Nursing students’ evaluation of clinical placement education quality: A national database analysis

To report nursing student ratings of clinical placement education quality. Australian nursing students must complete specified clinical placement hours which must be monitored and evaluated. A quality improvement evaluation design, incorporating survey. Participating universities used QR codes and w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nurse education in practice 2024-11, Vol.81, p.104185, Article 104185
Hauptverfasser: Ryan, Colleen, Hyun, Areum, Hughes, Lynda, Bogossian, Fiona, Cooper, Simon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To report nursing student ratings of clinical placement education quality. Australian nursing students must complete specified clinical placement hours which must be monitored and evaluated. A quality improvement evaluation design, incorporating survey. Participating universities used QR codes and weblinks to distribute a survey between January and December 2023. The validated Placement Evaluation Tool (PET – Nursing) incorporates 20 items; Clinical Environment (11 items), Cronbach’s alpha =.94 and Learning Support (8 items), Cronbach’s alpha =.96 and one item rating satisfaction. Nursing students from 36 universities submitted 17,705 evaluations. The PET – Nursing mean quality rating was 82.6/95 and a mean satisfaction with clinical placement rating (item 20) was 8.3/10; indicating perceived quality of education was high. Students over 41 years reported higher satisfaction compared to younger students as did male students. International students and those who did not speak English at home were more satisfied than domestic students and those who spoke English. First year students rated placements higher than other years. Placements in emergency and intensive care departments received significantly higher ratings than other placements, with aged care settings rated the lowest. This article reports a benchmark of the educational quality of nursing student placement learning in Australia. The results could be relevant to others seeking to improve the quality of students’ clinical learning. Stakeholders need to leverage the reported strengths that enhance student experiences and address the issues and concerns raised to improve the educational quality of nursing students’ clinical learning experiences. •Results offer a benchmark of the educational quality of Australian nursing placements.•Clinical settings, placement duration and supervision models influence learning.•Despite high satisfaction Australian nursing clinical placements can be enhanced.
ISSN:1471-5953
1873-5223
1873-5223
DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104185