Roby, Erin Shaw, Daniel S. |
| description | To test the feasibility of implementing The Pittsburgh Study's (TPS) Early Childhood Collaborative, a population-level, community-partnered initiative to promote relational health by offering accessible preventive parenting program options for families with young children.
TPS partnered with healthcare and community agencies serving families in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, to enroll and screen 878 parents of 1040 children 4-years-old and under. Participants were assigned to 1 of 4 tiered groups based on identified needs: (1) universal, (2) targeted/universal, (3) secondary/tertiary, or (4) tertiary programs. Parents were offered choices in empirically supported parenting programs within group ranging from texting programs to intensive home visiting. Program selection was optional. Chi-square tests were conducted to examine the likelihood of selecting a program by group.
About 25% of participants were assigned to each tiered group; 78% of parents chose to enroll in a parenting program. In general, parents with higher levels of adversity were more likely to select a parenting program compared with those reporting less adversity, including secondary/tertiary vs targeted/universal groups (81.4% vs 72.8%), and tertiary vs universal and targeted/universal groups (83% vs 74.1% and 72.8%, respectively; P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114396 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3128819822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022347624004992</els_id><sourcerecordid>3128819822</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-456dea5f0bd3db1571857c699ecc23b5f984da9eeaed45f8532aa5231e3118313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWqu_QJAs3UzNYzJNBBel-IL6AOs6ZCZ3bMq0GZOM0H_vaKtLV3fznXO4H0JnlIwoocXlcrRswcYRIywfUZpzVeyhASVqnBWS8300IISxjOfj4ggdx7gkhKickEN0xJXghSzIAD3NF4BfXEqx7ML7Ar-mzm6u8ATPHQSw-NFbaHDy-LVrWx8SfjEB1ili2wW3fsc3JjQbPF24xi68tyfooDZNhNPdHaK325v59D6bPd89TCezrGJcpSwXhQUjalJabksqxlSKcVUoBVUPlKJWMrdGARiwuail4MwYwTgFTqnklA_Rxba3Df6jg5j0ysUKmsaswXdRc8qkpEoy1qN8i1bBxxig1m1wKxM2mhL9LVIv9Y9I_S1Sb0X2qfPdQFeuwP5lfs31wPUWgP7Nz16WjpWDdQXWBaiStt79O_AFQl6EXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3128819822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Pittsburgh Study: A Tiered Model to Support Parents during Early Childhood</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Krug, Chelsea Weaver ; Mendelsohn, Alan L. ; Wuerth, Jordan ; Roby, Erin ; Shaw, Daniel S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Krug, Chelsea Weaver ; Mendelsohn, Alan L. ; Wuerth, Jordan ; Roby, Erin ; Shaw, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><description>To test the feasibility of implementing The Pittsburgh Study's (TPS) Early Childhood Collaborative, a population-level, community-partnered initiative to promote relational health by offering accessible preventive parenting program options for families with young children.
TPS partnered with healthcare and community agencies serving families in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, to enroll and screen 878 parents of 1040 children 4-years-old and under. Participants were assigned to 1 of 4 tiered groups based on identified needs: (1) universal, (2) targeted/universal, (3) secondary/tertiary, or (4) tertiary programs. Parents were offered choices in empirically supported parenting programs within group ranging from texting programs to intensive home visiting. Program selection was optional. Chi-square tests were conducted to examine the likelihood of selecting a program by group.
About 25% of participants were assigned to each tiered group; 78% of parents chose to enroll in a parenting program. In general, parents with higher levels of adversity were more likely to select a parenting program compared with those reporting less adversity, including secondary/tertiary vs targeted/universal groups (81.4% vs 72.8%), and tertiary vs universal and targeted/universal groups (83% vs 74.1% and 72.8%, respectively; P < .001).
Our high program enrollment rate supports the feasibility of TPS. TPS successfully engaged families in the study by offering choices in, and optimizing accessibility to, parenting programs. TPS is highly aligned with recent recommendations by the American Academy of Pediatrics for tiered approaches as part of a broad public health strategy for supporting early relational health.
The Pittsburgh Study Early Childhood (TPS-ECC): NCT05444205.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3476</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-6833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114396</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39536860</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Child, Preschool ; early childhood ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Parenting ; Parents - psychology ; Pennsylvania ; population health ; prevention ; relational health</subject><ispartof>The Journal of pediatrics, 2025-02, Vol.277, p.114396, Article 114396</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-456dea5f0bd3db1571857c699ecc23b5f984da9eeaed45f8532aa5231e3118313</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2838-0618</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347624004992$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39536860$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krug, Chelsea Weaver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendelsohn, Alan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wuerth, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roby, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><title>The Pittsburgh Study: A Tiered Model to Support Parents during Early Childhood</title><title>The Journal of pediatrics</title><addtitle>J Pediatr</addtitle><description>To test the feasibility of implementing The Pittsburgh Study's (TPS) Early Childhood Collaborative, a population-level, community-partnered initiative to promote relational health by offering accessible preventive parenting program options for families with young children.
TPS partnered with healthcare and community agencies serving families in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, to enroll and screen 878 parents of 1040 children 4-years-old and under. Participants were assigned to 1 of 4 tiered groups based on identified needs: (1) universal, (2) targeted/universal, (3) secondary/tertiary, or (4) tertiary programs. Parents were offered choices in empirically supported parenting programs within group ranging from texting programs to intensive home visiting. Program selection was optional. Chi-square tests were conducted to examine the likelihood of selecting a program by group.
