Phoneme-related potentials recorded from normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users in a selective attention paradigm to continuous speech

•Phoneme-related potentials extracted from electroencephalography with continuous speech stimuli in cochlear implant users.•Temporal morphology of the responses was influenced by phonetic features of the stimuli.•Differences between normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.•Differences be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hearing research 2024-12, Vol.454, p.109136, Article 109136
Hauptverfasser: Aldag, Nina, Nogueira, Waldo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 109136
container_title Hearing research
container_volume 454
creator Aldag, Nina
Nogueira, Waldo
description •Phoneme-related potentials extracted from electroencephalography with continuous speech stimuli in cochlear implant users.•Temporal morphology of the responses was influenced by phonetic features of the stimuli.•Differences between normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.•Differences between attended and unattended conditions.•Possible tool for a more objective clinical assessment of speech understanding in cochlear implant users or other hearing impaired patients. Cochlear implants can restore the ability to understand speech in patients with profound sensorineural hearing loss. At present, it is not fully understood how cochlear implant users perceive speech and how electric hearing provided by a cochlear implant differs from acoustic hearing. Phoneme-related potentials characterize neural responses to individual instances of phonemes extracted from continuous speech. This retrospective study investigated phoneme-related potentials in cochlear implant users in a selective attention paradigm. Responses were compared between normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users, and between attended and unattended conditions. Differences between phoneme categories were compared and a classifier was trained to predict the phoneme category from the neural representation. The phoneme-related potentials of cochlear implant users showed similar responses to the ones obtained in normal hearing listeners for early responses (< 100 ms) but not for later responses (> 100 ms) where peaks were smaller or absent. Attention led to an enhancement of the response, whereas latency was mostly not affected by attention. The temporal morphology of the response was influenced by the phonetic features of the stimulus, allowing a classification of the phoneme category based on the phoneme-related potentials. There is a clinical need for methods that can rapidly and objectively assess the speech understanding performance of cochlear implant users. Phoneme-related potentials may provide such a link between the acoustic and the neural representations of phonemes. They may also reveal the challenges of individual subjects and thus provide indications for patient-specific auditory training, rehabilitation programs or the fitting of cochlear implant parameters.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109136
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3128761435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378595524001898</els_id><sourcerecordid>3128761435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1564-b80b918ee62dfcfa9b842ee93de376cf0a80512c470e40bdc14e2ab45ff1f7e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UctuFDEQtBARWQJ_gJCPXGbxcx4XJBTxkiIlBzhbHrud9WrGHmxPJL4jP4yHCRw52aqu6uruQugNJUdKaPv-fDyBTpCPjDBRoYHy9hk60L7rG9kP9Dk6EL79Bykv0cucz4RQyQV7gS75IDkjUhzQ490pBpihSTDpAhYvsUAoXk8ZJzAx2Yq5FGccYpr1hDdTH-7x5HMlQspYB4tNNKepVrCfl0mHgte8lXzAGmeYwBT_AFiXP71jwItO2vr7GZdYtRULa1wzzguAOb1CF676w-un9wr9-Pzp-_XX5ub2y7frjzeNobIVzdiTcaA9QMusM04PYy8YwMAt8K41juieSMqM6AgIMlpDBTA9CukcdR20_Aq92_suKf5cIRc1-2xgqgtAnUZxyvqupYLLShU71aSYcwKnluRnnX4pStQWhzqrPQ61xaH2OKrs7ZPDOs5g_4n-3r8SPuwEqHs-eEgqGw_BgPX1-kXZ6P_v8BtWnKHd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3128761435</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phoneme-related potentials recorded from normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users in a selective attention paradigm to continuous speech</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Aldag, Nina ; Nogueira, Waldo</creator><creatorcontrib>Aldag, Nina ; Nogueira, Waldo</creatorcontrib><description>•Phoneme-related potentials extracted from electroencephalography with continuous speech stimuli in cochlear implant users.•Temporal morphology of the responses was influenced by phonetic features of the stimuli.•Differences between normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.•Differences between attended and unattended conditions.•Possible tool for a more objective clinical assessment of speech understanding in cochlear implant users or other hearing impaired patients. Cochlear implants can restore the ability to understand speech in patients with profound sensorineural hearing loss. At present, it is not fully understood how cochlear implant users perceive speech and how electric hearing provided by a cochlear implant differs from acoustic hearing. Phoneme-related potentials characterize neural responses to individual instances of phonemes extracted from continuous speech. This retrospective study investigated phoneme-related potentials in cochlear implant users in a selective attention paradigm. Responses were compared between normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users, and between attended and unattended conditions. Differences between phoneme categories were compared and a classifier was trained to predict the phoneme category from the neural representation. The phoneme-related potentials of cochlear implant users showed similar responses to the ones obtained in normal hearing listeners for early responses (&lt; 100 ms) but not for later responses (&gt; 100 ms) where peaks were smaller or absent. Attention led to an enhancement of the response, whereas latency was mostly not affected by attention. The temporal morphology of the response was influenced by the phonetic features of the stimulus, allowing a classification of the phoneme category based on the phoneme-related potentials. There is a clinical need for methods that can rapidly and objectively assess the speech understanding performance of cochlear