Imaging in Diagnosis and Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Review

IMPORTANCE: Active surveillance (AS) has become an increasingly important option for managing low-risk and select intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Although imaging, particularly multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), has emerged in the prebiopsy pathway for the diagnosis of prostate c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA surgery 2025-01, Vol.160 (1), p.93
Hauptverfasser: Li, Thomas, Nalavenkata, Sunny, Fainberg, Jonathan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 93
container_title JAMA surgery
container_volume 160
creator Li, Thomas
Nalavenkata, Sunny
Fainberg, Jonathan
description IMPORTANCE: Active surveillance (AS) has become an increasingly important option for managing low-risk and select intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Although imaging, particularly multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), has emerged in the prebiopsy pathway for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, the role of mpMRI in patient selection for AS and the necessity of prostate biopsies during AS remain poorly defined. Despite well-founded biopsy schedules, there has been substantial investigation into whether imaging may supplant the need for prostate biopsies during AS. This review aimed to summarize the contemporary role of imaging in the diagnosis and surveillance of prostate cancer. OBSERVATIONS: Multiparametric MRI is the most established form of imaging in prostate cancer, with routine prebiopsy use being shown to help urologists distinguish between clinically significant and clinically insignificant disease. The visibility of these lesions on mpMRI closely correlates with their behavior, with visible disease portending a worse prognosis. Combined with other clinical data, risk calculators may better delineate patients with higher-risk disease and exclude them from undergoing AS. While current evidence suggests that mpMRI cannot replace the need for prostate biopsy during AS due to the possibility of missing higher-risk disease, the addition of prostate biomarkers may help to reduce the frequency of these biopsies. The role of prostate-specific antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography is still emerging but has shown promising early results as an adjunct to mpMRI in initial diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Imaging in prostate cancer helps to better select patients appropriate for AS, and future studies may strengthen the predictive capabilities of risk calculators. Multiparametric MRI has been shown to be imperative to rationalizing biopsies for patients enrolled in AS. However, heterogeneity in the evidence of mpMRI during AS has suggested that further prospective studies and randomized clinical trials, particularly in homogenizing reporting standards, may reveal a more defined role in monitoring disease progression.
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4811
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3128816885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>2826320</ama_id><sourcerecordid>3128816885</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a1181-7dbf186e9561e597671cbe6701be336165d935a3726be6a4ebdcd6b21e0a424a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1PwzAMhiMEYtPYH9gB5cilI07aNOU2ja-hSSA-zlHaulWmtR1JO8S_p9XYfLFlv69lP4TMgM2BMbjdmMr4zpVzzng4DxXAGRlzkCqQXPLzUx2FIzL1fsP6UIyFIrkkI5FEIooVjMnLqjKlrUtqa3pvTVk33npq6pwustbukX50bo92uzV1hrRoHH1zjW9Ni3Q5tNwdXdB33Fv8uSIXhdl6nP7nCfl6fPhcPgfr16fVcrEODICCIM7TApTEJJKAURLLGLIUZcwgRSEkyChPRGREzGXfNiGmeZbLlAMyE_LQiAm5Oezduea7Q9_qyvoMhxOx6bwWwJXqn1dRL-UHadYf7R0WeudsZdyvBqYHjPqIUQ8Y9YCxN13_7-_SCvOT5QitF8wOgt57mnLFpeBM_AH3jHbS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3128816885</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imaging in Diagnosis and Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Li, Thomas ; Nalavenkata, Sunny ; Fainberg, Jonathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Thomas ; Nalavenkata, Sunny ; Fainberg, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><description>IMPORTANCE: Active surveillance (AS) has become an increasingly important option for managing low-risk and select intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Although imaging, particularly multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), has emerged in the prebiopsy pathway for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, the role of mpMRI in patient selection for AS and the necessity of prostate biopsies during AS remain poorly defined. Despite well-founded biopsy schedules, there has been substantial investigation into whether imaging may supplant the need for prostate biopsies during AS. This review aimed to summarize the contemporary role of imaging in the diagnosis and surveillance of prostate cancer. OBSERVATIONS: Multiparametric MRI is the most established form of imaging in prostate cancer, with routine prebiopsy use being shown to help urologists distinguish