About 25% of participants were assigned to each tiered group; 78% of parents chose to enroll in a parenting program. In general, parents with higher levels of adversity were more likely to select a parenting program compared with those reporting less adversity, including secondary/tertiary vs targeted/universal groups (81.4% vs 72.8%), and tertiary vs universal and targeted/universal groups (83% vs 74.1% and 72.8%, respectively; P < .001).
Our high program enrollment rate supports the feasibility of TPS. TPS successfully engaged families in the study by offering choices in, and optimizing accessibility to, parenting programs. TPS is highly aligned with recent recommendations by the American Academy of Pediatrics for tiered approaches as part of a broad public health strategy for supporting early relational health.
The Pittsburgh Study Early Childhood (TPS-ECC): NCT05444205.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>early childhood</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Parenting</subject><subject>Parents - psychology</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>population health</subject><subject>prevention</subject><subject>relational health</subject><issn>0022-3476</issn><issn>1097-6833</issn><issn>1097-6833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWqu_QJAs3UzNYzJNBBel-IL6AOs6ZCZ3bMq0GZOM0H_vaKtLV3fznXO4H0JnlIwoocXlcrRswcYRIywfUZpzVeyhASVqnBWS8300IISxjOfj4ggdx7gkhKickEN0xJXghSzIAD3NF4BfXEqx7ML7Ar-mzm6u8ATPHQSw-NFbaHDy-LVrWx8SfjEB1ili2wW3fsc3JjQbPF24xi68tyfooDZNhNPdHaK325v59D6bPd89TCezrGJcpSwXhQUjalJabksqxlSKcVUoBVUPlKJWMrdGARiwuail4MwYwTgFTqnklA_Rxba3Df6jg5j0ysUKmsaswXdRc8qkpEoy1qN8i1bBxxig1m1wKxM2mhL9LVIv9Y9I_S1Sb0X2qfPdQFeuwP5lfs31wPUWgP7Nz16WjpWDdQXWBaiStt79O_AFQl6EXQ</recordid><startdate>20250201</startdate><enddate>20250201</enddate><creator>Krug, Chelsea Weaver</creator><creator>Mendelsohn, Alan L.</creator><creator>Wuerth, Jordan</creator><creator>Roby, Erin</creator><creator>Shaw, Daniel S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2838-0618</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250201</creationdate><title>The Pittsburgh Study: A Tiered Model to Support Parents during Early Childhood</title><author>Krug, Chelsea Weaver ; Mendelsohn, Alan L. ; Wuerth, Jordan ; Roby, Erin ; Shaw, Daniel S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-456dea5f0bd3db1571857c699ecc23b5f984da9eeaed45f8532aa5231e3118313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>early childhood</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Parenting</topic><topic>Parents - psychology</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>population health</topic><topic>prevention</topic><topic>relational health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krug, Chelsea Weaver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendelsohn, Alan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wuerth, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roby, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of pediatrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krug, Chelsea Weaver</au><au>Mendelsohn, Alan L.</au><au>Wuerth, Jordan</au><au>Roby, Erin</au><au>Shaw, Daniel S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Pittsburgh Study: A Tiered Model to Support Parents during Early Childhood</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of pediatrics</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr</addtitle><date>2025-02-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>277</volume><spage>114396</spage><pages>114396-</pages><artnum>114396</artnum><issn>0022-3476</issn><issn>1097-6833</issn><eissn>1097-6833</eissn><abstract>To test the feasibility of implementing The Pittsburgh Study's (TPS) Early Childhood Collaborative, a population-level, community-partnered initiative to promote relational health by offering accessible preventive parenting program options for families with young children.
TPS partnered with healthcare and community agencies serving families in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, to enroll and screen 878 parents of 1040 children 4-years-old and under. Participants were assigned to 1 of 4 tiered groups based on identified needs: (1) universal, (2) targeted/universal, (3) secondary/tertiary, or (4) tertiary programs. Parents were offered choices in empirically supported parenting programs within group ranging from texting programs to intensive home visiting. Program selection was optional. Chi-square tests were conducted to examine the likelihood of selecting a program by group.
About 25% of participants were assigned to each tiered group; 78% of parents chose to enroll in a parenting program. In general, parents with higher levels of adversity were more likely to select a parenting program compared with those reporting less adversity, including secondary/tertiary vs targeted/universal groups (81.4% vs 72.8%), and tertiary vs universal and targeted/universal groups (83% vs 74.1% and 72.8%, respectively; P < .001).
Our high program enrollment rate supports the feasibility of TPS. TPS successfully engaged families in the study by offering choices in, and optimizing accessibility to, parenting programs. TPS is highly aligned with recent recommendations by the American Academy of Pediatrics for tiered approaches as part of a broad public health strategy for supporting early relational health.
The Pittsburgh Study Early Childhood (TPS-ECC): NCT05444205.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39536860</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114396</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2838-0618</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-3476 |
| ispartof | The Journal of pediatrics, 2025-02, Vol.277, p.114396, Article 114396 |
| issn | 0022-3476 1097-6833 1097-6833 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3128819822 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Adult Child, Preschool early childhood Feasibility Studies Female Humans Infant Male Parenting Parents - psychology Pennsylvania population health prevention relational health |
| title | The Pittsburgh Study: A Tiered Model to Support Parents during Early Childhood |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T06%3A24%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Pittsburgh%20Study:%20A%20Tiered%20Model%20to%20Support%20Parents%20during%20Early%20Childhood&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20pediatrics&rft.au=Krug,%20Chelsea%20Weaver&rft.date=2025-02-01&rft.volume=277&rft.spage=114396&rft.pages=114396-&rft.artnum=114396&rft.issn=0022-3476&rft.eissn=1097-6833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114396&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3128819822%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3128819822&rft_id=info:pmid/39536860&rft_els_id=S0022347624004992&rfr_iscdi=true |