implant users. Phoneme-related potentials may provide such a link between the acoustic and the neural representations of phonemes. They may also reveal the challenges of individual subjects and thus provide indications for patient-specific auditory training, rehabilitation programs or the fitting of cochlear implant parameters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-5955</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1878-5891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109136</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39532054</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Adult ; Aged ; Attention ; Case-Control Studies ; Cochlear implant ; Cochlear Implantation - instrumentation ; Cochlear Implants ; Comprehension ; Correction of Hearing Impairment - instrumentation ; Electroencephalography ; Event-related potential ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory ; Female ; Hearing ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - diagnosis ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - physiopathology ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - psychology ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - rehabilitation ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neural tracking ; Persons With Hearing Impairments - psychology ; Persons With Hearing Impairments - rehabilitation ; Phoneme-related potential ; Phonetic feature ; Phonetics ; Reaction Time ; Retrospective Studies ; Selective attention ; Speech Intelligibility ; Speech Perception ; Time Factors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Hearing research, 2024-12, Vol.454, p.109136, Article 109136</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1564-b80b918ee62dfcfa9b842ee93de376cf0a80512c470e40bdc14e2ab45ff1f7e63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7393-8353</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2024.109136$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39532054$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aldag, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogueira, Waldo</creatorcontrib><title>Phoneme-related potentials recorded from normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users in a selective attention paradigm to continuous speech</title><title>Hearing research</title><addtitle>Hear Res</addtitle><description>•Phoneme-related potentials extracted from electroencephalography with continuous speech stimuli in cochlear implant users.•Temporal morphology of the responses was influenced by phonetic features of the stimuli.•Differences between normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.•Differences between attended and unattended conditions.•Possible tool for a more objective clinical assessment of speech understanding in cochlear implant users or other hearing impaired patients. Cochlear implants can restore the ability to understand speech in patients with profound sensorineural hearing loss. At present, it is not fully understood how cochlear implant users perceive speech and how electric hearing provided by a cochlear implant differs from acoustic hearing. Phoneme-related potentials characterize neural responses to individual instances of phonemes extracted from continuous speech. This retrospective study investigated phoneme-related potentials in cochlear implant users in a selective attention paradigm. Responses were compared between normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users, and between attended and unattended conditions. Differences between phoneme categories were compared and a classifier was trained to predict the phoneme category from the neural representation. The phoneme-related potentials of cochlear implant users showed similar responses to the ones obtained in normal hearing listeners for early responses (&lt; 100 ms) but not for later responses (&gt; 100 ms) where peaks were smaller or absent. Attention led to an enhancement of the response, whereas latency was mostly not affected by attention. The temporal morphology of the response was influenced by the phonetic features of the stimulus, allowing a classification of the phoneme category based on the phoneme-related potentials. There is a clinical need for methods that can rapidly and objectively assess the speech understanding performance of cochlear implant users. Phoneme-related potentials may provide such a link between the acoustic and the neural representations of phonemes. They may also reveal the challenges of individual subjects and thus provide indications for patient-specific auditory training, rehabilitation programs or the fitting of cochlear implant parameters.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cochlear implant</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Correction of Hearing Impairment - instrumentation</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Event-related potential</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - psychology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neural tracking</subject><subject>Persons With Hearing Impairments - psychology</subject><subject>Persons With Hearing Impairments - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Phoneme-related potential</subject><subject>Phonetic feature</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Selective attention</subject><subject>Speech Intelligibility</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0378-5955</issn><issn>1878-5891</issn><issn>1878-5891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UctuFDEQtBARWQJ_gJCPXGbxcx4XJBTxkiIlBzhbHrud9WrGHmxPJL4jP4yHCRw52aqu6uruQugNJUdKaPv-fDyBTpCPjDBRoYHy9hk60L7rG9kP9Dk6EL79Bykv0cucz4RQyQV7gS75IDkjUhzQ490pBpihSTDpAhYvsUAoXk8ZJzAx2Yq5FGccYpr1hDdTH-7x5HMlQspYB4tNNKepVrCfl0mHgte8lXzAGmeYwBT_AFiXP71jwItO2vr7GZdYtRULa1wzzguAOb1CF676w-un9wr9-Pzp-_XX5ub2y7frjzeNobIVzdiTcaA9QMusM04PYy8YwMAt8K41juieSMqM6AgIMlpDBTA9CukcdR20_Aq92_suKf5cIRc1-2xgqgtAnUZxyvqupYLLShU71aSYcwKnluRnnX4pStQWhzqrPQ61xaH2OKrs7ZPDOs5g_4n-3r8SPuwEqHs-eEgqGw_BgPX1-kXZ6P_v8BtWnKHd</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Aldag, Nina</creator><creator>Nogueira, Waldo</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7393-8353</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Phoneme-related potentials recorded from normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users