between clinically significant and clinically insignificant disease. The visibility of these lesions on mpMRI closely correlates with their behavior, with visible disease portending a worse prognosis. Combined with other clinical data, risk calculators may better delineate patients with higher-risk disease and exclude them from undergoing AS. While current evidence suggests that mpMRI cannot replace the need for prostate biopsy during AS due to the possibility of missing higher-risk disease, the addition of prostate biomarkers may help to reduce the frequency of these biopsies. The role of prostate-specific antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography is still emerging but has shown promising early results as an adjunct to mpMRI in initial diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Imaging in prostate cancer helps to better select patients appropriate for AS, and future studies may strengthen the predictive capabilities of risk calculators. Multiparametric MRI has been shown to be imperative to rationalizing biopsies for patients enrolled in AS. However, heterogeneity in the evidence of mpMRI during AS has suggested that further prospective studies and randomized clinical trials, particularly in homogenizing reporting standards, may reveal a more defined role in monitoring disease progression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6254</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4811</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39535781</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Humans ; Male ; Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Risk Assessment ; Watchful Waiting</subject><ispartof>JAMA surgery, 2025-01, Vol.160 (1), p.93</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a1181-7dbf186e9561e597671cbe6701be336165d935a3726be6a4ebdcd6b21e0a424a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/articlepdf/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4811$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4811$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,780,784,3331,27915,27916,76250,76253</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39535781$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nalavenkata, Sunny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fainberg, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><title>Imaging in Diagnosis and Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Review</title><title>JAMA surgery</title><addtitle>JAMA Surg</addtitle><description>IMPORTANCE: Active surveillance (AS) has become an increasingly important option for managing low-risk and select intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Although imaging, particularly multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), has emerged in the prebiopsy pathway for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, the role of mpMRI in patient selection for AS and the necessity of prostate biopsies during AS remain poorly defined. Despite well-founded biopsy schedules, there has been substantial investigation into whether imaging may supplant the need for prostate biopsies during AS. This review aimed to summarize the contemporary role of imaging in the diagnosis and surveillance of prostate cancer. OBSERVATIONS: Multiparametric MRI is the most established form of imaging in prostate cancer, with routine prebiopsy use being shown to help urologists distinguish between clinically significant and clinically insignificant disease. The visibility of these lesions on mpMRI closely correlates with their behavior, with visible disease portending a worse prognosis. Combined with other clinical data, risk calculators may better delineate patients with higher-risk disease and exclude them from undergoing AS. While current evidence suggests that mpMRI cannot replace the need for prostate biopsy during AS due to the possibility of missing higher-risk disease, the addition of prostate biomarkers may help to reduce the frequency of these biopsies. The role of prostate-specific antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography is still emerging but has shown promising early results as an adjunct to mpMRI in initial diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Imaging in prostate cancer helps to better select patients appropriate for AS, and future studies may strengthen the predictive capabilities of risk calculators. Multiparametric MRI has been shown to be imperative to rationalizing biopsies for patients enrolled in AS. However, heterogeneity in the evidence of mpMRI during AS has suggested that further prospective studies and randomized clinical trials, particularly in homogenizing reporting standards, may reveal a more defined role in monitoring disease progression.