in a selective attention paradigm to continuous speech</title><author>Aldag, Nina ; Nogueira, Waldo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1564-b80b918ee62dfcfa9b842ee93de376cf0a80512c470e40bdc14e2ab45ff1f7e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cochlear implant</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Correction of Hearing Impairment - instrumentation</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Event-related potential</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - psychology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neural tracking</topic><topic>Persons With Hearing Impairments - psychology</topic><topic>Persons With Hearing Impairments - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Phoneme-related potential</topic><topic>Phonetic feature</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Selective attention</topic><topic>Speech Intelligibility</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aldag, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogueira, Waldo</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hearing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aldag, Nina</au><au>Nogueira, Waldo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phoneme-related potentials recorded from normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users in a selective attention paradigm to continuous speech</atitle><jtitle>Hearing research</jtitle><addtitle>Hear Res</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>454</volume><spage>109136</spage><pages>109136-</pages><artnum>109136</artnum><issn>0378-5955</issn><issn>1878-5891</issn><eissn>1878-5891</eissn><abstract>•Phoneme-related potentials extracted from electroencephalography with continuous speech stimuli in cochlear implant users.•Temporal morphology of the responses was influenced by phonetic features of the stimuli.•Differences between normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.•Differences between attended and unattended conditions.•Possible tool for a more objective clinical assessment of speech understanding in cochlear implant users or other hearing impaired patients. Cochlear implants can restore the ability to understand speech in patients with profound sensorineural hearing loss. At present, it is not fully understood how cochlear implant users perceive speech and how electric hearing provided by a cochlear implant differs from acoustic hearing. Phoneme-related potentials characterize neural responses to individual instances of phonemes extracted from continuous speech. This retrospective study investigated phoneme-related potentials in cochlear implant users in a selective attention paradigm. Responses were compared between normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users, and between attended and unattended conditions. Differences between phoneme categories were compared and a classifier was trained to predict the phoneme category from the neural representation. The phoneme-related potentials of cochlear implant users showed similar responses to the ones obtained in normal hearing listeners for early responses (&lt; 100 ms) but not for later responses (&gt; 100 ms) where peaks were smaller or absent. Attention led to an enhancement of the response, whereas latency was mostly not affected by attention. The temporal morphology of the response was influenced by the phonetic features of the stimulus, allowing a classification of the phoneme category based on the phoneme-related potentials. There is a clinical need for methods that can rapidly and objectively assess the speech understanding performance of cochlear implant users. Phoneme-related potentials may provide such a link between the acoustic and the neural representations of phonemes. They may also reveal the challenges of individual subjects and thus provide indications for patient-specific auditory training, rehabilitation programs or the fitting of cochlear implant parameters.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>39532054</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.heares.2024.109136</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7393-8353</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-5955
ispartof Hearing research, 2024-12, Vol.454, p.109136, Article 109136
issn 0378-5955
1878-5891
1878-5891
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3128761435
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Acoustic Stimulation
Adult
Aged
Attention
Case-Control Studies
Cochlear implant
Cochlear Implantation - instrumentation
Cochlear Implants
Comprehension
Correction of Hearing Impairment - instrumentation
Electroencephalography
Event-related potential
Evoked Potentials, Auditory
Female
Hearing
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - diagnosis
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - physiopathology
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - psychology
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - rehabilitation
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - surgery
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neural tracking
Persons With Hearing Impairments - psychology
Persons With Hearing Impairments - rehabilitation
Phoneme-related potential
Phonetic feature
Phonetics
Reaction Time
Retrospective Studies
Selective attention
Speech Intelligibility
Speech Perception
Time Factors
Young Adult
title Phoneme-related potentials recorded from normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users in a selective attention paradigm to continuous speech
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T12%3A11%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phoneme-related%20potentials%20recorded%20from%20normal%20hearing%20listeners%20and%20cochlear%20implant%20users%20in%20a%20selective%20attention%20paradigm%20to%20continuous%20speech&rft.jtitle=Hearing%20research&rft.au=Aldag,%20Nina&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=454&rft.spage=109136&rft.pages=109136-&rft.artnum=109136&rft.issn=0378-5955&rft.eissn=1878-5891&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.heares.2024.109136&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3128761435%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3128761435&rft_id=info:pmid/39532054&rft_els_id=S0378595524001898&rfr_iscdi=true