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Watchful Waiting</subject><issn>2168-6254</issn><issn>2168-6262</issn><issn>2168-6262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1PwzAMhiMEYtPYH9gB5cilI07aNOU2ja-hSSA-zlHaulWmtR1JO8S_p9XYfLFlv69lP4TMgM2BMbjdmMr4zpVzzng4DxXAGRlzkCqQXPLzUx2FIzL1fsP6UIyFIrkkI5FEIooVjMnLqjKlrUtqa3pvTVk33npq6pwustbukX50bo92uzV1hrRoHH1zjW9Ni3Q5tNwdXdB33Fv8uSIXhdl6nP7nCfl6fPhcPgfr16fVcrEODICCIM7TApTEJJKAURLLGLIUZcwgRSEkyChPRGREzGXfNiGmeZbLlAMyE_LQiAm5Oezduea7Q9_qyvoMhxOx6bwWwJXqn1dRL-UHadYf7R0WeudsZdyvBqYHjPqIUQ8Y9YCxN13_7-_SCvOT5QitF8wOgt57mnLFpeBM_AH3jHbS</recordid><startdate>20250101</startdate><enddate>20250101</enddate><creator>Li, Thomas</creator><creator>Nalavenkata, Sunny</creator><creator>Fainberg, Jonathan</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20250101</creationdate><title>Imaging in Diagnosis and Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Review</title><author>Li, Thomas ; Nalavenkata, Sunny ; Fainberg, Jonathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a1181-7dbf186e9561e597671cbe6701be336165d935a3726be6a4ebdcd6b21e0a424a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Watchful Waiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nalavenkata, Sunny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fainberg, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JAMA surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Thomas</au><au>Nalavenkata, Sunny</au><au>Fainberg, Jonathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imaging in Diagnosis and Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Review</atitle><jtitle>JAMA surgery</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Surg</addtitle><date>2025-01-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>160</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>93</spage><pages>93-</pages><issn>2168-6254</issn><issn>2168-6262</issn><eissn>2168-6262</eissn><abstract>IMPORTANCE: Active surveillance (AS) has become an increasingly important option for managing low-risk and select intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Although imaging, particularly multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), has emerged in the prebiopsy pathway for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, the role of mpMRI in patient selection for AS and the necessity of prostate biopsies during AS remain poorly defined. Despite well-founded biopsy schedules, there has been substantial investigation into whether imaging may supplant the need for prostate biopsies during AS. This review aimed to summarize the contemporary role of imaging in the diagnosis and surveillance of prostate cancer. OBSERVATIONS: Multiparametric MRI is the most established form of imaging in prostate cancer, with routine prebiopsy use being shown to help urologists distinguish between clinically significant and clinically insignificant disease. The visibility of these lesions on mpMRI closely correlates with their behavior, with visible disease portending a worse prognosis. Combined with other clinical data, risk calculators may better delineate patients with higher-risk disease and exclude them from undergoing AS. While current evidence suggests that mpMRI cannot replace the need for prostate biopsy during AS due to the possibility of missing higher-risk disease, the addition of prostate biomarkers may help to reduce the frequency of these biopsies. The role of prostate-specific antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography is still emerging but has shown promising early results as an adjunct to mpMRI in initial diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Imaging in prostate cancer helps to better select patients appropriate for AS, and future studies may strengthen the predictive capabilities of risk calculators. Multiparametric MRI has been shown to be imperative to rationalizing biopsies for patients enrolled in AS. However, heterogeneity in the evidence of mpMRI during AS has suggested that further prospective studies and randomized clinical trials, particularly in homogenizing reporting standards, may reveal a more defined role in monitoring disease progression.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>39535781</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4811</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-6254
ispartof JAMA surgery, 2025-01, Vol.160 (1), p.93
issn 2168-6254
2168-6262
2168-6262
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3128816885
source MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals
subjects Biopsy
Humans
Male
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Risk Assessment
Watchful Waiting
title Imaging in Diagnosis and Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A29%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imaging%20in%20Diagnosis%20and%20Active%20Surveillance%20for%20Prostate%20Cancer:%20A%20Review&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20surgery&rft.au=Li,%20Thomas&rft.date=2025-01-01&rft.volume=160&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=93&rft.pages=93-&rft.issn=2168-6254&rft.eissn=2168-6262&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.4811&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3128816885%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3128816885&rft_id=info:pmid/39535781&rft_ama_id=2826320&rfr_iscdi=true